Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Renting is a LOSING proposition 100% of the time.
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 184
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. Last
post 1631966003 02-21-2021, 10:14 AM
-
#61
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
And no links were seen.

Thanks for playing.
lol I gain nothing from tracking down links of properties and step by step showing you where the math checks out and where it doesn’t. I really could not care less if I change what you think or not
post 1631966053 02-21-2021, 10:15 AM
-
#62
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
Originally Posted By AccountingMajor
This is not true. I live in California, the most populous state.

I'm surrounded by mountains, some mountains have no houses built on them. Others have hundreds of homes on them. Near San Diego, there are 5 story condos and 20story apartments.

Away from the city, we are stuck with 2-story apartments and lots of empty land.

The obvious solutions is to build only 20-30story (apartment) buildings in the city.

Progressives in San Francisco want to remove building height limits of apartments, but of course democrats here hate that idea and it got rejected.
Water's always going to be the issue with CA. You can build the land denser, but do you have enough water for those extra people?
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1631966143 02-21-2021, 10:16 AM
-
#63
  1. Wh1teDyn0mite
  2. Registered User
  1. Wh1teDyn0mite
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Location: Croydon, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 18,736
  7. Rep Power: 62758
Alot of people rent as they cant afford the down payment.
1/4 Jamaican
1/4 Polish
1/4 Irish
1/4 Welsh
post 1631966213 02-21-2021, 10:17 AM
-
#64
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Posts: 4,435
  5. Rep Power: 12061
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls
In every market I look at the houses are appreciating faster than the stock market is.

Not owning a house = getting raped by inflation

Rents keep increasing faster than pay in this environment and you get nothing
Yup. Rent increases in California every year by 5% (due to rent control).

Unless all these renters are getting at least a 5% raise every year, they are getting raped.
post 1631966263 02-21-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#65
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls
The real problem is that the fed is welfare for the rich and the working class is subsidizing their extravagant net worth with productivity and seeing nothing for it because the banking class has manipulated the system.

If called on this, they will say that these artificially low rates actually help the lower income people. They are generous lords! It's just that the principal you have to borrow will skyrocket every year and your income will not.
This is the truth. Brag about the record low interest rate you are paying and how you sold your home for 30k over value. But completely ignore the price of
The house you just bought appreciating by 30% in the last few years and negating any of that benefit


Still great ways to make money from everything if you know your market well, but the average American is just taking it on the nose with increased asset costs
post 1631966293 02-21-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#66
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Buying a house when you don't have an expected time frame in the house of ~7 years is a bad move.
post 1631966333 02-21-2021, 10:19 AM
-
#67
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By Austanian
Buying a house when you don't have an expected time frame in the house of ~7 years is a bad move.
Not anymore
post 1631966343 02-21-2021, 10:19 AM
-
#68
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
Originally Posted By AccountingMajor
Yup. Rent increases in California every year by 5% (due to rent control).

Unless all these renters are getting at least a 5% raise every year, they are getting raped.
:-/ SD crew. Hold me brahs...

I've been investing in stonks and trying to get some returns to pay my inflated rent next year, but that jig is up whenever the market tanks. It's not a solution that's going to keep working forever.

Going to end up downshifting to like fukking Claremont or going up north to Escondido in a couple years, even as I get further along in my career and make more money. The housing market is phuuuucked. 3 years is kind of my window to where I either get fired or move out of this place.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1631966523 02-21-2021, 10:21 AM
-
#69
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By AccountingMajor
Yup. Rent increases in California every year by 5% (due to rent control).

Unless all these renters are getting at least a 5% raise every year, they are getting raped.
Even if you are getting a 5% raise every year, and I am beating that, why would you want all of your gains in income to go directly into your housing cost and not actually move ahead at all?
post 1631966603 02-21-2021, 10:22 AM
-
#70
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
I just care about you spouting nonsense that some people might take as coming from someone who knows what they are talking about.

You clearly do not.

You confirmed that you own "multiple housing units ' that you are losing money on.

Again, thanks for playing.
Lol I cash flow my rentals because they are multi families. But even then the long term value is paid off equity and appreciation. Any money gained goes right back into it or saved for future costs. No one is buying and turning single families for rent at a profit without rehabbing them first


Good luck paying $1,200 in mortgage, $250 in taxes, more in insurance and PMI - and finding a tenet that will come in and pay all that AND more so you cash flow. They don’t exist, why? Because at that point they will buy their own property.


Long story short. Negged.
post 1631966663 02-21-2021, 10:22 AM
-
#71
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Posts: 4,435
  5. Rep Power: 12061
Originally Posted By Anachron
And no links were seen.

Thanks for playing.

Edit: Also thanks for confirming that you own "multiple housing units" that you are losing money on.
He's talking about these homes:

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1...16750828_zpid/

Remember only 40K down payment.
post 1631966723 02-21-2021, 10:23 AM
-
#72
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By meanstringbean
Lol I cash flow my rentals because they are multi families. But even then the long term value is paid off equity and appreciation. Any money gained goes right back into it or saved for future costs. No one is buying and turning single families for rent at a profit without rehabbing them first


Good luck paying $1,200 in mortgage, $250 in taxes, more in insurance and PMI - and finding a tenet that will come in and pay all that AND more so you cash flow. They don’t exist, why? Because at that point they will buy their own property.


Long story short. Negged.
People around me in suburban PA are paying $1,400 - $1,500 all day for multifamily 900sq foot pieces of **** made out of bricks where you can hear your neighbors orgasm.
post 1631966873 02-21-2021, 10:26 AM
-
#73
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Posts: 4,435
  5. Rep Power: 12061
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls
Even if you are getting a 5% raise every year, and I am beating that, why would you want all of your gains in income to go directly into your housing cost and not actually move ahead at all?
I don't know, it doesn't make sense. I wouldn't want to rent as it would kill most gains in income. If you buy, at least you can pass that wealth down to your kids.
post 1631967243 02-21-2021, 10:31 AM
-
#74
  1. N0stradamus
  2. The Blackpill Prophet
  1. N0stradamus
  2. The Blackpill Prophet
  3. Join Date: Oct 2020
  4. Posts: 24,839
  5. Rep Power: 96971
There are millions of renters living free under eviction moratoriums..... it ain't always a losing proposition....
Everything I post is satire.
Tricknology Grand Master.
post 1631967253 02-21-2021, 10:31 AM
-
#75
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By SuperHercules
It's a great way to explore new areas
Agree on that - another good renting occasion is to better understand a market. Moving to a new city for a job with the wife and kids? Rent for a year, see the areas you like and dislike, and then buy. Buying blind can really screw ya
post 1631967303 02-21-2021, 10:32 AM
-
#76
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,691
  6. Rep Power: 169649
Originally Posted By BigTimeOperator
I want to buy a house soon (hoping the bubble bursts) and I agree with you about building wealth, but not having to pay for repairs or maintenance can be nice sometimes.
Who do you think is paying for maintenance and repairs where you live right now? Do you think your landlord pays the expenses? lol.

Originally Posted By HayZues
Say rent is 1000/month.

Buying a house 2k/month + 40k down.

Take that 40k down-payment and extra 1k/month and invest it seeing 10% growth and its over 300k within 10 years. Would take 20 to see that kind of equity in your house. That's also ignoring property taxes, and for people who live in places like Illinois or NY, that is easily 100k in 10 years.


So math isn't as simple as you say.
Are you comparing a 1 bedroom apartment to a 3 bedroom home? Why don't you compare buying a 2 bedroom 1 bath home to renting a 2 bedroom 1 bath apartment? I think you'll find the numbers more comparable.


My mortgage is $585 per month. Renting a home with this square footage in this neighborhood is $1850 per month. Lets assume I decide I don't need 1585 square foot, 3 bed 2 bath and a garage + yard. Lets assume I want to down-grade to a 2 bed 1 bath apartment. $1400-1600 per month rent for the apartment in this area. Yes. I put a down-payment on the home. Yes. I have a good deal of equity in the home. Yes. I refi at a very low rate for that juicy low note. But I can't help but imagine what my financial situation would look like if I'd have listened to miscers 6 years ago and kept renting.


Even if I'd have rented a crappy one bedroom apartment at 1K a month for the last six years. I'd have pissed away 72K in rent. I've been putting less then that into my mortgage every month and have about 75K in equity into the home.



I really have a hard time seeing how renters come out ahead unless you just live in a market where rent is cheap and home-ownership prices are ridiculously inflated.
post 1631967353 02-21-2021, 10:32 AM
-
#77
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls
Not anymore
People were saying that the housing market would never crash right before 2008.

Buying a house is in general a good investment, but there will be down periods you need to make sure you have a time frame to ride the variability otherwise you are gambling not investing.
post 1631967413 02-21-2021, 10:33 AM
-
#78
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  1. AccountingMajor
  2. Hispanic (no gay Latinx)
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Posts: 4,435
  5. Rep Power: 12061
Originally Posted By FA*******
Water's always going to be the issue with CA. You can build the land denser, but do you have enough water for those extra people?
The whole state should ban watering lawns, plants, and those old man toilets.

We live in a fuking desert, we shouldn't have lawns.

If you go down to menifee, you will see many houses just have dirt&gravel or astroturf as their front lawn. That's how every house in California needs to be. If people want greenery, they can go to the east coast or the south.

Logically, we should just have cactus everywhere.
post 1631967533 02-21-2021, 10:34 AM
-
#79
  1. Antonio519
  2. The ment, enjoy it.
  1. Antonio519
  2. The ment, enjoy it.
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
  5. Posts: 25,343
  6. Rep Power: 71998
I have a condo, it's up for sale for 20k more than I bought it for 3 years ago, but renting is nice b/c you can just get up and go whenever you want. Sometimes the freedom is worth more than the commitment
Blaugrana Crew
Chicago Crew
Misc Porsche crew
post 1631967763 02-21-2021, 10:36 AM
-
#80
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By Antonio519
I have a condo, it's up for sale for 20k more than I bought it for 3 years ago, but renting is nice b/c you can just get up and go whenever you want. Sometimes the freedom is worth more than the commitment
You're tied into a lease usually, so you are still stuck on intervals. In this particular market environment, it seems like you can list a property and have multiple offers over the list price within 48 hours with people not even looking at the ****ing thing. I don't see any negatives to ownership outside of potential large scale unexpected repairs and needing to have some cash/credit available for that at all times.

Even if you need a new roof and a new boiler, and you have no cash and borrow at 6-8% on a personal loan, you will still come out ahead in a few years from the appreciation.

We don't have real money any more. Have to adapt to it
post 1631967783 02-21-2021, 10:36 AM
-
#81
  1. BestAssMan
  2. Banned
  1. BestAssMan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 28
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By guest89
My mortgage is $585 per month. Renting a home with this square footage in this neighborhood is $1850 per month. Lets assume I decide I don't need 1585 square foot, 3 bed 2 bath and a garage + yard. Lets assume I want to down-grade to a 2 bed 1 bath apartment. $1400-1600 per month rent for the apartment in this area. Yes. I put a down-payment on the home. Yes. I have a good deal of equity in the home. Yes. I refi at a very low rate for that juicy low note. But I can't help but imagine what my financial situation would look like if I'd have listened to miscers 6 years ago and kept renting.
your comparing a mortgage you got 20 years ago. 20 years ago rent was bout 350/mth

also you are FORCED to pay property tax/home insurance as well so tack that on.
post 1631967893 02-21-2021, 10:38 AM
-
#82
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
Thanks for confirming that you are cash flowing from renting out properties, but at the same time claiming that renting is cheaper than owning.

But I see what you are playing at, you're trying to get people sold on the idea of renting so you have a bigger pool of tenants to pick from.

Please do some more research, there are nothing worse in the real estate business that landlords who have no clue what they are doing. Maybe go on biggerpockets or something, you might learn a thing or two.

To everyone else ITT, pay no attention to this guy - he has very little idea what he is talking about. I hope some of the other real estate investors chime in soon.
Lol Jesus F Christ you cash flow because a multi family is MULTIPLE tenants. So if you have a triplex that is 2k in total costs, the 3 renters each pay $800, you will cash flow while ALSO having them save money because $800 beats owning in that same area (good luck finding a mortgage + insurance + PMI for that cheap anywhere)


So the tenant is paying $800 to rent instead of say, $1300 to own their own place. You’re still profiting while owning, it’s still cheaper for them to rent than to own, financially it makes sense for both parties. Apartments work the same way, just at a larger scale, the apartment complex still makes money but you bet your ass it’s cheaper to rent a downtown apartment than own a downtown loft
post 1631968023 02-21-2021, 10:39 AM
-
#83
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By BestAssMan
your comparing a mortgage you got 20 years ago. 20 years ago rent was bout 350/mth

also you are FORCED to pay property tax/home insurance as well so tack that on.
exactly... wtf? So owning locks in a lower cost of living for your primary residence while everyone else will keep eating massive increases year to year and never get ahead.
post 1631968363 02-21-2021, 10:43 AM
-
#84
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By flrda77
Only losers rent

Only losers have Mortgages
It's a losing proposition not to use debt when debt is extremely cheap and assets only go up in value in excess of the cost of debt.

Post sponsored by:

post 1631968513 02-21-2021, 10:45 AM
-
#85
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
Go sit in the corner, you just rekt yourself without even knowing it.
Sure thing buddy
post 1631969013 02-21-2021, 10:50 AM
-
#86
  1. Antonio519
  2. The ment, enjoy it.
  1. Antonio519
  2. The ment, enjoy it.
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
  5. Posts: 25,343
  6. Rep Power: 71998
Originally Posted By Anachron
So you pay the penalty for breaking the lease?
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls
You're tied into a lease usually, so you are still stuck on intervals. In this particular market environment, it seems like you can list a property and have multiple offers over the list price within 48 hours with people not even looking at the ****ing thing. I don't see any negatives to ownership outside of potential large scale unexpected repairs and needing to have some cash/credit available for that at all times.

Even if you need a new roof and a new boiler, and you have no cash and borrow at 6-8% on a personal loan, you will still come out ahead in a few years from the appreciation.

We don't have real money any more. Have to adapt to it
Yeah, I know, but still it's usually like 6 months or a year, then you have the freedom to move around

my mortgage/tax/association is actually cheaper than rent in my neighborhood
Blaugrana Crew
Chicago Crew
Misc Porsche crew
post 1631969433 02-21-2021, 10:54 AM
-
#87
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By Anachron
You can't even see it, can you?

Do me a favour and register on biggerpockets if you really do have income properties ( although I highly, highly doubt you do ).
I’ve been on bigger pockets for years , actually got into all this from their podcast.


Any more cards up your sleeve or are you as bad at taking an L as you are at math
post 1631969523 02-21-2021, 10:55 AM
-
#88
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
only somebody who has never looked at it closely would say this

OP prob lives with relatives
post 1631969573 02-21-2021, 10:56 AM
-
#89
  1. Exiled93
  2. Manlet of Steel
  1. Exiled93
  2. Manlet of Steel
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: Tennessee, United States
  5. Posts: 7,754
  6. Rep Power: 23467
Waiting until I get out of the navy to use my 0% down VA loan. Have 3 years left here and feel like it would be a waste buying a home now.
post 1631969613 02-21-2021, 10:56 AM
-
#90
  1. chino3
  1. chino3
  2. Join Date: Oct 2012
  3. Posts: 18,554
  4. Rep Power: 134275
Too many variable to make such a blanket statement. But in SoCal, unless you’re looking long term, renting is just as viable and responsible option. Short, even sub 5 years, you are setting yourself up for failure between closing costs and getting in at potentially the top-ish of the market which in turn leaves you exposed to potential downturn when you are ready to sell.

In DTLA my rent is $3k for a 2x2. To get something similar, the price would have to be <$650k and that’swith 25% downandnoHOA fees (good luck lol). Doing a quick search for my zip code and immediate surrounding area, that’s not even a slight possibility.

To get anything in that price range, I would have to live either way the fukk out of the city (not an option) or in a borderline slum, and I don’t have the patience or desire to gentrify an area. It’s also the reason I haven’t purchased any investment properties out here, because the ROI is absolute trash at these prices.
"It won't get better, just different."
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts