Forum
»
Why do people say social mobility is bad in the USA and Canada due to cost of living?
- Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
Page 1 of 1
03-06-2021, 12:57 PM
-
#1
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Why do people say social mobility is bad in the USA and Canada due to cost of living?
I am either missing something or people do not understand basic stats and math.
Rent is high in NYC, Vancouver etc but the people who should be there work in jobs that are tied to there and pay enough to have a good lifestyle.
If you do not fit into those it is more than likely you can move anywhere else.
E.g a nurse in the USA can work and have a good lifestyle in any state. Why stay in California for instance (even though that job can actually pay well there too)?
I see comments from expat convos such as "social mobility is better in Japan" because the cost of living is lower? Wtf. Salary adjustment, none of that tells me dick about social mobility.
Rent is high in NYC, Vancouver etc but the people who should be there work in jobs that are tied to there and pay enough to have a good lifestyle.
If you do not fit into those it is more than likely you can move anywhere else.
E.g a nurse in the USA can work and have a good lifestyle in any state. Why stay in California for instance (even though that job can actually pay well there too)?
I see comments from expat convos such as "social mobility is better in Japan" because the cost of living is lower? Wtf. Salary adjustment, none of that tells me dick about social mobility.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 12:58 PM
-
#2
- nothingshocking
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Location: Uranus, Gambia
- Posts: 36,399
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 952290
-
-
dafuq is social mobility
03-06-2021, 12:58 PM
-
#3
03-06-2021, 01:00 PM
-
#4
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
-
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Posts: 47,761
- Rep Power: 284006
-
-
Social mobility is literally what the "American dream" is about.
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
03-06-2021, 01:00 PM
-
#5
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By nothingshocking⏩
wealth is a bell curve with percentilesdafuq is social mobility
social mobility is going from percentile ranges, although the definitions of these ranges vary from person to person
an example of social mobility is a doctor who comes from a lower-class family in the USA who makes an upper-class income
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 01:01 PM
-
#6
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
Ehh, true.Social mobility is literally what the "American dream" is about.
But social mobility is not inferior in, say, UK or Germany compared to there.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 01:05 PM
-
#7
- nothingshocking
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Location: Uranus, Gambia
- Posts: 36,399
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 952290
-
-
Originally Posted By atgbrahsrs⏩
yeah, my dad's grandpa was a bricklayer, his dad was a mechanic who owned a gas station, my dad became a specialized surgeon and professor at top medical school, I'm a CFO - so I guess the mobility stopped with mewealth is a bell curve with percentiles
social mobility is going from percentile ranges, although the definitions of these ranges vary from person to person
an example of social mobility is a doctor who comes from a lower-class family in the USA who makes an upper-class income
social mobility is going from percentile ranges, although the definitions of these ranges vary from person to person
an example of social mobility is a doctor who comes from a lower-class family in the USA who makes an upper-class income
My girlfriend grew up dirt poor in a small town, her mom made her clothes and stuff like that, she now makes 200K working in Medicine
seems like social mobility is alive and well
03-06-2021, 01:08 PM
-
#8
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
-
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Posts: 47,761
- Rep Power: 284006
-
-
Originally Posted By atgbrahsrs⏩
I think you're applying the "freedom level" debate points to this social mobility debate.Ehh, true.
But social mobility is not inferior in, say, UK or Germany compared to there.
But social mobility is not inferior in, say, UK or Germany compared to there.
I think, for sure, its easier to be socially mobile in America than UK, at least, just Because of the population & thus wealth you can siphon off if you do anything that garners interest. Like, £1 from 10 million people in England is like 20% of the population. $1 from 10 million people in the US is michigan.
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
03-06-2021, 01:14 PM
-
#9
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
I have heard this argument but it actually doesn't make sense. Scalable businesses are scalable regardless of the country. By that logic, it is easier to be socially mobile in India and China, which we know is not true.I think you're applying the "freedom level" debate points to this social mobility debate.
I think, for sure, its easier to be socially mobile in America than UK, at least, just Because of the population & thus wealth you can siphon off if you do anything that garners interest. Like, £1 from 10 million people in England is like 20% of the population. $1 from 10 million people in the US is michigan.
I think, for sure, its easier to be socially mobile in America than UK, at least, just Because of the population & thus wealth you can siphon off if you do anything that garners interest. Like, £1 from 10 million people in England is like 20% of the population. $1 from 10 million people in the US is michigan.
I think the rewards for high-earners and business people in the USA are higher but you have less of a safety net if things go south compared to the UK for instance.
There are also types of social mobility. In contrast to the first one above, in the UK trickling down through tax means more people less than 50th percentile on the bell curve are better off (at the expense of the high earners) but that helps some of them have equal opportunities to become high-earners themselves. This is taken to the next level (opposite direction of the USA) in Scandinavian countries, which rank highest on IHDI.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 01:17 PM
-
#10
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
That's what you get when you choose a career field where there are limited jobs and the jobs are only in some locations but yet the pay isn't really that great because they have loads of *******s that want those jobs.
03-06-2021, 01:18 PM
-
#11
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By nothingshocking⏩
I just think if it is like top 30 IHDI countries comparisons on that level make no sense (in contrast to comparing USA/UK to, say, Syria totally different ballgame)yeah, my dad's grandpa was a bricklayer, his dad was a mechanic who owned a gas station, my dad became a specialized surgeon and professor at top medical school, I'm a CFO - so I guess the mobility stopped with me
My girlfriend grew up dirt poor in a small town, her mom made her clothes and stuff like that, she now makes 200K working in Medicine
seems like social mobility is alive and well
My girlfriend grew up dirt poor in a small town, her mom made her clothes and stuff like that, she now makes 200K working in Medicine
seems like social mobility is alive and well
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 01:21 PM
-
#12
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
-
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Posts: 47,761
- Rep Power: 284006
-
-
Originally Posted By atgbrahsrs⏩
The comparison with 3rd world countries surely can't be relevant especially when opportunity is the factor from which social mobility takes off.I have heard this argument but it actually doesn't make sense. Scalable businesses are scalable regardless of the country. By that logic, it is easier to be socially mobile in India and China, which we know is not true.
I think the rewards for high-earners and business people in the USA are higher but you have less of a safety net if things go south compared to the UK for instance.
There are also types of social mobility. In contrast to the first one above, in the UK trickling down through tax means more people less than 50th percentile on the bell curve are better off (at the expense of the high earners) but that helps some of them have equal opportunities to become high-earners themselves. This is taken to the next level (opposite direction of the USA) in Scandinavian countries, which rank highest on IHDI.
I think the rewards for high-earners and business people in the USA are higher but you have less of a safety net if things go south compared to the UK for instance.
There are also types of social mobility. In contrast to the first one above, in the UK trickling down through tax means more people less than 50th percentile on the bell curve are better off (at the expense of the high earners) but that helps some of them have equal opportunities to become high-earners themselves. This is taken to the next level (opposite direction of the USA) in Scandinavian countries, which rank highest on IHDI.
I see your point, but "high earner" is defined in incredibly different ways in the UK vs US, just look at the highest tax brackets, £150,000+ compared to $500,000+
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
03-06-2021, 01:27 PM
-
#13
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
I totally see your point about scalable businesses and populations. But I believe products are traded on the WTO level so having access to a larger market domestically is not that much of a benefit for social mobilty.The comparison with 3rd world countries surely can't be relevant especially when opportunity is the factor from which social mobility takes off.
I see your point, but "high earner" is defined in incredibly different ways in the UK vs US, just look at the highest tax brackets, £150,000+ compared to $500,000+
I see your point, but "high earner" is defined in incredibly different ways in the UK vs US, just look at the highest tax brackets, £150,000+ compared to $500,000+
Also pretty much anywhere a successful business allows social mobility, including China and India. However, not many of those take off to achieve this social mobility.
Whereas because of the difference in tax brackets, the bottom 50th percentile in like the UK or Germany can be taught of as perhaps having more opportunities.
This is not the end all be all as these economic "science" terminologies are quite vague and unpredictable but as I have mentioned if you are on track to be on a good job and projected to be a no less than 100k USD and going to average 200k in the last 20 years of your life, the reward reaping will be better than the equivalent in the UK. But if you are at the bottom of the capitalist chain it can hurt twice as bad in the USA.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-06-2021, 01:34 PM
-
#14
- ErnieMccracken
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 100,062
- Rep Power: 330290
-
-
Originally Posted By nothingshocking⏩
Honestly I don't even know why we have economists at all. All those big brain guys at the London School of Economics? They could have just asked a guy on a gay indian bodybuilding forum who knows a couple people.yeah, my dad's grandpa was a bricklayer, his dad was a mechanic who owned a gas station, my dad became a specialized surgeon and professor at top medical school, I'm a CFO - so I guess the mobility stopped with me
My girlfriend grew up dirt poor in a small town, her mom made her clothes and stuff like that, she now makes 200K working in Medicine
seems like social mobility is alive and well
My girlfriend grew up dirt poor in a small town, her mom made her clothes and stuff like that, she now makes 200K working in Medicine
seems like social mobility is alive and well
All their work is for nothing and conclusions completely wrong.
03-06-2021, 01:48 PM
-
#15
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken⏩
What you jab at is fair. However, you also miss that Economics as a rigid science is dubious at best. Do not use a big academia name - big academia in the non-STEM puts out stuff like "White defensiveness".Honestly I don't even know why we have economists at all. All those big brain guys at the London School of Economics? They could have just asked a guy on a gay indian bodybuilding forum who knows a couple people.
All their work is for nothing and conclusions completely wrong.
All their work is for nothing and conclusions completely wrong.
Although as I have pointed out above. There do seem to be a better "socialist" type of benefit where people lower on the bell curve are better. Although if someone is successful he can call them leeches.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts