Wait till you figure out what else they have convinced the masses of.

Spoiler!

so bascially all the actually educated and notable scientists the footage/evidence was shown to said it was fake/no way it was a Sasquatch

im confused where you see that everyone says its real?

Subpar trolling. VERY subpar.

"Krantz also showed the film to Gordon Valient, a researcher for Nike shoes, who he says "made some rather useful observations about some rather unhuman movements he could see"."

"A first-season episode of MonsterQuest focuses on the Bigfoot phenomenon. One pair of scientists, Jurgen Konczak (Director, Human Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, University of Minnesota) and Esteban Sarmiento, attempts and fails to get a mime outfitted with LEDs on his joints to mimic the Patterson Bigfoot's gait. A second pair, Daris Swindler and Owen Caddy, employs digital enhancement and observes facial movements, such as moving eyelids, lips that compress like an upset chimp's, and a mouth that is lower than it appears, due to a false-lip anomaly like that of a chimp's. (Unfortunately, the show's narrator falsely claims, three times, that the original film shot by Patterson was used.) The episode concludes, "the new findings are intriguing but inconclusive, until a body is found.""

"Film industry personnel Edit
Movie production companies' executives Edit
Dale Sheets and Universal Studios. Patterson, Gimlin, and DeAtley[199] screened the film for Dale Sheets, head of the Documentary Film Department, and unnamed technicians[132] "in the special effects department at Universal Studios in Hollywood ... Their conclusion was: 'We could try (faking it), but we would have to create a completely new system of artificial muscles and find an actor who could be trained to walk like that. It might be done, but we would have to say that it would be almost impossible.'"[200] A more moderate version of their opinion was, "if it is [a man in an ape suit], it's a very good one—a job that would take a lot of time and money to produce."[201]
Disney executive Ken Peterson. Krantz reports that in 1969, John Green (who owned a first-generation copy of the original Patterson film)[202] interviewed Disney executive Ken Peterson, who, after viewing the Patterson film, asserted "that their technicians would not be able to duplicate the film".[132][197][203] Krantz argues that if Disney personnel were unable to duplicate the film, there is little likelihood that Patterson could have done so. Greg Long writes, "Byrne cited his trip to Walt Disney studios in 1972, where Disney's chief of animation and four assistants viewed Patterson's footage and praised it as a beautiful piece of work although, they said, it must have been shot in a studio. When Byrne told them it had been shot in the woods of Northern California, 'They shook their heads and walked away.'"[136][204]"

Other special effects artists Edit
Rick Baker. Famed Hollywood creator of Harry (from the movie, Harry and the Hendersons), Rick Baker, told Geraldo Rivera's Now It Can Be Told show (in 1992) that "it looked like cheap, fake fur," after seeing the subject in Patterson's filmstrip.[212] Baker said that John Chambers had "a crappy walkaround suit," that he sold as "a gag to be played on the guy that shot it [the film]".[213] Later on, Baker's studio stated in a fax, "He no longer believes this [that Chambers made the suit] is true."[214]
Ellis Burman. The Guenettes (Robert & Frances) wrote of him, "I also spoke to Ellis Burman of Burman Studios in Hollywood, creators of all kinds of strange creatures, including a fake Bigfoot for a traveling 'pickle and punk' carnival exhibit. Burman denied his company created the Patterson Bigfoot, but did say he could duplicate it—but for more than $10,000 in total costs."[215]
John Chambers. Academy Award–winning monster-maker John Chambers is most famous for his innovative flexible masks in Planet of the Apes (1968). In a 1997 interview in a nursing home with Bigfooter Bobbie Short in her nurse's uniform, he denied rumors that he had created a costume for the Patterson subject, saying "I'm good, but not that good."[216][217][218][219]
Some time before 1976 the Guenettes reported that, in answer to their questions, "He concluded that if the creature is a man in a suit, then it is no ordinary gorilla suit. It is not something they bought or rented in a store; it would have to be something tailor made. He also felt like it might have been made out of real animal fur."[215]
Janos Prohaska. After viewing the Patterson–Gimlin film with John Green,[132] costume designer and ape-suit mime Janos Prohaska (noted for his work in the late-1960s television programs Star Trek and Lost in Space) concluded the film's subject looked real to him. When asked if he thought the film was faked, Prohaska replied, "I don't think so ... to me it looks very, very real." If the film was hoaxed, Prohaska thought, it was remarkably realistic and sophisticated, and the best costume he had ever seen, and the only plausible explanation was that someone might have glued false hair "directly to the actor's skin".[220]
However, film critic David Daegling speculates that the same effect could be had by gluing the hair to a set of tight but expandable, waffle-design long johns.[221]
Chris Walas. Academy Award-winning "makeup artist Chris [Walas] in the BigfootForums [site] (in 2004) presented a theory that the arching hip line represents the overlap line between a fur costume leggings section and the torso section. ... "[222]
Stan Winston. Academy Award-winning film special effects supervisor and makeup artist Stan Winston, after viewing the PGF, said "it's a guy in a bad hair suit, sorry!" He also added that "if one of my colleagues created this for a movie, he would be out of business." He went on to comment that the suit in the film could have been made today for "a couple hundred dollars" or "under a thousand, in that day".[223]
"Barry Keith" (pen name), "an experienced make-up and costume artist," accused "the Hollywood costume industry" of making "bravado claims of how easy such an event would be to fake". He said that their "cheats and shortcuts" are not detectable in "Patty".[224]

Not trolling

Let me ask you a question though. Let's say it WAS real. Who gives a chit?

I do. I would like to learn their ways.

It strikes again.

It's clearly swamp gas or the planet Venus.

you basically cut out all the actual scientists and researchers and put in a bunch of film people and some dude who works for nike as the official experts....

not how it works

go back and read the actual stanford and ivy league researchers opinions of the video

Since you do not believe you are my enemy.

Bump

Can you prove that

Jimmy Hoffa and Bigfoot…who nose

See sig

"John Chambers. Academy Award–winning monster-maker John Chambers is most famous for his innovative flexible masks in Planet of the Apes (1968). In a 1997 interview in a nursing home with Bigfooter Bobbie Short in her nurse's uniform, he denied rumors that he had created a costume for the Patterson subject,saying "I'm good, but not that good.""

Do you have any idea how fukkin massive the woods of North America are?
Those are the same people who’ve convinced you and many others that this clip ISN’T real

That's a man baby

Exactly.. that video is real. It's a real Bigfoot (a female).

She looks at the cameramen then makes a face of disgust and then quickly looks away.

No costumes back then could do that.. no cgi..See sig

das a monkey suit

can confirm, i am bigfoot

"Stan Winston. Academy Award-winning film special effects supervisor and makeup artist Stan Winston, after viewing the PGF, said "it's a guy in a bad hair suit, sorry!" He also added that "if one of my colleagues created this for a movie, he would be out of business." He went on to comment that the suit in the film could have been made today for "a couple hundred dollars" or "under a thousand, in that day".
"Barry Keith" (pen name), "an experienced make-up and costume artist," accused "the Hollywood costume industry" of making "bravado claims of how easy such an event would be to fake".He said that their "cheats and shortcuts" are not detectable in "Patty"."

BIGFOOT IS REAL. HE'S ALIVE.

DEAL WITH IT, *******s.

Yeah the navy already said she’s 1921 6015 what they’ll do with Porsche and the Navy? Is irrelevant tj me. Not that even if I didn’t lie about that? Wouldn’t change that 35 is prison for its connection tj Covid and it being attached tj enemies of national security? But yeah? She knows even though I’m sure they’re all scheming up to benefit off me. What that means for the corrupt police and politicians? I guess is up tj the navy tj decide though I would assume being enemies of the state and being able tj get jail without trial? That it’s not looking good for them.

We have tj think logically here... what happens when she’s hooked up tj a lie detector and then the world expects tj see the way the fbi handled this. Lie detectors may not be admissible in regular court but they can be in nsa trials and are given regardless. It all depends on Porsche. It’s irrelevant tj me you entered at your own risk and paid the consequences for your actions.

Damn OP gone…

Good riddance, not sure how he made the font size 47 on mobile, but that was getting old

Hope he got banned for the font