he mad.

cliffs because this soyboy's voice makes me want to kill puppies.

Lmao. What a stupid ******* wincel is He’ll never get poosie.

i scrolled though the video and saw shirtless dude avi's so it's either bb.com or some weird site i've never heard of.

More like a bunch of retards that we’re caught up in the heat of the moment. But keep deflecting.



Funny how you believe Trumps lawyer when it suits you.

The information says she was shot you dolt. It does not say why she was shot.

Please show me where he was protecting his life or others, the standard for deadly force.

I'll wait....

So frail

Watch out your civil war bro

Where? It's right in the link. I've already explained that to you multiple times. You can read right?

I claim it's not there. Hard to prove something doesn't exist.

Instead of pretending like "it's right there," post it so I can drag you because you're either illiterate or lying.

I cannot prove the negative. You claim to possess the truth in writing. Lets see it.

Post the words explaining why he shot Babbit.

Thats not really my question though. Right now we have a judicial system that operates completely differently based on the political affiliation of the individual rather than what that person did to break the law. Is this really what we want our country to become?

People that meet your description are being treated like terrorists right now.

Here you go:

I'll make it easier for you....

Here's the words. Feel free to bold the REASON he shot Babbit.

Department of Justice Closes Investigation into the Death of Ashli Babbitt
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will not pursue criminal charges against the U.S. Capitol Police officer involved in the fatal shooting of 35-year-old Ashli Babbitt, the Office announced today.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia’s Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section and the Civil Rights Division, with the Metropolitan Police Department’s Internal Affairs Division (IAD), conducted a thorough investigation of Ms. Babbitt’s shooting. Officials examined video footage posted on social media, statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses to the events, physical evidence from the scene of the shooting, and the results of an autopsy. Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution. Officials from IAD informed a representative of Ms. Babbitt’s family today of this determination.

The investigation determined that, on January 6, 2021, Ms. Babbitt joined a crowd of people that gathered on the U.S. Capitol grounds to protest the results of the 2020 presidential election. Inside the Capitol building, a Joint Session of Congress, convened to certify the results of the Electoral College vote, was underway. Members of the crowd outside the building, which was closed to the public during the Joint Session, eventually forced their way into the Capitol building and past U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) officers attempting to maintain order. The Joint Session was stopped, and the USCP began evacuating members of Congress.

The investigation further determined that Ms. Babbitt was among a mob of people that entered the Capitol building and gained access to a hallway outside “Speaker’s Lobby,” which leads to the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives. At the time, the USCP was evacuating Members from the Chamber, which the mob was trying to enter from multiple doorways. USCP officers used furniture to barricade a set of glass doors separating the hallway and Speaker’s Lobby to try and stop the mob from entering the Speaker’s Lobby and the Chamber, and three officers positioned themselves between the doors and the mob. Members of the mob attempted to break through the doors by striking them and breaking the glass with their hands, flagpoles, helmets, and other objects. Eventually, the three USCP officers positioned outside the doors were forced to evacuate. As members of the mob continued to strike the glass doors, Ms. Babbitt attempted to climb through one of the doors where glass was broken out. An officer inside the Speaker’s Lobby fired one round from his service pistol, striking Ms. Babbitt in the left shoulder, causing her to fall back from the doorway and onto the floor. A USCP emergency response team, which had begun making its way into the hallway to try and subdue the mob, administered aid to Ms. Babbitt, who was transported to Washington Hospital Center, where she succumbed to her injuries.

The focus of the criminal investigation was to determine whether federal prosecutors could prove that the officer violated any federal laws, concentrating on the possible application of 18 U.S.C. § 242, a federal criminal civil rights statute. In order to establish a violation of this statute, prosecutors must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the officer acted willfully to deprive Ms. Babbitt of a right protected by the Constitution or other law, here the Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to an unreasonable seizure. Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so “willfully,” which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law. As this requirement has been interpreted by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent required under Section 242.

The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber. Acknowledging the tragic loss of life and offering condolences to Ms. Babbitt’s family, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and U.S. Department of Justice have therefore closed the investigation into this matter.

Done

Exactly what I thought. Frauding again.

So no dragging then? Weird because everything is right there.

The following two notions have a crucial difference:

~Injuring police officers with a flag whilst violently storming the U.S capitol, based on conspiracy theories and lies is disrespecting the flag and the country.

~Peacefully protesting and criticizing one's own government, is American as it gets, and one has every right to do so.

It's not wincel. He's posted multiple vicarious before and the voice doesn't match. Also pretty sure wincel is some chubby East Asian an not Middle Eastern.

LOL at conservatives LARPing in the Capitol. In related news, the QANON Shaman is still being denied bail.

In all seriousness dudes been in solitary. Did you watch his footage? Completely peaceful but trespassing and remaining. Is it cool with you that he's in solitary confinement? He's obviously mentally ill.

I agree they were larping idiots too. The ones assaulting and breaking things deserve prison time. Others, not so much. Kind of odd people find pleasure in political opponents beyond the pale political punishment.

Is everyone involved in 1/6 that static?

No gray? No inbetween? Some in jail for 6 months for trespassing?

I'll just leave these here.

Because 'Merica and Freedumz... right?

Laws only apply to conservatives and people that they don't like.

They spilled water??? JFC it's worse than I thought!

9/11 was nothing in compare

go back to work you scum

memDESKcop

More promotions more airplanes from desk to desk.

Desks are kind of the goal in Law Enforcement.

IDK how you guys think you can sit there and gaslight America over the fast that an angry mob attempted to overturn the election on Trump's behalf and murder our congresspeople. You really cannot deny that happened. It's also amusing you guys will go to bat for Trump after he did nothing to aid the people who were arrested on his behalf.

I disagree with your premise.

The judicial system is broken up into layers and jurisdictions, so by design there will be differences, but claiming "completely" different is an exaggeration.