Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Maricopa county audit finished - 200k ballots eliminated
  1. Results 1021 to 1050 of 1519
  2. First
  3. 33
  4. 34
  5. 35
  6. 36
  7. 37
  8. Last
post 1644177813 08-03-2021, 09:38 AM
-
#1021
  1. Scarrdbutsmartr
  2. Registered User
  1. Scarrdbutsmartr
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Posts: 20,492
  5. Rep Power: 93529
Originally Posted By metroins
lol?

Brb...letting a customer come audit all of my books and then take proprietary information from our companies. Letting anybody and everybody audit you; lol.

You cannot say you would never reject an audit or else please pm me all of your financial records so I can audit them.

Sigh - I didnt feel I had to clarify down to the microscopic level but I guess when its gotten to this level of herp derp, its required.

No one conducts audits without a legitimate directive and for a legitimate purpose.

To bring us back to the topic at hand...You do realize the audit is being conducted at the legitimate demand of the State, right?

So now that we have covered the common sense basics that audits are conducted only upon a legitimate directive, where do we go from here?
post 1644178723 08-03-2021, 09:51 AM
-
#1022
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,776
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By metroins
lol?

Brb...letting a customer come audit all of my books and then take proprietary information from our companies. Letting anybody and everybody audit you; lol.

You cannot say you would never reject an audit or else please pm me all of your financial records so I can audit them.

The AZ government runs elections, this is not some third party requesting an audit for no reason.

And in this case the county is defying a court order
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1644191133 08-03-2021, 01:02 PM
-
#1023
  1. Kane_89
  2. Registered User
  1. Kane_89
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 30,291
  6. Rep Power: 54391
Mari-COPE-a County "audit" in shambles lol
MIKE TYSON: "When you see me smash somebody's skull, you'll enjoy it."

"I try to catch him right on the tip of the nose, because I try to push the bone into the brain."

"It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."

"I can sell out Madison Square Garden masturbating"

"I'll f**k you till you love me f**got!"

"I just want to conquer people and their souls"
post 1644201263 08-03-2021, 03:28 PM
-
#1024
  1. metroins
  2. Power Of A God
  1. metroins
  2. Power Of A God
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Austin, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 22,479
  6. Rep Power: 140837
Originally Posted By Stizzel
The AZ government runs elections, this is not some third party requesting an audit for no reason.

And in this case the county is defying a court order
I know the AZ "audit" was authorized; I was responding specifically to the posters comment.

I think cyber Ninjas report will come up with 500 incorrect votes primarily due to addresses and 8 cases of people double voting.

I believe their report will be thorough and show there was no widespread election fraud conspiracy because if they come out with some random conspiracy theory that is proven false again, the company will likely not get any more real work.

Just my prediction.
Life is easy when you take personal responsibility
MMMC - Assistant to the Assistant of the Secretary of Assistance

I don't do limits.
post 1644202273 08-03-2021, 03:42 PM
-
#1025
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Snizzel and Friends took another L today.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-ord...211200536.html
post 1644203083 08-03-2021, 03:54 PM
-
#1026
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 43,261
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By XterraRob
I could see that happening. My main concern was the ballot images vs actual ballots vs certified count. If that checks out, then there's not much else to chase outside of suspecting voter registration fraud. Not sure how far these people are willing to take it.

I do think it's suspicious that Maricopa has declined to turn over the network hardware for investigation. The FBI raided the house of a Phoenix local who remotely accessed the Maricopa County Election Management System after the election, after they said it wasn't connected to the internet.

So... ...

https://www.ptnewsnetwork.com/fbi-ra...n-cyberattack/

That needs to be addressed.
they need a big rug to sweep all that chit under.
post 1644214723 08-03-2021, 07:11 PM
-
#1027
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,776
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441


Arrests incoming
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1644217123 08-03-2021, 07:58 PM
-
#1028
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By Stizzel


Arrests incoming
Stizzel with another prediction that won’t materialize. Yawn
post 1644217623 08-03-2021, 08:09 PM
-
#1029
  1. HurfDurf
  2. Registered User
  1. HurfDurf
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 2,406
  6. Rep Power: 20510
Originally Posted By Phil9
Stizzel with another prediction that won’t materialize. Yawn
It was funny for the last 8 months... Now it's just getting sad.
post 1644218793 08-03-2021, 08:33 PM
-
#1030
  1. metroins
  2. Power Of A God
  1. metroins
  2. Power Of A God
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Austin, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 22,479
  6. Rep Power: 140837
Originally Posted By XterraRob
AZ AG is a RINO.
Even if he were the conservative mctrumper, nobody would go to jail over these subpoenas.
Life is easy when you take personal responsibility
MMMC - Assistant to the Assistant of the Secretary of Assistance

I don't do limits.
post 1644218943 08-03-2021, 08:35 PM
-
#1031
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,776
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By metroins
Even if he were the conservative mctrumper, nobody would go to jail over these subpoenas.
No jail, they're grtting lined up against a wall

Im on the ground in phoenix right now getting the 411
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1644222773 08-03-2021, 09:58 PM
-
#1032
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 41,881
  5. Rep Power: 2018771
Originally Posted By metroins
Even if he were the conservative mctrumper, nobody would go to jail over these subpoenas.
Sure they would. Why would you say that?

Am I incorrect in assuming there is a law? Maybe I am.srs
Homerotic Modulator, Envious of Idiocy
post 1644222893 08-03-2021, 10:02 PM
-
#1033
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 41,881
  5. Rep Power: 2018771
I told you so. I told you so. I told you so.

Remember who told you about the splunk angle before anyone else? (Senate whip letter)

Where tf are the other network admin nerds at?

I think it's a large clue tbh. I said so.
Homerotic Modulator, Envious of Idiocy
post 1644223433 08-03-2021, 10:20 PM
-
#1034
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 41,881
  5. Rep Power: 2018771
Originally Posted By z4v4
Lol @ software.
Originally Posted By NYPat
Feel free to write them a letter and let them know this valuable information you possess before they waste all that money.
Originally Posted By memcop
Its Palo Alto. The combination government solution all in one. The routers aren't physical. Probably an Xtreme Net switch/routing and either Symantec or Crowd Strlike antivirus. Any or all modules would tell traffic.

It's probably overwritten by now. I think they're working theSplunkangle (storage).

It's pretty amazing to watch. There should be more network/security admins paying attention and yelling "look here."

Lmao I know I am
Originally Posted By Stizzel


Arrests incoming
I see the game
Originally Posted By metroins
To answer your question, I am alleging gross misconduct of this audit and incompetence of the senate around this audit.

Lol. You've posted so muchmisinformationin the past two pages, I'm just not going to engage you.

I've chuckled at your posts. Enjoy your Sunday.
Oh Boi oh Boi. Ever hear something from someone you should probably pay attention to?

Nah...just misinformation because you don't like it.

I can say for a fact if they use crowdstrike, splunk has piped internet to Germany, their hub, stored.

I hope they have a guy that can parse splunk. BTW it would have zero effect on current gov ops to see logs. All "sensitive" traffic is known. I could Google Maricopas outward facing IPs or just straight ping it. FBI NCIC servers are known too, the only sensitive pipeline.

It's going to get joocey, they know exactly what too look for and where. This would prove or disprove either allegation of net traffic and packet transfer being or not being an issue.

Very very interesting.
Homerotic Modulator, Envious of Idiocy
post 1644223983 08-03-2021, 10:45 PM
-
#1035
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Lol
post 1644229543 08-04-2021, 02:56 AM
-
#1036
  1. swoledoc13
  2. Banned
  1. swoledoc13
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 1,102
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Phil9
Stizzel with another prediction that won’t materialize. Yawn
Stizzel is clearly just a troll,why do they not ban him?
post 1644229683 08-04-2021, 03:02 AM
-
#1037
  1. swoledoc13
  2. Banned
  1. swoledoc13
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 1,102
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By memcop
Sure they would. Why would you say that?

Am I incorrect in assuming there is a law? Maybe I am.srs
Trump and Trumpkins believe they are above the law and thus break them.

Like when Trump violates laws regarding assaulting women and just grabs them by their pussies.
Or when he violates the Impoundment Control Act.
Or when Trump violated 50 USC 20511 when he called the govenor of Georgia and tried to pressure him into overturning the outcome of the votes in that state.
post 1644231243 08-04-2021, 04:13 AM
-
#1038
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By swoledoc13
Stizzel is clearly just a troll,why do they not ban him?
His clueless idiot form of comedy brings the lulz and the posting volume to keep political misc running.
post 1644231323 08-04-2021, 04:17 AM
-
#1039
  1. Redfish225
  2. Hunter/Fisherbreh
  1. Redfish225
  2. Hunter/Fisherbreh
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 69,167
  5. Rep Power: 903956
Originally Posted By swoledoc13
Trump and Trumpkins believe they are above the law and thus break them.

Like when Trump violates laws regarding assaulting women and just grabs them by their pussies.
Or when he violates the Impoundment Control Act.
Or when Trump violated 50 USC 20511 when he called the govenor of Georgia and tried to pressure him into overturning the outcome of the votes in that state.
Logic, facts, reality and general common sense does not compute with trumpers bro. Nice try though.


*Makes factual negative statement about orange ****g0t

Let the rage begin.
I loe e.
post 1644231813 08-04-2021, 04:36 AM
-
#1040
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Redfish225
Logic, facts, reality and general common sense does not compute with trumpers bro. Nice try though.


*Makes factual negative statement about orange ****g0t

Let the rage begin.
fake news
post 1644236533 08-04-2021, 06:43 AM
-
#1041
  1. Redfish225
  2. Hunter/Fisherbreh
  1. Redfish225
  2. Hunter/Fisherbreh
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 69,167
  5. Rep Power: 903956
Originally Posted By Cleveland33
fake news
Touché homie, touché
I loe e.
post 1644236693 08-04-2021, 06:47 AM
-
#1042
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 41,881
  5. Rep Power: 2018771
Originally Posted By metroins
I think this is the law.



Nobody is going go jail over these subpoenas. The courts will order them to comply if judge wants them to and they will comply because this is all Government property. A secretary could provide the information.

This is all civil law.
Looks like a teefless law. Is there a penalty other than the Sgt at arms Dragging you by the ear?

Misdemeanor graded penalty or such? I'll look up title 41 penalty when I get a chance
Homerotic Modulator, Envious of Idiocy
post 1644237373 08-04-2021, 07:03 AM
-
#1043
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  1. memcop
  2. Crassiest Modulator Alive
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 41,881
  5. Rep Power: 2018771
Originally Posted By metroins
I think this is the law.



Nobody is going go jail over these subpoenas. The courts will order them to comply if judge wants them to and they will comply because this is all Government property. A secretary could provide the information.

This is all civil law.
Originally Posted By memcop
Looks like a teefless law. Is there a penalty other than the Sgt at arms Dragging you by the ear?

Misdemeanor graded penalty or such? I'll look up title 41 penalty when I get a chance
Arizona Revised Statutes Title 41. State Government § 41-1154. Disobedience of legislative subpoena or refusal to give testimony or produce papers;  classification

Blah blah blah "class 2 misdemeanor."

-not civil law

A magistrate/judge could sign the warrant and that's a wrap.

We very well could see criminal charges against any NAMED violators for the production of information. The defiance was remarkable to be frank.
Homerotic Modulator, Envious of Idiocy
post 1644242803 08-04-2021, 08:33 AM
-
#1044
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,154
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98572
Originally Posted By memcop
The defiance was remarkable to be frank.
No it wasn't. A subpoena is simply a formal request and the first step in the process.

It's not uncommon to eventually bring the matter before a court to hammer out details of compliance.

People can bluster all they want about having something to hide and criminal charges but we're a looooong way from anything like that.
post 1644245443 08-04-2021, 09:21 AM
-
#1045
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,776
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By memcop
Arizona Revised Statutes Title 41. State Government § 41-1154. Disobedience of legislative subpoena or refusal to give testimony or produce papers;  classification

Blah blah blah "class 2 misdemeanor."

-not civil law

A magistrate/judge could sign the warrant and that's a wrap.

We very well could see criminal charges against any NAMED violators for the production of information. The defiance was remarkable to be frank.
The AG gets 30 days to investigate and then the county gets 30 days to comply. If the AG finds the law was broken it gets expedited to the supreme court.
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1644247283 08-04-2021, 09:54 AM
-
#1046
  1. JonZ
  2. Registered User
  1. JonZ
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2002
  4. Posts: 7,044
  5. Rep Power: 41238
Related news.
8.1 million votes in most secure election of most popular pres ever....


https://www.thethinkingconservative....y-seth-keshel/
" The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog"
- Mark Twain
post 1644248863 08-04-2021, 10:23 AM
-
#1047
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By Stizzel
The AG gets 30 days to investigate and then the county gets 30 days to comply. If the AG finds the law was broken it gets expedited to the supreme court.
4 more weeks! LOL
post 1644253993 08-04-2021, 11:39 AM
-
#1048
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,154
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98572
Originally Posted By Stizzel
The AG gets 30 days to investigate and then the county gets 30 days to comply. If the AG finds the law was broken it gets expedited to the supreme court.
Does the AZ senate have to first vote to find the county in contempt before the AG investigates?
post 1644257543 08-04-2021, 12:39 PM
-
#1049
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,776
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Karen Fann
@FannKfann
Build the case , set the trap, and boom the Maricopa lies will come back to haunt them
Originally Posted By Seatard
Does the AZ senate have to first vote to find the county in contempt before the AG investigates?
That i dont know. That request is from the senate majority whip so would likely be a formality
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1644397103 08-06-2021, 11:42 AM
-
#1050
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  2. Join Date: Feb 2006
  3. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 132,830
  5. Subscribers: 8
  6. Rep Power: 1753489
Wisconsin sending out election related supeonas

Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts