Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Google cucking their employees with paycuts if they dont come back in the office
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 68
  2. Page 1 of 3
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  7. Last

Thread: Google cucking their employees with paycuts if they dont come back in the office

post 1644701713 08-11-2021, 01:36 AM
-
#1
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0

Google cucking their employees with paycuts if they dont come back in the office

https://nypost.com/2021/08/10/google...s-by-up-to-25/


these cucks thought they could move from high COL areas and just work remote and earn the same pay.
post 1644702133 08-11-2021, 01:51 AM
-
#2
  1. Xerve
  2. Registered User
  1. Xerve
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Posts: 3,491
  5. Rep Power: 26179
sheesh.. honestly wouldn’t be surprised if all these companies trying to ride the WFH train change their mind in a year or so and employees getting screwed. I accepted a position that’s fully remote for a company who has never offered it until recently and it’s a bit worrisome.
post 1644702303 08-11-2021, 02:02 AM
-
#3
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 73,290
  7. Rep Power: 273505
Big tech is basically a phuck you enviornment.
post 1644702393 08-11-2021, 02:06 AM
-
#4
  1. MEDITATE
  2. cockroach indians
  1. MEDITATE
  2. cockroach indians
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Posts: 38,046
  5. Rep Power: 0
15% cut and a google employee earns an avergae of $10k to $15k a month, so theyll chop off $1500 to $2250 which these employees will end up paying for gas ,time wasted "commuting,lunch time,rest .. etc etc " so this is very normal for these huge companies.

peeps just like to make a big deal out of it
Cherish your life. Live to tell your story
post 1644702493 08-11-2021, 02:11 AM
-
#5
  1. IPoopStandingUp
  2. Registered User
  1. IPoopStandingUp
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Location: New Hampshire, United States
  5. Posts: 19,456
  6. Rep Power: 235404
Isn't working from home just demonstrating to the boss how easily you can be replaced by an Indian bodybuilding miscer for pennies on the dollar?
post 1644717863 08-11-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#6
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
The thing about this is that it mirrors government pay, which is a base flat rate and then high COL areas you get a boost. Now private industry has mirrored that instead of paying based on skill. All these WFH people are saying oh they shouldnt have to come into work if they can deliver the same product as they do in office but the company has decided to not pay them based on quality or output but on where they live, so holding back and retaining more profit on them if they live in the boondocks.

These people should be very worried in the future. We were just told nobody wants to work and its an employees market, blah blah blah but big tech just came and cucked them hard and according to the article all of them are doing it so not like you can just jump ship to a different company. The overlords can downsize their offices AND reduce your salary, THEY save money on both sides while you pay for your own electricity, space for your home office ect.

Then consider the mental effects of all of these people never leaving their houses and not getting as much social interaction and it will get worse when the company drops them for someone overseas.
post 1644718143 08-11-2021, 09:19 AM
-
#7
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 43,865
  6. Rep Power: 266599
First thing google has done I agree with. Back to work slackers
Toxic Masculinity
post 1644718353 08-11-2021, 09:22 AM
-
#8
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
Back to work, Nerds.
post 1644718533 08-11-2021, 09:25 AM
-
#9
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By Jasonw1178⏩
Back to work, Nerds.
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1644718553 08-11-2021, 09:25 AM
-
#10
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I pointed this out over a year ago, and everyone laughed.
Yup

lmao @ people thinking they can have their cake and eat it too, that chit will only last so long
post 1644718563 08-11-2021, 09:25 AM
-
#11
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
Work on Classified BS so I don't know what WFH even feels like SRS
𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω ₅₀/₁₉₅
𝕬𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝕮𝖚𝖙 𝕸𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝕽𝖆𝖈𝖊 ®
ᗪIᔕᑕᖇIᗰIᑎᗩTIOᑎ E᙭ᑕᒪᑌᔕIOᑎ IᑎᗪOᑕTᖇIᑎᗩTIOᑎ
post 1644718643 08-11-2021, 09:26 AM
-
#12
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By DesiredUser****⏩
Work on Classified BS so I don't know what WFH even feels like SRS
I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1644718783 08-11-2021, 09:27 AM
-
#13
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By elterrible987⏩
https://nypost.com/2021/08/10/google...s-by-up-to-25/


these cucks thought they could move from high COL areas and just work remote and earn the same pay.
Eh, I’ll side with Google on this one. The pay is proportional to where the employee is residing. Someone who lives in Stamford has a lower cost of living than someone in Manhattan. As long as the pay is proportional to the cost of living of what they were making in Manhattan then this is a non-issue.
post 1644719173 08-11-2021, 09:33 AM
-
#14
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme⏩
Eh, I’ll side with Google on this one. The pay is proportional to where the employee is residing. Someone who lives in Stamford has a lower cost of living than someone in Manhattan. As long as the pay is proportional to the cost of living of what they were making in Manhattan then this is a non-issue.
Cost of living is even lower in Mumbai
post 1644719303 08-11-2021, 09:35 AM
-
#15
  1. OntheClockNE
  2. Cornbrah
  1. OntheClockNE
  2. Cornbrah
  3. Join Date: Aug 2017
  4. Posts: 5,541
  5. Rep Power: 47948
Fiancé works for giant insurance company and took a 15% cut while working from home for a year. It wasn't that big of a deal, but she is back in the office now.
*MAGA crew*
Mod Neg Survivor
AP4C
<HTC>
*6'4" Crew*
*Misc. Old Geezer Crew - 54*
post 1644719403 08-11-2021, 09:36 AM
-
#16
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Wagie wagie get in cagie.
post 1644719413 08-11-2021, 09:36 AM
-
#17
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,504
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 412595
why though? doesnt it save employers $ long-term having less employees in office?
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1644719853 08-11-2021, 09:42 AM
-
#18
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By Destor⏩
Cost of living is even lower in Mumbai
Outsourcing was already tried in the early 2000’s and largely failed. There are communication barriers (language, time zones) and cultural differences that made it difficult for offshore teams to deliver effectively for stakeholders. That’s from a microeconomic perspective.

From a macroeconomic perspective, if more companies move offshore, that leaves the labor at home without jobs. No jobs, the citizens start to become poor. Citizens start to clamor for politicians that will support protectionist policies. Offshoring becomes illegal.

The only people that need be worried are city workers whose jobs could be moved out of state to a cheaper cost of living locations like Kansas.

^wizard Anachron beat me to the last point.
post 1644719973 08-11-2021, 09:43 AM
-
#19
  1. sfgiants13
  2. Էպշտեյնը իրեն չսպանեց
  1. sfgiants13
  2. Էպշտեյնը իրեն չսպանեց
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 12,532
  6. Rep Power: 88624
Good. This will keep those leftist cucks in their garbage tech utopias. Tired of them ruining everywhere they go.
post 1644720103 08-11-2021, 09:45 AM
-
#20
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I finally got to be Gandalf.
Lol and you beat my edit to give you the props.
post 1644720113 08-11-2021, 09:45 AM
-
#21
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,504
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 412595
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
With people moving to lower COL areas, they now realize that if they aren't even local, why not hire people from those lower COL at a lower salary.

It's not outsourcing to India people have to worry about - it's outsourcing to lower COL areas within the country.
now that makes sense

guess lower col brahs will remain victorious yet again compared to citycels
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1644720213 08-11-2021, 09:47 AM
-
#22
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme⏩
Eh, I’ll side with Google on this one. The pay is proportional to where the employee is residing. Someone who lives in Stamford has a lower cost of living than someone in Manhattan. As long as the pay is proportional to the cost of living of what they were making in Manhattan then this is a non-issue.
Does the employee in manhattan produce more?


WFHcels say that it shouldnt matter if they are in the office or where they are as long as their work is the same. THey also say their quality of work is much better than foreigners so they arent worried their job would be axed. But the company only pays on location not quality of work.....
post 1644720243 08-11-2021, 09:48 AM
-
#23
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme⏩
Outsourcing was already tried in the early 2000’s and largely failed. There are communication barriers (language, time zones) and cultural differences that made it difficult for offshore teams to deliver effectively for stakeholders. That’s from a microeconomic perspective.

From a macroeconomic perspective, if more companies move offshore, that leaves the labor at home without jobs. No jobs, the citizens start to become poor. Citizens start to clamor for politicians that will support protectionist policies. Offshoring becomes illegal.

The only people that need be worried are city workers whose jobs could be moved out of state to a cheaper cost of living locations like Kansas.

^wizard Anachron beat me to the last point.
Really? look at outsourced jobs from 2000s compared to today. Have they increased or decreased?


And the second sentence there, makes the assumption that politicians deliver on their campaign promises...... lmfao

Some senators been in office 30 fuking years and are still hot garbage.
post 1644720393 08-11-2021, 09:49 AM
-
#24
  1. Merc009
  2. Broscience Engineer
  1. Merc009
  2. Broscience Engineer
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 18,007
  7. Rep Power: 31601
Im with google on this one. Who the fuk makes permanent decisions based off a temporary lockdown?

Get back to work slackers
-Some people say good things come to those who wait, truth is, good things come to those who work..... who work later.....who work harder...... who are willing to go further than anyone else to get them. If you're waiting for good things to come to you, you'll be waiting for a pretty long time.

-I'd rather live life saying "I failed" than "I could have"
post 1644720663 08-11-2021, 09:53 AM
-
#25
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme⏩
Outsourcing was already tried in the early 2000’s and largely failed. There are communication barriers (language, time zones) and cultural differences that made it difficult for offshore teams to deliver effectively for stakeholders. That’s from a microeconomic perspective.

From a macroeconomic perspective, if more companies move offshore, that leaves the labor at home without jobs. No jobs, the citizens start to become poor. Citizens start to clamor for politicians that will support protectionist policies. Offshoring becomes illegal.

The only people that need be worried are city workers whose jobs could be moved out of state to a cheaper cost of living locations like Kansas.

^wizard Anachron beat me to the last point.
Yehhhh that was mostly me being facetious


Although my current company has an employee who traveled to India during the pandemic and wasn't able to come back, so he's working remotely from his parent's place there while still being under the payroll etc of a Canadian company. But I don't know the specifics of how it's all set up, and that still wouldn't address the issue of local workers.


Maybe Indian companies will begin outsourcing jobs here
post 1644720743 08-11-2021, 09:55 AM
-
#26
  1. TuskV
  2. Registered User
  1. TuskV
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,373
  6. Rep Power: 19256
Libs v Libs.

Love it
Trump 2024

Adopt Don't Shop
post 1644720853 08-11-2021, 09:57 AM
-
#27
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 25,599
  6. Rep Power: 44521
it makes sense. why?

cuz if u have employeses in bum**** nowhere - why are you pay8ing them $100k? when someone from mthat area will work easily for $80k? When u work remote, u now compete with others who work remote.

it's simple economics.

The reason u get paid a lot is because u agree to deal with traffic, dressing up, etc. to come in to work. That means u only compete with others in ur area for that job.

and yeah. outsourcinmg to cheaper areas/countries was all the rage but was a complete disaster. The cheaper workers offshore were god awful, time difference and delivered such garbage work - cuz those indian comapnies literally hire the cheapest workers possible with fake resumes.
Ur livign expense are super low now so shouldn't affect u. Or agree to come in 2x a week and save ur salary.
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.

Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
post 1644720893 08-11-2021, 09:58 AM
-
#28
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  1. MuscleXtreme
  2. INTJ - Christian
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 28,256
  6. Rep Power: 93116
Originally Posted By elterrible987⏩
Does the employee in manhattan produce more?


WFHcels say that it shouldnt matter if they are in the office or where they are as long as their work is the same. THey also say their quality of work is much better than foreigners so they arent worried their job would be axed. But the company only pays on location not quality of work.....
Company pays on skills (hard and soft skills) and proportionally adjust based on location.

Why do you think people in San Francisco get paid more than people in Omaha? It’s because housing, food, utilities, are more expensive in San Francisco than in Omaha. If companies didn’t adjust their salaries while wanting people to be a commutable distance to the office, then people wouldn’t work at those companies because it would not be worth their time.

So if the job pays a $100k as a baseline, then there will be a location factor associated based on cost of living. So that $100k is equivalent to $200k in San Francisco, but $95k in Omaha. However, the purchasing power is about equal for both the person in SF and Omaha.
post 1644720953 08-11-2021, 09:59 AM
-
#29
  1. suave2000
  1. suave2000
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Peru
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 29,109
  7. Subscribers: 2
  8. Rep Power: 12068
lol @ being a wage cuck. It's all about being a part of the self employed mastaerace. Imagine working for one of those tech companies ughhh. Fuk em employees should just go on strike and cuck them back
post 1644721203 08-11-2021, 10:02 AM
-
#30
  1. suave2000
  1. suave2000
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Peru
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 29,109
  7. Subscribers: 2
  8. Rep Power: 12068
Originally Posted By MuscleXtreme⏩
Company pays on skills (hard and soft skills) and proportionally adjust based on location.

Why do you think people in San Francisco get paid more than people in Omaha? It’s because housing, food, utilities, are more expensive in San Francisco than in Omaha. If companies didn’t adjust their salaries while wanting people to be a commutable distance to the office, then people wouldn’t work at those companies because it would not be worth their time.

So if the job pays a $100k as a baseline, then there will be a location factor associated based on cost of living. So that $100k is equivalent to $200k in San Francisco, but $95k in Omaha. However, the purchasing power is about equal for both the person in SF and Omaha.
Let's not forget that:



Why should they punish their employees when they've just given them boooooming profits?
"Hey wage cuck thanks for giving us more money than ever despite the cuckdemick, so go fuk yourself here's a paycut for ya even tho you've been saving me millions in utility costs while yours have been increasing from working from home"

fuk em
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts