InB4 it's claimed to be a bit pharma conspiracy theory

good thing its a video, ivermectincels cant read

Effective treatment for COVID = No emergency use authorization for vaccines by FDA

Guess why there won't be any approved treatments.

What an incredibly dishonest video. They started with their conclusion, then cherry-picked "facts" to support that conclusion.

No scientist in the world can honestly say "Ivermectin doesn't work on COVID". The research on that isn't close to complete or comprehensive. Anyone who would say that has an ulterior motive and can't be trusted. The truth is we don't know. We have anecdotes and some preliminary results that suggest it may be and some that it may not be. People who are using it are simply gambling that it might. If it doesn't, it's not harmful or expensive, so not a big deal.

Why this antagonizes the left so badly says a lot about the people on the left.

present us with your prospective double-blind studies then to counter the video

63 studies on the efficacy of ivermectin:

https://ivmmeta.com/


don't need to watch the (((video))). already discredited by having a horse picture on it.

another internet doctor who is also an internet epidemiologist. didn't click

is that not what we are doing with the vaccine that is now mandatory, which I remind you did NOT win a nobel prize in 2015?

Weird how the anti-science vaccine side has done a complete back-flip since Covid

used to be the anti-vaxxers that were retarded and ignored science, now it's the opposite

Taking a neutral approach but it’s just not acceptable to point out random studies. You can probably find a random studies supporting anything you want medically wise

It takes someone who can analyze the way the study was conducted. A lot of bodybuilding nutrition people do that.. Lyle McDonald, Alan Aragon, Layne Norton to name a few

Usually the public is wrong on these, for example aspartame which trusted experts picked apart certain studies, examining pointing out that cancer causing studies was at such a high dose it was physically impossible to consume from the amount contained in Diet Coke

At the same plenty of doctors will say it causes cancer which is verifiably false

I will say it’s pretty hard to trust the “experts” on Covid. Personally I’m not convinced it works but don’t care who wants to take it. If they didn’t push back so hard it wouldn’t be that interesting and I think it’s stupid for them to do so

/thread

do you know the story behind the study the FDA used to say natural immunity was not as good as the vaccine?

They took a group of people about 250 i think
200 had covid at some point in the past 2 years
50 had the vaccine, and got it sometime in the past 3 months

now as we know, Immunity to Covid wanes over time with

So first HUGE error here, invalidating the whole study, is you have people who had 10 times the exposure time and 10 times the amount of time for their immunity to wear off

The result was, and I kid you not the wording they use TWICE as many people who had natural immunity got covid again as people who got the vaccine, thus showing the vaccine is better protection. This is done through manipulating the way statistics are used and how a level of significance is calculated in order to make a result and conclusion statement.

To make it even better I believe the amount of people reinfected was something like 10 in the covid group vs 5 in the vaccine group, so in actuality the %'s of people reinfected was lower int he natural immunity group.



BUT this was the study the FDA used.

if ivermectin is the silver bullet for covid that would be amazing, but i couldnt help notice this in the opening