Double vaxxed

It's over for me

Same here. I'm moving my investments around so that I can be liquid enough in a year or two to keep myself comfortable while I'm dying of AIDS along with, you know, several billion other people on the planet.

Protein spiking. Covfefe.

Lmao at


1.) I’m getting the injection so I won’t have to worry about covid anymore and we can all get back to normal

2.) Don’t care if I can still get and spread covid, at least I can go get drunk in a bar

3.) I’m still glad I got it because now they’ll let me keep my job

4.) I don’t mind getting boosters because they probably won’t cause any serious damage






In less than a year we’ve gone from “let’s all get it and put this whole nightmare behind us” to “I’ll get two injections per year because it’s not like they’ll kill me or anything”. Mind blown at the demoralization.

Why? I know doctors and nurses IRL who support it.

Even Trump is vaxxed.

I only see the negatives about the vax on the Misc which makes me wonder where Miscers are from. No one has given me an ounce of proof about the long-term effects of the vaccine because no one knows.

I’m dependent on ****** and back in the 60s it was known as “mother’s little helper”. No one knew it was addictive then.

It’s all a risk.

So big pharma fukked you once with ****** and your reasoning is they won’t do that again.
Fukkin ded.

well apart from the reports and studies from hundreds of top scientists and doctors . a number of whom are Nobel prize winners that point out the fallacies and weakness of this crap that fades away in months and who knows what the long term impacts will be

but still fella you just enjoy the delusion that the companies and people making money off this chit have your best interests at heart and have a squeaky clean record in all that they do .............

This post is another perfect example of vaccine remorse. It’s ok gordo. I’m sure the boosters are safe long term and frequently.

Ya she continuously politicizes the vaccine because she doesn't realize it's gone way past that and it's good vs evil now, and then in the same post admits she's a dopehead dependent on benzos - no wonder she trusts big pharma - they're her pusher.

She's a lost soul now who probably pops those things before any activity. Lmfao literally the COPIUM PEPE IMAGE.

Not worth responding to her posts anymore.

The vax doesn't protect you from catching COVID and it doesn't prevent you from spreading COVID.

You've been scammed into taking something that really has very little benefit, and lots of potential long term risk.

These vaccines are therapeutics. IF you catch COVID while your antibody levels from the vaccines are high, THEN you are less likely to have severe symptoms. That's it. That's the whole "benefit" of these vaccines. Since the antibody levels drop off quickly, after a few months you need a booster to bring them back up. If you never catch COVID, these vaccines will end up being pointless for you.

We have other treatments for the disease as well. Zinc. Vitamin D. Ivermectin. etc. All taken in the early stages will have the same (or better) effect on battling COVID. None of them fukc around with your RNA. There's just no need for these vaccines now (if there ever was).

The vaccines are about CONTROL. Needing to show proof is about CONTROL. Restricting freedoms as a result of vaccine passports is about CONTROL.

Bumped for J.L.C. Whom asked for evidence, yet vanished when presented such..on a side note every jabbed girl I know (4 total) has had a miscarriage post inoculation.


Don’t know any that have had one that did not get the jab& beat Covid naturally.
But hey that’s anecdotal, we’ll ignore the thousands of VAERS reports & studies showing the proof of this.

Sometimes I sleep.

The miscarriage misinterpretation has been debunked enough times.

As has your VAERS copypasta.

My request was for cases of impotence and amenorrhea rather than a theoretical possibility. It's the same with ADE, where are the cases? After millions of doses, we should be seeing a high incidence.

just like herpes up he pops again LOL

Anecdotal examples of doctors and nurses 'IRL' isn't evidence, most are bought and paid for and just peddle the narrative set out by big pharma.

Why is Trump being drafted into this debate? Don't really care either way if he's had it.

You only see negative about it on here because this isn't a platform which has been twisted by algorithms to force a specific narrative i.e. like all big tech platforms. Freedom of speech is more prevalent here. It shouldn't matter where people are from, although in chit holes like California you're not very likely to meet people who possess any amount of critical thought, they're all too busy watching CNN and thinking up ways to lets dudes use the ladies bathroom.

You want proof of long term effects? That's precisely the argument, there isn't any. The burden of proof is on those who are manufacturing and distributing these vaccines to show that they are safe. They cannot do that. It's not the other way round to just take an experimental drug and then just assume its safe because there's no data proving otherwise - that makes zero sense its laughable.

The only data we can go from is that the survival rate for Covid is overwhelmingly high, we don't need an experimental drug to combat this. The vaccine itself poses far greater risk than the supposed virus, just look into VAERS and the hundreds of thousands of adverse events that have been reported. Anyone who can think for themselves would surely look at this and determine that the benefit to risk ratio is simply not there.

*Who

More accurate would be:
Pro-shot: sitting infront of a TV being spoonfed information from the MSM.

Skeptical of covid shot: doing their own research, for better or worse.

Or you could just have the woman in the lab coat for both, as there are researchers and scientists on both sides of the argument.

If doctors and nurses don't publicly support the vaccine it can cost them their career. Many medical providers may not actually research the topic and could just buy into the official message. The ones that don't know that they are living under a kind of gag order.https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...misinformation

This doctor:

- is vaccinated
- is not "anti-vax"
- spoke in favor of ivermectin and against the vaccine mandate

Fired for spreading "misinformation".90% of US media [this includes social media platforms] is owned by Vanguard and BlackRock.

Little more to the story but it’s fun to be outraged right?

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/mar...nts-texas/#app

“ and while Bowden told the hospital she was vaccinated, she emailed patients saying she would only treat the unvaccinated, the representative said. ”

There was nothing on our local news that indicated the doctor would "only treat unvaccinated patients".

From your link:Oh, wait. She is planning to takenew patientsthat are not vaccinated because they may not be able to be seen by other practices.

It doesn't say anything about "refusing to treat" her existing patients.

I'm not outraged, it was just a handy example because I saw the story while I was drinking my morning coffee.

“Debunked” all the reports & studies are now debunked..according to whom exactly?

I gave you Studies & actutal Case verifications, please explain how it is debunked.

Your debunks have been debunked by actual data.

Try again


Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons

See Page 8 / (p2280 of full volume journal):

Spontaneous abortion: <20 wk
Background expected / Published Incidence 10–26%
THEIR RESULTS: 104/827 ‡

THE PAYLOAD IS IN THE FOOTNOTES.
The 104 miscarriages here happened in the first 20 weeks.
700 of the 827 women had their FIRST DOSE in the third trimester!
(This leaves 127 women, of whom 104 had a miscarriage)


https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983

Okay, I'll post the same thing I posted last time:


The paper, titled "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons," was published by the New England Journal of Medicine on June 17. It was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team.

The authors used data from pregnant women who received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines and submitted reports to three different federal reporting systems that monitor vaccine safety.

Researchers contacted 3,958 women, who had enrolled in the pregnancy registry, about three months after their vaccination.

They found that 712 had given birth to healthy babies, 104 experienced miscarriages and one case resulted in a stillbirth. Induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy happened in 10 cases. The rest of the participants — over 3,100 — were either still pregnant or had not yet completed follow-ups with the authors.

The results showed a miscarriage rate of 12.6% out of the 827 pregnancies evaluated, which is comparable with the average miscarriage rate of 10 - 20%. (Some experts believe this figure may be higher.)

The 12.6% miscarriage rate only reflects the completed pregnancies the authors knew about at the time of the paper’s publication.

The catch, the claim’s proponents say, is that 700 of those 827 pregnant women received the vaccine when they were already in their third trimester, a point in pregnancy when fetuses are far more developed and miscarriage is less common. so, they changed the denominator by excluding those 700 to calculate a new miscarriage rate of about 82%. other social media posts have put it as high as 84%.

The quoted rate of 84% is not the miscarriage rate. It just tells us that we can't go from the first trimester to giving birth to a healthy baby in three months. Which most folks already know.

Footnotes, for reference:
"Data on pregnancy loss are based on 827 participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry who received an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, and who reported a completed pregnancy."

"A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester. Data on neonatal outcomes are based on 724 live-born infants, including 12 sets of multiples."

"A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation."


erm..the paper says "Published Incidence 10–26%"
ok. BUT we are talking 104/127 miscarriages.
that's over 80%.

Regarding the published correction:

Correcting “3,598” to “3,958” in paragraph nine. correcting the total number of women who had their vaccine in the first or second trimester from “1,714 and 1,019” to “1,132 and 1,714” in paragraph 15. subsequently correcting miscarriage rate among this group from “3.8% (104 out of 2,733)” to “3.65% (104 out of 2,846)” in paragraph 17

The preliminary report used data collected through the centers for disease prevention and control (cdc) v-safe registry which collects information from those who have received a pfizer-biontech or moderna covid-19 vaccine while pregnant.

with a sample of 3,958 women who were pregnant and had also received a covid-19 vaccine, the authors subsequently conducted a follow-up two to three months later. initial data had been collected and a limited number of follow-ups had been made by the time the preliminary study was released.

Of the 3,958 participants, 827 had what the study defines as a ‘completed pregnancy’. this term includes those who either had a baby (what the authors call a ‘live birth’), or those who suffered from a miscarriage or still birth (termed ‘pregnancy loss’ in the study). the rest were either still pregnant or a follow-up had not yet been made by the time the preliminary analysis had been released.

Of the 827 women who had a completed pregnancy, 104 had a miscarriage. therefore, the authors calculate that of the completed pregnancies, there was a 12.6% rate of miscarriage. (this was calculated with just those who had a completed pregnancy by the time the preliminary study had been released.)

Some of the social media posts say the rate of miscarriage should have been calculated differently. they say that miscarriage generally only occurs in the first or second trimester while a stillbirth is a loss after the 20th week of pregnancy and, therefore, the rate of miscarriage should only be calculated using figures of the women who had a vaccine in the first or second trimester and not the third.

by excluding the 700 (of 827 completed pregnancies) who had the vaccine in the last trimester, the 127 remaining becomes the denominator and the rate equates to 81.9%.

This is misleading as it exempts most of the women who took part in the study, who were either still pregnant or waiting for a follow-up.

The 127 pregnancies were those that had been completed by the time the preliminary analysis had been conducted and who had their vaccine in the first or second trimester – not the total number of women who had their vaccine in the first or second trimester (1,132 and 1,714, respectively).

The outcomes of many of the pregnancies that were part of the preliminary cdc study are not yet known – as many were still pregnant.

While obviously misleading, pushing this narrative is apparently "intellectually honest" because it may encourage people to avoid covid vaccines.

“The outcomes of many of the pregnancies that were part of the preliminary cdc study are not yet known – as many were still pregnant.”






...104/127 miscarriages.





that's over 80%.

Okay

if u get medical info from the thegatewaypundit - i don't know what to say.

I know we’re not all doctors here, but does anybody know if there is risk of ADE for people that were infected with COVID before getting the shot?

It seems like most of the theories/science on ADE deals with people who got the shot, but weren’t infected previously. Isn’t there a chance that if you already have natural defenses, that your body would also implement those and not just the antibodies that were a result from the vaccine? I haven’t been able to find any studies or articles on this

Fuk all this chit.

ADE doesn't appear to be occurring.