Can't seem to find it anywhere.

trust the science bro...not the data

As far as I know, re-infections don’t exist. I could be wrong though.

But who was South Africa?

What does it matter anyways...

Omnicron is a live vaccine....

Because people keep saying antibodies are ineffective compared to the vaccine and it's blatantly not true and it would be nice to have some data to back it up.

No. No one has the real data for anything about this scam because they lie to us on both sides.

This paper specifically looked at severity of disease in reinfection:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2108120


"Reinfection was defined as the first PCR-positive swab obtained at least 90 days after the primary infection."

"Of 1304 identified reinfections, 413 (31.7%) were caused by the B.1.351 variant, 57 (4.4%) by the B.1.1.7 variant, 213 (16.3%) by “wild-type” virus, and 621 (47.6%) were of unknown status."

"For reinfected persons, the median time between first infection and reinfection was 277 days (interquartile range, 179 to 315). The odds of severe disease at reinfection were 0.12 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.31) that at primary infection (Table 1). There were no cases of critical disease at reinfection and 28 cases at primary infection (Table S3), for an odds ratio of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.64). There were no cases of death from Covid-19 at reinfection and 7 cases at primary infection, resulting in an odds ratio of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00 to 2.57). The odds of the composite outcome of severe, critical, or fatal disease at reinfection were 0.10 times (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.25) that at primary infection. "

Severe disease and death are much less likely in cases of reinfection than in cases of primary infection, which makes sense.

Vaccinated folks were excluded from the analysis.

Not much out there but this article talks about a study. Pre-Omicron cold. I'm surprised this one slipped through CNN's lib fear filter.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/24/healt...rer/index.html

"'When you have only 1,300 reinfections among that many people, and four cases of severe disease, that's pretty remarkable,' said John Alcorn, an expert in immunology"

Typical nonsensical response ignoring any actual evidence by a moron.

Get fukked.

Sorry, those are the data. A lot people consider data to be evidence. Here's the sourcehttps://covid19-sciencetable.ca/onta...cinationstatus

I also shared an article that specifically looked at risk of severe disease from reinfection.

There's no need to be upset.

Here's the breakdown from the study:



Covid-deaths were rare across the board as was fatal disease.

No.

Until a few weeks ago reinfections were extremely rare.
In the US the CDC has completely screwed up accuracy of vaccination data and have had to admit it publicly.

YupI dunno if you were addressing me, but I didn't say anything about vaccination after infection.

Here's one that gets at the question more directly:

https://ncrc.jhsph.edu/research/comp...gh-infections/


"This study compared the frequency of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19 disease, hospitalizations and deaths between individuals with three types of immunity:
1) SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals who received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine by February 28, 2021 (vaccinated group);
2) people with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to February 28, 2021 that had not been vaccinated at all by August 14 (natural immunity group); and
3) previously infected people who received one dose of Pfizer vaccine by May 25, 2021 (7 days before the study period began; infection-vaccine group)."

"Overall, infections were very rare in all of the groups studied, and only 1.5% or less of study participants were infected in any of the analysis groups, regardless of how immunity was derived;

there were no deaths in any group."

My search term was: "death from breakthrough versus reinfection"

How do those look if you standardize the population sizes?

Missed your post that actually pertained to my question.

Sorry, it's a few posts above:

COVID is not causing illness in anyone, COVID is a lie, any stats about a lie means the stats are a lie

People are getting the flu, woopty do, nothing has changed except previously healthy people are now getting heart attacks, clots and myocarditis in growing numbers

Fuk off

No, they don't. Because "unvaccinated" extended to anyone that isn't +2 weeks past their second shot. The way the data is being collected is manipulated. On top of that, data for these sorts of things is usually only 1% - 10% of the true figures. We'll see in 5 - 10 years if the jab was a money laundering scheme and initiation of a Social Credit Score / Climate Credit score, a global genocide that will kill millions, or BOTH.

No. There’s no data for a reason