HR: we need to know your vaxx status
Me: I refuse to answer
HR: you can't refuse! OSHA! REEE!
Me: take a lucky guess
HR: you can write us a letter
Me: non-committal noises
HR: thanks, bye

So, should I write 'em a letter? What to say? Or ignore them?

I won't submit to testing, so I will be fired eventually if the mandates stand because our company contracts with the federal government.

but whom was hippaa


i wouldnt let em strong arm u cause ugive me an cm they take a m

It's none of their business.

Was the "OSHA" mandate actually passed....dont think it was.

It's currently at the Supreme Court for review.

If it passes, you will either get vaxed or submit to testing or lose your job. The fines for non-compliance are substantial and a huge liability to your employer.

HIPPA is about protecting others information - and this has been said over and over for like half a year or more now. So you’re either a retard or deliberately spreading disinformation - or both.

Tell them you are Catholic and the vaccine is against your belief system. Copypasta a letter like this:

To Whom It May Concern,

I am a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including myself, to decline certain vaccines.

The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious basis on which a Catholic may determine that he or she ought to refuse certain vaccines:

Vaccination is not morally obligatory in principle and so must be voluntary.
There is a moral duty to refuse the use of medical products, including certain vaccines, that are created using human cells lines derived from abortion; however, it is permissible to use such vaccines only under case-specific conditions—if there are no other alternatives available and the intent is to preserve life.
A person’s assessment of whether the benefits of a medical intervention outweigh the undesirable side-effects are to be respected unless they contradict authoritative Catholic moral teachings.
A person is morally required to obey his or her conscience.
A Catholic may judge it wrong to receive certain vaccines for a variety of reasons consistent with these teachings, and there is no authoritative Church teaching universally obliging Catholics to receive any vaccine. An individual Catholic may invoke Church teaching to refuse a vaccine that used abortion-derived cell lines at any stage of the creation of the vaccine. More generally, a Catholic might refuse a vaccine based on the Church’s teachings concerning therapeutic proportionality. Therapeutic proportionality is an assessment of whether the benefits of a medical intervention outweigh the undesirable side-effects and burdens in light of the integral good of the person, including spiritual, psychological, and bodily goods. The judgment of therapeutic proportionality must be made by the person who is the potential recipient of the intervention, not by public health authorities or by other individuals who might judge differently in their own situations.

The Catholic Bishops of the United States have affirmed this in two letters dated December 14, 2020 and March 17, 2021, concerning COVID-19 vaccines, stating:

“The bishops of the United States affirm that the use of some COVID-19 vaccines is morally acceptable under certain circumstances…. However, if individuals have serious moral objections or health concerns about vaccines, those concerns should be respected by society and government, and those individuals should not be forced into vaccination, contrary to their conscience. The government should not impose the COVID-19 vaccines on its citizens.”

Furthermore, the free-exercise clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment requires state accommodation of individuals who object to vaccinations on religious grounds. Government neutrality also requires religious accommodation when the state offers secular exemptions, which is the case in the United States for medical and non-medical exemptions and exemptions through the Americans with Disabilities Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Vaccination is not a universal obligation and a person must obey his or her own conscience. Therefore, if a Catholic comes to an informed judgment that he or she should not receive a vaccine, then the Catholic Church requires that the person follow this judgment of conscience and refuse the vaccine. The Catechism is clear: “Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. ‘He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters.’”

Sincerely,_________________________________

If that ^^ doesn't work, tell them to go fuk themselves.

The Pope says the vaccine is fine

Mine said it was mandatory to answer 3 months ago I’ve ignored every email, for months. They ain’t doing sht cause they’d lose 70%+ of their sales staff and they won’t have their cushion corporate jobs

They don't give a **** about any privacy laws.

I'm extremely stubborn, so I won't make it easy.They're preparing in case it does.Maybe I will copy and paste the preamble to the Constitution instead.That may be true, but I will not be violated on a weekly basis by some corporation at the behest of the federal government to prove that I am clean.

The Pope also says abortion is murder and yet Biden and Pelosi claim to practicing Catholics.. People tend to pick and choose which parts of a religion they want to follow.
The reason for the letter to HR has nothing to do with religion, so much as it has to do with forcing OP's company to decide how much capital they wish to expend fighting OP.
Truthfully, OP's suggestion of emailing a copy of the Constitution is probably a better idea. No government or company should have any say over who gets an untested and still not FDA approved, vaccine.
It's nobody's business.

I don't work from home, so they will have an easy time accosting me in person.

Vaxx status I understand

But why not take the tests?

Just ignore them, what are the repercussions?They are invasive and pointless

lmao.

ignore til fired. get unemployment.

find new job when the "vaccine" is found to be dangerous for your demographic due to myocarditis.

Getting vaxxed 9th
It's either that or retire early

Nyc

I’d take the test but I’d never get the shot. If my company ever starts this I capable of going back to my roots and starting my own business working with my hands. Which I miss a lot sometimes.

Op drag it out as long as possible and make them fire you. Just don’t quit. Find every hurdle possible to make them jump through. This is all against HIPAA law anyway and shouldn’t be legal to begin with. We have a weak ass administration atm though so they’re more concerned about trannys feelings than what’s law.

Tell them it is top secret classified.

I don’t work from home either, don’t give in. If they fire you there is so many other places hiring and I personally wouldn’t work for a company that would terminate you for that. You don’t live to work at that one single job

You gunna get fired bru.......

HIPAA (that’s how it’s spelled btw)
“The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient's consent or knowledge”.

He’s that patient, the clot shot status is his personal medical information. He doesn’t want to disclose it to his employer (a 3rd party). You’re the retard ol chap. Honk honk.

why won't you submit to testing?

edit: nvm saw your post #11

Its vaxx or weekly testing... here what weekly testing can turn into in a matter of days.

-employee has to pay
-all testing must be done in person
-restrict testing sites to few locations
-allow typical bureaucracy to turn a 5 minute test into a weekly DMV experience
-alter the tests so that more people spike positive (see pcr testing)
-every positive means 5 days no work
-make it so that you aren't paid for those 5 days because its your choice to go unvaxxed
-increase the price of the tests until its crippling middle class

They are already being sneaky with vax passports causing maximum inconvenience for the unvaxxed. They dare not stop essential chit like airports, hospitals, gas, groceries because they know people will burn it down. So they make it as hard as possible to resist. Same concept will apply to testing mandates. Manipulate the system to cause mass inconvenience to have people comply easier. You have to draw the line somewhere, some did it with masks, some will do it with their 4th booster, some will walk willingly into the labor camps waving their 7th booster stamp loud and proud.


OP, just don't reply. HR texted me asking if I'm vaxxed. Left her on read with no reply. Saw her in person that day, didn't bring it up. That's was 2 months ago. They all know they are in deep legal trouble if they have one fuk up. Ignore all their attempts and wait until you are in a chair looking at the guy who signs your checks to answer any personal medical questions.

tell them it is private business

Good luck OP. Vry srs.

OSHA mandate is held up in court. They even say on their website that they can't legally enforce it.

Never been swabbed. Pureblood assemble

The only reason this isn’t a hippa violation is because of this bs administration. The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine to fit this shot that isn’t a vaccine. Only a true retard couldn’t put this together. This far into the ‘pandemic’ and smooth brains are still being sheep.

meh, the only reason this isn't a hipaa violation is because no one violated hipaa. They asked him about his information. He can consent or not. That is on him. They are allowed to ask.


As far as lying about it after OP told them get fugged, that is just a chitty way to treat employees, but again, not a hipaa violation.