No, the whole thing HAS NOT become "do you follow Fauci or Malone" however you appear to want to drive the conversation in that direction to promote a false equivalence that "both sides are equally bad".

That's a bald faced lie.

Fauci has been the source of public health policies that have likely at least done as much harm as good. Fauci has promoted an experimental vaccine using fear tactics and now even giving some support for justifying mandates.

Malone has shared his experience and opinions regarding said public health policies and the experimental injections. He has spoken out in support of early treatment with various existing drugs. He has spoken on the risks of the injections, both known and potential.

Malone hasn't done anything that has directly affected government policy. He hasn't compelled people to do anything.

If Fauci had no power and was also merely speaking to small groups of physicians and doing interviews here and there then you might be able to consider them somewhat equivalent. Though if Fauci were still promoting universal injections with no informed consent of the patient and no risk benefit analysis I would still consider him unethical as such actions have been illegal for some time.

There is no in between position. You are for democracy or totalitarianism.

None of this matters - most people are fcking moronic useless sacks of panic-ridden chit incapable of reasoning beyond what the TV tells them.

Out of curiosity, what things has Malone said that you think is bullsh!t? Don’t need a laundry list, maybe just 5 or so things that he claims which you consider bullsh!t?


When you say “they keep up fighting against each other so nobody is looking at them”, who are you referring to when you say “them”?

No, the whole thing HAS NOT become "do you follow Fauci or Malone" however you appear to want to drive the conversation in that direction to promote a false equivalence that "both sides are equally bad".

That's a bald faced lie.

Fauci has been the source of public health policies that have likely at least done as much harm as good. Fauci has promoted an experimental vaccine using fear tactics and now even giving some support for justifying mandates.

Malone has shared his experience and opinions regarding said public health policies and the experimental injections. He has spoken out in support of early treatment with various existing drugs. He has spoken on the risks of the injections, both known and potential.

Malone hasn't done anything that has directly affected government policy. He hasn't compelled people to do anything.

If Fauci had no power and was also merely speaking to small groups of physicians and doing interviews here and there then you might be able to consider them somewhat equivalent. Though if Fauci were still promoting universal injections with no informed consent of the patient and no risk benefit analysis I would still consider him unethical as such actions have been illegal for some time.

There is no in between position. You are for democracy or totalitarianism.

His gaslighting trying to pit Fauci vs Malone is ridiculous. Fauci has been at the forefront of the “pandemic” since day 1. Most people didn’t know who Malone was until yesterday. Actually, most people still don’t know who he is.