Sillie,

Why do you and every other lib I see on Twitter think that Covid is a death sentence?

I’ve yet to meet anyone that went to the hospital over Covid. These are the unvaccinated I’m referring to. Including myself. I had big bad delta and it kept me in bed for 1-2 days.

Healthy under 50 statistics are hard for libs.

Vaccine injuries are pretty easy to prove. Especially in the young and healthy. But I'm sure a 30 year old women going into menopause is perfectly normal. Or a 25 year old athlete having a heart attack is fine.

Its because they're obese diabetic drinkers/smokers. You'd be terrified too

I don't know anyone that thinks it's a death sentence...BUT if your 1 in 1,000 chance hits, you're phuked if your not vaxxed. Why do you wear seatbelts? Compared to all the times you're in a car, the liklihood of being in an accident is tiny. Hell, like only 40k people die in car accidents yet we have to wear seat belts, all cars have to have air bags, etc.

I fixed your post assuming he doesnt have 3+ comorbidities

Seat belt efficacy was proven long ago, which is why they dont require an EUA

This fukin dolt thinks wearing a seatbelt carries the same risk as an experimental gene therapy given under EUA.

Libs gonna lib.

You think your odds of getting sick from covid are 1 in 100,000? Can you show your work?

Oh is that what you meant by 'phucked'? Getting sick?

I have a runny nose right now, guess I'm phucked

40k adverse events reported to VAERS, which under reports by a factor of at least 10 based on studies done. No distinguishable difference in spread or hospitalization amongst vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations when compared based on demographics.

But you get this sweet passport that says you're a better citizen than those unvaxed plebs. Totally worth it.

wearing a seat belt isnt going to potentially give you periocarditis, myocarditis or blood clots you simp

Lol this

Neither will the jab. In fact, seatbelts likely cause far more harm than the jab has. You peeps are all down the CT rabbit hole aren't you?

SAD

Virtually all patients hospitalzied and dying from covid are the dirty unvaxxed. Almost no boosted bloods seeing serious consequences.

But that's right you think covid is fake and just the flu. Never mind those extra million americans dead. They'd have died shortly anyway...SMH

Not everyone carries the same level of risk of covid, of course. The vast majority of people have little to fear, for example. In other cases, it's actually quite a bit deadlier than 1/1,000 (in some very elderly age groups: over 20% mortality rate iirc).

Here is the problem with the vaccine: The protection, such as it is, is very temporary. Why it might offer some level of protection initially, over time it is negated.

With that in mind, there are groups of people more at risk of the rare known side effects of the vaccine than any level of protection it offers. Do you disagree? If my risk is X and the vaccine potentially mitigates that risk for 3 months, what about the rest of my life? I have to measure that limited time I am protected against X vs the rare potential of known side effects and the possible unknown negative side effects which may happen with this rather untested gene therapy.

Specifically, myself: My risk based solely on age is something like 0.4% mortality rate. As I have no comorbidities and am not obese, we can drastically reduce that right then and there. I also have natural immunity and re-infection is quite rare. I can only speculate by my best guess of my actual threat currently -- more like 0.0002% or less.

So, to risk possible myocarditis (a known danger) and potential long-term unknown damage, I get 3ish months of protection which lower my ~0.0002% threat of mortality to like ~0.00002%.

Why would I do this? Why should anyone mandate I do this? I don't think heart issues are common with the vaccines -- but they fuking happen and getting some level of protection for 3 months for a ~0.0002% danger does not make any sense to me. Can you explain to me why it makes sense?

Your vaccine protects you it doesn't prevent spread but sure keep preaching that everybody should get vaccinated. THE VACCINATED ARE STILL SPREADING AND CATCHING COVID.

Top 5 for dumbest post of the year

I think I have covid right now actually. Ever since a few days ago I've had random spells of sweating during the day (and while sleeping) even though it's in the 30s here. If it is covid I gotta say, this chit is weaksauce. Maybe the real vaccine is exercise and not eating like chit 24/7? Good luck selling discipline and self-reflection to people instead of a 10 second stab though.

Yet the hospitalization/death rates in places that are vaxed vs unvaxed are practically the same

He also touched on something, in a rather silly mocking way - but the average age of death for covid -- it's over the average lifespan for people by like a year. More than that for males.

I'm not sure if he's ignorant here or goofing around, but to dismiss that fact as nothing or some wild conspiracy, totally entrenched against this idea that covid is primarily affecting a specific group of people? Ones that are very vulnerable and likely to die from any cause? Ones that have already lived beyond what the average person lives?

I'm beating a dead horse here, but look at all of those stories that would make the news about a single person getting hospitalized and bemoaning how they didn't take the virus seriously... after going to aparty full of other people, none of whom joined this single person in their little 'rona regret piece.

Look at how there is a nigh unanimous agreement that the virus is also highly transmissible.

Look at all of the people who are completely asymptomatic despite being infected with COVID-19, i.e. devoid of any remarkable symptoms despite having the supposed black death of our generation.

Look at how outside of hypochondriacs, almost no one has ever willingly gone to get tested when they feel next to nothing wrong.


Look at how vaxxers were amongst the first in line to throw down their masks in premature celebration of freedom.

Look at howin spite of vaccination, those very people could still transmit the virus, i.e. become infected.


If more people exercised a little common reasoning alongside clean practices and sensible precautions, they might have put together that they were still the 99%, even in a pandemic.
Not only is the protection short lived, but we don't even have a consistent estimate as for how long, which very likely involves individual factors that are not tested or studied enough for people to have any clue as to how much protecting they're actually going to get.

Now, though, that time factor is making rush to get any sort of vaccine/booster all the more moot as the virus has quickly evolved to be less deadlyanyways.

How healthy is it to keep getting boosters beyond a certain point as well, especially when your own natural immune system should be getting in the swing of dealing with what will inevitably become a common virus no matter what?My concern with the vaccine is the risk of side effects that specifically align with possible preexisting medical conditions. For example, someone who already has a heart condition and might very well have a higher chance of incurring heart-related side effects from the vaccine.

In my case, I already have existing nerve damage, and I have seen firsthand with my own father that the vaccine can cause nerve issues. Quite simply, there is no way in hell that I'm going to risk exacerbating my ongoing condition over a virus that for all I know I've already had, and even still would have a high enough chance of surviving that taking such a risk would be downright stupid.