Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Spotify CEO will NOT cancel Joe Rogan
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 147
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. Last
post 1655781073 02-07-2022, 05:03 PM
-
#61
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
He had access, we couldn't login. But, he claimed it was his undergrad university because it was ranked so low.
Do you remember what journal or database it was, by any chance? Because they would have separate logins from university accessed routes. Some allow a couple free articles or some older articles for free, others charge some ridiculous amount for anyone but an official university.
post 1655781163 02-07-2022, 05:05 PM
-
#62
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By DDSF1
Do you remember what journal or database it was, by any chance?
Nah, it would take a bit to go through the posts. It was from 2-3 months ago.
post 1655781173 02-07-2022, 05:05 PM
-
#63
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 43,261
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget
that and he went on and on about laying in his own chit while posting on the misc.
not to mention wiping his ass with his hand and smearing it on the wall.

just doesn't scream higher education to me.
nb4 he cries that i'm lying and gwg puts his actual posts of him saying that in the thread and he disappears.

LOL!
post 1655781413 02-07-2022, 05:10 PM
-
#64
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DDSF1
All of them. I am serious. You have no idea what you are talking about, in any issue, other than repeating exactly CNN or MSNBC would say, and your citations are pop articles. I don't think you even know what an academic article is or scholarly source. Not only because you are not a grad student itself, but also by virtue of not being a grad student you don't have access to databases that only grad students would have access to (I bet you don't even know what I mean by databases of scholarly articles for academics and grad students only).

Anyways, like I said, I could be wrong, but it looks and feels like you are a fraud.
So your evidence is that I don't tend to post academic articles on a forum full of functionally illiterate trolls literally incapable of reading them?


Yeah, I think we're done here. And funnily enough, gwg refuted your own claim here. I had access to the database.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655781513 02-07-2022, 05:11 PM
-
#65
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
Nah, it would take a bit to go through the posts. It was from 2-3 months ago.
Yeah, it is not that important lol I just get a strong fraud vibe from him. There are a couple guys, Rhadam and DrewDarden, for example, that it is clear they are actually in a Masters program. They know the way things work and they know what academic research is--it comes through when they post about stuff that relates directly or indirectly, to academia or academic stuff, however, Bhody just doesn't come off as a guy in a grad program, especially a doctoral program.
post 1655781613 02-07-2022, 05:13 PM
-
#66
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By Bodhy
So your evidence is that I don't tend to post academic articles on a forum full of functionally illiterate trolls literally incapable of reading them?


Yeah, I think we're done here.
Last time you linked a news report citing an academic article, I went into the actual paper and ripped it apart, showing that the author willfully lied about his work so he can get his peer-reviewed paper cited by US News & World report.
post 1655781723 02-07-2022, 05:15 PM
-
#67
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
So your evidence is that I don't tend to post academic articles on a forum full of functionally illiterate trolls literally incapable of reading them?


Yeah, I think we're done here.
I posted an article in a thread that was academics writing for a general audience and you could not understand it. It was basic AF and it went over your head. That was the first instance when I though there was something fishy. The way you are responding in this thread is only confirming it...fess up Bhody, you are not only not in a doctoral program, but you are in fact a NEET, right? Frauding hard by looking up stuff to try and impress "functionally illiterate trolls" huh?
post 1655781943 02-07-2022, 05:18 PM
-
#68
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
Last time you linked a news report citing an academic article, I went into the actual paper and ripped it apart, showing that the author willfully lied about his work so he can get his peer-reviewed paper cited by US News & World report.
Yeah see that is it he posts news articles and pop articles that have links to low level garbage academic papers made for the purpose of being used in popular feature articles. He never cites sources of proper scholarly articles from academic journals, that are not written for dumbed down general audience in Salon.com or CNN.com or something similar. He only has access to those types of articles because they are linked to pop articles. He does not, it seems, have access to legitimate scholarly work.
post 1655782273 02-07-2022, 05:24 PM
-
#69
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By DDSF1
Yeah see that is it he posts news articles and pop articles that have links to low level garbage academic papers made for the purpose of being used in popular feature articles. He never cites sources of proper scholarly articles from academic journals, that are not written for dumbed down general audience in Salon.com or CNN.com or something similar.
This one was from an Oxford scientist, so it was weird. But, it was clear that US News was trying to find a study that showed there was no way that covid could have originated in Wuhan, so they could debunk Trump's claim that it came from Wuhan. So, this Oxford scientist fudged his data to US News and tried to say that his phylogenetic study demonstrated that it was ambiguous that it came from Wuhan. But, when you went into his peer-reviewed paper, his numbers did not match what he told US News, and when you dug deeper into his raw data, he even made a mistake interpreting his data to his paper. Bodhy couldn't comprehend that it was simply an attempt at a TDS debunker news article.
post 1655782363 02-07-2022, 05:26 PM
-
#70
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DDSF1
I posted an article in a thread that was academics writing for a general audience and you could not understand it. It was basic AF and it went over your head. That was the first instance when I though there was something fishy. The way you are responding in this thread is only confirming it...fess up Bhody, you are not only not in a doctoral program, but you are in fact a NEET, right? Frauding hard by looking up stuff to try and impress "functionally illiterate trolls" huh?
What are you talking about? Can you bring up the post? It is more likely I didn't read it rather than not understand it.


But we can't say anything until you actually bring up the evidence of what you're talking about.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655782553 02-07-2022, 05:30 PM
-
#71
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
This one was from an Oxford scientist, so it was weird. But, it was clear that US News was trying to find a study that showed there was no way that covid could have originated in Wuhan, so they could debunk Trump's claim that it came from Wuhan. So, this Oxford scientist fudged his data to US News and tried to say that his phylogenetic study demonstrated that it was ambiguous that it came from Wuhan. But, when you went into his peer-reviewed paper, his numbers did not match what he told US News, and when you dug deeper into his raw data, he even made a mistake interpreting his data to his paper. Bodhy couldn't comprehend that it was simply an attempt at a TDS debunker news article.
Even an Oxford scientist can be compromised and write something worthless because of the funding or fellowship grants and such he can or will receive for doing it. There are very smart men I have as professors who have sold their soul to the devil for notoriety and funding by writing absolute garbage, knowingly, for mass consumption. Their much lesser known work is very different but only seen by relatively few people.
post 1655782623 02-07-2022, 05:31 PM
-
#72
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By Bodhy
What are you talking about? Can you bring up the post? It is more likely I didn't read it rather than not understand it.


But we can't say anything until you actually bring up the evidence of what you're talking about.
We know you don't like reading academic papers. When you provided links for one of Duehr's other claims in his Reddit paper, I went through the 3 or 4 academic papers he cited and could not find one single sentence that supported the claims he was making. He's another fruitcake.
post 1655782683 02-07-2022, 05:33 PM
-
#73
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Bodhy
What are you talking about? Can you bring up the post? It is more likely I didn't read it rather than not understand it.


But we can't say anything until you actually bring up the evidence of what you're talking about.
so you post your opinion on articles you didn't even read?
post 1655782773 02-07-2022, 05:34 PM
-
#74
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Well, that's funny.I don't like reading academic articles, but I just finished my Phd?


How does that work?
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655782933 02-07-2022, 05:37 PM
-
#75
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By Bodhy
Well, that's funny.I don't like reading academic articles, but I just finished my Phd?


How does that work?
Well, you do have a gift for plagiarism and endless diarrhea of the mouth.
post 1655783133 02-07-2022, 05:42 PM
-
#76
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
Well, that's funny.I don't like reading academic articles, but I just finished my Phd?


How does that work?
No, it seems more and more probable that you are lying about getting a PhD.

How about linking the academic articles you used in your dissertation? They should be of a certain quality far above pop articles and there should be several dozen of them, at least. Something that is not publicly accessible and that I can verify the journal article because either my school also has access or it is open to access for academic institutions if the librarian submits a request which I will do this week or next, or I can order access to it through ILL.

I maybe wrong but damn you seem so fake and this thread is making me even more certain. If I am wrong I will apologize and fully acknowledge my error.
post 1655783253 02-07-2022, 05:45 PM
-
#77
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By DDSF1
Even an Oxford scientist can be compromised and write something worthless because of the funding or fellowship grants and such he can or will receive for doing it. There are very smart men I have as professors who have sold their soul to the devil for notoriety and funding by writing absolute garbage, knowingly, for mass consumption. Their much lesser known work is very different but only seen by relatively few people.
Absolutely, which is why I have a hard time believing all the top scientists on the NIH dole for tens of millions of dollars who are claiming natural origins for covid-19.
post 1655783383 02-07-2022, 05:49 PM
-
#78
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Location: MISC Island
  5. Posts: 29,853
  6. Rep Power: 233414
they just dug up new dirt on rogan, so he's probably finished this time:

🟩🟩🟩🟩 I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. 🟩🟩🟩🟩
post 1655783553 02-07-2022, 05:54 PM
-
#79
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DDSF1
No, it seems more and more probable that you are lying about getting a PhD.

How about linking the academic articles you used in your dissertation? They should be of a certain quality far above pop articles and there should be several dozen of them, at least. Something that is not publicly accessible and that I can verify the journal article because either my school also has access or it is open to access for academic institutions if the librarian submits a request which I will do this week or next, or I can order access to it through ILL.

I maybe wrong but damn you seem so fake and this thread is making me even more certain. If I am wrong I will apologize and fully acknowledge my error.
I already did that, actually. I linked to an article behind a paywall which I had access to, but those foreign to the university didn't.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655783663 02-07-2022, 05:57 PM
-
#80
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By ispy
they just dug up new dirt on rogan, so he's probably finished this time:
Ha. That was funny. At least the guy with the NASA shirt got it. And the guy with the white t-shirt got it too.
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I already did that, actually. I linked to an article behind a paywall which I had access to, but those foreign to the university didn't.
That was from your undergrad program, though? And it didn't have anything to do with your dissertation.
post 1655783703 02-07-2022, 05:58 PM
-
#81
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I already did that, actually. I linked to an article behind a paywall which I had access to, but those foreign to the university didn't.
From your dissertation, a legit scholarly article written for other academics, from a non-publicly accessible journal. I will either have access myself, or can get it through two ways (librarian ordering it or ILL giving me access).

Why are playing dumb bhody? Have you been caught?
post 1655784313 02-07-2022, 06:13 PM
-
#82
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By gwg77
Ha. That was funny. At least the guy with the NASA shirt got it. And the guy with the white t-shirt got it too.



That was from your undergrad program, though? And it didn't have anything to do with your dissertation.
No, that's an article I accessed recently. I've got alumni access to the university, which I visit when I'm back in the area to visit my family. Which I was.
Originally Posted By DDSF1
From your dissertation, a legit scholarly article written for other academics, from a non-publicly accessible journal. I will either have access myself, or can get it through two ways (librarian ordering it or ILL giving me access).

Why are playing dumb bhody? Have you been caught?
If you're asking for evidence that I've got access to paywalled articles from academic journals, you've already got it.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655784443 02-07-2022, 06:15 PM
-
#83
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By Bodhy
No, that's an article I accessed recently. I've got alumni access to the university, which I visit when I'm back in the area to visit my family. Which I was.




If you're asking for evidence that I've got access to paywalled articles from academic journals, you've already got it.
But it had nothing to do with your dissertation.
post 1655784473 02-07-2022, 06:15 PM
-
#84
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
No, that's an article I accessed recently. I've got alumni access to the university, which I visit when I'm back in the area to visit my family. Which I was.




If you're asking for evidence that I've got access to paywalled articles from academic journals, you've already got it.
Confirmed you are a fraud. I hope everyone else that sees this interaction sees it as well. Bhody is lying.

You know exactly what I am saying and you can't do it because you have no dissertation to have legitimate scholarly articles cited within it.
post 1655784573 02-07-2022, 06:18 PM
-
#85
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By DDSF1
confirmed you are a fraud. I hope everyone else that sees this interaction sees it as well. Bhody is lying.
Dude should be in a PhD program, and he is using proof of his undergrad credentials that he can access academic papers, none of which had anything to do with his dissertation, as requested. Is he functionally illiterate? Lmao.
post 1655784793 02-07-2022, 06:21 PM
-
#86
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
Dude should be in a PhD program, and he is using proof of his undergrad credentials that he can access academic papers, none of which had anything to do with his dissertation, as requested. Is he functionally illiterate? Lmao.
He is trying to come up with some way to get out of this, as he has been caught. I think the dope thought he could fool everyone because he is so smart and everyone else is "functionally illiterate."
post 1655784813 02-07-2022, 06:22 PM
-
#87
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By gwg77
But it had nothing to do with your dissertation.
Originally Posted By DDSF1
Confirmed you are a fraud. I hope everyone else that sees this interaction sees it as well. Bhody is lying.

You know exactly what I am saying and you can't do it because you have no dissertation to have legitimate scholarly articles cited within it.
But the point is whether or not I had access to paywalled articles. Your accusation was that I only post pop-articles and have no access to academic databases. That's a false accusation.


I can post the reference list from my dissertation, or part of it, so you can go and see the articles. But that wouldn't serve much of a purpose other than to further obliterate this false claim, right?

I'm going to do it regardless, I just think it's pointless because the claim I don't have a database access is false.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1655784883 02-07-2022, 06:24 PM
-
#88
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
But the point is whether or not I had access to paywalled articles. Your accusation was that I only post pop-articles and have no access to academic databases. That's a false accusation.


I can post the reference list from my dissertation, or part of it, so you can go and see the articles. But that wouldn't serve much of a purpose other than to further obliterate this false claim, right?

I'm going to do it regardless, I just think it's pointless because the claim I don't have a database access is false.
Furiously search for articles Bhody, but I will verify them as being only accessible to students and I will then verify that you have read them. You have been caught. You are going to try and get out of this but I see from your responses that you are a fraud. You are playing dumb trying to find someway to scam your way out of this. If you think finding some articles behind a paywall from undergrad is going to work--you are wrong Bhody.

Go ahead post some of the articles from you dissertation. You have stalled long enough to put together a quick list.
post 1655785033 02-07-2022, 06:27 PM
-
#89
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  2. Join Date: Oct 2017
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 20,534
  5. Subscribers: 19
  6. Rep Power: 1101272
Originally Posted By DDSF1
Furiously search for articles Bhody, but I will verify them as being only accessible to students and I will then verify that you have read them. You have been caught. You are going to try and get out of this but I see from your responses that you are a fraud. You are playing dumb trying to find someway to scam your way out of this.
Anything longer than 5 minutes is bullshіt. Should be an easy copy/paste.
post 1655785153 02-07-2022, 06:29 PM
-
#90
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By gwg77
Anything longer than 5 minutes is bullshіt. Should be an easy copy/paste.
He has been stalling for all this time because he is furiously searching for articles to create the list. It is so obvious he is fake. He knew exactly what I asked way back in the thread and he dragged his foot on purpose.

edit- I posted the original post at 4:42 it is now 5:32.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts