Forum
»
Spotify CEO will NOT cancel Joe Rogan
Spotify CEO will NOT cancel Joe Rogan
02-07-2022, 06:32 PM
-
#91
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
Stop being mean. There is something wrong with his medulla oblongata.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
02-07-2022, 06:40 PM
-
#92
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By ispy⏩
Dice is a major ****ot, but the scariest thing about this video is that only one person who didn't know what a triceratops is actually asked wtf it is before yapping. Then again it's Dice, so the others who asked and then figured it out he didn't show.they just dug up new dirt on rogan, so he's probably finished this time:
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
02-07-2022, 06:40 PM
-
#93
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
Here is one article:Furiously search for articles Bhody, but I will verify them as being only accessible to students and I will then verify that you have read them. You have been caught. You are going to try and get out of this but I see from your responses that you are a fraud. You are playing dumb trying to find someway to scam your way out of this. If you think finding some articles behind a paywall from undergrad is going to work--you are wrong Bhody.
Go ahead post some of the articles from you dissertation. You have stalled long enough to put together a quick list.
Go ahead post some of the articles from you dissertation. You have stalled long enough to put together a quick list.
Favareau, D.F. Creation of the Relevant Next: How living systems capture the power of the adjacent possible through sign use.Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2015.119(3)
Now, what does this demonstrate, exactly?
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 06:43 PM
-
#94
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
It is on Academia.edu, therefore anyone has access. You are full of sh*t. Anyone can look that article up and get the full pdf.Here is one article:
Favareau, D.F. Creation of the Relevant Next: How living systems capture the power of the adjacent possible through sign use.Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2015.119(3)
Now, what does this demonstrate, exactly?
Favareau, D.F. Creation of the Relevant Next: How living systems capture the power of the adjacent possible through sign use.Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2015.119(3)
Now, what does this demonstrate, exactly?
You are lying, you have been caught.
You know exactly what I am saying and you know that you can't do it. That is why you are playing dumb and dragging your feet.
02-07-2022, 06:56 PM
-
#95
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
That's the case with a lot of articles. This came from an academic journal, I used it in my dissertation, and to access Progress in Biophysics you need a subscription to the journal.It is on Academia.edu, therefore anyone has access. You are full of sh*t. Anyone can look that article up and get the full pdf.
You are lying, you have been caught.
You know exactly what I am saying and you know that you can't do it. That is why you are playing dumb and dragging your feet.
You are lying, you have been caught.
You know exactly what I am saying and you know that you can't do it. That is why you are playing dumb and dragging your feet.
The fact the author has it on his Academia page means nothing. Similar case with many, many articles.
Now, if you really want to be forcefed a plate of chit here, I could upload my PhD acceptance letter? If I did this, would you accept a two week ban for these adamant accusations that I am a fraud?
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 06:59 PM
-
#96
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Why are you ignoring the request for an academic article that is not publicly accessible that only a student can access?...Because there is no dissertation to have sources. You are playing dumb and it is so obvious, you are embarrassing yourself Bhody the fraud. And the fake acceptance letter that you will fix up does not prove anything other than you found one online to forge.That's the case with a lot of articles. This came from an academic journal, I used it in my dissertation, and to access Progress in Biophysics you need a subscription to the journal.
The fact the author has it on his Academia page means nothing. Similar case with many, many articles.
Now, if you really want to be forcefed a plate of chit here, I could upload my PhD acceptance letter? If I did this, would you accept a two week ban for these adamant accusations that I am a fraud?
The fact the author has it on his Academia page means nothing. Similar case with many, many articles.
Now, if you really want to be forcefed a plate of chit here, I could upload my PhD acceptance letter? If I did this, would you accept a two week ban for these adamant accusations that I am a fraud?
I posted the original question at 4:42pm PST, it is now 6:05pm PST, you have been stalling for all this time because you are lying.
02-07-2022, 07:15 PM
-
#97
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
I'm not stalling for anything. You're moving the goalposts. Firstly, you claimed I had no access to paywalled articles. That was false. Then the standard of evidence was raised to it having to be an article from my dissertation. Then I provided an article. Then that was deemed unsatisfactory because the author also had it on his Academia page. Now, even my PhD acceptance letter is unacceptable because you would just call it a fake.Why are you ignoring the request for an academic article that is not publicly accessible that only a student can access?...Because there is no dissertation to have sources. You are playing dumb and it is so obvious, you are embarrassing yourself Bhody the fraud. And the fake acceptance letter that you will fix up does not prove anything other than you found one online to forge.
I posted the original question at 4:42pm PST, it is now 6:05pm PST, you have been stalling for all this time because you are lying.
I posted the original question at 4:42pm PST, it is now 6:05pm PST, you have been stalling for all this time because you are lying.
I think this witch hunt is over.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 07:19 PM
-
#98
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
You are lying. The posts are all there. What has been said by me and your responses are all there. You are avoiding, playing dumb, and stalling. You have been caught Bhody. You are lying.I'm not stalling for anything. You're moving the goalposts. Firstly, you claimed I had no access to paywalled articles. That was false. Then the standard of evidence was raised to it having to be an article from my dissertation. Then I provided an article. Then that was deemed unsatisfactory because the author also had it on his Academia page. Now, even my PhD acceptance letter is unacceptable because you would just call it a fake.
I think this witch hunt is over.
I think this witch hunt is over.
02-07-2022, 07:30 PM
-
#99
- Ephedra
- Medallion Wearing CEO10k
-
- Ephedra
- Medallion Wearing CEO10k
- Join Date: Apr 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,304
- Rep Power: 126056
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
He's avoiding your request at all costs. Instead of doing what you're asking, which would prove his case entirely, he's deflecting and only focusing on the fraudulent items he can provide.You are lying. The posts are all there. What has been said by me and your responses are all there. You are avoiding, playing dumb, and stalling. You have been caught Bhody. You are lying.
02-07-2022, 07:36 PM
-
#100
02-07-2022, 07:38 PM
-
#101
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Thanks, fam.Absolutely brutal. DD, I got you on recharge.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
02-07-2022, 07:39 PM
-
#102
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
So you're repping him for making a BS accusation, then moving the goalposts whenever I satisfied them?Absolutely brutal. DD, I got you on recharge.
I never had to entertain this circus in the first place. No one has to defend themselves from farcical accusations, the accuser has to sustain his case with tangible evidence. Not just a "hunch" that someone is frauding.
I guess character assassination is par for the course for Trumpers, though. Facts come in a distant second.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 07:41 PM
-
#103
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
The posts are all there, stop lying. Everyone can read them.So you're repping him for making a BS accusation, then moving the goalposts whenever I satisfied them?
I never had to entertain this circus in the first place. No one has to defend themselves from farcical accusations, the accuser has to sustain his case with tangible evidence. Not just a "hunch" that someone is frauding.
I guess character assassination is par for the course for Trumpers, though. Facts come in a distant second.
I never had to entertain this circus in the first place. No one has to defend themselves from farcical accusations, the accuser has to sustain his case with tangible evidence. Not just a "hunch" that someone is frauding.
I guess character assassination is par for the course for Trumpers, though. Facts come in a distant second.
02-07-2022, 07:43 PM
-
#104
02-07-2022, 07:48 PM
-
#105
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
Yes, they can. They can see you moving the goalposts, me meeting your requests, then you confided you would just wheel the goalposts away into infinity when you said you wouldn't accept a PhD acceptance letter.The posts are all there, stop lying. Everyone can read them.
I provided an article from my dissertation. The fact it's also on the authors Academia page means nothing. I know the clueless Trumpers will take that as a "rekking", but any normal or reasonable person would know your ad hoc excuse for why it doesn't count is meaningless.
And you had the burden of proof to show with evidence I'm not a PhD. I never had to defend myself against a farcical accusation; it's not how burden of proof works.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 07:52 PM
-
#106
02-07-2022, 07:59 PM
-
#107
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
You should probably point out to the waterboy that even if it had recently finished writing it's thesis, as it claims, it doesn't have a phd.Thanks.
I have been suspicious for a while, tonight he confirmed it.
I have been suspicious for a while, tonight he confirmed it.
Even if every other box was ticked, it would have to wait upon a viva/defend it's thesis. That usually takes over 3 months andcantake over a year.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
02-07-2022, 08:03 PM
-
#108
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
I never claimed to have a PhD. I claimed to have finished it, sans edits and revisions.You should probably point out to the waterboy that even if it had recently finished writing it's thesis, as it claims, it doesn't have a phd.
Even if every other box was ticked, it would have to wait upon a viva/defend it's thesis. That usually takes over 3 months andcantake over a year.
Even if every other box was ticked, it would have to wait upon a viva/defend it's thesis. That usually takes over 3 months andcantake over a year.
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 08:05 PM
-
#109
02-07-2022, 08:09 PM
-
#110
- StoliFun
- Osawatomie John Brown
-
- StoliFun
- Osawatomie John Brown
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 27,372
- Rep Power: 271790
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
I don't doubt that Duracell has a PhD. But the fact that he has a doctorate strongly suggests being so degreed doesn't necessarily imply you're smarter than a racist houseplant.I never claimed to have a PhD. I claimed to have finished it, sans edits and revisions.
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew
Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew
"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."
02-07-2022, 08:10 PM
-
#111
- 2020Wellness
- Author/Trainer
-
- 2020Wellness
- Author/Trainer
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 14,775
- Rep Power: 55757
-
-
Rumble offered him 100 milly.
trainingwithryan.substack.com
02-07-2022, 08:15 PM
-
#112
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By StoliFun⏩
Well, I personally doubt it because I believe someone with a PhD wouldn't post sassy comments and juvenile trash talk.I don't doubt that Duracell has a PhD. But the fact that he has a doctorate strongly suggests being so degreed doesn't necessarily imply you're smarter than a racist houseplant.
But the problem is I've been accused of lying about being in a PhD. The goalposts were repeatedly moved, and when an irrelevant ad hoc move was employed as an excuse, the Trumpers took this to be a "rekking" whilst ignoring anything I might say in defence.
There's the issue. The lack of critical thinking, then ganging up 5-10 on 1, as usual, and mocking and ridiculing.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-07-2022, 08:24 PM
-
#113
- StoliFun
- Osawatomie John Brown
-
- StoliFun
- Osawatomie John Brown
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 27,372
- Rep Power: 271790
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Lots of things could have happened to Duracell at some point in time that have brought him to this point since he intellectually peaked whenever. People are ****ed up and weird, and many just get worse as they get older.Well, I personally doubt it because I believe someone with a PhD wouldn't post sassy comments and juvenile trash talk.
But the problem is I've been accused of lying about being in a PhD. The goalposts were repeatedly moved, and when an irrelevant ad hoc move was employed as an excuse, the Trumpers took this to be a "rekking" whilst ignoring anything I might say in defence.
There's the issue. The lack of critical thinking, then ganging up 5-10 on 1, as usual, and mocking and ridiculing.
But the problem is I've been accused of lying about being in a PhD. The goalposts were repeatedly moved, and when an irrelevant ad hoc move was employed as an excuse, the Trumpers took this to be a "rekking" whilst ignoring anything I might say in defence.
There's the issue. The lack of critical thinking, then ganging up 5-10 on 1, as usual, and mocking and ridiculing.
Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew
Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew
"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."
02-07-2022, 08:37 PM
-
#114
- goody1
- Registered User
-
- goody1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 48
- Posts: 10,204
- Rep Power: 96536
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Why do you continue to post on a forum where you are a laughing stock to 99 percent of the members?I never claimed to have a PhD. I claimed to have finished it, sans edits and revisions.
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
Hardly anyone reads what you post yet you continue to type out some plagiarized word salad. Don’t bother responding because I won’t read it
02-07-2022, 09:51 PM
-
#115
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
Yeah, it’s almost as if people tend to listen to TV and a “doctor” in a white robe, and then roll over and do whatever they are told, inject 4 shots? Yes sir! Wear a mask? Yes Sir! Lockdown? Yes sir! Idk.. look in the mirror?Dice is a major ****ot, but the scariest thing about this video is that only one person who didn't know what a triceratops is actually asked wtf it is before yapping. Then again it's Dice, so the others who asked and then figured it out he didn't show.
02-07-2022, 10:03 PM
-
#116
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By kusok⏩
Almost, yet nothing close.Yeah, it’s almost as if people tend to listen to TV and a “doctor” in a white robe, and then roll over and do whatever they are told, inject 4 shots? Yes sir! Wear a mask? Yes Sir! Lockdown? Yes sir! Idk.. look in the mirror?
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
02-08-2022, 12:51 AM
-
#117
- rhadam
- Verified Aesthetic
-
- rhadam
- Verified Aesthetic
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Posts: 43,823
- Rep Power: 399983
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
So your defense is to call into question someone writing informally on an informal platform? There are many reasons forum members do not believe your academic claims; one being the simple logical error you just committed. Another is your refusal toproveyou have full access of journals. Quite easy to use your school access and pull up a full text.I never claimed to have a PhD. I claimed to have finished it, sans edits and revisions.
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
And if you want someone frauding about having a PhD, this guy I quoted is a fine example. Posts are sassy comments, juvenile trash talk, and child-tier name calling.
JFC at referring to me as "it". Could this attempt at condescension be any more cringey?
Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
02-08-2022, 01:10 AM
-
#118
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By rhadam⏩
There's no fallacy I'm aware of involved in my disbelief in that guy's PhD. I simply think someone with a PhD would command himself with scientific rigour instead of dropping sassy comments and juvenile trash-talk.So your defense is to call into question someone writing informally on an informal platform? There are many reasons forum members do not believe your academic claims; one being the simple logical error you just committed. Another is your refusal toproveyou have full access of journals. Quite easy to use your school access and pull up a full text.
You also mustn't have been reading. It's already been established that I've got access to paywalled articles, because gwg77 clicked on a link I provided and couldn't get behind the paywall. This is what I mean when I said the goalposts were moved. The one doubting my PhD asked me to provide an article from my thesis' reference list from a peer-reviewed journal. I did that, and the fact the author also had it on his Academia.edu page means absolutely nothing.
That was an ad hoc manoeuvre which did nothing to substantiate his claim I'm lying about being in a PhD. And don't forget I don't have to defend myself from a farcical accusation, the burden of proof is on the accuser. And the mere fact he is suspicious I am fraud is not evidence of fraud. He needs some sort of tangible evidence I'm not in a PhD and that's a tall order on a messageboard.
So like I said, witch hunt over. You can disbelieve my credentials all you like, I've got clout where it matters. Not like a bunch of non-lifting frauds on a bodybuilding forum will change anything in that regard, lol.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-08-2022, 01:12 AM
-
#119
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Or, alternatively, we can settle this another way.
You choose an article which is behind a paywall. If my university has a subscription to it, I can access the full article. I can then copy-paste a random sample from the full paper beyond the abstract to prove I accessed the article.
That should put the issue to bed.
You choose an article which is behind a paywall. If my university has a subscription to it, I can access the full article. I can then copy-paste a random sample from the full paper beyond the abstract to prove I accessed the article.
That should put the issue to bed.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-08-2022, 02:48 AM
-
#120
- rhadam
- Verified Aesthetic
-
- rhadam
- Verified Aesthetic
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Posts: 43,823
- Rep Power: 399983
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
I don't see why you would believe I care what your academic background is. You don't impress me with anything you post. Why would I be impressed by someone who claims to have submitted a thesis yet cannot decipher a simple post noting a portion of my academic background? You matter about as much as the ant beneath my boot.There's no fallacy I'm aware of involved in my disbelief in that guy's PhD. I simply think someone with a PhD would command himself with scientific rigour instead of dropping sassy comments and juvenile trash-talk.
You also mustn't have been reading. It's already been established that I've got access to paywalled articles, because gwg77 clicked on a link I provided and couldn't get behind the paywall. This is what I mean when I said the goalposts were moved. The one doubting my PhD asked me to provide an article from my thesis' reference list from a peer-reviewed journal. I did that, and the fact the author also had it on his Academia.edu page means absolutely nothing.
That was an ad hoc manoeuvre which did nothing to substantiate his claim I'm lying about being in a PhD. And don't forget I don't have to defend myself from a farcical accusation, the burden of proof is on the accuser. And the mere fact he is suspicious I am fraud is not evidence of fraud. He needs some sort of tangible evidence I'm not in a PhD and that's a tall order on a messageboard.
So like I said, witch hunt over. You can disbelieve my credentials all you like, I've got clout where it matters. Not like a bunch of non-lifting frauds on a bodybuilding forum will change anything in that regard, lol.
You also mustn't have been reading. It's already been established that I've got access to paywalled articles, because gwg77 clicked on a link I provided and couldn't get behind the paywall. This is what I mean when I said the goalposts were moved. The one doubting my PhD asked me to provide an article from my thesis' reference list from a peer-reviewed journal. I did that, and the fact the author also had it on his Academia.edu page means absolutely nothing.
That was an ad hoc manoeuvre which did nothing to substantiate his claim I'm lying about being in a PhD. And don't forget I don't have to defend myself from a farcical accusation, the burden of proof is on the accuser. And the mere fact he is suspicious I am fraud is not evidence of fraud. He needs some sort of tangible evidence I'm not in a PhD and that's a tall order on a messageboard.
So like I said, witch hunt over. You can disbelieve my credentials all you like, I've got clout where it matters. Not like a bunch of non-lifting frauds on a bodybuilding forum will change anything in that regard, lol.
Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts