Or you could've been a tradie, make bank and afford a good living instead of rotting in your cubicle.

lol @ cubicels srs.

Tell us more *******, i remember your posts from years ago.

What do you feel now? Desire for companionship, how do you find a woman who hasn't been gang banged by 20+ dudes at your older age? And how old are u brah

What separates us from wild animals is our ability to control our basic instincts.

Cliffs: Don't be a wild animal.

I think men AND women over 35 dating usually have issues/baggage from previous relationships and kids. It's inevitable.

Not equivalent at all, you could possibly compare with a +10 year delta.

You're naive if you think you can fully control your instincts (and especially be fulfilled on top of that).

You're constantly being driven by basic instinct. All day long.

Maybe I'm just abnormal, but I don't understand why guys are so eager to throw their freedom away for "companionship" and I think that shyt is overrated as Hell...and that's to say nothing of the sacrifices that come with it (even with a "good" one - it still eventually ends up feeling like a big chore imo).

Except women have sex with older Chad/Thugs 24/7. Looks ARE everything. No women is passing up 36 yr old Chad who makes $200k/yr. Trust me they aren't. Time and time again women have done the opposite of what they say.


What you fail to mention is MOST people are NPCs going with the herd, especially women. So who really cares at the end of the day?

I lived most of my life not needing or wanting companionship. It wasn't until my later 20s that a hint of wanting it showed up. Now in my 30s, it's slightly more prominent, but not desperation strong, like a lot of people suffer from.

I don't need companionship for sex, although it's preferred that they are together. To me companionship is more about making memories together that will last and something to look back on. And that's something I'd like to have. And then the act of raising children together with someone you can stand to be around for the rest of life. Which I'm still not ready to do.

You are atypical. It’s based on feelings, not logic.

Just from what I've seen IRL and on here, people have previous relationships so it's not as innocent as it is in high school when you're dating someone and they're your first love. There's a lot of baggage from being cheated on, dumped, divorced, etc.

I wouldn't bat an eye at a single man over 35 being single. Maybe he's just a career oriented dude. Maybe he's a late bloomer on his city boy chit and just enjoying the single life. Maybe he just isn't into relationships, and doesn't prioritize them;However a single woman over 35, especially an attractive one that's never been married is a Mt. Everest sized red flag. What's so fuked up about you, that no man has tried to lock you down?

And yes I know some, and socially they're completely worthless. Instead of getting married and settling down, they kept riding the cawk carousel until the wheels fell off and they're completely untouchable. Just take one look into their eyes, and they tell the entire story.

Can't tell if you're trolling or just really bad at math...


Start today at April 20, 2022

Try to impregnate your girl

Let's say by some miracle you actually achieve the goal today, then in 9 months she will give birth

Even if you somehow impregnate her the day after she gives birth (extremely unlikely), it would be another 9 months until the next birth


So at absolute minimum (and still almost impossible) we would be looking at an 18 month interval for two terms


18 months is more than 1 year (kinda sad that I'd actually have to explain this, but welcome to the year 2022 I guess)

Yes in more modern times we have forced monogamy which gives to opportunity for men who never would have reproduced to do so

However, if we actually dna tested every child, we'd find that many of these men are not actually the father



You seem to be claiming that all the men you personally know, if given $150million dollars today (and were physically attractive themselves) would not exercise options and end up banging some young fertile 18-25 yr olds

If for whatever reason that man decided to not do so, it would be a conscience choice or restraint, fighting his natural instinct to not bang those young fertile women

He is following a fabricated societal construct and abandoning his natural sexual imperative

Biologically speaking he is hindering his success to pass on his genes with the highest chance of survival

From a broad perspective it is a little weird. He's either incel or overthinks things, none of which are attractive to most women.

Time interval between deliveries is only part of the time frame, you have to start from the first conception for a total time frame..



Going back to the original point:

If a woman were to go out on a mission of "how many babies can I have starting today, before may 20, 2022" and she hasn't conceived already, then she'd be hard pressed to have more than 1 child, unless the babies are being born prematurely and/or twins, triplets etc.


Now how many women can a man impregnate from now until may 20, 2022?

Stop looking to women for dating/relationship advice. Women tend to have crazy high dating/relationship standards in general these days. Especially when they are just talking about it hypothetically, let alone among a group of women with cackling hen group think behavior influencing what they think and say in the moment.

Women say a lot of things. "No guys below 6'." "Must have a 5 bedroom house." "Must drive a Lamborghini." Then you catch them getting smashed by big dick rodney.

Stop listening to what they say, and instead watch what they do. No young woman is denying a 36 yr old guy with his **** together, if he's good looking, increase his value times 10.

Ironically, I've noticed that most younger women (18 - 25) tend to have way more reasonable dating/relationship standards than older women. In my experience, it's the older women with the most baggage who have the most absurd standards (divorced, single mothers, ages late 20's to early 40's).

and im guessing single wimin over 35 have no defects of their own..?

wiminlogic/10

i think people try to separate "social" from "biology" and im not sure that's the case.

the brain is another extension of our biology. our neurons, the structure and what comprises it are all a part of our biology.

it's the same reason why if i asked you to do an impromptu speech right now in front of lots of people you'd get a bit nervous.

your eyes are prob bigger than your stomach. you prob think about food more times than you eat. does that mean you should be fat?

WANTSto me, doesn't mean it should happen; or, doesn't mean that what you want should happen

Who tf doesnt have issues?

Dumb broad.

how do you wire you brain so you don't look at women to try to smash them when you have a girlfriend?

If you are blindly betting on someone who is single at 35+ being damaged goods, man or woman, you would be more likely to win the bet if you bet yes they are damaged goods.

With that said, being single at 35+ as a woman is a far greater failure than as a man, because you're basically done as an option to start a family. You can only have a serious relationship with divorced guys who already have kids, or man children who don't want kids because that means one less room in their house for their Funko Pop collection.

Look at it this way, you meet 35+ woman at the gym. Invade her space and trick her to go on a date with you. Unless you're insane, the earliest you'll move into together and be fake married is 1 year. More likely, 2 or more. Then you have to try to have kids. At that age, it doesn't just happen instantly. Then once you or her boyfriend knocks her up, there is a much greater chance of complications with older people having kids (older guy+younger girl might be okay as long as you don't mind your sperm possibly having one too many chromosomes, but older guy+older girl=danger zone). She may not carry the pregnancy to completion, then you have to try again,

So you're looking at her pumping out the kid at 37 or 38, and that's at the earliest with the two of you expediting the relationship because you're both old as **** and out of time.

Guys being physically attractive is obviously extremely important too, but there are other things that women are attracted to for long term partners like masculinity, stability, career, personality (yuck), etc. Guys are attracted to things other than looks and youth, but looks and youth play a much bigger part in what a guy looks for in a girl. Any 35-40 year old guy who says he wouldn't prefer a 20-25 year old is lying, because it's easy to say that and look good when you'll never actually have a 20-25 year old be attracted to you. It's like the guys who insult Tiger Woods for cheating, but will never have to face a Harem of 10/10s chasing after them. It's false integrity.

Amazing the mental gymnastics some people will play when they know they are wrong

Just lol

Seems like what you're trying to say is that you know a woman who was already pregnant months prior, who gave birth to a child in january, and then got pregnant again and birthed in december of the same (calender) year. This one calender year is not the total amount of time in the pregnancies, you have to add the months she was pregnant from the previous year..



Find a woman who hasn't conceived before today (April 20, 2022), and see if she can birth more than one pregnancy before May 20, 2022 (without premature births)



Good luck

You are simply sacrificing your sexual imperative to accommodate your girlfriend's sexual imperative

Social constructs will certainly have an effect on a humans behavior (as I had mentioned as well as yourself)

But what happens when those social constructs become less binding or become non-existent?

This is what you are seeing nowadays with most young women and how they mate select

They used to be bound by a heavy social construct to not have sex until marriage, so most women wouldn't

As soon as that social construct is removed, women have gone back to their instincts which essentially is to have sex with top tier males, ignoring lesser men until it's time to get security for their children

nick5569 you have made many great posts in this thread!!

1. What books would you recommend that go into more depth on the things you have mentioned in your posts?

2. You mentioned historically only around 30% of men reproduced whereas 90% women have reproduced. Does this prove God only loves around 30% of the men and the 70% of men historically who didn't reproduce, God doesn't give a fukk about them. Why would a loving God deny so many men the opportunity to reproduce? Should incels even follow the Bible??

But they would date a 35 year old who is in a relationship? This doesn’t add up

he didnt say 18 thought he said early to mid 20's.