Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » BREAKING: Wikileaks releases moon landing scenes filmed in Nevada desert
  1. Results 301 to 330 of 891
  2. Page 11 of 30
  3. First
  5. 9
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. 13
  11. Last

Thread: BREAKING: Wikileaks releases moon landing scenes filmed in Nevada desert

post 1660962163 05-08-2022, 08:14 PM
-
#301
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Anyone figure out those guidance system sensors yet?
I mean if two jets can meet to refuel, why wouldn't they be able to rendezvous in space? I agree though it is insane to think about. The fact that they had to work out the proper orbit, account for gravity, and be exact is nuts. Props to the scientists and engineers for figuring it all out.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1660964703 05-08-2022, 09:13 PM
-
#302
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
I mean if two jets can meet to refuel, why wouldn't they be able to rendezvous in space? I agree though it is insane to think about. The fact that they had to work out the proper orbit, account for gravity, and be exact is nuts. Props to the scientists and engineers for figuring it all out.
Allegedly these sensors were using stars to calculate their position in space. I have a hard time believing their computers at the time had that ability.

The CPU for the rockets is one thing, The CPU for the guidance system is another thing.

They are not navigating on earth, where the system would only have to compute 360 ° degrees of heading.

To be honest I dont know the number of options in how many different degrees of heading there are in space.

I know it's a lot larger than just 360°

Anyone care to chim in and provide that number?

I almost want to say it's an infinite amount of degrees, but I'm probably wrong.
As
post 1660967413 05-08-2022, 10:18 PM
-
#303
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 47,820
  6. Rep Power: 241736
Originally Posted By Realclout⏩
Imagine getting hit with a missile or something knowing you're underwater with only moments before death.

R.I.P
yeah cuz getting hit with a missile on land is chil af.
post 1660968193 05-08-2022, 10:37 PM
-
#304
  1. andrepmeet
  2. Registered User
  1. andrepmeet
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 21,226
  6. Rep Power: 73510
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Allegedly these sensors were using stars to calculate their position in space. I have a hard time believing their computers at the time had that ability.

The CPU for the rockets is one thing, The CPU for the guidance system is another thing.

They are not navigating on earth, where the system would only have to compute 360 ° degrees of heading.

To be honest I dont know the number of options in how many different degrees of heading there are in space.

I know it's a lot larger than just 360°

Anyone care to chim in and provide that number?

I almost want to say it's an infinite amount of degrees, but I'm probably wrong.
absolutely true how do you establish coordinates in space? Some tens of thousands of miles away from Earth in a small tech-deprived rocket.

so yeah...even more reason to not believe.
post 1660969483 05-08-2022, 11:19 PM
-
#305
  1. Discipline27
  2. Stoic lobster
  1. Discipline27
  2. Stoic lobster
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 3,455
  6. Rep Power: 2671
What a weird time to be alive.

Is this The Great Awakening hitting the misc?
Perpetually battling the existential void of our finite existence.

RIP Zyzz, Prince of Aesthetics
post 1660970633 05-09-2022, 12:02 AM
-
#306
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. 👽👽👽👽👽👽
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. 👽👽👽👽👽👽
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 65,452
  6. Rep Power: 688524
How did former president Nixon was able to talk with the astronauts in the moon by using a landline ☎️?
post 1660970833 05-09-2022, 12:08 AM
-
#307
  1. IPoopStandingUp
  2. Registered User
  1. IPoopStandingUp
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Location: New Hampshire, United States
  5. Posts: 19,456
  6. Rep Power: 235404
Originally Posted By MinisterOfLust⏩
How did former president Nixon was able to talk with the astronauts in the moon by using a landline ☎️?
According to the AT&T Archives, "Simply, the call went from the Oval Office in Washington D.C. to Houston, where it was routed into space via Mission Control, through the capsule communicator, or CapCom, astronaut Bruce McCandless II."
post 1660971333 05-09-2022, 12:34 AM
-
#308
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
Originally Posted By chalup⏩
Listen to what you are saying. Viktor was overthrown because he was a Russian bot RAPING the Country of money and funneling it back into Russia. Guess where he ran to when it was overthrown?



And what do you think would happen to civilians in the US if they formed a militia and said they wanted to be independent from the Country?(hint they would be killed) Russia isn't helping the people in Donbass, if thats what they invaded for they could have easily focused on Donbass region and most likely succeeded in helping take control of it. Instead they invaded the entire Country and have failed miserably because their entire Military is corrupt and stole money instead of using it as intended. They then lied to Poots and said everything was good to go.

Did Russia annex Crimea to help Ukranians as well? Or did he take it for how much money it brings it and the usefulness of its port? You have no idea WTF you are talking about.
LOL...the delusion and hysteria of Ukies. Actively going into threads about other topics so they can cry about Ukraine. This is how you know things aren't going that great.
post 1660973023 05-09-2022, 02:47 AM
-
#309
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
computer technology back then was actually a lot better than people baselessly claim, theres youtube vids of people explaining how the computer worked. It was actually more reliable than any modern day computer
post 1660973283 05-09-2022, 03:07 AM
-
#310
  1. J3remy
  2. Unregistered User
  1. J3remy
  2. Unregistered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: Thailand
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 5,658
  7. Rep Power: 9059
Im pretty sure some of the footage and pictures were faked, but most likely mainly for security reasons, and also just to make it look better
post 1660973913 05-09-2022, 03:55 AM
-
#311
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By J3remy⏩
Im pretty sure some of the footage and pictures were faked, but most likely mainly for security reasons, and also just to make it look better
Possible, but proving the video was staged is not the same as proving the moon landings didn't happen.

Also, it may be hard for the layman to understand but 'rocket science' is not all that complex compared to many other areas of physics. Calculating thrust, orbits and trajectories doesn't rely on very advanced mathematics.

The technology which is now lacking, if that's even true, I think are the rocket thrusters required for launch, although we can still get into orbit and land rovers on other planets so I don't understand why getting to the moon would supposedly be a problem. The real issue is having the will to actually do it again, space exploration was cut short because of politics and massive spending on social programs being seen as a higher priority. Those who look down in the dirt instead of up at the stars have taken hold of civilisation for the benefit of the lowest common denominator.
post 1660973933 05-09-2022, 03:57 AM
-
#312
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Allegedly these sensors were using stars to calculate their position in space. I have a hard time believing their computers at the time had that ability.

The CPU for the rockets is one thing, The CPU for the guidance system is another thing.

They are not navigating on earth, where the system would only have to compute 360 ° degrees of heading.

To be honest I dont know the number of options in how many different degrees of heading there are in space.

I know it's a lot larger than just 360°

Anyone care to chim in and provide that number?

I almost want to say it's an infinite amount of degrees, but I'm probably wrong.
Presumably you'd just convert the 2D angle to 3D solid angle using the formula for the surface area of a sphere instead of the circumference of a circle.

Yes, looked it up and it's 4pi steradians which is equal to about 41000 'square degrees', again if you don't know what radians are and haven't studied physics this would be difficult to understand.

It's said they did it with less computing power than a modern phone so obviously it doesn't require a lot, just a basic calculator.
post 1660974683 05-09-2022, 04:38 AM
-
#313
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 15,222
  6. Rep Power: 130112
ITT people who post on a gay dying indian bodybuilding forum can't understand how the same concepts as people who spent 8+ hours a day for 10+ years of their lives doing the math to make the moon landing work.

Most of you guys can't even tell what the numbers of your paycheck mean, no wonder the concepts of physics are lost on you.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1660974983 05-09-2022, 04:51 AM
-
#314
  1. iabs
  2. General
  1. iabs
  2. General
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 22,709
  5. Rep Power: 156138
Originally Posted By Pterodactyl314⏩
300 Forever
post 1660975183 05-09-2022, 05:02 AM
-
#315
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 54,085
  5. Rep Power: 321216
The government wouldn’t lie to us boyos , they have our best interests
Losers let it happen, winners make it happen.

Nonsense Army Crew.
post 1660975253 05-09-2022, 05:04 AM
-
#316
  1. CampingBruh
  2. U Byron mrah?
  1. CampingBruh
  2. U Byron mrah?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Posts: 2,895
  5. Rep Power: 20794


Just fukkin lol @ mooncells
☆☆☆Nissan Frontier Crew☆☆☆

Curls more than I can bench Crew
Dorky but still gets girls Crew
Fire-EMT Crew
Dont let your memes be Dreams ( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡)
Zuzka Light is my new HBB Crew

If Zuzka Light was a car, I'd slam her trunk ten times a day at least, Crew!
post 1660975443 05-09-2022, 05:12 AM
-
#317
  1. CampingBruh
  2. U Byron mrah?
  1. CampingBruh
  2. U Byron mrah?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Posts: 2,895
  5. Rep Power: 20794
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe⏩
ITT people who post on a gay dying indian bodybuilding forum can't understand how the same concepts as people who spent 8+ hours a day for 10+ years of their lives doing the math to make the moon landing work.

Most of you guys can't even tell what the numbers of your paycheck mean, no wonder the concepts of physics are lost on you.
Deadass believe the science maskcell logic LOL

Hows that going for you buddy? Do you also think soy is good for you because "smart" people said so?

Gullible retard. Ive got a bridge to sell you.
☆☆☆Nissan Frontier Crew☆☆☆

Curls more than I can bench Crew
Dorky but still gets girls Crew
Fire-EMT Crew
Dont let your memes be Dreams ( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡)
Zuzka Light is my new HBB Crew

If Zuzka Light was a car, I'd slam her trunk ten times a day at least, Crew!
post 1660975523 05-09-2022, 05:17 AM
-
#318
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 15,250
  5. Rep Power: 107906
Originally Posted By CampingBruh⏩
Deadass believe the science maskcell logic LOL

Hows that going for you buddy? Do you also think soy is good for you because "smart" people said so?

Gullible retard. Ive got a bridge to sell you.
It's more a case of understanding the science than believing the science since all the evidence is already available for anyone who cares. Miscers can't comprehend the logistics which went into landing on the moon and so declare the moon landing as fake.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn


"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
post 1660976843 05-09-2022, 06:00 AM
-
#319
  1. naich
  1. naich
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 17,222
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 128871
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe⏩
ITT people who post on a gay dying indian bodybuilding forum can't understand how the same concepts as people who spent 8+ hours a day for 10+ years of their lives doing the math to make the moon landing work.

Most of you guys can't even tell what the numbers of your paycheck mean, no wonder the concepts of physics are lost on you.
What incredible logic. So if we just locked a dozen scientists in a room with calculators and pencils for 10 years we can solve anything. Complete disregard for the fact that some things cannot be solved, yet.
**Florida Crew**
**Waiting for National Guard Bus Ride to Labor Camp Crew**
post 1660977223 05-09-2022, 06:12 AM
-
#320
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By naich⏩
What incredible logic. So if we just locked a dozen scientists in a room with calculators and pencils for 10 years we can solve anything. Complete disregard for the fact that some things cannot be solved, yet.
Strong reading comprehension.

It's more about literal mongoloids thinking they are smart because they glanced at a youtube video despite thinking that gravity and magnets are mysterious dark magic. While also believing that they got it all figured out despite being nothing more than autistic contrarians.

Funny how the gov for once decides not to splurge endless money just to recreate a worthless stunt that was repeatedly pulled off half a century ago and the usual suspects' conclusion is that because they couldn't do it.
post 1660977363 05-09-2022, 06:17 AM
-
#321
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 15,222
  6. Rep Power: 130112
Originally Posted By naich⏩
What incredible logic. So if we just locked a dozen scientists in a room with calculators and pencils for 10 years we can solve anything. Complete disregard for the fact that some things cannot be solved, yet.
Some things can't, sure. FTL drives, interplanetary colonization, why miscers have so much trouble talking to women. All things that will plague the scientific community for years to come.

Manned trips to the moon? Yeah that can be and has been solved. Just because you have a small, smooth brain doesn't mean people much smarter than you can't comprehend the physics.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1660977513 05-09-2022, 06:21 AM
-
#322
  1. Evantus
  2. Registered User
  1. Evantus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Posts: 4,501
  5. Rep Power: 17957
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
I mean if two jets can meet to refuel, why wouldn't they be able to rendezvous in space? I agree though it is insane to think about. The fact that they had to work out the proper orbit, account for gravity, and be exact is nuts. Props to the scientists and engineers for figuring it all out.
those sensors like a GPS for space use 3 axis rotation gyros that spin bigly. They have a lifespan due to gradually decrease their accuracy over time. Pretty amazing technology
post 1660977913 05-09-2022, 06:33 AM
-
#323
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By naich⏩
What incredible logic. So if we just locked a dozen scientists in a room with calculators and pencils for 10 years we can solve anything. Complete disregard for the fact that some things cannot be solved, yet.
'Rocket science' is not that difficult, it's not cold fusion or quantum computing. You'd know this if you'd ever done any physics in your life. Moon landing hoaxers aren't as bad as flat earthers but still make CTers look bad.
post 1660978513 05-09-2022, 06:52 AM
-
#324
  1. Lucas5814
  2. Registered User
  1. Lucas5814
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,030
  6. Rep Power: 30809
Originally Posted By Pterodactyl314⏩
I've never seen this meme, but this is the dumbest sh*t I have ever seen for the moonlanding. Top photo showing the fuking milkyway in full detail was done by layering multiple photos each exposed for 10-15 seconds. You would never get that picture with your phone. Not even close. The bottom pic is way more accurate for a picture.

NOW it's fuking impossible for a VIDEO camera to capture the top specticle. Would never happen with modern tech. Ever. The only thing you're going to see with a video camera is black sky.

Fuking pathetic I have to explain this, but the misc....
post 1660979183 05-09-2022, 07:10 AM
-
#325
  1. John$Galt
  2. Banned
  1. John$Galt
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Suck a fart out of my ass after I eat some, Chile
  5. Posts: 15,790
  6. Rep Power: 0
I'm highly suspicious that we landed on the moon, but this video doesn't prove sht.

If you have actual info proving it was a hoax, I'm all ears. I'd love to see it.

But this is just cutting back and forth, you can't see them transitioning from the behind the scenes vids to the actual recording of the footage.

The official footage looks pretty obviously fake to me, but this crap you posted seems like disinfo to discredit those who don't believe the moon landing narrative.
post 1660979433 05-09-2022, 07:15 AM
-
#326
  1. jackamo2887
  2. BEATINGU
  1. jackamo2887
  2. BEATINGU
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Posts: 29,617
  5. Rep Power: 146835
Just when you think the misc can't get even more retarded
Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.
post 1660985873 05-09-2022, 09:04 AM
-
#327
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Our scientists in 1969 didnt even know how to balance a diet.
As
post 1660986183 05-09-2022, 09:08 AM
-
#328
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By Lucas5814⏩
I've never seen this meme, but this is the dumbest sh*t I have ever seen for the moonlanding. Top photo showing the fuking milkyway in full detail was done by layering multiple photos each exposed for 10-15 seconds. You would never get that picture with your phone. Not even close. The bottom pic is way more accurate for a picture.

NOW it's fuking impossible for a VIDEO camera to capture the top specticle. Would never happen with modern tech. Ever. The only thing you're going to see with a video camera is black sky.

Fuking pathetic I have to explain this, but the misc....
Yep, a matter of basic photography, but instead of looking into any of this, we have the usual from a moon hoaxer/flat earther/take your pick. Notice what Pterodatcyl does here:

-finds meme online (created by someone else)
-no research about what's going on
-believes it
-regurgitates it

It's the same old, same old. Zero critical thinking, and again.....whois the gullible one here? Seems its Pterodactyl. He has not responded to any of this.

It is a basic matter of exposure time of why the sky appears starless and black in the lunar daytime pic above. Mentioned in my previous post, but the stars would all but be lost with the incredibly shining sun. The astronauts on board Apollo 11 couldnt see almost any stars on the way to the moon, but finally were able to make out the whole sky of stars once they hit 'nightime', i.e. when the moon eclipsed the sun and they were in its shadow. They say it on the transcript:
02 23 59 20 CDR Houston, it's been a real change for us. Now we
are able to see stars again and recognize constellations for the first time on the trip. It's -
the sky is full of stars. Just like the nightside
of Earth. But all the way here, we have only been
able to see stars occasionally and perhaps through
the monocular, but not recognize any star patterns.

02 23 59 52 CC I guess it has turned into night up there really,
hasn't it ?

02 23 59 58 CDR Really has.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1660986923 05-09-2022, 09:19 AM
-
#329
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Lol what should we expect to see here, Buzz Aldrin going "Zoom omg we totes just went to the MOON yo omg!!!' like some excited schoolgirl? This is one of the silliest counters yet. Maybe after the guy above not understanding that something going nearly 240,000 miles in the almost perfect vacuum of space is not hard to believe, or even one bit surprising (much less impossible) for something like the lunar module/command module ship.

These men were well trained military pilots/scientists. The talking here sounds exactly what you might expect from such individuals- disciplined, informative, to the point and matter of fact.....and not ditzy or emotional. Hmm almost if that's the exact kind of personality you might want an astronaut to have entrusted with such a monumental mission, who need to remain objective and cool under pressure in the most crazy circumstances.

As Johnez pointed out, it's somewhat contradictory to call these people out for a seeming strange/unnatural press conference (it's not) but at the same time demand this means they must be actors. Why would an actor give a most uninspiring performance like this. It's almost as if they really are pilots and scientists.

This does not show we didnt go to the moon, nor does a sham rock that was never a moon rock have any implications for the moon landings either....the vast evidence in support of the moon landings, easily found online, establish we did to any rational, critically thinking person.

Like said in the Flat Earth threads, it really doesnt matter that some people want to incorrectly assert we didnt go to the moon....science will march on as usual, amazing discoveries will continue to be made in matters of space and astronomy just the same- regardless of what some CTers on a bodybuilding forum think about any of this.
Low IQ response. Why not somewhere in the middle? A smile every now and then, some passion in their voices recounting their epic adventure, some overwhelming emotion of what they saw (Earth from the moon etc), its a life changing experience yet these bums act like they got caught in a huge bank fraud scandal and are under cross examination lmao.
post 1660987083 05-09-2022, 09:20 AM
-
#330
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
'Rocket science' is not that difficult, it's not cold fusion or quantum computing. You'd know this if you'd ever done any physics in your life. Moon landing hoaxers aren't as bad as flat earthers but still make CTers look bad.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that, Rocket Science, is hard.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts