Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » BREAKING: Wikileaks releases moon landing scenes filmed in Nevada desert
  1. Results 811 to 840 of 891
  2. Page 28 of 30
  3. First
  5. 26
  6. 27
  7. 28
  8. 29
  9. 30
  11. Last

Thread: BREAKING: Wikileaks releases moon landing scenes filmed in Nevada desert

post 1661415053 05-16-2022, 03:52 PM
-
#811
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Then maybe it's time to show irrefutable evidence.

I think that's what we all have been waiting 800 post to see.
And waiting.
As
post 1661415263 05-16-2022, 03:57 PM
-
#812
  1. chino3
  1. chino3
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 18,554
  5. Rep Power: 134275
Originally Posted By Travis99⏩
What would be the point of proving the moon landing was fake? What good would that do?

srs question.
the space race was the ULTIMATE flex. It was basically putting the crown on the smartest, bravest, and best looking nation. Imagine taking that away... Imagine getting busted as a fraud... That nation would not only be the laughing stock of the entire fukking world, but the amount of distrust/fallout, would absolutely destroy that nation.
"It won't get better, just different."
post 1661416513 05-16-2022, 04:22 PM
-
#813
  1. JtotheIzzo
  2. Registered User
  1. JtotheIzzo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2008
  4. Posts: 8,061
  5. Rep Power: 6078
Any good books on the space race/moon landing??
Cobra Kai Crew

Roman Catholic Crew

Donald Trump 2024 Crew

Ron DeSantis 2028 Crew
post 1661418473 05-16-2022, 04:58 PM
-
#814
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
Imagine thinking they could do it 50 years ago but they "lost" the technology. And they haven't been able to do it in the 50 years since then. All of that with computers that had less computing power than my current fridge.
The computers were more powerful than you know and they were specialized for specific tasks and were very robust
U
post 1661424453 05-16-2022, 07:17 PM
-
#815
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 8,772
  6. Rep Power: 37689
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
The computers were more powerful than you know and they were specialized for specific tasks and were very robust
everything was very special and very good.

it was so good that we destroyed it all and forgot how to recreate it. and you’ve yet to provide irrefutable information besides trust the big govt cawk.

meanwhile the private sector is building reusable rockets to get to the ISS in 2022. something tells me government employees were not capable of getting to the moon 53 years ago and chitty fake film footage is not proof of anything.
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.

Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
post 1661424663 05-16-2022, 07:25 PM
-
#816
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  3. Join Date: Nov 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 57,101
  6. Rep Power: 494160
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
Imagine thinking they could do it 50 years ago but they "lost" the technology. And they haven't been able to do it in the 50 years since then. All of that with computers that had less computing power than my current fridge.
This is what someone that doesn't understand what specialization looks like. You realize that there were MANY computers, right?
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
And waiting.
You've shown that you have the intellectual capacity of a rock, so there's no point. Irrefutable evidence has been posted ITT many times, but you're not looking for anything other than a way to do more mental gymnastics to show everyone how incredibly stupid you are.


Even more amazed that more retards are coming out of no where to show their lack of education and science knowledge.
AcetylCoA gets reps

"God your dunce." - Swept

LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
post 1661424903 05-16-2022, 07:31 PM
-
#817
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: -, -, Netherlands
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 125767
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
The computers were more powerful than you know and they were specialized for specific tasks and were very robust
Originally Posted By Lunatic⏩
This is what someone that doesn't understand what specialization looks like. You realize that there were MANY computers, right?

You've shown that you have the intellectual capacity of a rock, so there's no point. Irrefutable evidence has been posted ITT many times, but you're not looking for anything other than a way to do more mental gymnastics to show everyone how incredibly stupid you are.


Even more amazed that more retards are coming out of no where to show their lack of education and science knowledge.
The curious part imo is that they 1) lost all of that technology, all of those computers and 2) they haven't been able to recreate it or go back.

Now I know the counterargument for the second one is that it's too expensive and space exploration isn't worth it. Personally I think it could be worth it and it's at least very interesting. I haven't looked deep into this moon landing conspiracy so I'm not convinced either way, but I think there's definitely interesting questions like these to ask.
post 1661425313 05-16-2022, 07:43 PM
-
#818
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
The curious part imo is that they 1) lost all of that technology, all of those computers and 2) they haven't been able to recreate it or go back.

Now I know the counterargument for the second one is that it's too expensive and space exploration isn't worth it. Personally I think it could be worth it and it's at least very interesting. I haven't looked deep into this moon landing conspiracy so I'm not convinced either way, but I think there's definitely interesting questions like these to ask.
No one has posted "evidence" that the computers were powerful, because they were not.

There wasn't some secret computer system being used and you are right that NASA said they lost the technology.

As I have said many times, the FBI kept thousand page files on Elvis but they weren't monitoring all of the plans for the NASA moon rocket?

That's absurd.

The FBI would have been all over everyone involved with the moon landing.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661426223 05-16-2022, 07:59 PM
-
#819
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  3. Join Date: Nov 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 57,101
  6. Rep Power: 494160
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
The curious part imo is that they 1) lost all of that technology, all of those computers and 2) they haven't been able to recreate it or go back.

Now I know the counterargument for the second one is that it's too expensive and space exploration isn't worth it. Personally I think it could be worth it and it's at least very interesting. I haven't looked deep into this moon landing conspiracy so I'm not convinced either way, but I think there's definitely interesting questions like these to ask.
Why in the absolute **** would they recreate old, outdated stuff when we can make new, safer things? How has that not crossed your mind?

I agree that space exploration is worth it. We use many things today that were created to help us get to the moon. It would also create tons of new STEM professionals that are fascinated with all of it, which would bring about more technological innovations, snowballing the speed and progress.

Why go back to the moon? To prove to a bunch of idiots that have no understanding of science that we've done it before? We can control machines to do the exploring for us on Mars. While I would LOVE to see us step on Mars, at the moment it's safer to have machines do it.

Then you have the idiot Fraudlerian talking about evidence, when he thinks the entire moon is 400 degrees at all times, talking about what we can and cannot do.
AcetylCoA gets reps

"God your dunce." - Swept

LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
post 1661426423 05-16-2022, 08:04 PM
-
#820
  1. bezarker
  2. LIBTARD from KS
  1. bezarker
  2. LIBTARD from KS
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
  5. Posts: 90,864
  6. Rep Power: 714481
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSGTsjkHzM4
post 1661429713 05-16-2022, 09:39 PM
-
#821
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
I seriously can't believe people can be so retarded.
I can, but luckily I dont often run into people as dumb as some of the straight up retards that are on the misc irl. Probably because they dont leave the house much. I try to convince myself most are trolling to retain some faith in humanity.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1661440203 05-17-2022, 06:13 AM
-
#822
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Dirty South
  5. Posts: 19,745
  6. Rep Power: 163712
Astronauts refusing to swear on the Bible

https://www.bitchute.com/video/53ufuuN2TXNy/
See you tomorrow
post 1661442123 05-17-2022, 07:09 AM
-
#823
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Originally Posted By Pterodactyl314⏩
Astronauts refusing to swear on the Bible

https://www.bitchute.com/video/53ufuuN2TXNy/
Lost it at the oldcel literally running away from having to face his lies lmao.



'We leave you much that isundone'
'Thosewho can remove one of truths protective layers'
post 1661444533 05-17-2022, 08:02 AM
-
#824
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 15,477
  5. Rep Power: 176552
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
So nasa steals trillions of tax dollars and invests a percentage of that into lobbyists who push for the ministry of truth so they have never found out?
Not only does it sound possible it sounds likely.
Trillions of dollars huh?
Since its inception, the United States has spent nearly US $650 billion (in nominal dollars) on NASA.
Permabulk/bloatlord Crew
Tradie Crew
HTC
post 1661448703 05-17-2022, 09:15 AM
-
#825
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
They didn't "lose the technology". That entire fallacy is based on a single, out of context remark by someone.

It refers to not having the technology on hand to do it again, and it's not about computers.

There hasn't been a heavy lift vehicle since the Saturn V that would be powerful enough for the task.

In layman's terms - bigger rockets need bigger support infrastructure, and there was no need to have big rockets like that.

It's not about not being able to recreate it. Could a Saturn V be built again? For sure. But to actually use it, it's not only the rocket you have to build. You also have to assemble it somewhere, launch it somewhere, etc. And it would have no purpose other than to prove that it could be done again.

TL;DR : People think they can ride their iPhones to the moon.
No, the idea is that we did lose the technology.

The explanation is that the rocket was made "special order" by hundreds of contractors and they did not keep organized records of how it was actually constructed.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661449133 05-17-2022, 09:24 AM
-
#826
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
No, the idea is that we did lose the technology.

The explanation is that the rocket was made "special order" by hundreds of contractors and they did not keep organized records of how it was actually constructed.
For the record, Dunningkrugerian has been sticking to his lies that the plans do not exist for 10 days, 850 posts and counting.

And that's probably his least insane claim.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
The people involved in the moon landing could easily have been duped by a simulation. It is in fact a job at the CIA to run and invent all kinds of simulations of attacks. They even have plans in case aliens attack. They know that's not going to happen but it's like a thought exercise.

The CIA probably has plans to fight Belgium if they have to.

Anyway, have all the technicians at NASA involved in a simulation would be easy.

I also noted that NASA has NO PLANS for how the rocket was made. I mean where has a government agency not kept files? In addition, it was the most important and attention getting project in US history, so they not having plans is really weird.

As I've said, the FBI had huge files on actors and singers, but they were guarding the f@cking moon rocket plans...come on.
post 1661451533 05-17-2022, 10:03 AM
-
#827
  1. thedarrenestes
  2. Country ass chit
  1. thedarrenestes
  2. Country ass chit
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Posts: 3,862
  5. Rep Power: 69127
Originally Posted By Skeptical_Hippo⏩
Just LMAO @ this ownage. Inb4 some random made up rebuttal about it actually being aluminum foil and cardboard
Believe me when I say this doesn't even crack the top 10 of this thread's pwnage
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
And waiting.
Nah you're just outta chit that ain't already been refuted
NASCAR American
HA
LVIIILLIAN
post 1661452183 05-17-2022, 10:15 AM
-
#828
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
For the record, Dunningkrugerian has been sticking to his lies that the plans do not exist for 10 days, 850 posts and counting.

And that's probably his least insane claim.
You are of course the opposite in that you know absolutely nothing.

The NASA quote on "losing" or having disorganized plans has already been posted, and not by me.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661452593 05-17-2022, 10:22 AM
-
#829
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
The NASA quote on "losing" or having disorganized plans has already been posted, and not by me.
No it hasn't, not once, not never.

NASA saying they have the full plans on microfilm and whatnot on the other hand has been posted several times.
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
5 seconds of Googling to debunk your outlandish schizo claim based on nothing whatsoever and supported by "muh gubmint job".

This is) a claim John Lewis made in his 1996 book, Mining the Sky, that he went looking for the Saturn 5 blueprints a few years ago and concluded, incredibly, they had been "lost."

Paul Shawcross, from NASA's Office of Inspector General, came to the agency's defense in comments published on CCNet -- a scholarly electronic newsletter covering the threat of asteroids and comets. Shawcross said the Saturn 5 blueprints are held at the Marshall Space Flight Center on microfilm.

"The Federal Archives in East Point, Georgia, also has 2,900 cubic feet of Saturn documents," he said. "Rocketdyne has in its archives dozens of volumes from its Knowledge Retention Program. This effort was initiated in the late '60s to document every facet of F 1 and J 2 engine production to assist in any future restart."

Shawcross cautioned that rebuilding a Saturn 5 would require more than good blueprints.

"The problem in recreating the Saturn 5 is not finding the drawings, it is finding vendors who can supply mid-1960's vintage hardware," he wrote, "and the fact that the launch pads and vehicle assembly buildings have been converted to space shuttle use, so you have no place to launch from.

https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...lans-destroyed

It's 60 year old tech that's wholly irrelevant today. It's like claiming that modern PCs are a hoax because *** lost the plans for manufacturing punch card computers or whatevers.

edit: the fuk, why is the abbreviation for International Business Machines censored?
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Trying reading what you posted.

It's as if we don't have a copy of the constitution but the hundreds of notes the guys took to put it together.

Again, we have organized 1,000 page documents about Elvis and many others, but don't have organized documents about the MOON ROCKET, you f@cking moron.

Read what you posted.
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
Nah, you read it. They have the complete blueprints, they're just worthless. But be my guest:

Geoffrey Hughes from the Rotary Rocket Company supported Shawcross's view.

"There is no point in even contemplating trying to rebuild the Saturn 5," he said. "Having a complete set of Saturn 5 blueprints would do us no good whatsoever. True, we would still be able to bend the big pieces of metal fairly easily. But they are not the problem.

"The real problem is the hundreds of thousands of other parts, some as apparently insignificant as a bolt or a washer, that are simply not manufactured any more. Everything would have to be redone. So a simple rebuild would be impossible. The only real answer would be to start from scratch and build anew using modern parts and processes. Yet another immense challenge!"

http://web.archive.org/web/201008181...ve_000313.html

You're a mentally ill schizo in desperate need of professional medical help. Try and get some.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
You are literally confirming what I've said via your posts to prove I'm wrong, lol.

That's moronic and very weak.

You posted WHAT I SAID thus proving me to be correct.....
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
I'll just paste it again for the audience so we can laugh at you

Paul Shawcross, from NASA's Office of Inspector General, came to the agency's defense in comments published on CCNet -- a scholarly electronic newsletter covering the threat of asteroids and comets. Shawcross said the Saturn 5 blueprints are held at the Marshall Space Flight Center on microfilm.

They exist. Fully. Now. You can stop confabulating.
post 1661461443 05-17-2022, 01:14 PM
-
#830
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
No it hasn't, not once, not never.

NASA saying they have the full plans on microfilm and whatnot on the other hand has been posted several times.
NASA does not say they have the full plans. They have said what I have said because I researched the topic.

A number of years ago this was in the news.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661461733 05-17-2022, 01:21 PM
-
#831
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
NASA does not say they have the full plans. They have said what I have said because I researched the topic.

A number of years ago this was in the news.
and we are to trust your research?
post 1661462433 05-17-2022, 01:32 PM
-
#832
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538


'We leave you much that isundone'
'Thosewho can remove one of truths protective layers'
post 1661462583 05-17-2022, 01:35 PM
-
#833
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
NASA does not say they have the full plans. They have said what I have said because I researched the topic.

A number of years ago this was in the news.
Please, you can't even read and exist in a separate bubble farted out by your narcissism.


It's ok, we understand, you're struggling to maintain your ego while looking at evidence that proves that - once again - you were completely wrong.
post 1661464113 05-17-2022, 02:02 PM
-
#834
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
Please, you can't even read and exist in a separate bubble farted out by your narcissism.


It's ok, we understand, you're struggling to maintain your ego while looking at evidence that proves that - once again - you were completely wrong.
Again, this is you.

I do not care about this topic that much. If the moon landing was fake or real, I don't actually care, but I think it's interesting.

I do not read your posts extensively but you're clearly an idiot that takes a minute to google something. When I research a topic I do so thoroughly to weigh all the factors.

It is a fact that NASA had "lost the plans" has been in the news. Their explanation is that they aren't lost but rather there are countless plans from different contractors.

That makes no sense given how comprehensive the FBI was with monitoring important people in the 60s.

You are the one who can't accept logic and doesn't do research.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661475893 05-17-2022, 06:02 PM
-
#835
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
The curious part imo is that they 1) lost all of that technology, all of those computers and 2) they haven't been able to recreate it or go back.

Now I know the counterargument for the second one is that it's too expensive and space exploration isn't worth it. Personally I think it could be worth it and it's at least very interesting. I haven't looked deep into this moon landing conspiracy so I'm not convinced either way, but I think there's definitely interesting questions like these to ask.
They have not lost the technology to build those computers.

They have lost the machining and launch platforms to build the equipment we used in 1969.

The launch platforms were modified for other vehicles including the space shuttle.


God you people are the stupidest on the planet.
U
post 1661477773 05-17-2022, 06:41 PM
-
#836
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
NASA does not say they have the full plans. They have said what I have said because I researched the topic.

A number of years ago this was in the news.
Both of you are a little off. They technically don't have an as built.
U
post 1661479273 05-17-2022, 07:15 PM
-
#837
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
and we are to trust your research?
Moron, you can use the internet.

If you were interested in the topic you would already know what I'm saying is accurate.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661479963 05-17-2022, 07:30 PM
-
#838
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
Both of you are a little off. They technically don't have an as built.
Yes, they said they don't have an exact set of plans because of countless contractors making individual parts for the overall machine.

That does not make sense based on what we NOW know about the FBI.

There would have been top security on the moon rocket because of the potential for sabotage.

If you know anything about the FBI, they had all kinds of monitoring, keyhole cameras, illegal wiretapping, and they kept giant records about mundane people like movie stars because they were afraid of them being perverts or communist agents trying to undermine the US.

So, the story that no one has exact records on the moon rocket has to be fake.

It's either fake or they have records they do not want to share for some reason.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1661481643 05-17-2022, 08:19 PM
-
#839
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Yes, they said they don't have an exact set of plans because of countless contractors making individual parts for the overall machine.

That does not make sense based on what we NOW know about the FBI.

There would have been top security on the moon rocket because of the potential for sabotage.

If you know anything about the FBI, they had all kinds of monitoring, keyhole cameras, illegal wiretapping, and they kept giant records about mundane people like movie stars because they were afraid of them being perverts or communist agents trying to undermine the US.

So, the story that no one has exact records on the moon rocket has to be fake.

It's either fake or they have records they do not want to share for some reason.
Well it actually does.

See certain aspects of the project would change as they went along and so they had to change a few things on the fly as there was an overall deadline (beating the USSR)


That's no different than say you building a house
U
post 1661481793 05-17-2022, 08:22 PM
-
#840
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Has anyone provided proof we landed on the moon? Other than the official copy and paste documents.
As
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts