Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Should Semi-Automatic Guns be banned?

View Poll Results: Ban them now?

Voters: 100.
Fuk off you won't get mine
79 79%
No but I'd still vote blue
3 3%
Yes ban them but I still consider myslelf conservative
11 11%
Hell yes (I'm a lib)
7 7%
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 30
post 1661901103 05-26-2022, 06:56 AM
-
#1
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Posts: 1,302
  5. Rep Power: 12413

Should Semi-Automatic Guns be banned?

Since there is a lot of discussion here i'd like to see some poll results



For your time

Veni Vidi Vici MMXI
post 1661901143 05-26-2022, 06:56 AM
-
#2
  1. BalognaNbeans
  2. Registered User
  1. BalognaNbeans
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,319
  6. Rep Power: 312457
No, stupid idea
post 1661901203 05-26-2022, 06:58 AM
-
#3
  1. badbl00d
  2. Registered User
  1. badbl00d
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2015
  4. Age: 44
  5. Posts: 42,044
  6. Rep Power: 363602
so pretty much everything outside of bolt action, and revolvers? Mmmm..last time I checked those were capable of killing too.
No man is your friend
No man is your enemy
Every man is your teacher

Black Crew
Lol @ Tradies Srs
AP4 crew
post 1661901313 05-26-2022, 07:00 AM
-
#4
  1. EDcellent
  2. You too
  1. EDcellent
  2. You too
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 14,086
  6. Rep Power: 140306
Yeah banning semi autos would eliminate the vast majority of firearms, so no lol.
post 1661901363 05-26-2022, 07:02 AM
-
#5
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Posts: 1,302
  5. Rep Power: 12413
Originally Posted By badbl00d
so pretty much everything outside of bolt action, and revolvers? Mmmm..last time I checked those were capable of killing too.
pretty much exactly what most dems and supporters want for now

so basically like it is in europe
Veni Vidi Vici MMXI
post 1661901433 05-26-2022, 07:05 AM
-
#6
  1. Better Unborn
  2. ♔ King Rotter ♔
  1. Better Unborn
  2. ♔ King Rotter ♔
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 26,485
  6. Rep Power: 181877
these edgelords would just start driving trucks through kid field trips
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
post 1661901723 05-26-2022, 07:11 AM
-
#7
  1. Azrairc
  2. TwinkMAXXing
  1. Azrairc
  2. TwinkMAXXing
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Posts: 18,933
  5. Rep Power: 64988
automatics shouldn't even be banned by the letter of the law, if you want to ban them amend the constitution (lol goodluck with that)


like any right it can be abused from time to time in a small manner of a country with 340,000,000,000 people... 0.000000000000001% become innocent victims unfortunately
post 1661902543 05-26-2022, 07:30 AM
-
#8
  1. Omnivium
  1. Omnivium
  2. Join Date: Feb 2013
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 19,694
  5. Rep Power: 80934
Absolutely not. We need guns to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. We cannot compromise on this no matter what
post 1661902793 05-26-2022, 07:35 AM
-
#9
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
Nope. I'm not an absolute cuck with a female's mindset/logic/reasoning/emotions
Originally Posted By Better
these edgelords would just start driving trucks through kid field trips
This. If someone wants to harm others, they'll find a tool to do it. Brah up in Wisconsin couldn't get a gun so he ran people over with his car. Same with the ****g0t up in Canada.
𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω ₅₀/₁₉₅
𝕬𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝕮𝖚𝖙 𝕸𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝕽𝖆𝖈𝖊 ®
ᗪIᔕᑕᖇIᗰIᑎᗩTIOᑎ E᙭ᑕᒪᑌᔕIOᑎ IᑎᗪOᑕTᖇIᑎᗩTIOᑎ
post 1661902843 05-26-2022, 07:37 AM
-
#10
  1. Tehcelltech
  2. Honk Honk
  1. Tehcelltech
  2. Honk Honk
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Posts: 4,163
  5. Rep Power: 27246
Ban public schools
Raw
Bench 385
Squat 445 to parallel
Deadlift 525

4doorsmorewhores crew
antiped0 action
anticommie action
post 1661903033 05-26-2022, 07:42 AM
-
#11
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Every gun law is an infringement of the second amendment.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1661903133 05-26-2022, 07:45 AM
-
#12
  1. Goat_187
  2. Registered User
  1. Goat_187
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 26,316
  7. Rep Power: 93130
Originally Posted By Omnivium
Absolutely not. We need guns to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. We cannot compromise on this no matter what
This. There is a reason its #2.
post 1661903213 05-26-2022, 07:46 AM
-
#13
  1. mvitz
  2. Registered User
  1. mvitz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 2,898
  5. Rep Power: 12613
Nope.

We should ban rotten politicians and the elite that control them.
post 1661903673 05-26-2022, 07:55 AM
-
#14
  1. jimbob007
  2. Keep The Red Flag Flying
  1. jimbob007
  2. Keep The Red Flag Flying
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 99,476
  6. Rep Power: 275015
No, they should be better controlled as to who can have them & they need a good reason why they require them.
post 1661912983 05-26-2022, 10:55 AM
-
#15
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Posts: 1,302
  5. Rep Power: 12413
Originally Posted By jimbob007
No, they should be better controlled as to who can have them & they need a good reason why they require them.
That would violate the 2nd amendment imo

Every citizen should have the right to defend his life and freedom so you can't define what those good reasons to require are because everyone has the right to do so
Veni Vidi Vici MMXI
post 1661913233 05-26-2022, 10:59 AM
-
#16
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Originally Posted By jimbob007
No, they should be better controlled as to who can have them & they need a good reason why they require them.
New York already does that and that place is a cesspool.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1661913933 05-26-2022, 11:11 AM
-
#17
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: -, -, Netherlands
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 125767
Originally Posted By SteinerSteve
That would violate the 2nd amendment imo

Every citizen should have the right to defend his life and freedom so you can't define what those good reasons to require are because everyone has the right to do so
Where would you draw the line then? What if a regular citizen wants to defend their own property with a tank?
post 1661913983 05-26-2022, 11:12 AM
-
#18
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Originally Posted By Barteh
Where would you draw the line then? What if a regular citizen wants to defend their own property with a tank?
hoooooly phucking balls, this was just said LMAO!

If you can afford a tank, the maintenance, ammo, and don't harm anyone else, then hats off to them for being CEOs making 10k per day and it's no ones business except theirs.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1661914103 05-26-2022, 11:14 AM
-
#19
  1. Bigbuster1
  2. 41oz King
  1. Bigbuster1
  2. 41oz King
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 10,571
  5. Rep Power: 86766
It's the "AR-Style Fully Semi-Auto" that are doing most of the damage.
post 1661914533 05-26-2022, 11:20 AM
-
#20
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  2. Join Date: Feb 2006
  3. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 132,830
  5. Subscribers: 8
  6. Rep Power: 1753489
no guns should be banned

/ thread
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1661914563 05-26-2022, 11:20 AM
-
#21
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: -, -, Netherlands
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 125767
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps
hoooooly phucking balls, this was just said LMAO!

If you can afford a tank, the maintenance, ammo, and don't harm anyone else, then hats off to them for being CEOs making 10k per day and it's no ones business except theirs.
So where would you draw the line?
post 1661933623 05-26-2022, 04:38 PM
-
#22
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  1. SteinerSteve
  2. Tanned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Posts: 1,302
  5. Rep Power: 12413
Originally Posted By Barteh
Where would you draw the line then? What if a regular citizen wants to defend their own property with a tank?
I wouldn’t draw any new line since gun laws are already much stricter than they used to be in the US with some states already having bs gun laws active srs

It’s a free country and it’s founded on those values


The only option I’d consider is a psycological test prior purchase to newbies. Also a better ID and background check. If you commit any felony you lose your right to have them until you pass a even stricter test and check again. I’d also consider selling ARs only to people of 21 yrs and older since most school shooters are pretty much below 21.

Other than that make sure people don’t get into schools easy as he did

I’d much more focus on criminals in charge of deadly weapons and getting them from them since there is a much higher death toll be abuse of them every year than school shootings as hard as it may sounds. And it’s no coincidence that most of them do whatever they want in liberal states and cities nowadays think about that
Veni Vidi Vici MMXI
post 1661933863 05-26-2022, 04:42 PM
-
#23
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,170
  6. Rep Power: 274420
Ban liberal propaganda and globohomo. Keep the guns.
For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
post 1661933923 05-26-2022, 04:43 PM
-
#24
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Too many people have guns to ban them now.

Id say to ban certain types of ammunition, 5.56 and up.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1661934043 05-26-2022, 04:46 PM
-
#25
  1. dmike100
  2. Registered User
  1. dmike100
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 2,861
  5. Rep Power: 26438
Go build your own country without the right to self-defense.
Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved and tyranny is erected on its ruins.

Benjamin Franklin
post 1661934153 05-26-2022, 04:49 PM
-
#26
  1. jamalfudge
  2. Throbbing Member
  1. jamalfudge
  2. Throbbing Member
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 39,406
  6. Rep Power: 297374
Originally Posted By Omnivium
Absolutely not. We need guns to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. We cannot compromise on this no matter what
Pretty much this.
#
post 1661934183 05-26-2022, 04:50 PM
-
#27
  1. navid93
  2. Registered User
  1. navid93
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 11,474
  6. Rep Power: 25768
Isn’t semi automatic almost every gun lol
post 1661934663 05-26-2022, 05:01 PM
-
#28
  1. AWSbruh
  2. Registered User
  1. AWSbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,330
  6. Rep Power: 54725
No weapons should be banned ded fkn srs. If I want to get a Nuke I should be able to get one
post 1661934893 05-26-2022, 05:06 PM
-
#29
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Barteh
So where would you draw the line?
pretty sure in texas you can buy a tank. id draw it at chemical/radioactive weapons
post 1661934983 05-26-2022, 05:08 PM
-
#30
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 15,250
  5. Rep Power: 107906
I think the issue is a mental health crisis. AFAIK banning them wouldn't make a difference.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn


"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts