Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Another L for vaxcels (9 sigma event)
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 148
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Last
post 1663464993 06-26-2022, 05:12 AM
-
#1
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966

Another L for vaxcels (9 sigma event)



"This is a massive safety signal for infertility. Germany's FIRST report of birth rates since the rollout.

Remember that the birth rate data is 9 months too late.

If the next quarter is worse, this is Children of Men scenario."

***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465073 06-26-2022, 05:16 AM
-
#2
  1. Ikarsuz1337
  2. Registered User
  1. Ikarsuz1337
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 6,474
  6. Rep Power: 17032
sacrificed on the altar of soyience
post 1663465133 06-26-2022, 05:18 AM
-
#3
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966
Originally Posted By Ikarsuz1337
sacrificed on the altar of soyience
"Jab in haste, repent at your leisure"

(I'm double-jabbed btw)
***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465173 06-26-2022, 05:22 AM
-
#4
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514
I don't see how this is bad exactly lol
++
post 1663465183 06-26-2022, 05:22 AM
-
#5
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
who needs abortion when u can just get quintuple jabbed?
post 1663465223 06-26-2022, 05:26 AM
-
#6
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966
Originally Posted By TokenV
I don't see how this is bad exactly lol
Lowering the birthrate, thinning out the herd a bit? Maybe get to the magical 500 million population as per the Georgia Guidestones?

I see those Malthusian eggheads at the WEF have gotten to you too
***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465283 06-26-2022, 05:29 AM
-
#7
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
my guess is that it's just an incomplete count (bad data).... No way it dropped that much.
post 1663465293 06-26-2022, 05:29 AM
-
#8
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1663465303 06-26-2022, 05:29 AM
-
#9
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 64,672
  6. Rep Power: 351111
if it does turn out there are consequences for many who took an experimental vaccine to fight a cold, what will the backlash be? Can people even sue their employers who forced them to take it?
It's honestly insane how the media (sponsored by Pfizer) can keep people tame when their own lives are being ruined but rile them up when it's time to support what the Democrats want.

Liberals destroy your neighborhood? "Media said it's okay so I don't care."

Trumpers riot at the capitol? "OMG hundreds of unarmed 40 year olds were going to take over the most powerful nation in history that afternoon! Muh Democracy"
post 1663465343 06-26-2022, 05:31 AM
-
#10
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
This is another textbook example ofpost hoc, ergo propter hoc.: After this, therefore because of this.



It's a very common argument by the Chicken Nugget Crew, and notice there's not actually any rigorous scientific argument as to why it's causing infertility; just a vague hand wave to the LNPs.


The actual pharmacovigilance data ( the gold standard when assessing a vaccine safety) on the vaccines are fairly unanimous: The vaccines are safe and well-tolerated in hundreds of millions of cases--with a system sensitive enough to detect one in a thousand % events--and there is no biochemical plausibility by which the vaccine could cause a long-term issue down the road.


Response to this? Insults and childishness, as per usual.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1663465363 06-26-2022, 05:34 AM
-
#11
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514
Originally Posted By keels141
Lowering the birthrate, thinning out the herd a bit? Maybe get to the magical 500 million population as per the Georgia Guidestones?

I see those Malthusian eggheads at the WEF have gotten to you too
not sure what you're saying exactly but we are with too many on this planet already brah

no kids crew
++
post 1663465393 06-26-2022, 05:38 AM
-
#12
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN
my guess is that it's just an incomplete count (bad data).... No way it dropped that much.
Maybe...will be interesting to see the births and deaths figures come out this year.

Birth rates and all cause mortality are two data points that are hard to manipulate, and the frustrating thing is how much manipulation of the data there has been over the last two years:

- Covid deaths being manipulated (any death with a positive PCR within 28 days was treated as a covid death - even if you died from a car accident on day 27 and tested positive)
- Deaths within 14 days of taking the vaccine treated as an "unvaccinated death"
- PCR tests themselves being run at >35 cycles, making them meaningless. PCR test inventor Kary Mullis has said the PCR test should never have been used as a diagnostic tool in the first place.

The list goes on...anyway the data will trickle out slowly one way or the other.
***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465423 06-26-2022, 05:39 AM
-
#13
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966
Originally Posted By Bodhy
This is another textbook example ofpost hoc, ergo propter hoc.: After this, therefore because of this.



It's a very common argument by the Chicken Nugget Crew, and notice there's not actually any rigorous scientific argument as to why it's causing infertility; just a vague hand wave to the LNPs.


Response to this? Insults and childishness, as per usual.
Lol
***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465453 06-26-2022, 05:40 AM
-
#14
  1. Elias373
  2. Registered User
  1. Elias373
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 2,554
  6. Rep Power: 9372
LOL at Jabcels
post 1663465473 06-26-2022, 05:42 AM
-
#15
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Majority of births were already to foreigners. And who do you think was the majority of the people getting the injections? You think the native German population saved them for the foreigners out of the good of their hearts? You know, because they were so safe and effective.

This thing is a demonic suicide cult, and always has been.
post 1663465523 06-26-2022, 05:45 AM
-
#16
  1. Lastrepbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. Lastrepbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 2,235
  6. Rep Power: 9745
Still love this for them
We're all gonna make it brahs
post 1663465543 06-26-2022, 05:45 AM
-
#17
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  1. keels141
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,469
  7. Rep Power: 35966
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002
That quarter data is alarming but it is possible that the effects of the vaccine cause shorter term issues with pregnancy and eventually the effects of thr vaccine wear off over time as the body heals. We would need to track the pregnancy rate over time to ascertain if there is a permanent change in the ability of women to get pregnant.

That being said, even if the vaccine does cause reproductive issues even in the short term but resolve over time ,it is not supposed to do that and that is a massive issue
Yeah even short term would be an issue, since people were pressured so much into taking it.

Saying it was "safe and effective" for pregnant women when the extent of testing was on 42 PREGNANT RATS (srs - a Texas court has just forced Pfizer to release this info) is criminal.

Also there were ~70 pregnant women in the Pfizer study, a huge number had miscarriages (>70% I believe).

One of the side-effects reported by 3 women was blue/green breast milk (this is from Naomi Wolf's research).

Hopefully class action lawsuits are on the way and these criminals can rot in jail (or public hanging would be my preference).
***Trapped on prison island crew***
post 1663465553 06-26-2022, 05:46 AM
-
#18
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  3. Join Date: Apr 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 126,581
  6. Rep Power: 181292
So... they don't even try to correlate vaccination status with fertility (or any other factor)? Just a blanket proclamation that any medical result which occurred throughout 2021 into 2022 is solely due to vaccines?
post 1663465583 06-26-2022, 05:48 AM
-
#19
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514
Originally Posted By nutsy54
So... they don't even try to correlate vaccination status with fertility (or any other factor)? Just a blanket proclamation that anything which occurred in the 1st quarter of 2022 is solely due to vaccines?
of course
++
post 1663465633 06-26-2022, 05:51 AM
-
#20
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1663465683 06-26-2022, 05:54 AM
-
#21
  1. Jkm94
  2. Registered User
  1. Jkm94
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Posts: 4,092
  5. Rep Power: 19328
The vaxcels will accumulate L every time while the Purebloods have nothing to worry about
post 1663465713 06-26-2022, 05:57 AM
-
#22
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  1. TokenV
  2. I ❤ TECHNO
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: Belgium
  5. Posts: 41,404
  6. Rep Power: 442514
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002
Its a hypothesis. Do you have a better one? (Srs) Im open to any thoughts for this fall in birth rates
I don't know brah but I'd start with asking myself whereJikkyleaks (Fan account)took the data from
++
post 1663465773 06-26-2022, 05:59 AM
-
#23
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 32,148
  6. Rep Power: 346618
Yeah mildly concerned for society but my family avoided Covid vaccines

But just lol if you think I’m gonna run around spreading “breaking news the vaccines finally killing people” off of something like this. Why should I even care I’m not vaxxed. Gonna take a whole lot more then a most likely nothing burger.
post 1663465833 06-26-2022, 06:02 AM
-
#24
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By nutsy54
So... they don't even try to correlate vaccination status with fertility (or any other factor)? Just a blanket proclamation that anything which occurred in the 1st quarter of 2022 is solely due to vaccines?
Originally Posted By TokenV
of course
This. Like I said, textbook post hoc, ergo propter hoc. A common fallacy employed by conspiracy theorists. It's the worst thing about conspiracy theorists too; they just think too highly of people. That every doctor and scientist is in on some evil conspiracy to help the radical Marxists eradicate the pure bloods. Oh, but they're also admitting this in public documents btw.


Plus, this kind of statistic would be impossible to hide. We'd know if 80% of pregnant women in the Western hemisphere had undergone a miscarriage in the previous year.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1663465913 06-26-2022, 06:06 AM
-
#25
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  3. Join Date: Apr 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 126,581
  6. Rep Power: 181292
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002
Its a hypothesis. Do you have a better one? (Srs) Im open to any thoughts for this fall in birth rates
Well, I'd start with actual facts. Not sure how your cited post is claiming roughly 65,000 births per quarter, when Germany's annual rate is nearly 800,000 in recent years.

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/So...ifference.html

You'll also note their birth rate decreased in 2017, 2019, and 2020. With no 2021 or 2022 data posted yet.
post 1663466073 06-26-2022, 06:18 AM
-
#26
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1663469593 06-26-2022, 08:25 AM
-
#27
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002
Fair point. This does show a drop off in 2022, but still need more data. What the OP was showing was the average monthly birth rate for the first quarter of 2022.The graph was accurate, just unclear.

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/So...E28E07.live732
If that's monthly average, that would correlate with the 800k.... And is troubling.
post 1663469693 06-26-2022, 08:28 AM
-
#28
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
nice to see old Chit Smearer still getting rustled
post 1663470373 06-26-2022, 08:44 AM
-
#29
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1663470883 06-26-2022, 09:00 AM
-
#30
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 30,900
  6. Rep Power: 79002
The vaccine situation will take decades to sort out, with so many people having taken it and it having an extremely convenient confounding factor for any irregular data that comes out (ie COVID being the "real" cause), we might never know if it did have serious long term side effects.
#FreeCryptoBandit
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts