Okay? Lol how does this disprove any of the genetic studies I posted?

Also I'm saying the higher class and nobility was white hence so many pharaos with red, blonde hair. Also Egypt's history is very long, we're talking from 4000 BC, so of course during that time period there was some mixing with other ethnic groups and theory is that the average egyptian got more mixed when time went on but nobility didn't mix so much.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-b...7704PB20110801

"Half of European men share King Tut's DNA"

"Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy center, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III"

"The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent"

Keep coping

Lol this thread is still on. We need an Egyptian brah to clear confusion

Modern egyptians aren't the same though. Only copts come closest to the ancient egyptians.

I know. Maybe he'd be aware of his countrys historical stuff but then again years of jihadism probably rotted their brains

Really want to know the ethnicity of PissantSoldier, could explain his butthurt itt.

I think the answer can be found on his Wikipedia page early life section...

Wouldnt be surprised

Lmfao indeed, wouldn't be surprised.

Dude also has a hate boner for Trump and passionately defends the new amazon LOTR series.


lol

Well Trump shilled for the tribe aswell. ZOG doesnt only apply to the left or to the ruling party they own the right too internationally.

I think by attacking Trump theyre creating fake agendas/ conflicts so people there wont be talking about the real stuff that is going on over there. That trick is ancient

You're going to love this about, ****ggot

https://www.livescience.com/15388-di...hamen-dna.htmlSo to clarify, iGENEA watched a discovery channel special, and without the full data, created a false narrative to help them push their DNA kits.

A 2020 DNA study into Tut and his family, previous Pharoahs in the lineage can be found here.https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article...64?login=false

This is peer reviewed, and guess what ****ggot? Europeans aren't related tohim. So a sensationalist headline to get people to buy a DNA kit. lmao, brb let me watch discovery channel and create my own theory about a haplogroup and how I'm actually a direct descendent of Alexander the Great brb - "100% of Europeans are related to Alexander the Great".

Strong everything

COPE you dumb ****ggot

WE WUZ KING TUT

If you're going to start using that as a claim then you might as well say you're related to every historical Indo-Aryan, Proto-Into-Euro and Indo-Euro.

WE WUZ GANDHI
WE WUZ XERXES
WE WUZ NEFERTITI
WE WUZ AKHENATENGagging for white cok again I see, Turks truly are betaI'm related to King Tut

I took this DNA test that shows I'm related to King Tut, you should try it. Only $299 and you can confirm it too

[QUOTE=PissantSoldier post_id=1667451923]You're going to love this about, ****ggot

[URL=https://www.livescience.com/15388-discovery-channel-tutankhamen-dna.html]https://www.livescience.com/15388-di...hamen-dna.html[/URL]



So to clarify, iGENEA watched a discovery channel special, and without the full data, created a false narrative to help them push their DNA kits.

A 2020 DNA study into Tut and his family, previous Pharoahs in the lineage can be found here.[URL=https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/30/R1/R24/5924364?login=false]https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article...64?login=false[/URL]

This is peer reviewed, and guess what ****ggot? Europeans aren't related to[b]him[/b]. So a sensationalist headline to get people to buy a DNA kit. lmao, brb let me watch discovery channel and create my own theory about a haplogroup and how I'm actually a direct descendent of Alexander the Great brb - "100% of Europeans are related to Alexander the Great".

Strong everything

COPE you dumb ****ggot

WE WUZ KING TUT

If you're going to start using that as a claim then you might as well say you're related to every historical Indo-Aryan, Proto-Into-Euro and Indo-Euro.

WE WUZ GANDHI
WE WUZ XERXES
WE WUZ NEFERTITI
WE WUZ AKHENATEN



Gagging for white cok again I see, Turks truly are beta



I'm related to King Tut

I took this DNA test that shows I'm related to King Tut, you should try it. Only $299 and you can confirm it too

[img]https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/mobile/000/035/699/pepe.jpmg][/QUOTE]
Lmao incel denying that Egyptians were astronauts like any sane man doesnt mean Im whitemaxxing.

You sound growingly rustled af in every new post you make.

Besides my ethnicity is none of your business. I know that youknowhwoes claim that theyre locals whenever they move to a different country but for normal people it doesnt work that way

The official Scottish history books of the 14th century, the Scottichronicon, details the Egyptian roots of the Scottish, The Irish too corroborate this with their Leinster documents. It's well known. Awesome thread ****inator, reps for life

Pissant is such an anti-white NPC, Early life check is needed. Location "New (Jew) York"

Look at Pissants post to rep ratio, what an unpopular poster. Quite justified. Why is he so invested in the anti-white narrative he is pushing?

You're denying evidence and supporting nonsense, you're definitely whitemaxxing you ****ggot

The later dynasties of a 3,000 year-long empire were Nubian, and Greco-Roman. Both these groups of people were interacting in Egypt and mixing anyway. Prior to larger scale invasions and occupations, the genetic diversity of the land is pretty consistent with Copt Egyptians today as was the ruling class. Europeans weren't Ancient Egyptians.

You could make the claim that there are common ancestors, because of the way humans travelled, but a direct relation to King Tut and saying WE WEZ is pure unadulterated and concentrated COPE.The Scotichronicon is mythological

rofl

And "anti-white narrative"? You ****ggs are trying to claim everything was made by us

It's worse than Hotep claims because it's at least the same continent, utter retard ****g

So mythological its in the Declaration of Arbroath, right? Founding a nations declaration of independence on a made up story...yeah sure. I wish Jews like you would stop hating people groups who created actual nations and civilizations.

The Bible influences many declarations we have, and that's also mythological with some history to cling on to its narrative.

****gg

The Hebews claimed to be slaves in Egypt. Guess what? No evidence.

A jew denying the bible too? Shocking

Who said I'm Jewish? You ****ggots can't stop projecting

Deluded and strange

So I read your cope study, no where does it state euros are not related to him.


https://www.livescience.com/15388-di...hamen-dna.html

Same in this article you posted, no where do they deny that Tut is related to euros but from the limited data found the conclusions still stand.

And I delved a bit deeper into this and the research is very controversial.

Great deep dive article:********************/matter/tutankhamu...d-9fb62a68597b

The truth is we just don't know yet but next generation sequencing should solve it.

"Next-generation sequencing may also transform the search for the genetic origins of the ancient Egyptians. Egyptologists could, in theory, use next-generation sequencing to look at the entire genomes of hundreds or even thousands of individuals: there are certainly enough mummies around. This could radically deepen their understanding of where these populations really came from, and how they moved around over time. For those who are interested in hearing the results, that just might solve the riddle over the pharaohs’ race and ancestry once and for all."

So in conclusion the caucasian theory hasn't been debunked at all.

And this is just the DNA part.

How do you explain so many mummies with red and blonde hair?



Ramses 2 had red hair for example and other mummies from egyptian nobility had blonde hair. (many mummies before Alexander conquered Egypt btw)

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wor...cient-17215576

Coffin of Tutankhamun's great-grandmother opened to show preserved body with blonde hair

TUTANKHAMUN’S great-grandmother may have had blonde hair, after footage showed her tomb being opened for the first time in years.

I think judging by your post to rep ratio and your complete denial of the facts ITT, you are at the very least an obvious troll who no one should take seriously.

Ltc detected

The paper is form 2020, your medium is from 2014. It has been sequenced and identified. Europeans aren't related to Tut.

Or, Napoleon was actually Ethiopian. Afterall, E1b1b1c1 is most commonly found there.

French people are actually Ethiopian, who knew?

Do you understand that going of Y-DNA haplogroups shows nothing? Do you realize how retarded you are yet?

And your paper didn't prove that euros are not related to Tut. Again quote me where it states your claim. Otherwise you're a liar

https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article...64?login=false

Hell from your cope paper:

"A 4-generation pedigree of Tutankhamun’s immediate lineage and the identity of his ancestors were established.The Royal male lineage was the Y-chromosome haplogroup R1b that was passed from the grandparent (Amenhotep III) to the father (KV55, Akhenaten) to the grandchild (Tutankhamen).The maternal lineage, the mitochondrial haplogroup K, extended from the great-grandmother (Thuya) to the grandmother (KV35 Elder lady, Queen Tiye) to the yet historically unidentified mother (KV35 Younger lady) to Tutankhamen (38,55)."

Keep on coping

So wait, Napoleon is Ethiopian, is what you're saying. Yeah?

Strong everything, and all this from a DNA company pausing the discovery channel. WOW!

Most Ethiopians are related to Napoleon Bonaparte. Get your DNA test to see if you are too!

We were kings. Holy **** no ebonics about this topic. Congrats whites we won.

Why can't we? The only reason why we can't put people into boxes is because it's racist. It is fair that we do not do that in modern era, because suggesting one side has does more will only degrade the other. It is understandable. Any theory that would suggest the opposite would be shut down, regardless whether it makes sense or not.

But hypothetically speaking, if we all came from Africa hundred + thousand years ago, it logically makes absolute sense for certain groups to evolve faster than others. Not necessarily because one was superior from the start but because living conditions have benefited human living in Europe compared to areas of the world around equator.
If you are living in USA or Europe and have travelled towards hotter countries, you would notice a slowdown in your thought process. European balanced climate keeps your mind more engaged, Europe has more wildlife, more forests, more animals, more protein, perfect land for growing, etc. There's nothing crazy about suggesting that European people (regardless of your ethnicity or shade (but generally white)) would evolve to be smarter over 100k+ years, which is generally supported by European history, development of practically everything. Europe is by far the most successful continent in terms of what our human race has achieved.

Now, compare European continent to any other continent, especially in the hotter regions of the world. Africa? Central America region? South East and West Asia? Middle East? Look what Australian natives have achieved in 50,000 years, very little. There's just no comparison, regardless of your skin tone. The only reason why white skin tone is looked at by many as superior is not because of what it looks like but what it represents and what white people have achieved.

So, there is nothing ludacris about suggesting that the success of Egyptian Empire was because of white people, who probably sailed or walked across. To be fair, it's not that far.

Hahahaha this is utterly deranged. What a lunatic

Fan fiction

How so? Please do address what you think is wrong. It's just a discussion, no need to get emotional....

Nah, I'm bored of this now, it's a never ending stream of retards

Napoleon is Ethiopian. King Tut is from Britain. I can draw scientific conclusions by pausing the discovery channel.

So you can't quote anywhere from your paper king Thut is not related to euros. Thanks for confirming what everyone here knows mister liar.

Keep on coping

And yes if R1b is dominant in the DNA analysis it's a clear indicator of the link with euros.

Why does this make you so mad though? Please do tell us your etnicity.

How is it deranged?

You do know there are clear differences between races right? You do know how evolution works right?

That's fine, I am not the one saying that Europeans were 100% responsible for Egyptian progress. But it can still be considered if there's some evidence to the claim. After all, as I said, Europe is only across the sea and it's not like natives were known to be intellectually gifted.