Where in scripture does it describe that verse as such? I’ve done quite a bit of reading on these passages, and nothing I came across indicates the contradiction that Christ was implying they could not use self defense. Self defense is shown several times throughout the New Testament.

No I clearly agree with evolution as it’s understood. You don’t seem to know what that is.

The same as the Jewish church saying they see no disagreement with the Bible and how evolution was presented by Darwin.

And if what you got out of bio class was “humans evolve from monkeys”. I would place you at around elementary school education?

The shared ape ancestors is at least high school take.

So we are on the same page, evolution in the sense of : man and chimps share a common ancestor, speciation is a fact, and man descended from ancestral apes. You seemed to to take issue with these basic scientific facts above, which are discussed at length in any modern biology textbook, and which any evolutionary biologist understands. Im not talking about how evolution occurs: the importance of genetic drift, sexual selection, punctuated equilibrium etc...Im talking about that itdidoccur, which is an overwhelmingly evidenced fact.

Edit:
Where did I say this?

My book, THE book, is vastly superior to modern biology books . You saying the latter is the truth is no difference than me believing mine is. It’s all speculative. You’ll she’ll know the truth someday.

Edit 2:
Sorry no, your book has shown to be wrong in basic facts from science and history, contains contradictions etc. The overwhelming point though is biology textbooks are based in evidenced facts in contrast to various holy books. We know the facts contained within have truth to them because we can literally test them all the time. Many of the findings are used every day, constantly, in such disciplines as medicine and genetics. Your post here, like Krakens, is one of anti-intellectualism- and is laughable.

My argument is on the current shared ape research. How’s that link going.

Specifically the research around alesi

Hail Lord XenuHail Lord XenuHail Lord Xenu

What? Again, are you trying to say that common ancestry/speciation/humans descended from ancestral primates is not the prevailing view of modern biologists? Because if you are, you are wrong. It's an overwhelmingly supported fact....there's a reason its taught in any science classroom... What am I even arguing with here?

lmao yes I am sure Jesus would be proud of people standing in front of Costco raging at people l m f a o

He did condensed the condemned gamblers and prostitutes that one sermon he seemed rightoutlt angerrd

bruh does your book explain how DNA replication works? cuz mine does bruh

Sure it does!

It really does not. Everything they sold you on has been “debunked”.. one of my favorite s was chromagnum man. We did not come from apes nor any other monkey species. I can go through them all. I was an atheist up until I was just about 30, raised by a Jew that believed the Darwinian model of evolution. When you really start looking into it, it’s all nonsense. You have variations of horses, whales, but only one variation of a human being..what you do not have is one species transitioning to another...if you find a fossil in the dirt, all you know is it died. you can't prove it had any kids, and you sure can't prove it had different kids.

DNA is the perfect example of evidence that supports a creator, both Hood & Crick described DNA as code, a language. Show me one example of a language/code that did not come from a mind. Even when we look at the way genomes function, it is clear a creator is responsible. Genomes of animals were created by a genius. Here is part of the mouse genome on chromosome number 2, maybe someone can explain the function of this sequence of nucleotide bases...
gcagtggaca caggaatacg cagtggacac aggaatatgc agtggagaca ggaatacgca gtggacacag gaatacgcag tggacacagg aatacgcagt ggacacagga atacgcagtg gagacaggaa tatgcagtgg agacaggaat acgcagtgga cacaggaata cgcagtggac acaggaatac gcagtggaga ctggaatatg cagtggagac aggaacacgc agtggagaca ggaatatgca gtggagacag gaatacgcag tggagacagg aatacgcagt ggacacagga atacgcagtg gagacaggaa tacgcagtgg agacaggaac acgcagtgga gacaggaaca cgcagtggag acaggaatac gctgtggaga caggaataca ctgggtcggt ttggacgttg gtgctgggga ttgaagcaag ccttgaacgc gaccagacag tgctgtaact gaactgcttc ttccctgggg cagtgtttct ttcagttccg aggttctgct cacctggttt ctaatttatg cagataaatc tctgggtcaa gcataagtgt gcctacaact ttagcccttg gaagggaaag gcaggggatt gggagtttaa ccccaacctg cactgcgcag tgagactcta tctcaaaata ataatattgc agttggtaat cgggtctgtg aatccaaaat agtcctgaaa tatcatgttt tatcagtctc ttttataaaa acctaacaat attaccaaaa agccattgga ctgtctggag tactggagtt gggagcatta gaaaatgagg aaacagacag tggctctctg ctgctgcctg tctgaaggtg tagaaggtcc tccattggta gaggtttcaa gcagaaggca gcagtattgc cattcatctc tctgtctttc tccttcacag gagtatttct tgcaagcaga gttgacaagt aacgttttga aaacaggagt ggtccactgc tgtgtggggc agtgcaacaa caccatccct gtggacacca tccttaccat gaagaaactg cctatcactt atgtacgttc actgtgggag ttaagtcact caagcacctt ttcttgcttg tgcgttatgt gtctgtctag gttctggatg agggaggtaa tggagtcgtt tctataatgc ttccttcccc aagagttttc tatggaagca tggcagatgt gagttctgcc tttttgtcag agatggaacc aatgatctaa agtgagttgg gttggatgac tgctatttcc tgggtgtgct aaagacttcc agcctgggag gttgagctgt gctgagagac ctcagagggg agctgtttgc ctggaggacc tggttcaatc tttctttgtt ctttatctct ttcttattct ctggtgctag aaactgagca tgctagttgt gtactccagc gctcagcagt ccctagttct ttatctcctg atgggatgat tgtgttagtc ctctaaagga ctgggatgga gttgagtcta gatcagtgat cagtgggtgt gcacagccac aatgaattag catgttagca gatgtgacag taattcggcg ctttttggtg aaaaattttt atccttagat tgtcccttac tctttttctt atccatcctt gtagagcaac aggaaggaaa acaagggtgg ctacctctgc cactcatgtg cagagcagcg catcgggcct ttggcattcc tgactgcctc

This is only a small part of the 2,700,000,000 nucleotide bases that can create a mouse. If anyone believes that this is a result of random chance then they are mentally challenged

No it doesnt. Passage that specifically refers to DNA and its replication, including the role of enzymes such as DNA polymerase, etc? Oh wait, it's not there. Remember: merely saying something doesnt make it true.

Example:
'17 is even'
'ants are larger than elephants'
'triangles have 4 sides'
etc

I mean what's going on in the mind of posters like Deathstroke when they see content they dont like: just respond with an obvious false claim....andstillthink 'that'll show em!'. Just lol cant make this up. Sorry, no the bible doesnt explain how DNA replication works. Bio textbooks do though.This is false, but remember you can merely just say anything, as Deathstroke above is doing. These posts come across as someone unfamiliar with any of this, just giving a hot take on a forum. More importantly, the field of biology, myriads of evolutionary biologists, and the vast research and data disagree with you. There is a reason why basic facts like evolution and common ancestry are taught in any university bio class. You will not 'solve' or 'refute' this fact- actually the entire paradigm underlying modern biological science- by merely debating in words on a bb forum, sorry. That's not how science is done.

I'll await the paradigm-shifting, shattering published research of Paul- from the field- in peer reviewed journals, overturning biology as we know it. Until then, biology will continue to do its thing and we will continue to understand basic facts like humans sharing (relatively recent) common ancestors with chimps. Students in biology class will continue to learn about their real origins. Say hi to your cousins (and all of our cousins)

Just getting smashed during Hurricane Ian
Wait until I sober down I’ll show em you all thrn Srs

That’s an appeal to authority and it is is not a valid argument. You keep stating that we share a common ancestor with apes, but this is simply not true..do you have any evidence supporting this claim other than..”my school book says so”..? Not trying to be an ass, but you wouldn’t accept an argument of..”cause my Bible says so”. Cambrian explosion amongst the fossil evidence itself does not support the Darwinian model of evolution

Does it come from the same book that states living things originated from dead things?

Also the OP clearly stated to do the opposite of raging.

I'm right here with you in Broward. We probably go to the same Costco!

Theres freedom in denying yourself and living for God/Love. Freedom I wish you will all discover. If anyone is interested in learning more about God feel free to message me.

Living things clearly come from nonliving things. Living things are made of nonliving things.

And the mouse genome has been fully sequenced, btw.

They CLEARLY come from non living things even though no consensus has been reached among scientists.

But please, explain in detail.

Are you made of elements? Y/N? Are elements alive? Y/N? How did the first elements form?

There is a consensus among scientists on this. You aren't a scientist.

It is clearly sequenced by a creator, I agree, random mutations never produce functional information. Try again..

And exactly when in the history of the known universe has every a nonliving animal/organism ever produced a living?

Go on..

The Bible does not in fact talk about quantum physics. If you think it does, you are simply projecting and reinterpreting to fit your own belief. This is heresy.

I'm going to carry on smashing baby skulls as per the Good Book.

brb my favorite Psalm.... 137:9... "How blessed will be the one who seizes your young children and pulverizes them against the cliff!"

lulz

Whoa! Y/N! I just learned something new, awesome! Hey Mr. Science guy, can I ask a few more questions?

This nonliving thing that created man, did it also create the complexity of life such as dinosaurs, lions, freaking whales, fish, frogs, cockroaches, dogs and cats? Or was there a bunch of non living things that communicated with each other and told each other hey you create humans I create a t rex?

While you're at it what are the probabilities, if any, is such a thing even realistically possible? Let's say you're right. There are 10 billion other earth like planets, yet 0 life. All just a convenient little coincidence, right?

Get your head out your ass.

Those elements are always derived from a living entity..

The rest of your statement is a fallacy of an appeal to authority which is not a valid argument.
Try again.

Also, if you are trying to argue the Big Bang..I’m sorry but that is an impossibility

Are you aware that we literally MADE a cell? As in, literally synthesized all the components from scratch and created life?

Dickhead.

Look up Craig Venter's work.

https://www.nature.com/articles/531557aNo they are not. How the fuk is hydrogen derived from living entities? There were zero living entities in this universe when most of the hydrogen formed.

There is nearly unlimited evidence, easily searchable if you dont want to enroll in a biology class. Books written about it. Countless scientific studies galore. Youtube lectures. My intention is not to give a run-down of this vast evidence and cram the entire field of biology into a post on a forum. Im not even engaging in an evolution debate on specifics here, since it's not worth my time. See, your first mistake is thinking this is a question that is solved by mere wordy debates on a forum in the first place....that's not how science works.

Here is exactly how evolution willnotbe refuted: some random scientist (never mind a poster on a forum) all the sudden says 'Oh snap! We all overlooked this 2-bit mistake, this mere wordy argument about the origin of information or whatever you are trying to argue: all these practicing scientists, over a century's worth of fruitful research in evolutionary biology, all these big $$ research grants, all these textbooks, genetics research....all wrong because we just didnt think that through!" - this is not how science works.

I repeat: unless you shatter the scientific world with your groundbreaking, published research, which Im not gonna hold my breath for, the world and the field of biology will continue going about its thing, with the correct understanding of humanity's origins from ancestral primates. One thing is for sure....whatever you are saying in these posts.....Johnny enrolled in biology at USC (or basically anywhere else) will go to school tomorrow and continue to learn about evolution and man's origins. We dont learn about intelligent design in the classroom, for good reason.

He disputes the theory of evolution, the big bang theory, and basic notions of how hydrogen and other elements formed. He denies nuclear physics. I mean he basically rejects all of science in favor of his garbage myth. It's quite insane because he uses technology based on those theories daily.

That's what scares me about these people. They may try to impose their version of "truth" and kill scientists and force the class to teach what they say. They've done it before.

Luckily, science is too useful and profitable. If, at any point, the idiots start winning, the decline in education and technology should self correct. You can't want to beat China at stuff and simultaneously reject science, for example. Well, you can, but that strategy is self defeating.