Forum
»
Sloot's $130000 call w/ J high on poker god Garrett Adelstein's bluff (Cheating)
10-01-2022, 03:42 PM
-
#91
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
She looked at her hand right before making the call, and that was just one of her many stories that she changed up through the course of the whole charade.Right. It is a huge allegation. And I think he just f'd up big time because her husband happens to be an LA attorney who sounds pissed as hell.
I don't know how much you play poker but I play a lot. Mainly in Vegas at Aria and the Wynn. And I have seen many calls as bad or worse than that one. Not for that much money mind you, but calls just as bad. And as I said, she said she 'thought' she had a pair or 3s and at best Garret had Ace high. Which means in her mind she has him beat going into the river. Would I bet $120 k on that?
Hell no. But as I said she is wealthy, was not playing with her money, wanted to make a name for herself in the poker world, and thought she had a read on him.
Her poker coach was interviewed in that podcast above and he said she does stuff like that all of the time. Not smart....but she does it.
As for G mans reaction? What if he had won the hand when she flipped over J 4? He would have been all smiles. He didn't care about the call, in fact I am sure if you asked him he would have wanted her to make the call. He just didn't like the fact that he lost to the call.
I don't know how much you play poker but I play a lot. Mainly in Vegas at Aria and the Wynn. And I have seen many calls as bad or worse than that one. Not for that much money mind you, but calls just as bad. And as I said, she said she 'thought' she had a pair or 3s and at best Garret had Ace high. Which means in her mind she has him beat going into the river. Would I bet $120 k on that?
Hell no. But as I said she is wealthy, was not playing with her money, wanted to make a name for herself in the poker world, and thought she had a read on him.
Her poker coach was interviewed in that podcast above and he said she does stuff like that all of the time. Not smart....but she does it.
As for G mans reaction? What if he had won the hand when she flipped over J 4? He would have been all smiles. He didn't care about the call, in fact I am sure if you asked him he would have wanted her to make the call. He just didn't like the fact that he lost to the call.
10-01-2022, 03:43 PM
-
#92
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Well that explains why she gave her money back. Hustler Casino Live management told her it would be a big deal if she didn't give the money back and that she would need to find ways to justify her play as millions would see it. She did a terrible job at that too.
Not sure what the ramifications for getting caught cheating hundreds of thousands of dollars is but she probably didn't want to find out and wanted it to go away.
Ofc people saw it anyway and now she's blaming misogyny.
Again, that is old news. Watch some of the interviews she has done since. She explained that she made a deal with Garret to give back the money if he would return to the game. She doesn't care about the money. It wasn't even hers as she was staked. She said she didn't want the star of the show Garret to leave the game and give her a bad rep.Well that explains why she gave her money back. Hustler Casino Live management told her it would be a big deal if she didn't give the money back and that she would need to find ways to justify her play as millions would see it. She did a terrible job at that too.
Not sure what the ramifications for getting caught cheating hundreds of thousands of dollars is but she probably didn't want to find out and wanted it to go away.
Ofc people saw it anyway and now she's blaming misogyny.
And then he took the money and never returned to the game. So he took her to the cleaners.....twice lol.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 03:45 PM
-
#93
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
Well that explains why she gave her money back. Hustler Casino Live management told her it would be a big deal if she didn't give the money back and that she would need to find ways to justify her play as millions would see it. She did a terrible job at that too.
Not sure what the ramifications for getting caught cheating hundreds of thousands of dollars is but she probably didn't want to find out and wanted it to go away.
Ofc people saw it anyway and now she's blaming misogyny.
And btw Hustler casino saying that? Opens them up BIGTIME to a huge lawsuit if no proof of cheating is found. It is basically extortion. No one I have ever heard of has given back money from a poker win. So they f'd up big time if Ryan from HCL and Hustler said that. Which from what I understand? He did.Well that explains why she gave her money back. Hustler Casino Live management told her it would be a big deal if she didn't give the money back and that she would need to find ways to justify her play as millions would see it. She did a terrible job at that too.
Not sure what the ramifications for getting caught cheating hundreds of thousands of dollars is but she probably didn't want to find out and wanted it to go away.
Ofc people saw it anyway and now she's blaming misogyny.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 03:47 PM
-
#94
Fact that she's being staked, and married to a rich dude, can tell the money didn't mean that much to her. Like when she ran it twice it was just "who gives a chit" attitude.
If they were both the blinds and he's constantly bullying people, it makes sense that she puts him on a draw that he's so far missed. Still a retarded call, but when you're staked and the money doesn't mean that much to you and you know your opponent, it at least semi makes sense.
If they were both the blinds and he's constantly bullying people, it makes sense that she puts him on a draw that he's so far missed. Still a retarded call, but when you're staked and the money doesn't mean that much to you and you know your opponent, it at least semi makes sense.
10-01-2022, 03:47 PM
-
#95
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
She explained that as well. Listen to her interviews lol. She said she was only looking to see if she had a Jack of clubs to block the possible club flush on the board. She never looked at the other card, which she thought was a 3, pairing the board, but what was really a 4. If you watch when she looks at her cards you can see she has one card over the other and only looks at the one card. The jack.She looked at her hand right before making the call, and that was just one of her many stories that she changed up through the course of the whole charade.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 03:52 PM
-
#96
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Garrett says he's done it before. i.e. lost a big hand, then accused the winner of cheating and then they gave the money back.No one I have ever heard of has given back money from a poker win.
It's almost like a "I will attempt to ruin your reputation and call you a cheater if you don't repay me on a bad beat" threat. Probably why he pulled that here, because it worked for him before. Wonder how many times he's pulled that.
10-01-2022, 03:52 PM
-
#97
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Humungus⏩
Exactly that. It was a stupid call and she even said so. But in that situation, under that pressure, and considering their past hand history? She made it.Fact that she's being staked, and married to a rich dude, can tell the money didn't mean that much to her. Like when she ran it twice it was just "who gives a chit" attitude.
If they were both the blinds and he's constantly bullying people, it makes sense that she puts him on a draw that he's so far missed. Still a retarded call, but when you're staked and the money doesn't mean that much to you and you know your opponent, it at least semi makes sense.
If they were both the blinds and he's constantly bullying people, it makes sense that she puts him on a draw that he's so far missed. Still a retarded call, but when you're staked and the money doesn't mean that much to you and you know your opponent, it at least semi makes sense.
And again, no one who is cheating asks to run it twice as you said lol.
And further, if she was cheating? That means Hustler casino, or someone who works there, was in on it. Which Garret just said a few months ago that Hustler would never cheat and even said yesterday was not possible lol. So which one is it?
How in THE HELL WOULD SHE HAVE HAD THE TECH and smarts to cheat with no one knowing? It's ridiculous. This is not a Mike Postle situation where he was looking at his phone. She had nothing around her to give her any info whatsoever. Could she have been signaled? Of course. But again that means someone from Hustler was helping her, which again Garret said is impossible lol.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 03:53 PM
-
#98
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Humungus⏩
That is crazy if he has done that before. And if he has? I would never play with him. You can't win.Garrett says he's done it before. i.e. lost a big hand, then accused the winner of cheating and then they gave the money back.
It's almost like a "I will attempt to ruin your reputation and call you a cheater if you don't repay me on a bad beat" threat. Probably why he pulled that here, because it worked for him before. Wonder how many times he's pulled that.
It's almost like a "I will attempt to ruin your reputation and call you a cheater if you don't repay me on a bad beat" threat. Probably why he pulled that here, because it worked for him before. Wonder how many times he's pulled that.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 03:56 PM
-
#99
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Talked about this in the other thread, but here's the gist of it -
She's literally a retard. A lot of retards don't think logically when they play, or don't even think logically in life in general.
Players like her exist in the games all day long... ALL DAY LONG.
She's not a poker pro, she's a rich bimbo, people calling her a poker professional really dunno what they're talking about.
It's like YOU going onto a football field right now, and claiming you're an nfl pro. It's actually worse than that, because you'd probably be somewhat competent. Some people that play poker are literally retards. "But how could she make that call no way" ... trust me, I play 100k+ hands per month, I see this **** all the time. It doesn't make sense. Don't try an attribute any logical thinking on their part. "But there's no way she could make that call without cheating." Truuuust me. Just stop thinking that she's thinking. She's not. She's a dumb bimbo. "But that's what she wants you to think. heh. that's how she gets her edge." No, no and ****ing no. Literally a dumb bimbo, end of story.
She's literally a retard. A lot of retards don't think logically when they play, or don't even think logically in life in general.
Players like her exist in the games all day long... ALL DAY LONG.
She's not a poker pro, she's a rich bimbo, people calling her a poker professional really dunno what they're talking about.
It's like YOU going onto a football field right now, and claiming you're an nfl pro. It's actually worse than that, because you'd probably be somewhat competent. Some people that play poker are literally retards. "But how could she make that call no way" ... trust me, I play 100k+ hands per month, I see this **** all the time. It doesn't make sense. Don't try an attribute any logical thinking on their part. "But there's no way she could make that call without cheating." Truuuust me. Just stop thinking that she's thinking. She's not. She's a dumb bimbo. "But that's what she wants you to think. heh. that's how she gets her edge." No, no and ****ing no. Literally a dumb bimbo, end of story.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
10-01-2022, 04:00 PM
-
#100
- plsmire
- Registered User
-
- plsmire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Location: London, State / Province, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,042
- Rep Power: 29655
-
-
Her explanation made no sense. Says she misread her hand and thought she had the 3 on turn when she checked her cards for a while.
Explains that she thought garret had ace high, but she only has J high.
She sounds like a complete noob as she was throwing around poker terms without really understanding what they mean.
She may have known what Garrets hand was and thought she was ahead (cos noob) not knowing she was behind on odds. Or someone could just signal to her that garret has low numbers and no pair, she doesn’t understand the odds so naturally she thinks she’s ahead.
I can’t see why she would call with J high unless she just thought garret had no pair and placed him on 6/7 or something. Then again, why the terrible explanation as if she’s getting caught red handed and then giving the money back. May have just been a nervous reaction though.
Explains that she thought garret had ace high, but she only has J high.
She sounds like a complete noob as she was throwing around poker terms without really understanding what they mean.
She may have known what Garrets hand was and thought she was ahead (cos noob) not knowing she was behind on odds. Or someone could just signal to her that garret has low numbers and no pair, she doesn’t understand the odds so naturally she thinks she’s ahead.
I can’t see why she would call with J high unless she just thought garret had no pair and placed him on 6/7 or something. Then again, why the terrible explanation as if she’s getting caught red handed and then giving the money back. May have just been a nervous reaction though.
10-01-2022, 04:04 PM
-
#101
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Exactly. People like Garret and others talking about how no pro would make that call and using analysis and GTO data to prove it are so far off base it is hilarious. She isn't thinking like any of that.Talked about this in the other thread, but here's the gist of it -
She's literally a retard. A lot of retards don't think logically when they play, or don't even think logically in life in general.
Players like her exist in the games all day long... ALL DAY LONG.
She's not a poker pro, she's a rich bimbo, people calling her a poker professional really dunno what they're talking about.
It's like YOU going onto a football field right now, and claiming you're an nfl pro. It's actually worse than that, because you'd probably be somewhat competent. Some people that play poker are literally retards. "But how could she make that call no way" ... trust me, I play 100k+ hands per month, I see this **** all the time. It doesn't make sense. Don't try an attribute any logical thinking on their part. "But there's no way she could make that call without cheating." Truuuust me. Just stop thinking that she's thinking. She's not. She's a dumb bimbo. "But that's what she wants you to think. heh. that's how she gets her edge." No, no and ****ing no. Literally a dumb bimbo, end of story.
She's literally a retard. A lot of retards don't think logically when they play, or don't even think logically in life in general.
Players like her exist in the games all day long... ALL DAY LONG.
She's not a poker pro, she's a rich bimbo, people calling her a poker professional really dunno what they're talking about.
It's like YOU going onto a football field right now, and claiming you're an nfl pro. It's actually worse than that, because you'd probably be somewhat competent. Some people that play poker are literally retards. "But how could she make that call no way" ... trust me, I play 100k+ hands per month, I see this **** all the time. It doesn't make sense. Don't try an attribute any logical thinking on their part. "But there's no way she could make that call without cheating." Truuuust me. Just stop thinking that she's thinking. She's not. She's a dumb bimbo. "But that's what she wants you to think. heh. that's how she gets her edge." No, no and ****ing no. Literally a dumb bimbo, end of story.
She is just playing as an amateur and making many calls based on pure feel and craziness. Really is that simple. Plus she wanted to get Gman 1000000%.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 04:06 PM
-
#102
- bicmane123
- Banned
-
- bicmane123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,078
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Is this her first tournament? How does she normally do?Literally a dumb bimbo, end of story.
no clue who she is, but the answer to those questions would help confirm that
10-01-2022, 04:07 PM
-
#103
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
I think we already established that she is a retard.
There are some people who are in the camp that it's either she's a retard that got lucky or she's a cheater, but like I said before, that's not mutually exclusive.
You can have outside help while being a terrible player and not using the help to it's fullest potential.
There are some people who are in the camp that it's either she's a retard that got lucky or she's a cheater, but like I said before, that's not mutually exclusive.
You can have outside help while being a terrible player and not using the help to it's fullest potential.
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Not sure how long the stream was delayed but there was people saying she was 'tanking' aka taking super long to act. Guess it didn't have to be somebody from production or he's connected with the people at HCL and didn't want to point out that there could be cheating or how to do it in those games as that would blow the whole thing up.Exactly that. It was a stupid call and she even said so. But in that situation, under that pressure, and considering their past hand history? She made it.
And again, no one who is cheating asks to run it twice as you said lol.
And further, if she was cheating? That means Hustler casino, or someone who works there, was in on it. Which Garret just said a few months ago that Hustler would never cheat and even said yesterday was not possible lol. So which one is it?
How in THE HELL WOULD SHE HAVE HAD THE TECH and smarts to cheat with no one knowing? It's ridiculous. This is not a Mike Postle situation where he was looking at his phone. She had nothing around her to give her any info whatsoever. Could she have been signaled? Of course. But again that means someone from Hustler was helping her, which again Garret said is impossible lol.
And again, no one who is cheating asks to run it twice as you said lol.
And further, if she was cheating? That means Hustler casino, or someone who works there, was in on it. Which Garret just said a few months ago that Hustler would never cheat and even said yesterday was not possible lol. So which one is it?
How in THE HELL WOULD SHE HAVE HAD THE TECH and smarts to cheat with no one knowing? It's ridiculous. This is not a Mike Postle situation where he was looking at his phone. She had nothing around her to give her any info whatsoever. Could she have been signaled? Of course. But again that means someone from Hustler was helping her, which again Garret said is impossible lol.
10-01-2022, 04:08 PM
-
#104
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By plsmire⏩
Simple explanation for that. She was embarrassed that she misread her hand.Her explanation made no sense. Says she misread her hand and thought she had the 3 on turn when she checked her cards for a while.
Explains that she thought garret had ace high, but she only has J high.
She sounds like a complete noob as she was throwing around poker terms without really understanding what they mean.
She may have known what Garrets hand was and thought she was ahead (cos noob) not knowing she was behind on odds. Or someone could just signal to her that garret has low numbers and no pair, she doesn’t understand the odds so naturally she thinks she’s ahead.
I can’t see why she would call with J high unless she just thought garret had no pair and placed him on 6/7 or something. Then again, why the terrible explanation as if she’s getting caught red handed and then giving the money back. May have just been a nervous reaction though.
Explains that she thought garret had ace high, but she only has J high.
She sounds like a complete noob as she was throwing around poker terms without really understanding what they mean.
She may have known what Garrets hand was and thought she was ahead (cos noob) not knowing she was behind on odds. Or someone could just signal to her that garret has low numbers and no pair, she doesn’t understand the odds so naturally she thinks she’s ahead.
I can’t see why she would call with J high unless she just thought garret had no pair and placed him on 6/7 or something. Then again, why the terrible explanation as if she’s getting caught red handed and then giving the money back. May have just been a nervous reaction though.
I will say this, when she was thinking about calling she asked Garrett "Can you beat a pair of 3s"? Implying she thought she had a pair of 3s.
Then when she turned her cards over and saw no 3? Complete embarrassment.
I almost did that last time I played at Aria. I thought I had something different than I actually did and even said "you're good" and was throwing in my hand. Luckily a guy next to me saw me right before I did it and saw I actually had a straight. I was embarrassed as ****.
So trust me it can happen, especially since she had the J 3 the hand right before that.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 04:08 PM
-
#105
- plsmire
- Registered User
-
- plsmire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Location: London, State / Province, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,042
- Rep Power: 29655
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Fact that she gave the money back made her 10x more suspect. But if she’s loaded and don’t care about the money and cares more about Garret staying, then that might make sense.Again, that is old news. Watch some of the interviews she has done since. She explained that she made a deal with Garret to give back the money if he would return to the game. She doesn't care about the money. It wasn't even hers as she was staked. She said she didn't want the star of the show Garret to leave the game and give her a bad rep.
And then he took the money and never returned to the game. So he took her to the cleaners.....twice lol.
And then he took the money and never returned to the game. So he took her to the cleaners.....twice lol.
Basically comes down to a bimbo winning the odds. She placed him below 10 and no pairs. Maybe a 6/7 clubs and she thought she had a club blocker.
Her explanation on placing him on Ace high made 0 sense though, and same with thinking she had a 3.
10-01-2022, 04:09 PM
-
#106
10-01-2022, 04:10 PM
-
#107
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By bicmane123⏩
Couple things.Is this her first tournament? How does she normally do?
no clue who she is, but the answer to those questions would help confirm that
no clue who she is, but the answer to those questions would help confirm that
This wasn't a tournament but a live streamed cash game from Hustler Casino. They do that every Mon-Fri.
She started to play about a year ago. Learned from her husband. Is getting coaching now and her coach said she is very beginner levelish. Knows the basics but that is about it. He is interviewed in that podcast I posted above.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 04:12 PM
-
#108
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By Slamt⏩
No. I watched the steam. She didn't take any longer than anyone else except for a hand or two. And then she used her time chips. Which ever player who plays on that stream does. Nothing unusual.I think we already established that she is a retard.
There are some people who are in the camp that it's either she's a retard that got lucky or she's a cheater, but like I said before, that's not mutually exclusive.
You can have outside help while being a terrible player and not using the help to it's fullest potential.
Not sure how long the stream was delayed but there was people saying she was 'tanking' aka taking super long to act. Guess it didn't have to be somebody from production or he's connected with the people at HCL and didn't want to point out that there could be cheating or how to do it in those games as that would blow the whole thing up.
There are some people who are in the camp that it's either she's a retard that got lucky or she's a cheater, but like I said before, that's not mutually exclusive.
You can have outside help while being a terrible player and not using the help to it's fullest potential.
Not sure how long the stream was delayed but there was people saying she was 'tanking' aka taking super long to act. Guess it didn't have to be somebody from production or he's connected with the people at HCL and didn't want to point out that there could be cheating or how to do it in those games as that would blow the whole thing up.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 04:13 PM
-
#109
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Yep. And if they were cheating they wouldn't instruct her to make such and mindblowing call, it would be too obvious.Exactly. People like Garret and others talking about how no pro would make that call and using analysis and GTO data to prove it are so far off base it is hilarious. She isn't thinking like any of that.
She is just playing as an amateur and making many calls based on pure feel and craziness. Really is that simple. Plus she wanted to get Gman 1000000%.
She is just playing as an amateur and making many calls based on pure feel and craziness. Really is that simple. Plus she wanted to get Gman 1000000%.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
10-01-2022, 04:15 PM
-
#110
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86094
-
-
Originally Posted By plsmire⏩
No she actually said he probably had an Ace but thought she had him beat with her pair of 3s.....which was a misread. She had J 4 not J 3.Fact that she gave the money back made her 10x more suspect. But if she’s loaded and don’t care about the money and cares more about Garret staying, then that might make sense.
Basically comes down to a bimbo winning the odds. She placed him below 10 and no pairs. Maybe a 6/7 clubs and she thought she had a club blocker.
Her explanation on placing him on Ace high made 0 sense though, and same with thinking she had a 3.
Basically comes down to a bimbo winning the odds. She placed him below 10 and no pairs. Maybe a 6/7 clubs and she thought she had a club blocker.
Her explanation on placing him on Ace high made 0 sense though, and same with thinking she had a 3.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
10-01-2022, 04:19 PM
-
#111
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By plsmire⏩
Her explanation actually further proves she's a dumb bimbo. I've played hands were opponents have called me with zero chance of winning, just because they think I'm bluffing, but they don't even have a hand that can call, even though they 'know' they're facing a bluff. There's like this emotional intertwining thing that happens, if I were to put it into words it would sound like this -Fact that she gave the money back made her 10x more suspect. But if she’s loaded and don’t care about the money and cares more about Garret staying, then that might make sense.
Basically comes down to a bimbo winning the odds. She placed him below 10 and no pairs. Maybe a 6/7 clubs and she thought she had a club blocker.
Her explanation on placing him on Ace high made 0 sense though, and same with thinking she had a 3.
Basically comes down to a bimbo winning the odds. She placed him below 10 and no pairs. Maybe a 6/7 clubs and she thought she had a club blocker.
Her explanation on placing him on Ace high made 0 sense though, and same with thinking she had a 3.
"EUhhhh fuk i know your bluffing. you are. i know you are euuuuughh. i call"
"But babe, you have jack high."
"eueuhghgh i know but i know you only have ace high"
"But babe, ace high beats jack high"
"euuguguhh i mean, i thought you had eight high.. euguuguhhhhhh wait my logic doesn't even make sense eueuueuguuhguhuhghuhuguhuuhuuuhh uuuuuhhh. Whatever I knew you were full of ****. Ownned wooo owned."
Ever beat someone in an argument and show them how their point is wrong, and then they babble nonsense?
Literally what's happening with her. Emotional attachment in the hand and went full retard
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
10-01-2022, 04:22 PM
-
#112
- plsmire
- Registered User
-
- plsmire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Location: London, State / Province, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,042
- Rep Power: 29655
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
If she truly misread her hand then that makes sense.No she actually said he probably had an Ace but thought she had him beat with her pair of 3s.....which was a misread. She had J 4 not J 3.
Calling the flop was probably just a noob move, specially if she thought Garret had an Ace high. Which we would have to buy if we’re buying her misread hand explanation. Only explanation is she thought 9,10,J somehow gave her better odds to catch a straight…
10-01-2022, 04:25 PM
-
#113
- plsmire
- Registered User
-
- plsmire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Location: London, State / Province, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,042
- Rep Power: 29655
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Lmao, this actually makes sense. People so focused on you being wrong that they forget to check if they themselves are even right.Her explanation actually further proves she's a dumb bimbo. I've played hands were opponents have called me with zero chance of winning, just because they think I'm bluffing, but they don't even have a hand that can call, even though they 'know' they're facing a bluff. There's like this emotional intertwining thing that happens, if I were to put it into words it would sound like this -
"EUhhhh fuk i know your bluffing. you are. i know you are euuuuughh. i call"
"But babe, you have jack high."
"eueuhghgh i know but i know you only have ace high"
"But babe, ace high beats jack high"
"euuguguhh i mean, i thought you had eight high.. euguuguhhhhhh wait my logic doesn't even make sense eueuueuguuhguhuhghuhuguhuuhuuuhh uuuuuhhh. Whatever I knew you were full of ****. Ownned wooo owned."
Ever beat someone in an argument and show them how their point is wrong, and then they babble nonsense?
Literally what's happening with her. Emotional attachment in the hand and went full retard
"EUhhhh fuk i know your bluffing. you are. i know you are euuuuughh. i call"
"But babe, you have jack high."
"eueuhghgh i know but i know you only have ace high"
"But babe, ace high beats jack high"
"euuguguhh i mean, i thought you had eight high.. euguuguhhhhhh wait my logic doesn't even make sense eueuueuguuhguhuhghuhuguhuuhuuuhh uuuuuhhh. Whatever I knew you were full of ****. Ownned wooo owned."
Ever beat someone in an argument and show them how their point is wrong, and then they babble nonsense?
Literally what's happening with her. Emotional attachment in the hand and went full retard
Of course, if she was to make her own bluff (I forgot the exact move on turn whether she had a chance to shove on his bet), then calling out his ace high bluff would make more sense.
10-01-2022, 04:31 PM
-
#114
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Either that or he's trained a real hustler because that is exactly what a hustler would want people to think.Couple things.
This wasn't a tournament but a live streamed cash game from Hustler Casino. They do that every Mon-Fri.
She started to play about a year ago. Learned from her husband. Is getting coaching now and her coach said she is very beginner levelish. Knows the basics but that is about it. He is interviewed in that podcast I posted above.
This wasn't a tournament but a live streamed cash game from Hustler Casino. They do that every Mon-Fri.
She started to play about a year ago. Learned from her husband. Is getting coaching now and her coach said she is very beginner levelish. Knows the basics but that is about it. He is interviewed in that podcast I posted above.
10-01-2022, 04:48 PM
-
#115
- Slamt
- Registered User
-
- Slamt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 10,874
- Rep Power: 35518
-
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...the_whole_hand
Checks her hand at 2:20, lifts them for about 10 seconds, then puts a time chip in, you're telling me that she still misread her hand?
At around 4:30, he puts her on something like pocket 5's or has a 3, he asks "do you have a small pair?"
She replies: "You give me that much credit?", which implies she knew she didn't even have a pair...
The reasoning you guys pointed out and the interviews afterwards sounds like somebody committing a crime and then having some time afterwards to put their alibis and stories together.
Also there was a guy playing at that table who staked her? How's that even allowed.
I'm sticking to the anal plug theory signaling somehow she was technically ahead but not knowing full depth and odds of the hand.
Checks her hand at 2:20, lifts them for about 10 seconds, then puts a time chip in, you're telling me that she still misread her hand?
At around 4:30, he puts her on something like pocket 5's or has a 3, he asks "do you have a small pair?"
She replies: "You give me that much credit?", which implies she knew she didn't even have a pair...
The reasoning you guys pointed out and the interviews afterwards sounds like somebody committing a crime and then having some time afterwards to put their alibis and stories together.
Also there was a guy playing at that table who staked her? How's that even allowed.
I'm sticking to the anal plug theory signaling somehow she was technically ahead but not knowing full depth and odds of the hand.
10-01-2022, 05:09 PM
-
#116
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Illogical being does something illogical
'Logical' Folk asses the illogical being in what is actually an illogical way, in that they assume illogical being is acting with logic.
The 'Logical Folk' are being illogical for doing that.
'Logical folk' spas out too and become illogical.
Logic all around is 1/10
'Logical' Folk asses the illogical being in what is actually an illogical way, in that they assume illogical being is acting with logic.
The 'Logical Folk' are being illogical for doing that.
'Logical folk' spas out too and become illogical.
Logic all around is 1/10
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
10-01-2022, 05:50 PM
-
#117
10-01-2022, 05:55 PM
-
#118
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
-
- umop3pisdn
- Registered Muser
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Posts: 15,406
- Rep Power: 77939
-
-
Is this what demonic possession looks like?
10-01-2022, 06:10 PM
-
#119
- JonMillsJr
- Banned
-
- JonMillsJr
- Banned
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 641
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
The only thing that’s certain is that she’s retarded
If she was cheating, calling someone’s all in with J high is retarded. He had so many outs and you can easily pick a better spot to avoid being outed as a cheater if you know your opponents hands
If she wasn’t cheating, it was an absolute retard level play
If she was cheating, calling someone’s all in with J high is retarded. He had so many outs and you can easily pick a better spot to avoid being outed as a cheater if you know your opponents hands
If she wasn’t cheating, it was an absolute retard level play
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts