Calls 'em like I sees 'em Crew
Suomalainen Crew
Feels like a manlet around Amazonian women Crew
Gets turned on when looking in the mirror Crew

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

I'm not even referring to the "libs." I'm just saying let everyone see it. I get that it drives traffic to Twitter the way he is doing it but if you're going to drip it out at least make it accessible for everyone to report on it rather than reporting on reporters.

Jesus Christ are you even listening to yourself??

Ok, he's not releasing the info in a manner that you approve of.. BFD. Seriously, what difference does it even make? At this point you're arguing "just because" and you know it.

Fact of the matter is he IS releasing it. Info which, btw was a top Twitter/Government secret until now.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

Originally Posted By gwg77⏩

Remember what happened the night of the first Twitter Files release? Literally every single corporate journalist decided to attack Matt Taibbi instead of actually covering the story. There was nothing stopping them from doing some actual journalism and reaching out to him for questions about source docs, etc. But, they decided to attack his character instead of covering an actual story.

It was the same exact blackout we saw with the Hunter Biden laptop story. Attack the source instead trying to actually do any investigative journalism. And, as it turns out 18 months later, most of MSM ended up covering the story and verifying the laptop.


Now, and unverified Steele Dossier and peepee tapes - it was unverified with questionable sources and every single MSM outlet covered it ad nauseum.

Taibbi and Weiss haven't been popular among the MSM for quite some time now, so that's not really surprising - which is also not surprising Musk chose them. Personally, I have no issues with Taibbi or Weiss but the MSM does and has for awhile now. But once again, it's not about me... it's about everyone else who wants full transparency on this. The way this is released - to handpicked journalists and leaking out selected material this will always remain a minor story because it wasn't released in bombshell fashion. Republicans should be looking to obtain as much information as possible right now to get investigations going at least. But the way it is now it will continue to drag out and people will just lose interest. You have a very short period of time to grab people's attention on something like this, and to be honest, I think a lot of it has already fizzled out. Automatically the story now shifts to who will be the next Twitter CEO after the Musk poll.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩

Jesus Christ are you even listening to yourself??

Ok, he's not releasing the info in a manner that you approve of.. BFD. Seriously, what difference does it even make? At this point you're arguing "just because" and you know it.

Fact of the matter is he IS releasing it. Info which, btw was a top Twitter/Government secret until now.

OK answer me this - if I released all of Hillary Clinton's emails to Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann, will you take their word when they report it? Or will you ask to see the emails? If your answer is "yes that's completely acceptable and I will take Maddow and Olbermann at their words" then you win this argument.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

OK answer me this - if I released all of Hillary Clinton's emails to Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann, will you take their word when they report it?Or will you ask to see the emails? If your answer is "yes that's completely acceptable and I will take Maddow and Olbermann at their words" then you win this argument.

They're showing the emails for fux sake. Are you even following along with any of this??

Here.

In before another "just because" argument

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩

They're showing the emails for fux sake. Are you even following along with any of this??

Here.

In before another "just because" argument

Ok.. then let me rephrase it so it's 100% equal...

If I released all of Hillary Clinton's emails to Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermannand they selectively released emails of their choosing, will you take their word when they report it? Or will you ask to see therest of the emails?

Now it's even... so answer.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

Taibbi and Weiss haven't been popular among the MSM for quite some time now, so that's not really surprising - which is also not surprising Musk chose them. Personally, I have no issues with Taibbi or Weiss but the MSM does and has for awhile now. But once again, it's not about me... it's about everyone else who wants full transparency on this. The way this is released - to handpicked journalists and leaking out selected material this will always remain a minor story because it wasn't released in bombshell fashion. Republicans should be looking to obtain as much information as possible right now to get investigations going at least. But the way it is now it will continue to drag out and people will just lose interest. You have a very short period of time to grab people's attention on something like this, and to be honest,I think a lot of it has already fizzled out.Automatically the story now shifts to who will be the next Twitter CEO after the Musk poll.

Well isn't that what you want? You know as well as I do that every lib in the country has been in a batshiit rage since the day he said he wanted to buy Twitter, don't we. And now that he has, and now that the info he's releasing is fizzled out, then.... WTF is the problem?

Like I said, arguing "just because"

Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget⏩

he is z4 lite.
always every time he has some retarded opposite stance on everything.
if he's trolling he's doing it wrong by getting butthurt over people calling him out on it.

if he isn't trolling....oh man...dude has some issues.

Happy Gilmore is intentional though. I honestly think Audio here thinks he's making some sort of rational argument for.... something.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩

Well isn't that what you want? You know as well as I do that every lib in the country has been in a batshiit rage since the day he said he wanted to buy Twitter, don't we. And now that he has, and now that the info he's releasing is fizzled out, then.... WTF is the problem?

Like I said, arguing "just because"

It shouldn't be about what libs want.. it should be about what's right andtransparency. If you only want what's good for libs that's on you.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

Ok.. then let me rephrase it so it's 100% equal...

If I released all of Hillary Clinton's emails to Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermannand they selectively released emails of their choosing, will you take their word when they report it? Or will you ask to see therest of the emails?

Now it's even... so answer.

Here you go... Your answer is in this post.

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

Taibbi and Weiss haven't been popular among the MSM for quite some time now, so that's not really surprising - which is also not surprising Musk chose them.Personally, I have no issues with Taibbi or Weiss but the MSM does and has for awhile now.

They are independent journalists not affiliated with any MSM. Ergo they have my trust already - and the fact that, as you say, the MSM does have a problem with them tells me all I need to know. The MSM is not to be trusted - which is only the whole point of this. Did Twitter collude with the DNC and FBI to cover shiit up? Lets find out... But to do that, who are you going to trust - Sean Hannity? Keith Olberman? Dan Rather, or Tucker Carlson?

Fuk all of them.

Who are Bari Weiss and Matt Taibbi?

Major figures in US’ media scenes, both Weiss and Taibbi abandoned high-profile roles in journalism to pursue their own reporting, using scathing criticisms against the US government and policies – a trait shared by Musk.

Taibbi is a journalist, active since the 1990s, shelling out some of the major news of the time. However, post 2015, he became hostile towards mainstream media speaking out on how it was destroying itself. Taibbi was a vaccine sceptic at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic as well.

https://www.firstpost.com/world/who-...-11813461.html

"Oh noez! We can't use them because the MSM has a problem with them!

GTFO

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩

Here you go... Your answer is in this post.



They are independent journalists not affiliated with any MSM. Ergo they have my trust already - and the fact that, as you say, the MSM does have a problem with them tells me all I need to know. The MSM is not to be trusted - which is only the whole point of this. Did Twitter collude with the DNC and FBI to cover shiit up? Lets find out... But to do that, who are you going to trust - Sean Hannity? Keith Olberman? Dan Rather, or Tucker Carlson?

Fuk all of them.



"Oh noez! We can't use them because the MSM has a problem with them!

GTFO

They were in the MSM but were kicked out. Like I said, I have no problem with them but I wouldn't take their reporting for gospel, especially when there are no other reliable reporters to lean on to either back them up or debate them. And most importantly, they were specifically chosen by Musk, which would inherently create a conflict. If you think that's better than full transparency then that is your opinion. Not everyone thinks transparency is a good thing.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Originally Posted By gwg77⏩

Well, at least we know the new lefty talking point, courtesy of Audioslave:Corporate journalists can't cover Twitter Files because it wasn't leaked to everyone in the media.

Yet, I remember zero media outlets having a problem covering the Snowden leaks, which were selectively given to Greenwald and a couple others.

And the MSM has had a problem with the two that it was released to for a long time.. So I guess that's that. Investigation over boyo!

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩

They were in the MSMbut were kicked out. Like I said, I have no problem with them but I wouldn't take their reporting for gospel, especially when there are no other reliable reporters to lean on to either back them up or debate them. And most importantly, they were specifically chosen by Musk, which would inherently create a conflict. If you think that's better than full transparency then that is your opinion. Not everyone thinks transparency is a good thing.

LMAO!! Kicked out huh... Ok, good. That just makes them even more trustworthy then lol.

And there ARE NO reliable reporters in the MSM you simpleton. That's the whole point. Fuk dude, how are you not getting this?

Edit: Here.. This is what you're shilling for.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)

Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩

LMAO!! Kicked out huh... Ok, good. That just makes them even more trustworthy then lol.

And there ARE NO reliable reporters in the MSM you simpleton. That's the whole point. Fuk dude, how are you not getting this?

Edit: Here.. This is what you're shilling for.

Dude are you serious? The question waswhythe MSM isn't covering it... like I said, none of the MSM reporters were allowed access to the Twitter Files. If you wanted the MSM to report it, at least give them access so they can. You're asking for the MSM to pick up massive coverage covering those covering the Twitter Files. It obviously made the MSM but it didn't get far because they aren't in the real time loop so they cannot break any headlines.

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE

Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)