Forum
»
Elon Musk getting ready to post the Hunter Biden cover up story
12-20-2022, 07:39 PM
-
#541
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
Limit transparency means that the Twitter Files havelimitedaccess. Meaning what gets released is cherry picked and who it gets released to is cherry picked. I don't like Jack Dorsey, but I agree with him when he told Musk“why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves?”I still haven't heard a single good response to that answer. Everyone on here is circling around that question.I don't really understand what you mean by "limit transparency." This crap has been suppressed to such a degree for years that virtually any mainstream discussion of it is amazing. Instead of asking why Elon is slowly dripping to certain people, why not ask why the Feds and Deep State uniparty ****s didn't want anyone to know any of this.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-20-2022, 07:42 PM
-
#542
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1673238643]“why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves?”[/B][/QUOTE]Every single thing being released was known by people years ago. The Twitter stuff is nothing more than the receipts. The "people" ignored that crap then, what makes you think they won't now? Factor in the average attention span of a ****ing goldfish and you need to give it to them in small doses to make any sort of dent in the brainwashing.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-20-2022, 07:42 PM
-
#543
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
So no one should see the Twitter Files unfiltered? Then what good are they? Anybody can post random sentences with redacted names and no context to alter a story. I agree they could be on to something very real here but the legitimacy gets lost when you refuse to release it all unfiltered.The MSM is complicit, if not outright involved, in the suppression of free speech and illegally pushing a political agenda. Do you not get that?
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-20-2022, 07:46 PM
-
#544
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
That's an interesting take. Unfortunately, many people will be skeptical if they cannot verify the context of what is being dripped out. People will just continue to be skeptical of the process until the information is made public.Every single thing being released was known by people years ago. The Twitter stuff is nothing more than the receipts. The "people" ignored that crap then, what makes you think they won't now? Factor in the average attention span of a ****ing goldfish and you need to give it to them in small doses to make any sort of dent in the brainwashing.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-20-2022, 07:51 PM
-
#545
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Most people do not like to have their world view disrupted or admit they were mistaken. The biggest problem with brainwashing is that once brainwashed, it's like 10x more difficult to de-program someone. It's like those people who were kidnapped by Apaches or whatever and were finally rescued years later, some of them ran back to their captors because they knew that lifestyle better. The skeptics will never ever ever ever be given enough information to change their mind because they're not actually skeptics, they're programmed meat robots. There are some people, however, with a somewhat open mind, and this slow drip is for them.That's an interesting take. Unfortunately, many people will be skeptical if they cannot verify the context of what is being dripped out. People will just continue to be skeptical of the process until the information is made public.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-20-2022, 07:59 PM
-
#546
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
First of all - forget about the brainwashing thing. Nobody is going to get "de-programed" because of this and that shouldn't even be the focus. The focus should be one of legality. If there was collusion between the government and social media companies, the FBI pressuring companies to further a candidate, etc., that should be the focus. But that is a very serious accusation, and if made, the evidence should be unfiltered. It shouldn't just be a couple of cherry picked redacted emails that gets released. If you want to hold people accountable the only fair way is through transparency. Just my opinion... some people prefer it this way. I agree it can be more entertaining, but like I said, less will come out of it.Most people do not like to have their world view disrupted or admit they were mistaken. The biggest problem with brainwashing is that once brainwashed, it's like 10x more difficult to de-program someone. It's like those people who were kidnapped by Apaches or whatever and were finally rescued years later, some of them ran back to their captors because they knew that lifestyle better. The skeptics will never ever ever ever be given enough information to change their mind because they're not actually skeptics, they're programmed meat robots. There are some people, however, with a somewhat open mind, and this slow drip is for them.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-20-2022, 08:01 PM
-
#547
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
No one is going to prison and nothing is going to change, so the entertainment part is all we have left. Bread and circuses, comrade.First of all - forget about the brainwashing thing. Nobody is going to get "de-programed" because of this and that shouldn't even be the focus. The focus should be one of legality. If there was collusion between the government and social media companies, the FBI pressuring companies to further a candidate, etc., that should be the focus. But that is a very serious accusation, and if made, the evidence should be unfiltered. It shouldn't just be a couple of cherry picked redacted emails that gets released. If you want to hold people accountable the only fair way is through transparency. Just my opinion... some people prefer it this way. I agree it can be more entertaining, but like I said, less will come out of it.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-20-2022, 10:53 PM
-
#548
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
i'm not mad or intimidated by you.I don't know why you're so intimidated by me - I never said you couldn't post here.
You are the one crying and claiming i came into this thread just to follow you around which is false.
your insecurity and projection make it clear you don't want me in this thread.
too bad.
here you go sally.
you earned it.
and she sounds like a gusher.
like when the elevator doors opened in the shinning.
I hope it's big enough for you.
lolololol

12-21-2022, 05:53 AM
-
#549
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
[QUOTE=Bushmaster post_id=1673230783]LMAO!! Kicked out huh... Ok, good. That just makes them even more trustworthy then lol.
And there ARE NO reliable reporters in the MSM you simpleton. That's the whole point. Fuk dude, how are you not getting this?[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Edit: Here.. This is what you're shilling for.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/zVLArxk.jpg[/img
[img]http://faculty.uml.edu//sgallagher/0921rather.jpg[/img[/QUOTE]Ok, so just so we're clear, the post above ^^^ is the one you're replying to... right?
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1673238443]Dude are you serious? The question was[i]why[/i]the MSM isn't covering it... like I said, none of the MSM reporters were allowed access to the Twitter Files.[b] If you wanted the MSM to report it,[/b]at least give them access so they can. You're asking for the MSM to pick up massive coverage covering those covering the Twitter Files. It obviously made the MSM but it didn't get far because they aren't in the real time loop so they cannot break any headlines.[/QUOTE]At NO point anywhere did I say I wanted the MSM to cover anything. If fact I even spelled it out to you in plain English that the MSM is not to be trusted, and that there are no reliable reporters in it.. Did I not?
So then how TF did you get[i]"If you wanted the MSM to report it"[/i]out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif[/img]
You seem a little too worked up over this for some reason bro.. Because like I said you're here arguing about shiit "just because." It's making you look unhinged, and you might want to think about taking a step back to pull yourself together.[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]
And there ARE NO reliable reporters in the MSM you simpleton. That's the whole point. Fuk dude, how are you not getting this?[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Edit: Here.. This is what you're shilling for.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/zVLArxk.jpg[/img
[img]http://faculty.uml.edu//sgallagher/0921rather.jpg[/img[/QUOTE]Ok, so just so we're clear, the post above ^^^ is the one you're replying to... right?
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1673238443]Dude are you serious? The question was[i]why[/i]the MSM isn't covering it... like I said, none of the MSM reporters were allowed access to the Twitter Files.[b] If you wanted the MSM to report it,[/b]at least give them access so they can. You're asking for the MSM to pick up massive coverage covering those covering the Twitter Files. It obviously made the MSM but it didn't get far because they aren't in the real time loop so they cannot break any headlines.[/QUOTE]At NO point anywhere did I say I wanted the MSM to cover anything. If fact I even spelled it out to you in plain English that the MSM is not to be trusted, and that there are no reliable reporters in it.. Did I not?
So then how TF did you get[i]"If you wanted the MSM to report it"[/i]out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif[/img]
You seem a little too worked up over this for some reason bro.. Because like I said you're here arguing about shiit "just because." It's making you look unhinged, and you might want to think about taking a step back to pull yourself together.[img]//assets.bodybuilding.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 06:02 AM
-
#550
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Name a reliable reporter in the MSM... The reality is that to remain an MSM reporter, you need to be willing to post endless propaganda. The russia collusion investigation and subsequent reporting is a master class on propaganda and throwing journalistic integrity out the window. That case should have been destroyed by an honest media within days-- yet they beat the drum for years.They were in the MSM but were kicked out. Like I said, I have no problem with them but I wouldn't take their reporting for gospel, especially when there are no other reliable reporters to lean on to either back them up or debate them. And most importantly, they were specifically chosen by Musk, which would inherently create a conflict. If you think that's better than full transparency then that is your opinion. Not everyone thinks transparency is a good thing.
12-21-2022, 06:05 AM
-
#551
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
During Trump, there was literally zero authentication or verification of anything that the MSM reported... yet they ran with it anyway. Why the sudden change in standards? If the twitter files revealed some level of cooperation between trump and twitter, it would be the biggest story in the country and the MSM would be going nuts. This fact alone discredits the MSM.Dude are you serious? The question waswhythe MSM isn't covering it... like I said, none of the MSM reporters were allowed access to the Twitter Files. If you wanted the MSM to report it, at least give them access so they can. You're asking for the MSM to pick up massive coverage covering those covering the Twitter Files. It obviously made the MSM but it didn't get far because they aren't in the real time loop so they cannot break any headlines.
12-21-2022, 06:10 AM
-
#552
12-21-2022, 06:11 AM
-
#553
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
It's not so much that there are no reliable reporters in the MSM, it's just that they know what they need to do/write to keep their jobs and maintain their career. People are willing to through away their integrity to not get blacklisted from the world of journalism for going against the narrative. The same can be said for intel, etc. I'm sure if you spoke to journalists in the MSM (project veritas confirmed this), they would be the first to admit this.Ok, so just so we're clear, the post above ^^^ is the one you're replying to... right?
At NO point anywhere did I say I wanted the MSM to cover anything. If fact I even spelled it out to you in plain English that the MSM is not to be trusted, and that there are no reliable reporters in it.. Did I not?
So then how TF did you get"If you wanted the MSM to report it"out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?
You seem a little too worked up over this for some reason bro.. Because like I said you're here arguing about shiit "just because," it's making you look unhinged, and you might want to think about taking a step back to pull yourself together.
At NO point anywhere did I say I wanted the MSM to cover anything. If fact I even spelled it out to you in plain English that the MSM is not to be trusted, and that there are no reliable reporters in it.. Did I not?
So then how TF did you get"If you wanted the MSM to report it"out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?

You seem a little too worked up over this for some reason bro.. Because like I said you're here arguing about shiit "just because," it's making you look unhinged, and you might want to think about taking a step back to pull yourself together.

Yet we are in a constant state of pretending. After the russia collusion investigation, everyone in the FBI "had no idea" that they submitted fraudulent info to the fisa court. Nobody had any idea that literally all claims could be traced back to clinton. Mueller didn't even know who fusion gps was... Politicians all pretended they didn't know what the mueller investigation was all about.
12-21-2022, 06:34 AM
-
#554
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
Either way.. They can't be trusted to report the actual truth on anything so as far as I'm concerned they can GTFO.It's not so much that there are no reliable reporters in the MSM, it's just that they know what they need to do/write to keep their jobs and maintain their career.People are willing to through away their integrity to not get blacklisted from the world of journalism for going against the narrative. The same can be said for intel, etc. I'm sure if you spoke to journalists in the MSM (project veritas confirmed this), they would be the first to admit this.
Yet we are in a constant state of pretending. After the russia collusion investigation, everyone in the FBI "had no idea" that they submitted fraudulent info to the fisa court. Nobody had any idea that literally all claims could be traced back to clinton. Mueller didn't even know who fusion gps was... Politicians all pretended they didn't know what the mueller investigation was all about.
Yet we are in a constant state of pretending. After the russia collusion investigation, everyone in the FBI "had no idea" that they submitted fraudulent info to the fisa court. Nobody had any idea that literally all claims could be traced back to clinton. Mueller didn't even know who fusion gps was... Politicians all pretended they didn't know what the mueller investigation was all about.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 06:45 AM
-
#555
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Procta⏩
CCP employees.I wouldn't be surprised if half the MSM "reporters" are current/ex/contractual/undercover government employees
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-21-2022, 07:13 AM
-
#556
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
If you're talking about a criminal investigation, then has it ever occurred to you that maybe there might be difference in what's released for the investigation and what you're seeing get released on Twitter? BecauseIFthere is one then I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the courts might just in fact see ALL of it.First of all - forget about the brainwashing thing. Nobody is going to get "de-programed" because of this and that shouldn't even be the focus. The focus should be one of legality.If there was collusion between the government and social media companies, the FBI pressuring companies to further a candidate, etc., that should be the focus. But that is a very serious accusation, and if made, the evidence should be unfiltered. It shouldn't just be a couple of cherry picked redacted emails that gets released. If you want to hold people accountable the only fair way is through transparency. Just my opinion... some people prefer it this way. I agree it can be more entertaining, but like I said, less will come out of it.
And you know this too but you're just Queefing for no reason. Like I told you, you're doing nothing but arguing "just because" and you look unhinged.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 08:06 AM
-
#557
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Catch that? "Official state propaganda isdefinitely a thing on Twitter."
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 08:19 AM
-
#558
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Yeah, but "it's different in terms of how we handle it than clandestine fake accounts." NOTHINGBURGER, SIR.Catch that? "Official state propaganda isdefinitely a thing on Twitter."
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-21-2022, 08:24 AM
-
#559
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
yep.During Trump, there was literally zero authentication or verification of anything that the MSM reported... yet they ran with it anyway. Why the sudden change in standards? If the twitter files revealed some level of cooperation between trump and twitter, it would be the biggest story in the country and the MSM would be going nuts. This fact alone discredits the MSM.
remember "suckers and losers"?
not a single person could claim they actually heard trump say that.
not even the "source".
but they ran with it on a friday i believe anyway.
always on a friday.
all these "sources said" articles where they are literally 3 fuk'n people involved where it's obvious someone is just making chit up.
if these people actually covered the news instead of publishing bad erotic fan-fiction for liberals they might still have jobs.
12-21-2022, 08:27 AM
-
#560
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
Remember how libs shiit themselves over The Patriot Act? "Zomg muh civil liberties! I thought this was America! Rage!"Yeah, but "it's different in terms of how we handle it than clandestine fake accounts." NOTHINGBURGER, SIR.

And now it looks like they were right.... only they can't seem to find any fux to give now.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 08:31 AM
-
#561
12-21-2022, 08:38 AM
-
#562
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
The Patriot Act was one of the best psyops ever run by the US Government. I'll even admit I was somewhat ambivalent about it but sort of understood the need at the time. Eventually we all grow up though and understand the commies are literally running the show.Remember how libs shiit themselves over The Patriot Act? "Zomg muh civil liberties! I thought this was America! Rage!"
And now it looks like they were right.... only they can't seem to find any fux to give now.

And now it looks like they were right.... only they can't seem to find any fux to give now.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-21-2022, 09:21 AM
-
#563
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
Dude I'm not gonna lie, I legit used to LMAO hard at the libs over it. Called them a bunch of paranoid crybabies, argued that it was only for fighting terrorism, etc..The Patriot Act was one of the best psyops ever run by the US Government. I'll even admit I was somewhat ambivalent about it but sort of understood the need at the time. Eventually we all grow up though and understand the commies are literally running the show.
And I swear more than one lib has asked what made me so sure teh gumint wouldn't use it internally. "GTFO" I said.. that would never happen.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-21-2022, 02:21 PM
-
#564
12-21-2022, 02:28 PM
-
#565
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
Originally Posted By Procta⏩
That's not a denial and is actually a well crafted statement.lmao get a load of this chit


As long as they can find 2 fbi hating conspiracy theorists spouting crazy rhetoric (not hard to do), it's a true statment. They never actually state that the 2 reporters are conspiracy theorists or that elon was feeding them misinformation.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
12-24-2022, 11:20 AM
-
#566
12-24-2022, 12:57 PM
-
#567
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
12-24-2022, 01:22 PM
-
#568
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget⏩
Yeah... that's why you come following me around with a variety of tampon pictures and no substantive posts loli'm not mad or intimidated by you.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-24-2022, 01:26 PM
-
#569
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
I came back into this thread to answer the question "why isn't the MSM covering it more?" And you literally responded to one of my posts arguing this point. Re-read thread please.At NO point anywhere did I say I wanted the MSM to cover anything. If fact I even spelled it out to you in plain English that the MSM is not to be trusted, and that there are no reliable reporters in it.. Did I not?
So then how TF did you get"If you wanted the MSM to report it"out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?
So then how TF did you get"If you wanted the MSM to report it"out of that?? I mean seriously, WTF dude? I don't want them to cover shiit - is that clear enough for you?

YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts


