Kinda cuck of the owner to be the owner, and NOT smash the sloots.

Maybe he wanted to profit off the degradation and subversion of people, but didn’t have large enough ‘credentials’ to be on camera?

Let’s troll the sloots,Brian Holm, John O Brien, Exodus Cry, Lelia Mickliewaite. Btw she was on Pimp my ride with a purple van. And 354 was lying about being drugged and abused lol

Rofl. Imagine asking where your crypto is and she goes "it's in a wallet, I think".

If FBI etc have the unedited tapes & it confirms these claims then he is never seeing the light of day again & from past history it wouldn't surprise me. Same claims were made about Max Hardcore, who edited stuff down doing interviews to protect himself from allegations. In Japan there were guys 20 plus years back that were raping women on set after falsely advertising for models. Over here we had this clown-https://kiwifarms.net/threads/philip...-cooper.35811/

Any girl who believed that the videos were going to be for private use or wouldn't get distributed all over the internet are really, really dumb.

So how do the Netvideogirls guys get away with it? It's basically the same thing, except I know they use legit porn girls sometimes.

Lmao true

In the civil court the judge posed a similiar question about what if the private buyer then uploads on the net, but said he didnt need to answer since that wasnt what happened.

I think it's like sending a d*ck pic - you should know all of her friends are gonna see it.

Answer: Because women will come up with any cope reason to justify their slooty behavior so long as it absolves them of any personal responsibility whatsoever for the consequences of their retarded actions.

lol @ being a wanted fugitive by the FBI and hiding in Spain.



Dude should have went to a country with no extradition where what he did is not a crime.

That's like a vague twist

It's totally true they used regular modeling fliers originally. Then when the girls responded, they told them it was porn

They said a lot of girls didn't respond from there. So the girls you see were okay with porn

I remember seeing the actual doc they signed it and it said it was to be distributed online. Just online, no specifics

Sloots still had to fly out there and chit. And then go through with it

Anyways, was probably only about $$

That's disgusting, which ones?

Instead of calling their parents, siblings, grandparents, friends, or beta orbiters for a ticket home they choose to get dinked down on camera. just lol

Why don't you have a seat over there?

Yes he could have just gone to Russia and continued his business as usual

[QUOTE=CuttyUnderleaf post_id=1673453143]FBI Press release--19 Count Indictment. I haven't been able to find the full indictment list

-sex trafficking
-production of child pornography
-sex trafficking of a minor
-conspiracy to launder monetary instruments

[URL=https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/sandiego/news/fbi-ten-most-wanted-fugitive-michael-pratt-captured-in-spain]https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field...tured-in-spain[/URL]


[img]https://media.nbcsandiego.com/2022/12/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2.gif?resize=850%2C478&quality=85&stripimg]

[img]https://media.giphy.com/media/l3q2K5jinAlChoCLS/giphy.mg][/QUOTE]Did you read any of the details of the case or are you just emotionally reacting to the charges being thrown at him?

Sloots gonna sloot.

Crazy they're treating this guy harsher than they treated Epstein. First few sentences I was like "Oh sh!t, this guy sounds crazy!" Then the more you read and the girls are completely undermining their own point.

"He didn't say it was porn until we got there, at which point we agreed."
"He said they'd be private videos, then shared publicly!"

Well maybe just don't do porn at all, ladies? Maybe don't debase yourself and give them the ammunition to release beyond the private porn sector? (What kinda retard believes the pornographer is gonna keep these videos private? Give me a fukkin' break.)
The only sketchy sh!t I saw was if they actually locked girls up and abused them before letting them go. In which case...ya, dude is scum. But the other sh!t is just"I consider those consensual sex sessions rape now in retrospect because I feel guilty for being a whore!"

Sloots gonna sloot, that man is a hero

Exactly.

Every single detail of this case is going to be dragged out into the open (if it hasn't already) to make him out to be a CP-fiend monster child smuggler, but the people who were actually doing the chit that they are accusing this brah of doing (Epstein and Maxwell) are tried behind closed doors, no details or names released, and all info that does seep out is ignored or supressed.

Really activates the almonds.

I’m not sure how I am emotionally reacting by posting the FBI press release… I mean I am a little surprised that miscer called him a hero being that he’s charged with several counts involving child porn, by force no less.

What’s your position? That every single thing against the guy is a lie, including these girls ages?

Okay, so just emotionally reacting to the charges with no knowledge of the details of the case. AKA exactly why they charged this guy with all that chit-- and he's a groce looking schlub so 99% of women don't process it any further than that and just assume he's guilty and condemn him to death.

1. I think that the charges of human trafficking are completely bunk, because they are related to him "coercing" these women into pron because he told them the videos were being sold to a private collector rather than released on the internet. Is it shady af? Yep. Is it human trafficking? Nope. It's a breach of contract and has no criminal ramifications in my opinion (not a lawyer though).
2. He apparently spoke with one girl who was under 18 and agreed to do a film with her on her 18th birthday. That is where the CP charge comes from. She contacted him. If other girls showed fake documents to him, then they should be charged with crossing state lines to commit felony identity fraud and the charge can stand-- because he should certainly have confirmed they were real documents. To my knowledge, that's not even close to what happened though.

What this guy did was post innocuous ads saying that they were looking for models, then either respond that it was pron, or just tell them it was nude modeling. Some of the hoes are claiming that they didn't find out it was pron until they got in the room and the guy said that they were going to make them pay for their own flight home if they didn't take the dick. Again, shady af and morally reprehensible? Absolutely. Anything even close to the crimes listed by the FBI? Absolutely not.

This entire case is a complete farce. Read through some of the other posts that have been made ITT if you are actually interested in learning the details of the case and tell me why you think this dude deserves to spend the rest of his life in jail on some trumped up #MeToo horsechit.

Agree

Calling a guy a child pornographer who filmed a girl who lied about her age and had a fake ID but was still 17 is ridiculous.

I think a lot of women react emotionally to this story and stories like these because they, themselves have been lied to before and manipulated by men to get into her panties. However they empathize with these women because like the GDP whores,they chose to believe the lieand now regret it. They knew what they were getting into from the get-go but after the fact they feel the fool and instead of learning the lesson just off-set the responsibility they should have taken onto others.

On spread. Wise as phuck post.

Its hard to be a woman. You can either do hard work like men or just get ****ed for tripple the salary.

People keep wanting the change of the definition of what a woman is. It needs to be changed to 2 words:

ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY

I hope those sloots are happy, that site was gold

@mcdojo I’m serious do you have the pics of the sloots at the beach I was able to only see one, please please post it I wanna see it