In terms of long term, would you rather be with a

-9.5/10, just your type, gorgeous but not very sexually compatible.
-7.5/10 but you find her very sexy and is 100% sexually compatible.

Incels, sit this one out pornfavor.

First one.

Who cares about sexual compatibility if you're cheating.

Say you're not cheating...

Why would we ever say that?

I would think that an objective 7.5/10 that YOU find to be "very sexy" and "100% sexual compatibility" with would subjectively be a 10 to you basically.

You say the first girl is just your type but lacks sexual compatibility.... choose one dumbass. Im just going to play this as if that is not even a part of the equation because it makes no sense.

This really comes down to would you choose the girl that most guys would be more attracted to but that just doesn't really do it for you all that much vs a girl that most guys would rate as less attractive but checks your boxes and to you, meets your sexual preferences better.

Only guys who say the first girl are incels or closeted ****gits.

If you are more into the "less hot buy normal standards" girl then obviously you'd pick her, lol.

"Not very sexually compatible"

So I get tolookat this 9.5/10, but the sex (which is the important aspect) isn't enjoyable? Sounds pretty cuck-like to me (srs).
"Bro look at my girl, she's fukking amazing!"
"How's the sex? I bet it's great?!"
"....well...no. Actually I don't really enjoy it very much. I don't get much satisfaction from her tbh. But I mean just look at how good she looks!!!1111oneone"


No thank you. 7.5/10 that matches my sexual appetites is a much better choice.

Don't be retarded. Some girls are objectively gorgeous but something about them might not be sexy. Maybe she has prude vibes.

A girl can be cute but be very sexually appealing.