Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Hot mess milf gets banned as a school volunteer for her OnlyFans page
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 112
  2. Page 3 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Hot mess milf gets banned as a school volunteer for her OnlyFans page

post 1676249883 01-31-2023, 11:44 AM
-
#61
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
"Kids" don't compete in bodybuilding competitions, adults do.
Kids don't have OnlyFans accounts... adults do. What's your point?
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676251713 01-31-2023, 12:12 PM
-
#62
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Ok... well then I guess it's OK to force out parents who have a DUI in their past... or parents who own or work at a marijuana dispensary... or parents who are competitive bodybuilders.... although maybe we don't ban the parents who actuallyownOnlyFans, Pornhub, etc., because they are the ones ultimately paying hundreds of thousands in school taxes. But everyone else can go. Just lol
case by case basis in some times, automatic disqualification in others, really just common sense dawg. your all or nothing approach is unwise. why are you so passionate about having pornstars as school volunteers.
post 1676254713 01-31-2023, 01:01 PM
-
#63
  1. monty097
  2. Registered User
  1. monty097
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 12,833
  6. Rep Power: 75637
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
Good, stop validating these whores.
Basically this.
-always pick 4 crew
-mod negged crew
-mod repped crew
-Conservative crew
-Trump 2024 crew
post 1676254723 01-31-2023, 01:01 PM
-
#64
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
case by case basis in some times, automatic disqualification in others, really just common sense dawg. your all or nothing approach is unwise. why are you so passionate about having pornstars as school volunteers.
I just gave everyone case by case scenarios and not a single person could answer for them. It's not like she was promoting herself as an adult model to students. Someone's wife found out and complained. Reminds me of liberals digging up old tweets... in which case, that's something else all of these school boards should consider doing prior to allowing parents to volunteer I guess? Run your usual background checks and screen everyone's social media first... if you find something that you don't agree with then ban them from volunteering at their kids school.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676257123 01-31-2023, 01:40 PM
-
#65
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
I just gave everyone case by case scenarios and not a single person could answer for them. It's not like she was promoting herself as an adult model to students. Someone's wife found out and complained. Reminds me of liberals digging up old tweets... in which case, that's something else all of these school boards should consider doing prior to allowing parents to volunteer I guess? Run your usual background checks and screen everyone's social media first... if you find something that you don't agree with then ban them from volunteering at their kids school.
bro no one in this thread is about to create a comprehensive policy for school volunteers. But it is common sense to accept that schools have just cause to disqualify pornstars from volunteering, none of you relativistic or "what about" arguments changes that single self evident fact my bro.
post 1676257653 01-31-2023, 01:47 PM
-
#66
  1. saltypits
  1. saltypits
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 14,086
  5. Rep Power: 54189
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Kids don't have OnlyFans accounts... adults do. What's your point?
Misc libs triggered.
post 1676257823 01-31-2023, 01:51 PM
-
#67
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
bro no one in this thread is about to create a comprehensive policy for school volunteers. But it is common sense to accept that schools have just cause to disqualify pornstars from volunteering, none of you relativistic or "what about" arguments changes that single self evident fact my bro.
They absolutely do change the facts in this scenario because this is now a legal issue, not just a subjective school policy. My understanding is that this is apublicschool. If it is not, then I retract my statements. But like I said, don't complain about people getting silenced/ cancelled because of tweets they made in the past that people don't agree with them. If you want to ban adult models from volunteering, then fine. Just make sure the playing field is equal and ban any parent with a DUI, parents that work at marijuana dispensaries, parents who owns adult clubs, websites, or video companies, etc.

And it's completely fine ifyoubelieve it is OK to ban someone from volunteering because a jealous mom complained about her OnlyFans account... but it doesn't mean I have to think it's OK. If you are not bringing, talking, or promoting any of it in the school, then I believe it is 100% fine. Same thing with parents who are swingers. What they do in their own time is there own business... so long as they don't bring it into the school no one should care. But hey, that's my opinion.... and quite a lot of other people out there too if we're being honest.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676258833 01-31-2023, 02:12 PM
-
#68
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
They absolutely do change the facts in this scenario because this is now a legal issue, not just a subjective school policy. My understanding is that this is apublicschool. If it is not, then I retract my statements. But like I said, don't complain about people getting silenced/ cancelled because of tweets they made in the past that people don't agree with them. If you want to ban adult models from volunteering, then fine. Just make sure the playing field is equal and ban any parent with a DUI, parents that work at marijuana dispensaries, parents who owns adult clubs, websites, or video companies, etc.

And it's completely fine ifyoubelieve it is OK to ban someone from volunteering because a jealous mom complained about her OnlyFans account... but it doesn't mean I have to think it's OK. If you are not bringing, talking, or promoting any of it in the school, then I believe it is 100% fine. Same thing with parents who are swingers. What they do in their own time is there own business... so long as they don't bring it into the school no one should care. But hey, that's my opinion.... and quite a lot of other people out there too if we're being honest.
schools should always err on the side of caution when it comes to volunteers, with a wide margin at that. you're makin this out to be a civil rights argument, I just don't see it having the same gravity.

sure do a quick background check and any offenses in the last 5 years auto disqualify, for personal "social media" background its like all other aspects, post at your own risk. i wouldn't go looking for chit, but if something immoral comes to light well it is what it is ban em just to be safe.
post 1676259433 01-31-2023, 02:22 PM
-
#69
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
schools should always err on the side of caution when it comes to volunteers, with a wide margin at that. you're makin this out to be a civil rights argument, I just don't see it having the same gravity.

sure do a quick background check and any offenses in the last 5 years auto disqualify, for personal "social media" background its like all other aspects, post at your own risk. i wouldn't go looking for chit, but if something immoral comes to light well it is what it is ban em just to be safe.
That's your opinion and that's fine. But you're advocating a morality police, which I don't believe works so well with public institutions. Privately? Sure, it's done all the time. Publicly? I suppose it can be done but they better come with a good explanation of why a parent (edit) who has been volunteering for 5 years is a distraction/ counterproductive to elementary school children who don't know what OnlyFans even is.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676260323 01-31-2023, 02:39 PM
-
#70
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 27,183
  7. Rep Power: 223047
Originally Posted By crupiea⏩
They really want us to believe that there are guys paying to watch tatted up, heavily made up and filtered 30 year old moms.

Its simply not a realistic thing.
How do you think these hoes pull in $15-20K per month? Because of simps who buy their content.
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."

- PJ O'Rourke
post 1676262483 01-31-2023, 03:15 PM
-
#71
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: -, -, Netherlands
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 125767
Fukkin LOL @ this cuck raging on about bodybuilders or people with one prior arrest not being allowed to volunteer also. The fuk is going on in someone's brain when they go on an insane rant like that?
post 1676263833 01-31-2023, 03:36 PM
-
#72
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 43,261
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
Fukkin LOL @ this cuck raging on about bodybuilders or people with one prior arrest not being allowed to volunteer also. The fuk is going on in someone's brain when they go on an insane rant like that?
my fault.
I triggered the fuk out of him long time ago and now all i have to do is quote him or point out his mental illness and he just goes off the rails.
it's quite a thing.
post 1676266613 01-31-2023, 04:16 PM
-
#73
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,170
  6. Rep Power: 274420
arguing semantics with leftist shills who cannot accept moral compass as a direction for society is worthless. They are children and sometimes you have to tell children "why? because I said so"

bottom line, degenerate whores should not be around children, we cant control who kids parents are, but we can control the radius their sickness will spread by removing them from influencing the rest of the kids out there by not being around them at school.
For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
post 1676274083 01-31-2023, 06:05 PM
-
#74
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
Originally Posted By Tshadows⏩
Because regardless of what incel basement dwelling miscers think or whatever the misc narrative may be on tattoos women now a days really like tattoos rather that be on men or on themselves. Let that sink in
Quality women don’t like tattoos bro. This is a bit of a cope
post 1676274433 01-31-2023, 06:08 PM
-
#75
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
This is true.
To be clear I would still dump a load in her even with the tats but she would look better without for sure
post 1676275453 01-31-2023, 06:21 PM
-
#76
  1. Weightaholic
  1. Weightaholic
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 54
  6. Posts: 34,904
  7. Rep Power: 82209
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
I want my kids exposed to successful well-to-do adults
That's why I only send my children to posh private schools. Imagine consorting with peasants!
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
post 1676276843 01-31-2023, 06:37 PM
-
#77
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
I just gave everyone case by case scenarios and not a single person could answer for them. It's not like she was promoting herself as an adult model to students. Someone's wife found out and complained. Reminds me of liberals digging up old tweets... in which case, that's something else all of these school boards should consider doing prior to allowing parents to volunteer I guess? Run your usual background checks and screen everyone's social media first... if you find something that you don't agree with then ban them from volunteering at their kids school.
So the female pre-school teacher that was taking pictures of her tits at work, in the bathroom, for her onlyfans account, shouldn't be fired?
post 1676289753 01-31-2023, 10:06 PM
-
#78
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 441
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
Good, stop validating these whores.
this
post 1676291963 01-31-2023, 10:51 PM
-
#79
  1. 2011change
  2. MISC_LEGEND
  1. 2011change
  2. MISC_LEGEND
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 8,068
  5. Rep Power: 9876
onlyfans is cancer to society.
***Disclaimer: All posts made by [2011change] are works of satire and made for entertainment use only.***
post 1676308383 02-01-2023, 06:31 AM
-
#80
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
That's your opinion and that's fine. But you're advocating a morality police, which I don't believe works so well with public institutions. Privately? Sure, it's done all the time. Publicly? I suppose it can be done but they better come with a good explanation of why a parent (edit) who has been volunteering for 5 years is a distraction/ counterproductive to elementary school children who don't know what OnlyFans even is.
everything is an opinion, the more based in logic the more valid. you are advocating anti-morality police, the same philosophy that has allowed tranny book reading fun time in schools. Being a pornstar is not a protected class, and legally can be discriminated agaisnt. sorry bro but as stewards of the youth, common sense virtue should be upheld in lower grade schools, not post modern moral relativism.
post 1676308733 02-01-2023, 06:38 AM
-
#81
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
So the female pre-school teacher that was taking pictures of her tits at work, in the bathroom, for her onlyfans account, shouldn't be fired?
That's an unfair comparison. You're describing a teacher who is being compensated for her work and bringing her adult work into the workplace. The other is a parent who had volunteered for 5 years without a complaint until a parent found found out about her adult modeling. Talk about a slippery slope.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676309043 02-01-2023, 06:44 AM
-
#82
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
everything is an opinion, the more based in logic the more valid. you are advocating anti-morality police, the same philosophy that has allowed tranny book reading fun time in schools. Being a pornstar is not a protected class, and legally can be discriminated agaisnt. sorry bro but as stewards of the youth, common sense virtue should be upheld in lower grade schools, not post modern moral relativism.
Except she did it for 5 years without any issue, since the "only factor listed that disqualifies volunteers is a criminal record" which she doesn't have. Even on a case by case scenario she shouldn't have been banned. But yeah... you want the morality police to run our public institutions... I'm not for that. I'll stick to the legal system, so we'll have a hard time agreeing.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676309223 02-01-2023, 06:47 AM
-
#83
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
So the female pre-school teacher that was taking pictures of her tits at work, in the bathroom, for her onlyfans account, shouldn't be fired?
Is the woman in the OP modeling for only fans on school grounds while she is being paid by the school?
This situation brings up a good argument. Where does it stop? If you have a DUI should you be banned from volunteering at your children's school. I would say a DUI is way more dangerous than posing on Onlyfans.
Where do we draw the line? Once we keep all the drag queens out of school and all talk about sexuality until kids are at least in middle school then we can dive deeper into a supposed morality code.
post 1676309673 02-01-2023, 06:54 AM
-
#84
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
To be fair, it's entirely discretionary. If there is no perceived threat of toxic influence or behavior (subjective) to children with them interacting with certain individuals, then it shouldn't be a problem. If this woman was courting young ladies and telling them how they can be millionaires by age 18 via OnlyFans, then yeah, she probably needs to get ran over by a dump truck. But if the interactions are benign, there isn't much to worry about. In some areas of society, people in industries such as OnlyFans explicit content or Pornography or Drag may not get a lot of approval from the community. I don't honestly see a problem with disapproving things like that as they may be more-so morally frowned upon. Bodybuilding, DUIs, MJ dispensaries, these are in a different categories as two have more to do with legal issues and one is not not strictly sexual or illegal or immoral.

Again, it's all discretionary. In Seattle, you'd probably find parents who are more willing to intentionally allow their kids around questionable characters than that of a Christian neighborhood in the Bible belt.
That's my entire point... she doesn't have a criminal record, she's been volunteering for 5 years without any issue... there is no perceived threat except for the fact that a parent is simply jealous or intimated or whatever by her. But we live in this cancel culture now where everyone is out to get someone so it should be expected.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676310163 02-01-2023, 07:05 AM
-
#85
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
Where do we draw the line? Once we keep all the drag queens out of school and all talk about sexuality until kids are at least in middle school then we can dive deeper into a supposed morality code.
This is my point exactly. I'm for keeping drag queens out of school... however, that doesn't mean I believe if a parent has performed in drag they shouldn't be able to show up in normal clothes and volunteer at their kids school. If a parent owns a marijuana dispensery, that doesn't mean I would ban them from the school because I'd be afraid they're going to sell weed to the kids. Like I said, it's all an opinion... I just happen to think most people here are on the wrong side of it. But it is what it is.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676310293 02-01-2023, 07:07 AM
-
#86
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Except she did it for 5 years without any issue, since the "only factor listed that disqualifies volunteers is a criminal record" which she doesn't have. Even on a case by case scenario she shouldn't have been banned. But yeah... you want the morality police to run our public institutions... I'm not for that. I'll stick to the legal system, so we'll have a hard time agreeing.
lets take your morality police argument further, are you as passionate about getting rid of rules for dress codes or foul language or PDA's. morality is already embedded into the school system, as it should be.
post 1676311623 02-01-2023, 07:28 AM
-
#87
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
lets take your morality police argument further, are you as passionate about getting rid of rules for dress codes or foul language or PDA's. morality is already embedded into the school system, as it should be.
No.. so long as those are in line with basic societal norms. Also, those are imposed upon children and in part to further any hindrances on children's lesson plansin the school. Every student or parent should follow those guidelines when they arein the school. But that doesn't mean a school should act as the morality police when it comes to what parents do outside of the school on their own time. If a parent is a stripper then I'd assume they would ban them too... and maybe ban those parents who visit strip clubs. Or drink, smoke weed, etc. Pretty much anything you don't like you can ban them from volunteering. Maybe you think that's a good idea... that's fine... but I don't.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676312673 02-01-2023, 07:43 AM
-
#88
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
Is the woman in the OP modeling for only fans on school grounds while she is being paid by the school?
This situation brings up a good argument. Where does it stop? If you have a DUI should you be banned from volunteering at your children's school. I would say a DUI is way more dangerous than posing on Onlyfans.
Where do we draw the line? Once we keep all the drag queens out of school and all talk about sexuality until kids are at least in middle school then we can dive deeper into a supposed morality code.
Actually it was a simple question, a pre-school teacher that showed her tits in the school bathroom, for her Onlyfans account, should she have been fired?
post 1676313973 02-01-2023, 08:06 AM
-
#89
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Actually it was a simple question, a pre-school teacher that showed her tits in the school bathroom, for her Onlyfans account, should she have been fired?
In school during school hours I would say yes. The woman in the OP does not take photos on school grounds I am assuming nor is she doing it on the taxpayers dime.
Now my question was actually simple as well. Where do we draw the morality line? Should someone with a DUI be banned from volunteering at their kids school?
post 1676315113 02-01-2023, 08:25 AM
-
#90
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
In school during school hours I would say yes. The woman in the OP does not take photos on school grounds I am assuming nor is she doing it on the taxpayers dime.
Now my question was actually simple as well. Where do we draw the morality line? Should someone with a DUI be banned from volunteering at their kids school?
The one thing about a DUI is that there is no gray area or morality around it - it's simply illegal. It's very black and white, whereas the thing about being an adult model is that it isonlya moral gray area because there is nothing illegal about it. My whole point is that schools can dictate what parents do, say, act, wear, etc.on school grounds. I don't believe they should be a morality police dictating what is and isn't acceptable for them to dooffschool grounds. That's my entire argument. Obviously some people don't agree with that... whatever. But that's my stance on it.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts