Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Dianne Feinstein (89) for Senate 2024?
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 37
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: Dianne Feinstein (89) for Senate 2024?

post 1676384503 02-02-2023, 07:57 AM
-
#1
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Posts: 8,619
  5. Rep Power: 35570

Dianne Feinstein (89) for Senate 2024?

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has under $10,000 in her campaign account as uncertainty grows over whether she will run for reelection in 2024.

Feinstein, 89, raised under $600 in the last three months and just over $100,000 total in 2022, a fundraising haul that is not consistent with an incumbent senator gearing up for a reelection bid. Instead, as the senator who has been in office for more than 30 years contemplates her next steps, a number of other high-profile Democrats have jumped into the race for senate in California in 2024.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...4-speculation/
post 1676384903 02-02-2023, 08:05 AM
-
#2
  1. John L
  2. Make that coffee to go
  1. John L
  2. Make that coffee to go
  3. Join Date: May 2006
  4. Location: Brookhaven, New York, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 39,817
  7. Subscribers: 3
  8. Rep Power: 235027
Eh, who cares. It's not like her still being in office is making any difference. A Democrat further to the left than her will replace her once she retires or croaks.
post 1676384983 02-02-2023, 08:06 AM
-
#3
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 132,839
  6. Subscribers: 8
  7. Rep Power: 1754461
perfect for Cali
fuk em
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1676387023 02-02-2023, 08:45 AM
-
#4
  1. hardcock
  2. Banned
  1. hardcock
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 936
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By John
Eh, who cares. It's not like her still being in office is making any difference. A Democrat further to the left than her will replace her once she retires or croaks.
We can only hope.
post 1676387293 02-02-2023, 08:49 AM
-
#5
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
Originally Posted By greenleaf⏩
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has under $10,000 in her campaign account as uncertainty grows over whether she will run for reelection in 2024.

Feinstein, 89, raised under $600 in the last three months and just over $100,000 total in 2022, a fundraising haul that is not consistent with an incumbent senator gearing up for a reelection bid. Instead, as the senator who has been in office for more than 30 years contemplates her next steps, a number of other high-profile Democrats have jumped into the race for senate in California in 2024.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...4-speculation/
We need fewer boomers and more Gen X. Hopefully, she retires.
post 1676387643 02-02-2023, 08:55 AM
-
#6
  1. Guyfawkes1010
  2. Remember the 5th of Nov
  1. Guyfawkes1010
  2. Remember the 5th of Nov
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Posts: 4,630
  5. Rep Power: 11544
I know its not really work, but chit retire already and enjoy what few years you have left before you have to answer to God for all youve done.
post 1676391083 02-02-2023, 09:49 AM
-
#7
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
She has been mentally unfit for years already. If no one polished can step up to the plate she'll get reelected on name recognition. Term limits were needed a long time ago.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1676397363 02-02-2023, 11:43 AM
-
#8
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Posts: 8,619
  5. Rep Power: 35570
"If Feinstein does run for another term, then “she has my whole-hearted support,” said the82-year-old Pelosi, who in November stepped down as the long-serving House Democratic leader after Republicans won the chamber majority in the November midterm elections."

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/02/pelo...rchterm=pelosi
post 1676399183 02-02-2023, 12:09 PM
-
#9
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  1. PepperedAngus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,170
  6. Rep Power: 274420
Guys shes got a few steals left in her, its only right to let her keep going. nancy too, shes got an insider trading portfolio to maintain, how the fuk is she supposed to do that if she cant vote for things shes invested in???

you guys are just bigots, ageists, and misogynists not letting older women who have served so valiantly and selflessly continue.
For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
post 1676399623 02-02-2023, 12:15 PM
-
#10
  1. SmithMachineGuy
  1. SmithMachineGuy
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 19,759
  6. Rep Power: 107444
With $10,000 she will win re-election is a landslide. California gonna California. That "D" next to her name guarantees re-election.
post 1676399913 02-02-2023, 12:19 PM
-
#11
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
how do these hags live to be so old?
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1676403473 02-02-2023, 01:14 PM
-
#12
  1. BrickJames
  2. Registered User
  1. BrickJames
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 409
  6. Rep Power: 198
Hope she runs and wins again.
The people that are trying to replace her are far far faaaaar worse.
post 1676404883 02-02-2023, 01:41 PM
-
#13
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By SmithMachineGuy⏩
With $10,000 she will win re-election is a landslide. California gonna California. That "D" next to her name guarantees re-election.
I think California does their elections a little different than most. Most states I think do primaries, R's pick their candidate, D's pick theirs. They faceoff in the General Election. California I think has all candidates on the ballot and the top 2 regardless of party faceoff in the General. So while its guarantee that a D will win, its not a guarantee she will.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1676405093 02-02-2023, 01:45 PM
-
#14
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By John
Eh, who cares. It's not like her still being in office is making any difference. A Democrat further to the left than her will replace her once she retires or croaks.
Don’t be so sure. She and her husband have been in the middle of scandals and she’s far left. She’s part of the deep state and just hasn’t been at the center of attention. The dems did a great job distracting the country with Trump and taking eyes off of bad actors.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1676406353 02-02-2023, 02:10 PM
-
#15
  1. crupiea
  2. Lifetime Member
  1. crupiea
  2. Lifetime Member
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Location: San Diego, California, United States
  5. Posts: 42,878
  6. Rep Power: 232216
You wonder why they keep running for office.

Of course they would still get the best seats in restaurants even if they were retired so it cant be the perks like that they find appealing. it has to be access to something they would not get if they were to retire.

Obviously, money has to be the key. Clearly when they retire they would somehow lose access to the fountain of money so makes sense they would keep running for office.

Plus it tells us just how tough the job actually is. If 90 year olds can easily do it, its probably not that demanding. Clearly its not the 170k a year or whatever it is they make that driving this.

I would be very interested in that fountain of money and what is going on with that. We need to see that information way more than some rich guys tax forms.
"To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one. It is rather an endless struggle that will go on to the very last moment of our lives. Nobody is born a warrior, in exactly the same way that nobody is born an average man. We make ourselves into one or the other."-- Carlos Castaneda
post 1676408693 02-02-2023, 02:48 PM
-
#16
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By crupiea⏩
You wonder why they keep running for office.

Of course they would still get the best seats in restaurants even if they were retired so it cant be the perks like that they find appealing. it has to be access to something they would not get if they were to retire.

Obviously, money has to be the key. Clearly when they retire they would somehow lose access to the fountain of money so makes sense they would keep running for office.

Plus it tells us just how tough the job actually is. If 90 year olds can easily do it, its probably not that demanding. Clearly its not the 170k a year or whatever it is they make that driving this.

I would be very interested in that fountain of money and what is going on with that. We need to see that information way more than some rich guys tax forms.
This is exactly what it is. The job comes with so many fringe benefits. It’s the same with many other jobs, just amplified mini mini times. The average person would get paid maybe $15 an hour, but fringe benefits might put them at $20-$25 an hour. This is why fringe benefits for the first thing to go when people demand higher wages. Politicians, on the other hand, continue to get more and more salary, along with more and more fringe benefits. I think quite a bit of money is coming via corruption as well though. Getting filthy rich is a politician doesn’t just happen as fast as it does with many of them. People like Obama, the Clintons, and Jill, Biden are good examples of this.

This is how they end up being millionaires within a few years.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1676409683 02-02-2023, 03:07 PM
-
#17
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Dirty South
  5. Posts: 19,745
  6. Rep Power: 163712
Welcome to zombie nation



Those cheeky kunts
See you tomorrow
post 1676412273 02-02-2023, 03:48 PM
-
#18
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 27,183
  7. Rep Power: 223047
Term. Limits.

These geriatrics should be nowhere near positions of power.
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."

- PJ O'Rourke
post 1676413593 02-02-2023, 04:09 PM
-
#19
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
Term. Limits.

These geriatrics should be nowhere near positions of power.
But how would you get politicians to vote on term limits 195% of them disagree with it? They don’t do with the people want if it compromise is there power. I truly believe that this is the problem today. There is no politician that would make a policy that goes against their self interest as a politician. It’s the same with bureaucrats; they would never agree, or do anything that would show their own incompetence, like seeking a the truth in their policy performance. For example, if a policy had a bad outcome and they discovered it, they would pretend they never saw it and just keep doing it.

Thomas Sowell discovered this working in the department of labor. He started actually looking at the data and discovered much of what the department of labor was doing had a cost that nobody was accounting for. His colleagues began getting angry with him, and he decided the government was not for him.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1676426453 02-02-2023, 07:45 PM
-
#20
  1. InPhase
  2. Registered User
  1. InPhase
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 45
  6. Posts: 3,673
  7. Rep Power: 94566
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport⏩
how do these hags live to be so old?
By feasting on the souls of young children.
post 1676430363 02-02-2023, 08:54 PM
-
#21
  1. HaiMeesk
  2. Jive Azz Turkey
  1. HaiMeesk
  2. Jive Azz Turkey
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 11
  6. Posts: 11,242
  7. Rep Power: 49990
Originally Posted By fitnessislife⏩
Term. Limits.

These geriatrics should be nowhere near positions of power.
Would rather Age Limits, esp for POTUS.
Boston sports crew
Live Free or Die 603 crew
Ex-Howard Stern crew
1974 crew

***Connoisseur: Les Derrieres de Femmes ***
post 1676431073 02-02-2023, 09:09 PM
-
#22
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By HaiMeesk⏩
Would rather Age Limits, esp for POTUS.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but what age would you limit it to, and what would be the reasons for that age? Who would get to decide that, because it wouldn’t be the voters, it would be a political party.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1676436013 02-02-2023, 11:18 PM
-
#23
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Nope, she should definitely not be the next Strom Thurmond or Robert Byrd who held seats into their 90s. Byrd died during his term and Strom just slept during sessions until someone woke him up to cast his vote. Time to retire, granny.
post 1676439283 02-03-2023, 01:01 AM
-
#24
  1. HaiMeesk
  2. Jive Azz Turkey
  1. HaiMeesk
  2. Jive Azz Turkey
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 11
  6. Posts: 11,242
  7. Rep Power: 49990
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
I don’t necessarily disagree, but what age would you limit it to, and what would be the reasons for that age? Who would get to decide that, because it wouldn’t be the voters, it would be a political party.
Realistically it would have to become a hot button issue with both the public and congress itself.
So far, two really bad presidents in a row, both 75 & 80 yrs old now, plus Hillary and Bernie still under the delusions that they can rule the world. Has to be really off-putting for some of the current younger members of congress (who also aspire to be president) to see the previous contenders like Buttigeig, Klobuchar, and even Tulsi get shut out of the process like they did. An age limit put forth thru congress would make the most sense to put an end to it.

We do at least have a minimum age of 35 already in place, which most people are cool with. Really starting to dread the darkest of days we have a millennial in the White House.
Boston sports crew
Live Free or Die 603 crew
Ex-Howard Stern crew
1974 crew

***Connoisseur: Les Derrieres de Femmes ***
post 1677197653 02-14-2023, 01:36 PM
-
#25
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Posts: 8,619
  5. Rep Power: 35570
Dianne Feinstein, 89, won’t seek re-election, opening up a California Senate seat in 2024

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California announced she will retire at the end of her current term.

Feinstein, 89, is the oldest sitting U.S. senator and the longest-serving senator from her state.

Reps. Adam Schiff and Katie Porter, both California Democrats, have already launched campaigns for Feinstein’s Senate seat.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/14/cali...n-in-2024.html
post 1677197923 02-14-2023, 01:39 PM
-
#26
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 132,839
  6. Subscribers: 8
  7. Rep Power: 1754461
good riddance
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1677198783 02-14-2023, 01:48 PM
-
#27
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Dr. Oz getting a house in California as we speak. 😁
post 1677199113 02-14-2023, 01:51 PM
-
#28
  1. saltypits
  1. saltypits
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 14,086
  5. Rep Power: 54189
Originally Posted By Jayarbie⏩
We need fewer boomers and more Gen X. Hopefully, she retires.
She's not a boomer. She's part of the Silent Generation.
post 1688095053 08-10-2023, 12:21 AM
-
#29
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  1. greenleaf
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Posts: 8,619
  5. Rep Power: 35570
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, 90, falls at home and goes to hospital, but scans are clear, her office says

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the oldest member of Congress, fell in her home and went to a hospital for a short time, her office said on Wednesday.

The 90-year-old California Democrat, who has faced mounting concerns about her health and her ability to perform the duties of a senator, “briefly went to the hospital yesterday afternoon as a precaution after a minor fall in her home,” her office said in a statement.

All of her scans were clear, and she returned home later Tuesday, said her spokesman Adam Russell, who provided no further details.

https://apnews.com/article/dianne-fe...bb699d83c75d58
post 1688096183 08-10-2023, 01:35 AM
-
#30
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By greenleaf⏩
Dianne Feinstein, 89, won’t seek re-election, opening up a California Senate seat in 2024

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California announced she will retire at the end of her current term.

Feinstein, 89, is the oldest sitting U.S. senator and the longest-serving senator from her state.

Reps. Adam Schiff and Katie Porter, both California Democrats, have already launched campaigns for Feinstein’s Senate seat.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/14/cali...n-in-2024.html
Schiff is possibly getting ejected from congress as a result of his part in taking down Trump and all of his lying. He was caught lying under oath, withholding information from investigators etc, breaking many laws on the way. He likely won't be allowed to run for anything.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts