Forum
»
Bodhy, Wincel, Covidcels… Explain this testimony
03-03-2023, 09:40 AM
-
#121
- jamalfudge
- Throbbing Member
-
- jamalfudge
- Throbbing Member
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: United States
- Posts: 39,406
- Rep Power: 297374
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
Everybody should forget JLCyou forgot JLC, OP
#
03-03-2023, 09:43 AM
-
#122
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
-
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
- Join Date: Feb 2015
- Posts: 9,555
- Rep Power: 78353
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I'm very glad that you didn't deny being ashamed of yourself.It hasn't really been a quantitative discussion, but that has happened in other threads.
I took this thread to be about the video clip in the OP. The clip is of a fella making incorrect statements.
I took this thread to be about the video clip in the OP. The clip is of a fella making incorrect statements.
New thread coming for you in t-12 hours.
“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes, 1588 – 1679
*Never Respond To RSM3 Threads crew*
03-03-2023, 09:43 AM
-
#123
- EdwardTheGreat
- Registered User
-
- EdwardTheGreat
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Age: 52
- Posts: 9,092
- Rep Power: 235009
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So, you have no credentials, and you say it's not definitive. So we should listen to you.That's not how it works.
He described the study as definitive, it was not definitive. People in here are saying it's definitive because this guy says so and he has credentials.
The paper in question was inconclusive and flawed in creating pooled estimates. Far from "definitive".
He described the study as definitive, it was not definitive. People in here are saying it's definitive because this guy says so and he has credentials.
The paper in question was inconclusive and flawed in creating pooled estimates. Far from "definitive".
03-03-2023, 09:44 AM
-
#124
03-03-2023, 09:46 AM
-
#125
Originally Posted By EdwardTheGreat⏩
I didn't say I have no credentials.So, you have no credentials, and you say it's not definitive. So we should listen to you.
I didn't say you should listen to me.
I was maybe not clear enough in suggesting interested people read the study for themselves.
It's here:
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr...6207.pub6/full
03-03-2023, 10:10 AM
-
#126
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
-
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,157
- Rep Power: 204849
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Life and truth are bitter and brutal until one accepts the situation s/he is in, and moves from there.This post deserves to be quoted.
Brutal.
Brutal.

If the move is LARPing on a forum, prospects aren't good for personal progression though.
03-03-2023, 10:16 AM
-
#127
Since quantitative contributions were mentioned:
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
There are some other issues with the Cochrane analysis.
If you look at table 2.1.1

The portion I highlighted is information the stats software is reporting on between-study heterogeneity in the meta-analysis. It says there is significant heterogeneity and we should exercise caution in attempting to combine these trials. One or some of these things are not like the others.
The authors seem to have disregarded this warning.
Between-study heterogeneity means attempting to produce pooled estimates isn't a great idea. However, there is opportunity in identifying sources of heterogeneity, which could improve our understanding of how interventions help or harm. Meta-regression is one way to approach this, but with only 4 studies included in this review, that's not really possible.
If you look at table 2.1.1

The portion I highlighted is information the stats software is reporting on between-study heterogeneity in the meta-analysis. It says there is significant heterogeneity and we should exercise caution in attempting to combine these trials. One or some of these things are not like the others.
The authors seem to have disregarded this warning.
Between-study heterogeneity means attempting to produce pooled estimates isn't a great idea. However, there is opportunity in identifying sources of heterogeneity, which could improve our understanding of how interventions help or harm. Meta-regression is one way to approach this, but with only 4 studies included in this review, that's not really possible.
03-03-2023, 10:41 AM
-
#128
- ~Hades~
- True Patriot Crew
-
- ~Hades~
- True Patriot Crew
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Posts: 26,187
- Rep Power: 695527
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
you, wincel, bodhy and other deranged libs that love controlling people and only trusting science when its convenient for youCan you clarify to which "they" you're referring?
Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew
03-03-2023, 10:48 AM
-
#129
Originally Posted By ~Hades~⏩
I'm not a liberal, have never tried to control anyone, and am very skeptical of science.you, wincel, bodhy and other deranged libs that love controlling people and only trusting science when its convenient for you
03-03-2023, 11:45 AM
-
#130
03-03-2023, 11:52 AM
-
#131
03-03-2023, 11:53 AM
-
#132
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
What is it with you ****ggots and your crying about your arguments not being addressed?Presumably the term is being used pejoratively as a character attackrather than addressing any arguments


It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-03-2023, 11:59 AM
-
#133
03-03-2023, 12:00 PM
-
#134
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Because that's a lot worse than moving goalposts, playing semantics, and generally acting stupid whenever it suits you.I just don't see the point in trying to insult strangers on the internet.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-03-2023, 12:05 PM
-
#135
03-03-2023, 12:10 PM
-
#136
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
People try to insult strangers in the internet because it's worse than the other things you listedBecause that's a lot worse than moving goalposts, playing semantics, and generally acting stupid whenever it suits you.

Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts