Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Cochrane apologizes for mask review misinterpretations
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 113
  2. Page 1 of 4
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  7. Last

Thread: Cochrane apologizes for mask review misinterpretations

post 1678754723 03-11-2023, 06:27 AM
-
#1
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920

Cochrane apologizes for mask review misinterpretations

"Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that 'masks don't work', which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation."

"The original Plain Language Summary for this review stated that 'We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed.' This wording was open to misinterpretation, for which we apologize."

https://www.cochrane.org/news/statem...viruses-review
post 1678755643 03-11-2023, 06:47 AM
-
#2
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699079
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1678756393 03-11-2023, 07:02 AM
-
#3
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Location: BC, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,341
  6. Rep Power: 354666
I cant even read OPs posts - Ive set that user to ignore.

I dont look at posts from bots/trolls/shills.

Just neg and move on.
post 1678756443 03-11-2023, 07:03 AM
-
#4
  1. ThatGuy950
  2. Floridayyy
  1. ThatGuy950
  2. Floridayyy
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: Turks and Caicos Islands
  5. Posts: 15,255
  6. Rep Power: 171546
Oh they worked


Coincel
Florida crew (lol at coldcels)
post 1678756543 03-11-2023, 07:04 AM
-
#5
  1. EarlA
  2. Registered User
  1. EarlA
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 10,746
  6. Rep Power: 109886
Just two more weeks?
Ack...Ack
post 1678756873 03-11-2023, 07:13 AM
-
#6
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699079
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1678757623 03-11-2023, 07:29 AM
-
#7
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
I cant even read OPs posts - Ive set that user to ignore.

I dont look at posts from bots/trolls/shills.

Just neg and move on.
Entered the thread though
post 1678759313 03-11-2023, 08:15 AM
-
#8
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1678759423 03-11-2023, 08:18 AM
-
#9
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Yeah, he’s isn’t saying they don’t work. He’s saying that after extensive review of N95 masks they still can’t determine whether they work or not. If they can’t even conclude whether N95 masks are effective for that use case what makes you think those stupid surgical masks and other cloth coverings are doing much of anything at all?
post 1678759523 03-11-2023, 08:21 AM
-
#10
  1. badreligion
  2. Meh
  1. badreligion
  2. Meh
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: Groton, Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 25,200
  6. Rep Power: 55006
Lol I wonder who got to them to make them change their position.
In Hoots We Trust.
post 1678759573 03-11-2023, 08:22 AM
-
#11
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Yeah, he’s isn’t saying they don’t work. He’s saying that after extensive review of N95 masks they still can’t determine whether they work or not. If they can’t even conclude whether N95 masks are effective for that use case what makes you think those stupid surgical masks and other cloth coverings are doing much of anything at all?
I think these types of extensions and unsupported conclusions are why they issued the statement and apology.
post 1678759813 03-11-2023, 08:27 AM
-
#12
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I think these types of extensions and unsupported conclusions are why they issued the statement and apology.
Well if they study something extensively trying to show a use case but are unable to do so, then a reasonable approach would be to take the stance that it’s quite possible/likely that they don’t work for that use case. Otherwise they would’ve been able to show the effectiveness in the studies being reviewed.
post 1678760013 03-11-2023, 08:32 AM
-
#13
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well if they study something extensively trying to show a use case but are unable to do so, then a reasonable approach would be to take the stance that it’s quite possible/likely that they don’t work for that use case. Otherwise they would’ve been able to show the effectiveness in the studies being reviewed.
That's the thing, it hasn't been studied extensively. Which is stated in the article, but either missed or glossed over by many.
post 1678760583 03-11-2023, 08:47 AM
-
#14
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that 'masks don't work', which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation."

"The original Plain Language Summary for this review stated that 'We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed.' This wording was open to misinterpretation, for which we apologize."

https://www.cochrane.org/news/statem...viruses-review
Glad they clarified their position, the truth never hurts unless you have an agenda.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1678762493 03-11-2023, 09:27 AM
-
#15
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Glad they clarified their position, the truth never hurts unless you have an agenda.
Interesting those who have "Covid Derangement Syndrome."
post 1678763013 03-11-2023, 09:36 AM
-
#16
  1. saltypits
  1. saltypits
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 14,085
  5. Rep Power: 54189
Imagine if there was a cancer drug that was used and then later on it was shown that it was ineffective. Would people still take it?
post 1678763203 03-11-2023, 09:42 AM
-
#17
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Of course you don't, the facts don't fit your narrative. But you all cared SOOOOO much when they came out with their original, vague, incorrect interpretation..




Originally Posted By saltypits⏩
Imagine if there was a cancer drug that was used and then later on it was shown that it was ineffective. Would people still take it?
If Tucker told them to.
post 1678763343 03-11-2023, 09:43 AM
-
#18
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699079
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Of course you don't, the facts don't fit your narrative. But you all cared SOOOOO much when they came out with their original, vague, incorrect interpretation..
Actually, I didn't Pat.

I never GAF about your masks, your Fauci Fluid injections, or your sacred Rona.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1678763353 03-11-2023, 09:44 AM
-
#19
  1. NKWulf
  2. Retired
  1. NKWulf
  2. Retired
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Age: 52
  6. Posts: 25,186
  7. Rep Power: 148179
Originally Posted By saltypits⏩
Imagine if there was a cancer drug that was used and then later on it was shown that it was ineffective. Would people still take it?
look at supplement companies and ask that question again.
post 1678763493 03-11-2023, 09:46 AM
-
#20
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Of course you don't, the facts don't fit your narrative. But you all cared SOOOOO much when they came out with their original, vague, incorrect interpretation..








If Tucker told them to.
Remember when you said you were gonna stop wearing one, just because you were vaccinated? How'd that work out for you? Especially in NY of all places.
post 1678763713 03-11-2023, 09:49 AM
-
#21
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By saltypits⏩
Imagine if there was a cancer drug that was used and then later on it was shown that it was ineffective. Would people still take it?
I guess we're still waiting for masks to be shown to be ineffective.
post 1678763803 03-11-2023, 09:51 AM
-
#22
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,754
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
I cant believe some of you f.aggots still wear masks
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678763973 03-11-2023, 09:54 AM
-
#23
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  1. freeheeler
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 65
  6. Posts: 11,675
  7. Rep Power: 83841
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that 'masks don't work', which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation."

"The original Plain Language Summary for this review stated that 'We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed.' This wording was open to misinterpretation, for which we apologize."

https://www.cochrane.org/news/statem...viruses-review
We are

What he means is "Sorry Democrats for going against the narrative "
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
post 1678764013 03-11-2023, 09:55 AM
-
#24
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I guess we're still waiting for masks to be shown to be ineffective.
So the fact that they "sort of worked," equals they worked?

And why are you people still wearing one? "Mask Derangement Syndrome?"
post 1678764033 03-11-2023, 09:55 AM
-
#25
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Remember when you said you were gonna stop wearing one, just because you were vaccinated? How'd that work out for you? Especially in NY of all places.
It worked out exactly like I said it would. I stopped wearing masks to "protect" others (unless the places I went required it, which of course I had no problem doing). And guess what happened? Tons of retarded Trumpers got themselves killed by delta and omicron because they didn't get vaccinated and wear masks. Oh well... not my problem.



Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
I cant believe some of you f.aggots still wear masks
You think Trump won in 2020. No one cares what you believe.
post 1678764113 03-11-2023, 09:58 AM
-
#26
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By freeheeler⏩
We are

What he means is "Sorry Democrats for going against the narrative "
That was in the original paper. It's just that many either ignored or missed that point.
post 1678764373 03-11-2023, 10:01 AM
-
#27
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
I cant believe some of you f.aggots still wear masks
It's beyond pathetic, and they even make excuses for them. "Why do you caaaaaaaaaaare???"
post 1678764503 03-11-2023, 10:03 AM
-
#28
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
It worked out exactly like I said it would. I stopped wearing masks to "protect" others (unless the places I went required it, which of course I had no problem doing). And guess what happened? Tons of retarded Trumpers got themselves killed by delta and omicron because they didn't get vaccinated and wear masks. Oh well... not my problem.







You think Trump won in 2020. No one cares what you believe.
Riiiiight, you stopped wearing a mask in NY after getting vaccinated, where it was required, but I'm sure they dropped the mandate juat for you Patty.......

And why would someone get it for not wearing a mask? That's not how they work Patty.
post 1678764633 03-11-2023, 10:06 AM
-
#29
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Riiiiight, you stopped wearing a mask in NY after getting vaccinated, where it was required, but I'm sure they dropped the mandate juat for you Patty.......

And why would someone get it for not wearing a mask? That's not how they work Patty.
I live here Dave, don't know what crap you've been reading on your right wing fake news sites but masks weren't mandatory outside of NYC a lonnnnnnnng time ago.

And for your second question.. I said I stopped wearing them to protect others.. literally said if you don't want to get vaccinated or wear a mask to protect others, fuk you then. And a whole bunch of retards killed themselves because they sure showed everyone..
post 1678764863 03-11-2023, 10:10 AM
-
#30
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Lmao at the absolute state of the goalposts now.




“See, we’re uncertain whether masks work or not! Suck on that antivaxxing science-deniers.”
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts