Forum
ยป
When left-leaning politicians want to tax the top 10-1% they only consider income
- Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Page 1 of 1
03-18-2023, 05:38 PM
-
#1
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
When left-leaning politicians want to tax the top 10-1% they only consider income
as the only asset that makes you that.
Top 5% of income is probably not even in the top 30% of wealth because most wealth is either inheritance or wealth hedged against ownership of a business, property or other assets.
And the latter moggers never pay tax - they just keep it in a portfolio and borrow money from banks at interest less than what their portfolio earns them and live on debt.
Meanwhile the average wagie has no access to debt like that because banks know very well one illness or recession and that asset is poof!
So they never ever "tax the rich/billionaires", they just tax the top end working commoner.
Here is some sausage on British TV trying to explain it in a very poor fashion to other commoners so they end up kinda booing him:
Top 5% of income is probably not even in the top 30% of wealth because most wealth is either inheritance or wealth hedged against ownership of a business, property or other assets.
And the latter moggers never pay tax - they just keep it in a portfolio and borrow money from banks at interest less than what their portfolio earns them and live on debt.
Meanwhile the average wagie has no access to debt like that because banks know very well one illness or recession and that asset is poof!
So they never ever "tax the rich/billionaires", they just tax the top end working commoner.
Here is some sausage on British TV trying to explain it in a very poor fashion to other commoners so they end up kinda booing him:
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-18-2023, 05:43 PM
-
#2
03-18-2023, 05:59 PM
-
#3
03-18-2023, 06:03 PM
-
#4
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
-
- atgbrahsrs
- ToningWasTooHarshForMe
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 16,298
- Rep Power: 67825
-
-
Originally Posted By DomMJr⏩
no problemIt is difficult to tax wealth
then, they should stop saying tax the rich
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
03-18-2023, 06:11 PM
-
#5
- johnnydeep1
- Registered User
-
- johnnydeep1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 43,974
- Rep Power: 20436
-
-
Yeah, you have a point. Some people have gotten rich off leveraged ETFs over the years during the stock market bull. For example, TECL was .34 a share in 2008 and now its about $30(well below its all time high of $88 per share. If you put 10,000 in spxl 10 years ago, it would be just over $100,000 today (Source:https://screener.fidelity.com/ftgw/e...l?symbols=SPXL)
If you don't earn much but put a lot in leveraged ETFs for the past 10 years, you will only be taxed on long term capital gains. Same with Crypto of course. That said, a doctor earning like $350,000 but spent a bunch of $$$ educating his kids through college , and grad/medical school and put much of his money in bonds and money market would still be taxed a lot.
If you don't earn much but put a lot in leveraged ETFs for the past 10 years, you will only be taxed on long term capital gains. Same with Crypto of course. That said, a doctor earning like $350,000 but spent a bunch of $$$ educating his kids through college , and grad/medical school and put much of his money in bonds and money market would still be taxed a lot.
AGE-28
Wt-165
HT-5'10"
Bench-100 dumbbell press-5 reps
*Mechanical Engineer*
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts