Think it is more only one side of the story has been presented-his families & the black lawyer for them who chases around looking for these cases & the media are reporting that as fact & dubbing the guy as a KKK member. Even though they cannot get basic facts about how he was shot right, haven't seen the footage like any of us & so really have no idea exactly what went down.

Clearly unless the kid pulled a weapon on him nothing justifies him shooting the kid, but is exactly how it is being portrayed, that the kid rang the doorbell & the guy who seemingly has no criminal record at 84 years old just picked up a gun, went to the door or window & shot him immediately? Doesn't that sound highly improbable?

Let's see the security camera footage before the black lynch mob gets their hands on him.

This isn't the old west.

This. The old man is an idiot, he's old so probably not as spry as he was with a gun. He lost control, unless the kid was actually inside robbing or something. And if he wasn't then the old man should be in trouble. But the issue is we will never know because according to the media he was just walking down the street thinking about spreading bible hymns, when all of a sudden the racist man saw him from the window and knew he had to kill this kid due to race. And tbh the old man probably never even thought of race. Media makes 99% of things about race. Then idiots aka libs go OMG a nazi!!! He was hunting down black kids!!! Because they have the IQ of a rock and believe the media and can't think for themselves.

yeah the media never pushes stories or told lies for the sake of political agendas at all. Let's just trust them and take their "reporting" on the subject at face value!

Evidently it is how some people like to answer the door, watch the video.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bodycam-...wrong-address/

The security camera isn’t gonna show what miscers are hoping for tbh

You walk into my house "by accident" at 10PM and you're getting buckshot to the face, IDGAF who you are or what you look like.

He never entered the home so take it easy cleetus

There is no video of the encounter, Thompson said.

Strange, are the CCTV & sign just for show then?

Equal rights, equal lefts.

Most likely it is a fairly rough neighbourhood & maybe he had past experiences of attempted robberies etc-which is why the dude is a bit paranoid & has CCTV & a sign up saying his house is protected by camera. Kid starts shaking/pounding the door etc & he panics & thinks it is a home invasion. Bet the old guy just wishes he hadn't got out of bed & just kept his gun on him in case of a break-in.

That’s a fake camera

I never said he did, but the assertion made is that somehow knocking on random doors at 10PM is perfectly normal.Incapacitate and tie up in the sex dungeon, obviously.

According to the misc - we'd like the actual facts to come out before rushing to judgement.

said man in his younger days

This should teach everyone to use a 10mm for their nightstand gun

I see Misc KKK crew is still fine with innocent black kids being shot

Has anybody actually said this?

Seems like 95% of people have said it seems like there is more to the story than this random dude opened the door to little johnny looking for his brother and shot him in the face. *IF* That is the ACTUAL story, then **** me, call a spade a spade. But with all of the other situations that have occured, its tough to believe that being true.

My guess is realistically, the kid probably went to the house thinking it was the right house, and walked in, old man thinks its a B&E and shoots him. Seems the most 'logical' based on what we DONT have yet.

That is what the police & media said about Christopher Jefferies without any evidence against him & ruined his life-turned out it was a young guy that killed his tenant.







And Colin Stagg-who the police tried to trap with a female officer in a honey sting at the behest of a 'Cracker Criminologist' type while they entrapped him into confessing to murders in return for sex, pursued him & eventually took him to trial-which collapsed right away with total disbelief from the judge as to what he was hearing the real killer was off trying to rape & kill more women & eventually killed a mother & her child & dismembered them.

Even when the case against him was thrown out & later after the conviction of the perpetrator the tabloids who had done everything to paint him as the warped killer & convict him in the media prior to trial in 1993/194 still couldn't leave him alone, even after he was paid compensation-for the damage they in large part caused to his life.







In 1986, Napper first came to police attention after being convicted of an offence with an airgun.[9] In October 1989,[11] police had rejected information conveyed in a phone call from Napper's mother that her son had admitted to committing a rape on Plumstead Common. No case apparently matched the evidence.

However, it emerged at the time of Napper's second conviction, that the rape of a 30-year-old woman, in front of her children, eight weeks earlier, had been reported to have occurred in a house which backed on to Plumstead Common. At this point, Pauline Napper broke off all contact with her son.[9]

On 15 July 1992 on Wimbledon Common, Napper stabbed the young mother Rachel Nickell 49 times in front of her son Alex, then aged two, who clung on to his mother's body begging her to wake up. Napper was questioned about unsolved attacks on other women during the year, but was eliminated from inquiries.[12]

In November 1993, in the Bisset home in Plumstead, Napper stabbed 27-year-old Samantha Bisset in her neck and chest, killing her, and then sexually assaulted[13] and smothered her four-year-old daughter, Jazmine Jemima Bisset.[11][14]

In her sitting room, Napper mutilated Bisset's body, taking away body parts as a trophy. The crime scene was reportedly so grisly that the police photographer assigned to the case was forced to take two years' leave after witnessing it.[11]

This thread sponsored by

Cricket Bat is best.

Darwin award for that moron

hahahahah lmfao

Go back to reddit, ****g00t.

Half the people ITT have blamed the kid already though. And if he entered the home, why was he shot on the porch?

In case it hasn't been posted. Here's the probable cause affidavit:

Okay the kid never broke into the home then it's not self defense. Pulling on a locked screen door isn't threatening, most people open a screen door to knock on the main door.

It sounds fake.

I doubt he walked up to the door and was like "Oh geez...sorry" and then they shot him.

Seems pretty clear from that report that the old guy panicked after the kid was hammering on his door.