Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Scientists say they've reached a turning point in Canser Research with vaccines
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 52
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Last
post 1685320003 06-26-2023, 04:51 AM
-
#1
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0

Scientists say they've reached a turning point in Canser Research with vaccines

Years of research exploring mRNA vaccines for cancer treatment in preclinical and clinical trials have set the stage for the rapid development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therapeutic cancer vaccines based on mRNA are well tolerated, and the inherent advantage in ease of production, which rivals the best available conventional vaccine manufacture methods, renders mRNA vaccines a promising option for cancer immunotherapy. Technological advances have optimised mRNA-based vaccine stability, structure, and delivery methods, and multiple clinical trials investigating mRNA vaccine therapy are now enrolling patients with various cancer diagnoses.
Great news! What a time to be alive! ( and stay alive)
post 1685325303 06-26-2023, 07:39 AM
-
#2
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 14,302
  6. Rep Power: 82218
Great, we stomped out canser, now net's work on cancer
Would kick em in the nuts
post 1685325483 06-26-2023, 07:43 AM
-
#3
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Antoine99
Great, we stomped out canser, now net's work on cancer
Inb4 articles flooding misc of this vaccine killing people after saving their life.
post 1685325873 06-26-2023, 07:51 AM
-
#4
  1. Doober4
  2. Registered User
  1. Doober4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 7,634
  5. Rep Power: 27754
I have cancer and I wouldn’t do it.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Browns
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Indians
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Buckeyes
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Beer
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Cavs
post 1685326283 06-26-2023, 08:00 AM
-
#5
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,379
  6. Rep Power: 0
lmao the grand irony is one day a bunch of pureblood crew will take them to protect against cancer lol

fuking idiots
post 1685327193 06-26-2023, 08:14 AM
-
#6
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
NB4 “well your cancer would’ve been worse if you hadn’t gotten the ‘vaccine’ “
post 1685328213 06-26-2023, 08:29 AM
-
#7
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 31,602
  6. Rep Power: 241807
So basically, if this is to be believed, because of his fast tracking, etc Trump cured cancer, which would never have happened as the entirety of the left, including Biden, was against that.
post 1685329143 06-26-2023, 08:43 AM
-
#8
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Anachron
Can't agree...

This is what the tech would've been best suited for, and what the hope was that it could be used for.

I am 100% on board with this, and a lot of people affected with cancer would definitely be on board with, even if still in experimental stage.
As a country we spend over $200,000,000,000 per year on cancer care.


How much do you think companies would make from cancer vaccines?


When have pharmaceutical companies ever prioritized impact on health over company profits?
post 1685329693 06-26-2023, 08:53 AM
-
#9
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Hey grandma f*ck your pancreatic cancer the vaccine is dangerous.
post 1685329813 06-26-2023, 08:55 AM
-
#10
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 14,315
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 161966
Meh, experimental stage. Never going to happen. I remember when nut job Glen Beck was crying with joy (literal [probably fake tears] tears) over a therapeutic gold injection that was supposed to cure all cancers. The guy is a ****ing loon. Everyone always touts 'the next big cancer treatment/cure' and it never happens/isn't allowed to happen.

That was like 15 years ago and now the gold nanoparticles is a silent topic.
post 1685330163 06-26-2023, 09:00 AM
-
#11
  1. Madscient1st
  2. Registered User
  1. Madscient1st
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,054
  6. Rep Power: 19865
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
As a country we spend over $200,000,000,000 per year on cancer care.


How much do you think companies would make from cancer vaccines?


When have pharmaceutical companies ever prioritized impact on health over company profits?
100% this. If a cure for cancer were found (for all we know, it already exists) it would be kept quiet for the sake of profits
My identical twin brother (RIP) was perma'd by teampunishment circa 2012. Miscing in 2023 to carry on his legacy

USMC '09-13 ACCURACY BY VOLUME
LOL @ POGs crew
IBEW gorillaback crew
Top tier tradie crew
Californians have ruined Idaho crew
post 1685330253 06-26-2023, 09:02 AM
-
#12
  1. Sergis
  2. Olympic Beer Lifter
  1. Sergis
  2. Olympic Beer Lifter
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: Latvia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 13,334
  7. Rep Power: 21150
thought itll be mrna before clicking the thread

leaving satisfied i guess
straight white male and proud

fat as fuk and disgust

no hover - no enter thread crew
post 1685330273 06-26-2023, 09:02 AM
-
#13
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,748
  6. Rep Power: 174067
So they want to replace cancer therapies that work with mRNA that do no better, no thx Jeff
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
post 1685331853 06-26-2023, 09:27 AM
-
#14
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,588
  6. Rep Power: 50203
It has been known for 150 years that infections will sometimes result in spontaneous remission of cancers. The father of immune therapy for cancer, Dr. William Colby used to inject infectious bacteria into cancers to cause fever and chills in patients. His immune therapy had high levels of success in curing patients, with 5 year survival times being 50% and higher. Some say the cure rate was around 80%.

Not sure if this vaccine idea will work or not against cancer. Hope it does.

A film on cancer immune therapy that i found enjoyable ~


"Immunotherapy: The Battle Within (The Film)"

https://www.themossreport.com/immuno...e-moss-report/
post 1685334593 06-26-2023, 10:14 AM
-
#15
  1. Chowboy
  2. Registered User
  1. Chowboy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Location: Mississippi, United States
  5. Age: 68
  6. Posts: 10,717
  7. Rep Power: 88646
Originally Posted By ParsleyTea
It has been known for 150 years that infections will sometimes result in spontaneous remission of cancers. The father of immune therapy for cancer, Dr. William Colby used to inject infectious bacteria into cancers to cause fever and chills in patients. His immune therapy had high levels of success in curing patients, with 5 year survival times being 50% and higher. Some say the cure rate was around 80%.

Not sure if this vaccine idea will work or not against cancer. Hope it does.

A film on cancer immune therapy that i found enjoyable ~


"Immunotherapy: The Battle Within (The Film)"

https://www.themossreport.com/immuno...e-moss-report/
Immunotherapy works. Kept me alive way past my expiration date.
* Trad Archery Crew


If you allow the Govt to break the law because of an emergency, they will always create an emergency to break the law
post 1685374823 06-26-2023, 08:57 PM
-
#16
  1. InPhase
  2. Registered User
  1. InPhase
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 45
  6. Posts: 3,673
  7. Rep Power: 94566
CANSER.

OP is retard.
post 1685375283 06-26-2023, 09:08 PM
-
#17
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Sergis
thought itll be mrna before clicking the thread

leaving satisfied i guess
NB4 mRNA is toxic to humans and causes can(s)cer!!one!
post 1685375833 06-26-2023, 09:26 PM
-
#18
  1. JDsSpoons
  2. Banned
  1. JDsSpoons
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,208
  6. Rep Power: 0
Leftist scientists

The left is the party of smart people

Trump made a fake vaccine
post 1685376663 06-26-2023, 09:46 PM
-
#19
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 11,669
  6. Rep Power: 62380
So what you are saying is that Trump literally cured cancer?
post 1685376743 06-26-2023, 09:48 PM
-
#20
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
Can't die of cancer if you die of heart failure first!
post 1685377863 06-26-2023, 10:18 PM
-
#21
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,379
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
NB4 mRNA is toxic to humans and causes can(s)cer!!one!
It is amusing that people call it experimental gene therapy and spread all these lies about how it is modifying DNA and chit. These same people will eventually turn around and take these vaccines to protect against cancer.
post 1685379493 06-26-2023, 11:28 PM
-
#22
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Location: BC, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,341
  6. Rep Power: 354666
Anything is possible if you just change definition. (Vaccines are not defined to provide immunity anymore)
post 1685379663 06-26-2023, 11:38 PM
-
#23
  1. Judgment
  2. Registered User
  1. Judgment
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 11,454
  7. Rep Power: 56697
Blows my mind that people are ITT talking about cancer when OP isclearlytalking about canser.

Don’t you idiots understand that both definitionsandwords change?!?! Pay attention!
post 1685379693 06-26-2023, 11:41 PM
-
#24
  1. MajorTendonitis
  1. MajorTendonitis
  2. Join Date: Jan 2016
  3. Location: East Kootenays BC
  4. Age: 65
  5. Height: 5'8"
  6. Weight: 241 lbs
  7. Posts: 42,008
  8. Subscribers: 8
  9. Rep Power: 717206
Originally Posted By Judgment
Blows my mind that people are ITT talking about cancer when OP isclearlytalking about canser.

Don’t you idiots understand that both definitionsandwords change?!?! Pay attention!
lol my bad , good catch
Back with my Fam
post 1685379763 06-26-2023, 11:45 PM
-
#25
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Duh. Hoping mRNA vaccines can be used to prevent or treat cancer has been the end goal for a long time before Covid.

Pfizer and Moderna were put on the fast track with mRNA during COVID, with J&J's viral vector vaccine held back in the US so proof of concept could be done with mRNA vaccines. People who said the public were the trial weren't wrong. There was no good reason to push exclusively mRNA vaxes during COVID and deny others in the US except as a demonstration. The J&J was safer but it could've gotten in the way of the end goal, a green light on mRNA cancer trials. Same for Novavax, used since 2021 in other countries and the safest, but held back from the US, where mRNA for cancer trials will be primarily done.

Said cancer trials priorities meant many extra people had to die in the COVID stage of mRNA development in the hopes far more can be saved from cancer years from now. Let's hope they are a relative silver bullet on cancer or many deaths during and after COVID were for nought.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1685380573 06-27-2023, 12:18 AM
-
#26
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
The UK trials use the same technology as the Covid vaccines. I wonder if the conspiracy theorists will squeal about these, too? Bill Gates! Microchips!


I expect that with gains in mRNA tech, along with CRISPR, and AI eventually doctors will just need to sequence a tumour, wait for an AI to generate a personalized therapy, and within 1-2 months a patient can have a personal vaccine. We look to be most of the way there with these technologies.


This is a major milestone towards a future of personalized medicine. Cancers at a particular point are so genetically heteregeneous it doesn't even make sense to call cancer a single disease. Within a decade we could even be where were at with HIV now: Not a death sentence, and demoted to a treatable chronic illness.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1685380883 06-27-2023, 12:35 AM
-
#27
  1. Judgment
  2. Registered User
  1. Judgment
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 11,454
  7. Rep Power: 56697
Originally Posted By Bodhy
The UK trials use the same technology as the Covid vaccines. I wonder if the conspiracy theorists will squeal about these, too? Bill Gates! Microchips!


I expect that with gains in mRNA tech, along with CRISPR, and AI eventually doctors will just need to sequence a tumour, wait for an AI to generate a personalized therapy, and within 1-2 months a patient can have a personal vaccine. We look to be most of the way there with these technologies.


This is a major milestone towards a future of personalized medicine. Cancers at a particular point are so genetically heteregeneous it doesn't even make sense to call cancer a single disease. Within a decade we could even be where were at with HIV now: Not a death sentence, and demoted to a treatable chronic illness.
We were discussing canser, retard.

That aside; Sure it only took a haphazard human trial of COVID to “work out the kinks,” right?
post 1685387833 06-27-2023, 06:11 AM
-
#28
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
Duh. Hoping mRNA vaccines can be used to prevent or treat cancer has been the end goal for a long time before Covid.

Pfizer and Moderna were put on the fast track with mRNA during COVID, with J&J's viral vector vaccine held back in the US so proof of concept could be done with mRNA vaccines. People who said the public were the trial weren't wrong. There was no good reason to push exclusively mRNA vaxes during COVID and deny others in the US except as a demonstration. The J&J was safer but it could've gotten in the way of the end goal, a green light on mRNA cancer trials. Same for Novavax, used since 2021 in other countries and the safest, but held back from the US, where mRNA for cancer trials will be primarily done.

Said cancer trials priorities meant many extra people had to die in the COVID stage of mRNA development in the hopes far more can be saved from cancer years from now. Let's hope they are a relative silver bullet on cancer or many deaths during and after COVID were for nought.
Is AZ mRNA-based?
post 1685389133 06-27-2023, 06:53 AM
-
#29
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 43,261
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By RIKTER
So basically, if this is to be believed, because of his fast tracking, etc Trump cured cancer, which would never have happened as the entirety of the left, including Biden, was against that.
so does that mean bidens promise to cure cancer if elected was just a lie?
post 1685391503 06-27-2023, 07:41 AM
-
#30
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  1. Putinist
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,379
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget
so does that mean bidens promise to cure cancer if elected was just a lie?
Biden can't even tell where the exit is at the events he speaks at...how tf this angloid gonna cure cancer? lmfao
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts