Forum
»
I know a lot of you took the vax. How bad do you feel for being grifted?
06-27-2023, 12:48 PM
-
#31
- absprintco
- Registered User
-
- absprintco
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2018
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 947
- Rep Power: 15692
-
-
Originally Posted By DeceasedRussian⏩
NeggedVax was free.
0 sides.
perfect health.
Regret what?
0 sides.
perfect health.
Regret what?
06-27-2023, 12:49 PM
-
#32
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Thanks again for displaying reading comprehension isn't in your wheelhouse. Your hysteria was not missed in your absence. The bigger picture is lockdowns and restrictions caused far more deaths than they prevented. Per Johns Hopkins and meta analysis of dozens of studies. It's been common knowledge for over a year. Not to mention they put kids on average a year behind in school and caused governments around the world to flood their currencies, fuked up chain supplies. The list goes on and on and on. Lockdowns and large restrictions were a mistake and it's not even disputed anymore.No, the point didn't fly over my head. The "point" was that you didn't vaccinate your family and you're now blaming the lockdowns for your newborn getting sick more than your other kids.
So to recap.. you wanted your newborn to get sick during a 100 year pandemic, even though newborns have very little immunity to anything.. so that they would be less sick later when the pandemic was over.
As you said.. not exactly rocket science.
So to recap.. you wanted your newborn to get sick during a 100 year pandemic, even though newborns have very little immunity to anything.. so that they would be less sick later when the pandemic was over.
As you said.. not exactly rocket science.
Though Sweden had initial high deaths from Covid because it ran through their nursing homes early in the pandemic, Sweden tied Norway as the lowest all cause mortality since the pandemic started of all OECD (dozens) of countries. Sweden as you may recall didn't do lockdowns and only late in the pandemic did some restrictions. Norway had restrictions initially then eventually said fuk it, removed them as summer ended in 2021. More Americans would be alive now if restrictions weren't carried on for so long.
I find that all far more perverse than arguing about vaccines after the fact. Distrust in public health is at an all time low and with strong reasons.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
06-27-2023, 12:55 PM
-
#33
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
How do kids avoid germs like that? No pets? No air? No yard?5 people in my family. I'm the only one who got a shot, the J&J viral vector 1 jab since I knew it was safer. The only one of my kids who had any symptoms when we all caught Covid together was the one born at the beginning of Covid. Per our pediatrician kids born early the pandemic have been the sickest kids ever since, as they were rather isolated and not exposed to germs for the first year of life. He's been the one that has consistently had colds the other two don't catch, strep throat twice, and much more.
The lockdown grift was arguably worse than mRNA jabs, not just for my middle child, but for society as a whole. The lockdowns are causing excess deaths now and will for years. Government good intentions always make every situation worse, whether it's health or finance.
The lockdown grift was arguably worse than mRNA jabs, not just for my middle child, but for society as a whole. The lockdowns are causing excess deaths now and will for years. Government good intentions always make every situation worse, whether it's health or finance.
06-27-2023, 12:56 PM
-
#34
- tunejunkie
- Registered User
-
- tunejunkie
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Age: 39
- Posts: 8,677
- Rep Power: 58060
-
-
Originally Posted By DeceasedRussian⏩
If your health is perfect, why did you take it?Vax was free.
0 sides.
perfect health.
Regret what?
0 sides.
perfect health.
Regret what?
06-27-2023, 12:56 PM
-
#35
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
That wasn't a John's Hopkins meta study. Do people really fall for this stuff?Thanks again for displaying reading comprehension isn't in your wheelhouse. Your hysteria was not missed in your absence. The bigger picture is lockdowns and restrictions caused far more deaths than they prevented. Per Johns Hopkins and meta analysis of dozens of studies. It's been common knowledge for over a year. Not to mention they put kids on average a year behind in school and caused governments around the world to flood their currencies, fuked up chain supplies. The list goes on and on and on. Lockdowns and large restrictions were a mistake and it's not even disputed anymore.
Though Sweden had initial high deaths from Covid because it ran through their nursing homes early in the pandemic, Sweden tied Norway as the lowest all cause mortality since the pandemic started of all OECD (dozens) of countries. Sweden as you may recall didn't do lockdowns and only late in the pandemic did some restrictions. Norway had restrictions initially then eventually said fuk it, removed them as summer ended in 2021. More Americans would be alive now if restrictions weren't carried on for so long.
I find that all far more perverse than arguing about vaccines after the fact. Distrust in public health is at an all time low and with strong reasons.
Though Sweden had initial high deaths from Covid because it ran through their nursing homes early in the pandemic, Sweden tied Norway as the lowest all cause mortality since the pandemic started of all OECD (dozens) of countries. Sweden as you may recall didn't do lockdowns and only late in the pandemic did some restrictions. Norway had restrictions initially then eventually said fuk it, removed them as summer ended in 2021. More Americans would be alive now if restrictions weren't carried on for so long.
I find that all far more perverse than arguing about vaccines after the fact. Distrust in public health is at an all time low and with strong reasons.
06-27-2023, 01:03 PM
-
#36
06-27-2023, 01:05 PM
-
#37
- DeceasedRussian
- Banned
-
- DeceasedRussian
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,728
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By tunejunkie⏩
Work requirement.If your health is perfect, why did you take it?
06-27-2023, 01:08 PM
-
#38
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Lulz.Interesting.
So you confirm that you weren't able to produce a pic of a vial of Comirnaty because it doesn't exist?
Yes or no answer please
So you confirm that you weren't able to produce a pic of a vial of Comirnaty because it doesn't exist?
Yes or no answer please

I can confirm that I don't take orders from random internet folks

06-27-2023, 01:12 PM
-
#39
06-27-2023, 01:19 PM
-
#40
06-27-2023, 01:20 PM
-
#41
- WetCoaster
- Registered User
-
- WetCoaster
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
- Age: 68
- Posts: 2,598
- Rep Power: 23568
-
-
I hope I am around when the 5.55 billion people who took the vax die all at once.
06-27-2023, 01:25 PM
-
#42
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
We do struggle.That's the second time you used that term. I don't think you know what it means.
vendetta
vĕn-dĕt′ə
noun
A series of acts attacking or attempting to injure another.
I know the beavercel educational system is just deplorable, but holy chit at your not having a rudimentary command of the English language.
vendetta
vĕn-dĕt′ə
noun
A series of acts attacking or attempting to injure another.
I know the beavercel educational system is just deplorable, but holy chit at your not having a rudimentary command of the English language.

06-27-2023, 01:39 PM
-
#43
- tunejunkie
- Registered User
-
- tunejunkie
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Age: 39
- Posts: 8,677
- Rep Power: 58060
-
-
Originally Posted By DeceasedRussian⏩
So you took an experimental shot with no long term studies for a job. What did you get in exchange? What guarantees did your company give you in exchange?Work requirement.
06-27-2023, 02:18 PM
-
#44
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Was that the one where I mistakenly called a proportion of adverse events a percentage (the unforgivable 2 decimal points) and the first several digits after the decimal were all zeros and you recently said that was effectiveness?I am happy to help you improve your English skills any time. Just like I helped improve your proficiency at math - remember how you didn't know how to calculate percentage and needed me to call you out on it? It's the least I can do for people living in locations where proper education is not available.
You're welcome.
You're welcome.

That was the start of the vendetta, yeah?
06-27-2023, 02:30 PM
-
#45
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
So that was the unforgivable mistake that began the vendetta?Ah you do remember! I knew I could coax it out of you by intentionally "misremembering" it and saying it was related to efficacy.
Thanks for confirming that you "mistakenly" called the proportion of adverse events a percentage. Not sure how you "mistakenly" used the percentage symbol... or how you edited the post multiple times, each time "mistakenly" getting the calculation wrong, or how you then backpedaled for several pages trying to claim that you didn't "mistakenly" call a proportion of adverse events a percentage.
And no, that wasn't the start of a "vendetta", since there isn't one to begin with. Please refer to one of my previous posts in the thread for the definition of "vendetta".
Again, I am always happy to help you improve both your English skills and your proficiency at math.
Thanks for confirming that you "mistakenly" called the proportion of adverse events a percentage. Not sure how you "mistakenly" used the percentage symbol... or how you edited the post multiple times, each time "mistakenly" getting the calculation wrong, or how you then backpedaled for several pages trying to claim that you didn't "mistakenly" call a proportion of adverse events a percentage.
And no, that wasn't the start of a "vendetta", since there isn't one to begin with. Please refer to one of my previous posts in the thread for the definition of "vendetta".
Again, I am always happy to help you improve both your English skills and your proficiency at math.

Coaxing, lying, honest, dishonest, potato, potahto

06-27-2023, 02:37 PM
-
#46
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
MaybeInteresting.
That's the fourth time you used that term. I still don't think you know what it means.
vendetta
vĕn-dĕt′ə
noun
A series of acts attacking or attempting to injure another.
I know the beavercel educational system is just deplorable, but holy chit at your not having a rudimentary command of the English language.
That's the fourth time you used that term. I still don't think you know what it means.
vendetta
vĕn-dĕt′ə
noun
A series of acts attacking or attempting to injure another.
I know the beavercel educational system is just deplorable, but holy chit at your not having a rudimentary command of the English language.

06-27-2023, 02:47 PM
-
#47
06-27-2023, 03:18 PM
-
#48
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
Derp. Provide a VALID link that proves that "lockdowns and restrictions" caused far more deaths than prevented. Tired of you morons making bullchit claims and passing it off as fact.Thanks again for displaying reading comprehension isn't in your wheelhouse. Your hysteria was not missed in your absence. The bigger picture is lockdowns and restrictions caused far more deaths than they prevented. Per Johns Hopkins and meta analysis of dozens of studies. It's been common knowledge for over a year. Not to mention they put kids on average a year behind in school and caused governments around the world to flood their currencies, fuked up chain supplies. The list goes on and on and on. Lockdowns and large restrictions were a mistake and it's not even disputed anymore.
Though Sweden had initial high deaths from Covid because it ran through their nursing homes early in the pandemic, Sweden tied Norway as the lowest all cause mortality since the pandemic started of all OECD (dozens) of countries. Sweden as you may recall didn't do lockdowns and only late in the pandemic did some restrictions. Norway had restrictions initially then eventually said fuk it, removed them as summer ended in 2021. More Americans would be alive now if restrictions weren't carried on for so long.
I find that all far more perverse than arguing about vaccines after the fact. Distrust in public health is at an all time low and with strong reasons.
Though Sweden had initial high deaths from Covid because it ran through their nursing homes early in the pandemic, Sweden tied Norway as the lowest all cause mortality since the pandemic started of all OECD (dozens) of countries. Sweden as you may recall didn't do lockdowns and only late in the pandemic did some restrictions. Norway had restrictions initially then eventually said fuk it, removed them as summer ended in 2021. More Americans would be alive now if restrictions weren't carried on for so long.
I find that all far more perverse than arguing about vaccines after the fact. Distrust in public health is at an all time low and with strong reasons.
And the "distrust" is from morons who decided to politicize the vaccines. These are the same retards who, without question, demanded HQC and Ivermectin without seeing a shred of proof they did anything to protect against covid. But they just "knew" the vaccines were deadly and still do to this day. Public health will move forward without these idiots, regardless of how much people like yourself try to blame them.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Yes.That wasn't a John's Hopkins meta study. Do people really fall for this stuff?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts