According to the types of “studies” Opie likes to share, over 17% of people who get Covid have symptoms two years later.

Pretty heavy on political donations/ a few million

I think you might be suffering from long Covid man.

Just noticed the edit.

I am not "trying to discuss vaccines in this thread".

I am calling you out on your "taking on an active role in preventing discussion".

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

Because for you, it never was an honest discussion.

Just like this thread, there is an underlying reason why you decided to post it in R&P. Because for you, it is both political and religious at the same time.

Why do I need to offer a suggestion for you?

It's all good though... Because you have confirmed there is an underlying reason why you decided to post this in R&P. Because for you, it is both political and religious at the same time.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

Because for you, it never was an honest discussion.

Why do I need to offer a suggestion for you?

It's all good though... Because you have confirmed there is an underlying reason why you decided to post this in R&P. Because for you, it is both political and religious at the same time.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

Because for you, it never was an honest discussion.

The same reason he won’t answer my question about headaches in the study, and completely ignored my point about the cognition tests in the study.


It doesn’t help his narrative, and that’s all he cares about.

I mean, thank you for confirming that you deem the study linked in the OP to be political and/or religious in nature.

It's all good though... Because you have confirmed there is an underlying reason why you decided to post this in R&P. Because for you, it is both political and religious at the same time.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

Because for you, it never was an honest discussion.

The details of lot control are all something that one would expect people who administer the vaccines to be aware of.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

To me, it's odd to want to deflect from discussing something that should be common knowledge.

No, you did not.

Please, quote the post where you did.

If you cannot quote the post, it counts as admission that you did not in fact answer the question.

I do not see a quote...

Thanks for admitting, by applying your standards to yourself, that your claim of having answered the question already, is a "made up story".

Which brings us back to, since you were unable to supply the quote, which in turn means that you are admitting that you did not in fact answer the question...

The details of lot control are all something that one would expect people who administer the vaccines to be aware of.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

To me, it's odd to want to deflect from discussing something that should be common knowledge.

And still no quote...

Thanks for admitting, by applying your standards to yourself, that your claim of having answered the question already, is a "made up story".Thanks for admitting, by applying your standards to yourself, that your claim of having answered the question already, is a "made up story".

Which brings us back to, since you were unable to supply the quote, which in turn means that you are admitting that you did not in fact answer the question...

The details of lot control are all something that one would expect people who administer the vaccines to be aware of.

Why can't you answer a rudimentary question about lot control of the very vaccines you claim to have been administering?

What is it that you feel the need to hide, and why do you feel a need to hide it?

To me, it's odd to want to deflect from discussing something that should be common knowledge.

It's very unsettling.

Are you denying you fudged numbers by two decimal points?

Yet none of your stories are supported by quotes.

Curious.

Neurologic Manifestations of Long COVID Differ Based on Acute COVID-19 Severity

"PNP and NNP patients both experience persistent neurologic symptoms affecting their quality of life. However, they harbor significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, neurologic symptoms and findings, as well as pattern of cognitive dysfunction. Such differences suggest distinct etiologies of Neuro-PASC in these populations warranting targeted interventions."

"The median number of neurologic symptoms attributed to COVID-19 was 7, and 91% reported more than 4 neurological symptoms with no differences between the 2 groups. Overall, the 10 most common neurological symptoms included non-specific cognitive complaints, which patients referred to as “brain fog” (81.2%), headache (70.3%), anosmia (55.7%), dysgeusia (54.5%), dizziness (49.5%), myalgia (47.5%), numbness/tingling (42.2%), pain other than chest (40.5%), tinnitus (28.7%), and blurred vision (26%). NNP patients more frequently reported anosmia (59% vs 39%; p = 0.0003), dysgeusia (57.6% vs 39%; p = 0.0009), and myalgias (50.4 vs 33%; p = 0.002) compared to the PNP group. Seizures, movement disorders, ischemic stroke, meningitis, or polyradiculitis were rare in both groups. None of our patients presented with Guillain-Barre syndrome/acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.26649

The deflection is even more so...

One doesn't have to wonder why you didn't answer the question.

Here it is again:

Are you denying you fudged numbers by two decimal points?

Good thing some people were making sick members of their family stay in the garage!

Good study, my only issue is that the average age was 54 but other than that, the list of long symptoms is ridiculous!
i have been told that tinnitus alone can drive a person nuts!

Why have you changed your settings so that others can’t search your posts? Hmmm, let me consider a few reasons why that may be.

Wat?

This is a new story

I have a problem with a study that conducts post infection cognition tests and uses them as evidence of impact from Covid when they have not administered the same test prior to infection to compare it against. But since you refuse to answer the questions(which, or course, we all know why you won’t), maybe you’ll answer this one. What do you think the cognition test results indicate? Not asking for specifics from the “study”, just want to get your thoughts on that aspect of it.

As explained in the paper, they reviewed medical records of everyone enrolled in the study.

Sure there are limitations, but to suggest the only way to know long covid is real is for a large cohort of people to have been thoroughly worked up on the measures associated with long covid, prior to covid, seems an overly conservative requirement, imo.

Interesting how I didn't say it was you, but you inferred that it was.

One doesn't even have to wonder why.

Aside from the fact that it took several edits to "correct your mistake" over several posts, and that the first set of numbers were out even further and that I don't recall you apologizing...

Thanks for admitting that when I say you "fudged numbers by two decimal points", it's not a "made up story" as you claimed just earlier ITT, and is an actual fact instead.

I am ready for your apology for your baseless attack on my character now.

Back in 2005 when someone quoted you (see post #181) it meant they were talking to and about you.
You will eventually learn the rules here; you are neither slick or clever, quite the contrary.

What do you think the cognition test results indicate?

Maybe she got pneumonia from being banished to an unheated garage?

Can you quote where you apologized for fudging the numbers? Sounds like another "made up story" to me.

But still, thanks for admitting that when I say you "fudged numbers by two decimal points", it's not a "made up story" as you claimed just earlier ITT, and is an actual fact instead.

I am ready for your apology for your baseless attack on my character now.