Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Neurologic Manifestations of Long COVID
  1. Results 391 to 420 of 421
  2. Page 14 of 15
  3. First
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  10. Last

Thread: Neurologic Manifestations of Long COVID

post 1686664243 07-17-2023, 08:21 AM
-
#391
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
So, which one do you want to tackle next, now that you finally admitted that you did in fact fudged numbers by more than two decimal points?

The vial of Comirnaty?

Your claim that unvaccinated people are barred from getting tested in beaverland?

Or another item from your extensive list of misinformation and disinformation?
Let me know when we get to the part about how he thinks his government preventing him from exposing his genitals to the public is an example of government overreach.
post 1686664373 07-17-2023, 08:25 AM
-
#392
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
The point, that we finally got to, is that there could be issues with the code. You pointed out an issue you have with one of the five things I listed(which is just from the “prediction” section of code…we didn’t even get into the others). You did not touch others. And iirc you either repeatedly ignored or drastically downplayed the excessive conflicts of interest that people involved with the study had. No worries though. Keep preaching about long Covid, and how absolutely terrible it is(even going so far as to say there are probably hundreds of millions of people who have brain damage from it) and screaming about how “safe and effective” the injections are while refusing to suggest things as if that disguises your motives here.
You found a generic list of concerns and copy/pasted.

It's also cringe because most don't apply to this data set. Those that do can be readily and easily assessed. The assumption that the authors didn't check their models is flawed and unsupported.

If you want to find a flaw, run the code with modifications (number of folds, for example) and see if the predictive accuracy changes.

But, keep in mind the authors reported on sensitivity analysis.
post 1686664403 07-17-2023, 08:27 AM
-
#393
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Let me know when we get to the part about how he thinks his government preventing him from exposing his genitals to the public is an example of government overreach.
The stories keep on keeping on.

Your cringey rebuttals to the paper go unchallenged by anyone else. Too funny.
post 1686664773 07-17-2023, 08:34 AM
-
#394
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The stories keep on keeping on.
Where I am, I can be charged for being naked in my own home.

I think that's government overreach
Source?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Canada

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/...ction-174.html
“I think that’s government overreach”


Every one who, without lawful excuse, is nudeand exposed to public view while on private property, whether or not the property is his own.










https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...3&p=1686175153
post 1686664923 07-17-2023, 08:37 AM
-
#395
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
“I think that’s government overreach”


Every one who, without lawful excuse, is nudeand exposed to public view while on private property, whether or not the property is his own.









https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...3&p=1686175153
I do still think it's government overreach in the form of poorly written law.

But, it's nudity.

Exposure (which is the genital one) is a different law. I posted that one too. No regression models required
post 1686665233 07-17-2023, 08:44 AM
-
#396
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I do still think it's government overreach in the form of poorly written law.

But, it's nudity.

Exposure (which is the genital one) is a different law. I posted that one too. No regression models required
Fact #1 - the law does not prevent you from being naked in your own home

Fact #2 - the law does prevent you from exposing your genitals to the public

Fact #3 - you feel that the law is government overreach
post 1686665253 07-17-2023, 08:45 AM
-
#397
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
I think the law as written leaves people vulnerable to punishment by process.

Others may think it's good law.

I understand some people may think nudity is bad by default, anywhere, any time.

I don't agree. But I don't think that makes them bad people or invalidates anything they may say, or position they may hold, on any and every other topic.


To each their own
post 1686665343 07-17-2023, 08:47 AM
-
#398
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Fact #1 - the law does not prevent you from being naked in your own home

Fact #2 - the law does prevent you from exposing your genitals to the public

Fact #3 - you feel that the law is government overreach
The law does not refer to genitals.

It defines "nude" in non-specific and subjective terms.

"Nude

(2) For the purposes of this section, a person is nude who is so clad as to offend against public decency or order."

Link was provided, no regression models necessary.

Fact: calling something a fact doesn't make it a fact.
post 1686665733 07-17-2023, 08:55 AM
-
#399
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The law does not refer to genitals.

It defines "nude" in non-specific and subjective terms.

"Nude

(2) For the purposes of this section, a person is nude who is so clad as to offend against public decency or order."

Link was provided, no regression models necessary.

Fact: calling something a fact doesn't make it a fact.
Good catch. I guess I got caught up in that aspect since you repeatedly claimed your concern was due to it impending on your ability to be naked in your house. Perhaps you should express your concerns a little better in the future as to avoid these types of misunderstandings.
post 1686665903 07-17-2023, 08:58 AM
-
#400
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Good catch. I guess I got caught up in that aspect since you repeatedly claimed your concern was due to it impending on your ability to be naked in your house. Perhaps you should express your concerns a little better in the future as to avoid these types of misunderstandings.
Ah. So maybe there was some story telling happening?

It's not a catch. It's the basis of why I think it's poorly written law.

Some folks think nudity, or even being clad in a way that might offend someone, is bad and should never happen, even in one's own home.

I disagree. But I'm cool with people having different views.
post 1686665983 07-17-2023, 09:59 AM
-
#401
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Fact: calling something a fact doesn't make it a fact.
Just LOL @ pseudointellectual beavercels srs.
post 1686666093 07-17-2023, 10:00 AM
-
#402
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Ah. So maybe there was some story telling happening?

It's not a catch. It's the basis of why I think it's poorly written law.
Nah...

You did in fact claim that you could get "charged for being naked in your own home". You have failed to provide a source for your claim up to this point.
post 1686669993 07-17-2023, 09:51 AM
-
#403
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,808
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Nah...

You did in fact claim that you could get "charged for being naked in your own home". You have failed to provide a source for your claim up to this point.
So you admit to deliberately being naked in your home in a visible place for the purpose of grooming children?
post 1686670483 07-17-2023, 09:58 AM
-
#404
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Ah. So maybe there was some story telling happening?

It's not a catch. It's the basis of why I think it's poorly written law.

Some folks think nudity, or even being clad in a way that might offend someone, is bad and should never happen, even in one's own home.

I disagree. But I'm cool with people having different views.
Well as Anachron pointed out you claimed you could be charged “FOR being naked in your own home”. That is false.


And when pointing out your issues with the law you never once mentioned “scantily clad” or any other thing regarding how covered or uncovered someone was. You repeatedly talked about being naked, curtains, and neighbors.


Again, if your issue all along was just with the “clad as to offend public decency” or however they worded it then perhaps you should work on communicating.
post 1686670593 07-17-2023, 11:00 AM
-
#405
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well as Anachron pointed out you claimed you could be charged “FOR being naked in your own home”. That is false.


And when pointing out your issues with the law you never once mentioned “scantily clad” or any other thing regarding how covered or uncovered someone was. You repeatedly talked about being naked, curtains, and neighbors.


Again, if your issue all along was just with the “clad as to offend public decency” or however they worded it then perhaps you should work on communicating.
He doesn't need to work on communicating.

He is intentionally vague - it's what pseudointellectuals shills do to spread misinformation and disinformation.
post 1686670723 07-17-2023, 10:01 AM
-
#406
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well as Anachron pointed out you claimed you could be charged “FOR being naked in your own home”. That is false.


And when pointing out your issues with the law you never once mentioned “scantily clad” or any other thing regarding how covered or uncovered someone was. You repeatedly talked about being naked, curtains, and neighbors.


Again, if your issue all along was just with the “clad as to offend public decency” or however they worded it then perhaps you should work on communicating.
If this is how you enjoy participating on this forum, have at it
post 1686670823 07-17-2023, 10:02 AM
-
#407
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,808
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well as Anachron pointed out you claimed you could be charged “FOR being naked in your own home”. That is false.


And when pointing out your issues with the law you never once mentioned “scantily clad” or any other thing regarding how covered or uncovered someone was. You repeatedly talked about being naked, curtains, and neighbors.


Again, if your issue all along was just with the “clad as to offend public decency” or however they worded it then perhaps you should work on communicating.
Where did he point this out?
post 1686670833 07-17-2023, 11:03 AM
-
#408
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
If this is how you enjoy participating on this forum, have at it
By that, you mean "calling out pseudointellectual shills for spreading misinformation", then yes we should all enjoy that.
post 1686671103 07-17-2023, 10:05 AM
-
#409
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
By that, you mean "calling out pseudointellectual shills for spreading misinformation", then yes we should all enjoy that.
Then have at it
post 1686671233 07-17-2023, 11:07 AM
-
#410
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Then have at it
I never needed your permission in the past, and I never will.

Did you find the source for your claim of how you can be "charged for being naked in your own home"?
post 1686671273 07-17-2023, 10:08 AM
-
#411
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,808
  6. Rep Power: 0
Anachron admitted to raping children in another thread. Pretty horrible stuff.
post 1686671343 07-17-2023, 10:08 AM
-
#412
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By TheMossad⏩
Anachron admitted to raping children in another thread. Pretty horrible stuff.
Source?
post 1686671433 07-17-2023, 10:10 AM
-
#413
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,808
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Source?
People are saying. You'll have to Google it. He probably deleted it by now. He admitted to raping kids. Pretty fuked up.
post 1686671453 07-17-2023, 11:10 AM
-
#414
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Source?
Don't engage with his latest shtick. Poor little bugger just wants attention so badly.

He's doing a wonderful job of demonstrating how "brilliant academics" operate. And Bodhy already endorsed it as well.
post 1686671523 07-17-2023, 10:11 AM
-
#415
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Source?
Ono. You engaged with Wincel after the forum was told not to
post 1686671553 07-17-2023, 10:12 AM
-
#416
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. fishnbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 47,820
  6. Rep Power: 241736
lold hard @ 81% complaining of brain fog.
post 1686671563 07-17-2023, 10:12 AM
-
#417
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  1. TheMossad
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,808
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Don't engage with his latest shtick. Poor little bugger just wants attention so badly.

He's doing a wonderful job of demonstrating how "brilliant academics" operate. And Bodhy already endorsed it as well.
See he's trying to hide it. He doesn't deny it. Anachron is a child rapist.
post 1686671643 07-17-2023, 11:13 AM
-
#418
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Ono. You engaged with Wincel after the forum was told not to
Just remember...

Wincel's conduct reflects on you, but not me.
post 1686671663 07-17-2023, 10:13 AM
-
#419
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By fishnbrah⏩
lold hard @ 81% complaining of brain fog.
How 'bout that physical brain damage?
post 1686671753 07-17-2023, 11:14 AM
-
#420
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 16,256
  5. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
How 'bout that physical brain damage?
How 'bout those drop down menus on the physical labels of the individual syringes?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts