Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Cortical thickness alterations and systemic inflammation with Long Covid
  1. Results 31 to 39 of 39
  2. Page 2 of 2
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2

Thread: Cortical thickness alterations and systemic inflammation with Long Covid

post 1687131513 07-24-2023, 08:27 PM
-
#31
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
And I’m sure they are completely trustworthy. Just like the ties we saw with the last studu you posted.
Not sure to which ties you're referring, but not liking the results isn't the same as the study being poor or invalid
post 1687131523 07-24-2023, 08:27 PM
-
#32
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I'm not asking anyone to trust me or anything else. These papers are open access
Be afraid, be very afraid.........

Am I gonna be okay??? Should I go to the hospital and get checked out?
post 1687131643 07-24-2023, 08:31 PM
-
#33
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Be afraid, be very afraid.........

Am I gonna be okay??? Should I go to the hospital and get checked out?
Checked out for what?
post 1687131943 07-24-2023, 08:39 PM
-
#34
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Not sure to which ties you're referring, but not liking the results isn't the same as the study being poor or invalid
Democrat ties and the main funder with shady economic & sexual practices. But let’s not pretend the majority of the studies you post suppress information. There is nothing disingenuous with your posts whatsoever. I understand
post 1687132043 07-24-2023, 08:41 PM
-
#35
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Democrat ties and the main funder with shady economic & sexual practices. But let’s not pretend the majority of the studies you post suppress information. There is nothing disingenuous with your posts whatsoever. I understand
Lol

You didn't realize that was trolling?

It was funded by an NIH grant, which was also posted.
post 1687132413 07-24-2023, 08:48 PM
-
#36
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Lol

You didn't realize that was trolling?

It was funded by an NIH grant, which was also posted.
Umm..the main funder’s name was literally on the study you posted.

Was that a troll too
post 1687132553 07-24-2023, 08:52 PM
-
#37
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
OP - srs question

There are legit, peer reviewed, mostly unbiased studies out there- why not just post & discuss those?
post 1687132713 07-24-2023, 08:56 PM
-
#38
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By paul
umm..the main funder’s name was literally on the study you posted.

Was that a troll too
nih?
post 1687132753 07-24-2023, 08:57 PM
-
#39
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
OP - srs question

There are legit, peer reviewed, mostly unbiased studies out there- why not just post & discuss those?
I posted a couple in this thread including the one with only unvaccinated participants
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts