Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » BREAKING: Trump hit with more charges in Mar-A-Lago docs case. IT guy charged
  1. Results 31 to 45 of 45
  2. Page 2 of 2
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2

Thread: BREAKING: Trump hit with more charges in Mar-A-Lago docs case. IT guy charged

post 1687339113 07-28-2023, 06:24 AM
-
#31
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Apparently only the left is allowed to mishandle classified documents and destroy subpoenaed evidence.
post 1687341053 07-28-2023, 07:02 AM
-
#32
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
Apparently only the left is allowed to mishandle classified documents and destroy subpoenaed evidence.
But Trump railed on Hillary and said she should be locked up for her email server.. he wouldn't do worse and then play the victim card would he?
post 1687341313 07-28-2023, 07:08 AM
-
#33
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
But Trump railed on Hillary and said she should be locked up for her email server.. he wouldn't do worse and then play the victim card would he?
I could give a **** less about Trump. But going so hard at Trump and letting Hillary off with little more than a slap on the wrist for destroying subpoenaed evidence isn’t a good look for the justice system.
post 1687341583 07-28-2023, 07:14 AM
-
#34
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
I could give a **** less about Trump. But going so hard at Trump and letting Hillary off with little more than a slap on the wrist for destroying subpoenaed evidence isn’t a good look for the justice system.
But you're forgetting that they asked nicely many, many times and Trump would be fine right now if he simply complied with the law. Hillary did what every person in her shoes before her did. What Trump did is completely different.
post 1687341893 07-28-2023, 07:20 AM
-
#35
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
But you're forgetting that they asked nicely many, many times and Trump would be fine right now if he simply complied with the law. Hillary did what every person in her shoes before her did. What Trump did is completely different.
They asked for Hillary’s emails as well but instead of handing them over she destroyed them. Destroying subpoenaed evidence is kind of a big deal.
Edit: so if Trump just destroyed all the documents they were asking for do you think they still wouldn’t be going hard at Trump?
post 1687342193 07-28-2023, 07:25 AM
-
#36
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 12,142
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 146252
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
But you're forgetting that they asked nicely many, many times and Trump would be fine right now if he simply complied with the law. Hillary did what every person in her shoes before her did. What Trump did is completely different.
The lines between parody and reality have been completely been crossed. This post could have been made by someone 100% satirizing something a brainwashed liberal would say and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.

If I just saw the text of what you said and nothing else, I would actually assume it was someone intentionally making a bad impression of a liberal.
post 1687344263 07-28-2023, 07:57 AM
-
#37
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
They asked for Hillary’s emails as well but instead of handing them over she destroyed them. Destroying subpoenaed evidence is kind of a big deal.
Edit: so if Trump just destroyed all the documents they were asking for do you think they still wouldn’t be going hard at Trump?
It's almost like your fantasies about Hillary's server and Trump's classified documents aren't close to the same thing.

Didn't the Orange Moron control the DOJ? Couldn't he have had Hillary investigate?

LMFAO
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1687344373 07-28-2023, 07:58 AM
-
#38
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
They asked for Hillary’s emails as well but instead of handing them over she destroyed them. Destroying subpoenaed evidence is kind of a big deal.
Edit: so if Trump just destroyed all the documents they were asking for do you think they still wouldn’t be going hard at Trump?
If you're actually interested in the difference, here's a good read.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/14/polit...nts/index.html



Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
The lines between parody and reality have been completely been crossed. This post could have been made by someone 100% satirizing something a brainwashed liberal would say and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.

If I just saw the text of what you said and nothing else, I would actually assume it was someone intentionally making a bad impression of a liberal.
Everything I said is factually correct. What you're noticing is a reflection on yourself, not me.
post 1687344483 07-28-2023, 08:01 AM
-
#39
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
It's almost like your fantasies about Hillary's server and Trump's classified documents aren't close to the same thing.

Didn't the Orange Moron control the DOJ? Couldn't he have had Hillary investigate?

LMFAO
He tried.

https://www.americanoversight.org/sessions-letter

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/u...ald-trump.html
post 1687344783 07-28-2023, 08:06 AM
-
#40
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
If you're actually interested in the difference, here's a good read.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/14/polit...nts/index.html







Everything I said is factually correct. What you're noticing is a reflection on yourself, not me.
From the article.
“But what we didn’t have was evidence that Hillary Clinton had intentionally exchanged or withheld classified information.”

They don’t have evidence that she withheld classified material because she destroyed the evidence

Also from the article,
“Trump mishandled far more classified material.”

Again they don’t know that for a fact because Hillary destroyed the evidence.
post 1687344953 07-28-2023, 08:10 AM
-
#41
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
From the article.
“But what we didn’t have was evidence that Hillary Clinton had intentionally exchanged or withheld classified information.”

They don’t have evidence that she withheld classified material because she destroyed the evidence

Also from the article,
“Trump mishandled far more classified material.”

Again they don’t know that for a fact because Hillary destroyed the evidence.
Like I said, she did nothing different than what her predecessors did. No intent... unlike Trump directing people to delete videos off servers AFTER they asked for it because it showed Trump and his people committing crimes.

Why can't you people simply admit basic facts?
post 1687345023 07-28-2023, 08:12 AM
-
#42
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Like I said, she did nothing different than what her predecessors did. No intent... unlike Trump directing people to delete videos off servers AFTER they asked for it because it showed Trump and his people committing crimes.

Why can't you people simply admit basic facts?
No intent? So she didn’t intend to destroy the evidence?
post 1687354673 07-28-2023, 11:07 AM
-
#43
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Posts: 19,647
  5. Rep Power: 135286
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
You'll always be a winner to me boyo. Despite your unhealthy obsession with Trump.

I can overlook that.
Ily
post 1687356353 07-28-2023, 11:34 AM
-
#44
  1. BrianDaMan
  2. Registered User
  1. BrianDaMan
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 22,168
  5. Rep Power: 383523


https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT...92630788512191
post 1687360833 07-28-2023, 12:52 PM
-
#45
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By BrianDaMan⏩


https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT...92630788512191
Why has no other president been charged? Because they ALL complied. It's that simple. Trump deserves what he gets, no matter how much the cultists here screech.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts