Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » It’s Official - Boosters For Everyone!
  1. Results 211 to 240 of 350
  2. Page 8 of 12
  3. First
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. 10
  11. Last

Thread: It’s Official - Boosters For Everyone!

post 1690131943 09-15-2023, 05:51 PM
-
#211
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Is there a reason that people should be alarmed? Are you gonna take a test every time you come down with something? Is that how you're gonna live your life? Not to mention getting numerous jabs a every year?
That's the narrative
post 1690132733 09-15-2023, 06:05 PM
-
#212
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That's the narrative
That's your pathetic narrative, that's how you live your life.
post 1690149313 09-16-2023, 05:00 AM
-
#213
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699628
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Is there a reason that people should be alarmed?Are you gonna take a test every time you come down with something? Is that how you're gonna live your life? Not to mention getting numerous jabs a every year?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That's the narrative
...
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Acting stupid still.

How many covid vaccine injections have you had so far?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
What about psychological dependence?

How many have you had?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Well? How many?
So how many?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1690151923 09-16-2023, 07:05 AM
-
#214
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
...







So how many?
Well, he has recently made a comment about hisfirstbooster…so if he uses language like a normal person that would suggest that he has had more than one. Then again, he doesn’t use or read language like a normal person. Plus he has a history of lying so it’s also possible he wouldn’t give us an honest answer anyway.
post 1690152113 09-16-2023, 07:11 AM
-
#215
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well, he has recently made a comment about hisfirstbooster…so if he uses language like a normal person that would suggest that he has had more than one. Then again, he doesn’t use or read language like a normal person. Plus he has a history of lying so it’s also possible he wouldn’t give us an honest answer anyway.
post 1690152123 09-16-2023, 07:11 AM
-
#216
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699628
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Well, he has recently made a comment about hisfirstbooster…so if he uses language like a normal person that would suggest that he has had more than one. Then again, he doesn’t use or read language like a normal person. Plus he has a history of lying so it’s also possible he wouldn’t give us an honest answer anyway.
This fuk is stone cold addicted to covid.. Spends every single day here arguing about it and defending it - so you KNOW he's fully injected and boosted. Probably can't even wait for his next jab.

But he won't admit it lol...
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That's the narrative
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1690153013 09-16-2023, 07:40 AM
-
#217
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699628
A virus SO unimaginably fuking deadly that not only can you have it without having any symptoms, but now.....

Why you might still have Covid-19 despite a negative test
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...21da31d8&ei=12
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1690155983 09-16-2023, 09:00 AM
-
#218
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
A virus SO unimaginably fuking deadly that not only can you have it without having any symptoms, but now.....

Why you might still have Covid-19 despite a negative test
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...21da31d8&ei=12
The home kits have become less reliable with recent mutations.
post 1690156083 09-16-2023, 09:03 AM
-
#219
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699628
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The home kits have become less reliable with recent mutations.


...But anyway. You gonna tell us how many jabs you've had so far?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1690156443 09-16-2023, 09:10 AM
-
#220
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By isingmodel⏩
Which is what I said. Covid vaccines for the elderly and vulnerable. Which is what the data supports.
Viruses are living organisms that adapt to survive. Giving the vaccine or boosters to the weakest people first was actually stupid. Because it's easier for a virus to mutate in someone with a weak immune system then a strong one.
post 1690156483 09-16-2023, 09:11 AM
-
#221
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The home kits have become less reliable with recent mutations.
Does this mean that going forward, the “studies” you post, which are actually just internet surveys with zero data validation will be even LESS reliable….if that’s possible.
post 1690156623 09-16-2023, 09:14 AM
-
#222
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Viruses are living organisms that adapt to survive. Giving the vaccine or boosters to the weakest people first was actually stupid. Because it's easier for a virus to mutate in someone with a weak immune system then a strong one.
That's not how evolution and mutation work.
post 1690156673 09-16-2023, 09:15 AM
-
#223
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The home kits have become less reliable with recent mutations.
PCR test was always unreliable. What’s your point?
post 1690156693 09-16-2023, 09:15 AM
-
#224
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Does this mean that going forward, the “studies” you post, which are actually just internet surveys with zero data validation will be even LESS reliable….if that’s possible.
No.

RT-PCR is still considered a gold standard.
post 1690156773 09-16-2023, 09:16 AM
-
#225
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That's not how evolution and mutation work.
Are you claiming viruses don’t adapt to survive?
post 1690156793 09-16-2023, 09:16 AM
-
#226
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The home kits have become less reliable with recent mutations.
They were always unreliable, someone who's obsessed with the Rona would have known this.
post 1690156853 09-16-2023, 09:17 AM
-
#227
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
No.

RT-PCR is still considered a gold standard.
They can consider it anything they want, it’s still an unreliable metric to test viruses..as Mullis himself stated.

To those not catching on like JLC here, we are heading into virus season.

Every year virus occurrence spikes up towards the point where the sun is weakest in the winter and then virus incidence collapses down into spring.

every year like clockwork.
post 1690157063 09-16-2023, 09:22 AM
-
#228
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Are you claiming viruses don’t adapt to survive?
I'm stating viral mutation doesn't happen with or under. intent
post 1690157163 09-16-2023, 09:24 AM
-
#229
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I'm stating viral mutation doesn't happen with or under. intent
You didn’t answer the question though :/
post 1690157193 09-16-2023, 09:24 AM
-
#230
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
They can consider it anything they want, it’s still an unreliable metric to test viruses..as Mullis himself stated.

To those not catching on like JLC here, we are heading into virus season.

Every year virus occurrence spikes up towards the point where the sun is weakest in the winter and then virus incidence collapses down into spring.

every year like clockwork.
You've repeated the anti PCR talking points many times.

The skeptic claims are not what Mullis said.

RT-PCR is a reliable metric/index of viral load.
post 1690157393 09-16-2023, 09:29 AM
-
#231
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
You didn’t answer the question though :/
Yes I did. With the presentation of a fact
post 1690157483 09-16-2023, 09:30 AM
-
#232
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You've repeated the anti PCR talking points many times.

The skeptic claims are not what Mullis said.

RT-PCR is a reliable metric/index of viral load.
Wrong on all accounts. PCR test was always unreliable which is why the WHO had to send out different guidelines well into the “Plandemic”. Sorry buddy, the receipts speak for themselves
post 1690157643 09-16-2023, 09:33 AM
-
#233
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Wrong on all accounts. PCR test was always unreliable which is why the WHO had to send out different guidelines well into the “Plandemic”. Sorry buddy, the receipts speak for themselves
I haven't seen any receipts.

But, your misunderstanding doesn't change the technology. Similar to IHC.
post 1690157703 09-16-2023, 09:35 AM
-
#234
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I haven't seen any receipts.

But, your misunderstanding doesn't change the technology. Similar to IHC.
WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-...-users-2020-05

Memo from the beginning of the year where the WHO indicates cycle rate adjustment may be necessary for accurate testing.

No misunderstanding at all, your half-assed deception narrative doesn’t change the facts.
post 1690157773 09-16-2023, 09:36 AM
-
#235
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 699628
Originally Posted By Paul
You didn’t answer the question though :/
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Yes I did. With the presentation of a fact
So you gonna tell us how many transfusions of Fauci Fluid you've had or nah.
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Acting stupid still.

How many covid vaccine injections have you had so far?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
What about psychological dependence?

How many have you had?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Well? How many?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
So how many?
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
...But anyway. You gonna tell us how many jabs you've had so far?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1690158013 09-16-2023, 09:40 AM
-
#236
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-...-users-2020-05

Memo from the beginning of the year where the WHO indicates cycle rate adjustment may be necessary for accurate testing.

No misunderstanding at all, your half-assed deception narrative doesn’t change the facts.
I get your point. It's just that it's based on misunderstanding. The folks who spin these up seem to rely on their audience not understanding. It works, this stuff goes viral.

Read the notice. It says to read the directions for the specific assay in use. There are several available assays.

"Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

Actions to be taken by IVD users:

Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.
Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.
Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.
Provide the Ct value in the report to the requesting health care provider."
post 1690158163 09-16-2023, 09:42 AM
-
#237
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
8 pages of chit chat for something that is "just a cold, not deadly and no big deal"

A lot of time and energy dedicated to a nothing burger, unless.....

Yall love jlc
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1690158363 09-16-2023, 09:47 AM
-
#238
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I get your point. It's just that it's based on misunderstanding. The folks who spin these up seem to rely on their audience not understanding. It works, this stuff goes viral.

Read the notice. It says to read the directions for the specific assay in use. There are several available assays.

"Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

Actions to be taken by IVD users:

Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.
Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.
Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.
Provide the Ct value in the report to the requesting health care provider."
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

Seems to say to do that right there.
post 1690158483 09-16-2023, 09:50 AM
-
#239
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

Seems to say to do that right there.
Yep. Reliable metric of viral load.
post 1690158533 09-16-2023, 09:51 AM
-
#240
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By x-trainer
8 pages of chit chat for something that is "just a cold, not deadly and no big deal"

A lot of time and energy dedicated to a nothing burger, unless.....

Yall love jlc
The comradery is interesting
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts