What's the difference between an alive and a dead nucleotide?

You aren’t answering the question.

PCR detects sequences not single nucleotides.

Yes I am.

I'm also demonstrating my previous point as to why skeptics can't gain any traction.

No, you aren’t..skeptics are on the rise, contrary to your opinion

Definitely on the rise. It's a lucrative market.

But, molecules aren't "alive" or "dead".

Then why does Faucci state differently?

Dunno and don't care.

So he’s wrong..& you’re right?

What is the difference between a dead and an alive nucleotide?

You aren’t answering the question..again.

This is why conformists are losing traction.

Your position is based on the differentiation of dead versus alive nucleotides.

What's the difference?

I’m gonna need you to stop deflecting & answer the questions addressed.

Do alive nucleotides demonstrate metabolism?

I’m gonna need you to stop deflecting & answer the questions addressed.

This doesn't even make sense. (If a question has been addressed...)



You can't explicate your own position. Hence my previous comment.

Skeptics rely on audience misunderstanding.

I kinda get it.

But won't endorse it

It doesn’t make sense for you to answer questions addressed to you but expect responses from others?

Oh, okay. Well, I laughed at least.

It's aways fun, Paul

So why do you think this virus assay from
2006 is the same as SARS-Cov-2 today..?

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...irus_assays_14

I don't think that assay is the same as the available covid assays.

Kudos on the topic change tho

Did it differentiate between alive versus dead nucleotides?

It is though..well, 26 consecutive bases long.
The chance of that being random is cosmically low, don’t you think..?

"Covid is the host horrific black plague zombie apocalypse virus of DOOM in the history of mankind"
No this is your fake news line, no one thinks this.
He is just extra extra careful probably due to health issues already existing.

You need to retire that zombie black line, it is as old as your argument style and is just as inaccurate as 90% of your rambling old man arguments here.

You never ask what people think in September of 2023,
You just repeat that old tired chit from March of 2020.
Gues what?
In the face of new information, new studies, and new results, new data opinions get modified on all topics on Earth.

Are you saying they should or shouldn't?

"Covid is the host horrific black plague zombie apocalypse virus of DOOM in the history of mankind"
No this is your fake news line, no one thinks this.

You never ask what people think in September of 2023,
You just repeat that old tired chit from March of 2020.
Gues what?
In the face of new information, new studies, and new results, new data opinions get modified on all topics on Earth.

You need to retire that zombie black line, it is as old as your argument style and is just as inaccurate as 90% of your rambling old man arguments here.

Lol right Benny.. You Rnaholic fux shiit your pants in horror every time a fresh new variant drops. Get all tingly and excited in anticipation of a new vax for it too.



And when it does you Rnaholic fux shiit your pants in horror every time a fresh new variant drops. Get all tingly and excited in anticipation of a new vax for it too.



But it's still funny.

He types that **** out, feeling smug, while ignoring what JLC posts about the Rona, instead he Reeeeees that we're allegedly "bullying" Rainman......

And then Backtracking Benny also let's it slip that he saved all his masks and at home testing kits, because this fall, the cases will come back.

And then claims the masks are for mowing the lawn.....

FML that was classic lol.. And then J.F.C took his deflection ball and ran with it.. tried to say a lot of people used masks for work like drywall workers lol.

Sure. We all knew that's what it's for lol.

jonhamm dot gif

Not everybody gets angry about masks. Some people do.

Everybody's different

On Tuesday afternoon, an advisory committee to the Centers for Disease Control recommended all Americans receive mRNA Covid boosters this fall. The CDC is already pressing full speed ahead with that terrible advice.

This morning, CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen wrote in the New York Times that she, her husband, and her preteen daughters “will all be rolling up our sleeves to get our updated Covid-19 vaccines along with our flu shots soon. I hope you and the people you care about will do the same.”
Yet the CDCs own statistics show the mRNAs have now failed and boosters will quickly make no difference.

They become ineffective against Omicron variants of Covid within months, possibly weeks.

“Updating” them - that is, changing the mRNA they contain, in an effort to keep current with the current variant - does not help.

Why? Imprinting from the original jabs makes our immune systems produce antibodies tailored to fight the now-extinct original coronavirus variant, no matter the specifics of the mRNA in the booster.

In its slide presentation to the CDC yesterday, Moderna simply ignored this fact by refusing to disclose how much better its new booster works against the original Sars-Cov-2 than the new variants. Pfizer didn’t even bother to offer data on how well the new shots work in humans. Instead, it presented data from 20 mice.
—
The evidence that the jabs now protect against hospitalization or serious illness is also much weaker than mRNA advocates claim.

The CDC reported yesterday the jabs have roughly 0 to 25 percent effectiveness against hospitalization within three to four months. (For several reasons I won’t repeat here, those estimates are likely biased upwards, in favor of the jabs.)
—
(See those dots at the bottom, the ones left of the vertical line? That’s the CDC reporting that vaccinated people are MORE likely to be hospitalized than unvaccinated ones with Omicron this year. Yes, you read that right. MORE likely.)


Health authorities originally promised the Covid vaccines needed at least 50 percent effectiveness for approval.

But the CDC’s own data show booster effectiveness against Omicron is nowhere near that level. Further, the mRNAs have much more severe side effects than flu shots, the only vaccines that are comparable in terms of their (lack of) effectiveness.

This combination makes the mRNAs a very bad bet - particularly for children, who are at miniscule risk of hospitalization or death from Covid.

The CDC itself estimated yesterday that 1 million mRNA boosters in adolescents would prevent at most one death from Covid (and probably zero), as well as roughly 10 Covid intensive care admissions.
—
(They said it, not me. The real numbers are probably significantly lower, as in zero, but this makes the point.)

At the same time, giving teenagers a million additional mRNA doses will cause anywhere from 100,000 to 200,000 cases of severe short-term side effects, such as fevers and nausea.
They will also cause anywhere from 50 to 300 cases of myocarditis severe enough to cause hospitalization (depending on which estimates and what mix of Pfizer and Moderna shots are used).
That math has led most of the world, including Japan, Germany, Britain, and Australia, to stop recommending Covid boosters for children and teenagers. In fact, the latter three countries no longer recommend Covid shots for the vast majority of people under 65.

But the United States will not back down.
Admitting that most people won’t benefit from shots this fall would raise questions the CDC and White House cannot tolerate. So they are pushing on, no matter that their own (biased) data suggests they’re making a huge mistake.
The only good news is that the rejection of last fall’s booster campaign suggests what is happening now is mostly theater and the vast majority of Americans will ignore these recommendations.

But some will not.

They will trust the CDC - for themselves, or their parents, or their children.
And some of those - we will never know how many, but some, like this 27-year-old man - will pay the ultimate price.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35812802/


https://open.substack.com/pub/alexbe..._campaign=post