Misc,

Been watching YouTube videos lately of the shroud of Turin.

Let me tell you.

This is the most fascinating thing I’ve ever learned about SRS.

I’ve heard basically all the evidence and objections to the authenticity.

I’ve concluded it’s real.

All the evidence points to it being authentic. Yet mouth breathers still bring up the flawed/debunked carbon dating from 1988.

They’ve been studying this for over a century and they still can not recreate the image with the same detail and properties.





And yet people think some subhuman from medieval times forged it using medieval technology.

Just lol.

The shroud of Jesus is real. My belief is a burst of light occurred at resurrection and imprinted on the shroud. Further, it would appear that Jesus was upright in the shroud which is even more wild.

Jesus is real. God is real. And the shroud is just one reason why.

Our entire basis of time and calendar is based on the birth of God's human son

How much proof do you need
Strong Jew psyop

Jesus was literally described as blue eyed w/ tan skin in written text around 2,000 years ago

Religion is the biggest setback that happened to humanity. Endless wars in the name of God. God doesn't exist. Religion is bull sht. The sooner people realize that is the sooner society can advance.

Ok Rabbi



Is that why society continues to crumble in every way the further it strays from Christianity

You couldn't be more wrong; you simply can't accept that you are not in control

If God exists....why does he allow for good people to have horrible diseases like cancer, and die a slow and painful death?

I mean the evolutionary scientists even disagree with you!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ial-evolution/

“You need something quite literally to stop everybody from killing everybody else out of just crossness,” said Robin Dunbar. “Somehow it’s clear that religions, all these doctrinal religions, create the sense that we’re all one family.”
Fear of a vengeful God may explain humanity’s global expansion

Dunbar, an evolutionary psychology professor at Oxford University, gained some measure of fame more than 20 years ago for his research on the size of animals’ social networks. Each species of primate, he found, can manage to keep up a social bond with a certain number of other members of its own species. That number goes up as primates’ brain size increases, from monkeys to apes.


Humans, Dunbar found, are capable of maintaining significantly more social ties than the size of our brains alone could explain. He proved that each human is surprisingly consistent in the number of social ties we can maintain: About five with intimate friends, 50 with good friends, 150 with friends and 1,500 with people we could recognize by name. That discovery came to be known as “Dunbar’s number.”

And then Dunbar turned to figuring out why Dunbar’s number is so high. Did humor help us manage it? Exercise? Storytelling? That riddle has been Dunbar’s quest for years — and religion is the latest hypothesis he’s testing in his ongoing attempt to find the answer.
“Most of these things we’re looking at, you get in religion in one form or another,” he said.
Harvard Medical School professor says faith-based miracle cures could be real


Dunbar is just one of a recent wave of scientists who are interested in how religion came to be and how people have benefited from it. “For most of Western intellectual history since the Enlightenment, religion has been thought of as ignorant and strange and an aberration and something that gets in the way of reason,” said Christian Smith, a sociologist at the University of Notre Dame who studies religion. “In the last 10 or 20 years on many fronts, there’s been a change in thinking about religion, where a lot of neuroscientists have been saying religion is totally natural. It totally makes sense that we’re religious. Religion has served a lot of important functions in developing societies.”


In the case of Dunbar and his colleagues, they already published research demonstrating that two other particularly human behaviors increased people’s capacity for social bonding. In the lab, they showed that first, laughter, and second, singing, left research subjects more capable of forming connections with other people than they were before.
Religion is the remaining key to explaining humans’ remarkable social networks, Dunbar thinks. “These three things are very good at triggering endorphins, making us feel bonded,” he said last week at the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual meeting, where he presented his team’s research on laughter and singing and introduced the forthcoming research on religion.
Religion doesn’t necessarily influence Americans’ views on science, with two big exceptions


Religion includes numerous elements of Dunbar’s earlier studies on endorphin-producing activities. Lots of singing, to start. Repetitive motion triggers endorphins, he said, noting that traditions from Catholicism to Islam to Buddhism to Hinduism make use of prayer beads.
Story continues below advertisement

Plus, researchers have shown that doing these activities in synchronized fashion with other people drastically magnifies the endorphin-producing effect: Picture the coordinated bowing that is central to Muslim, Jewish and Catholic worship.
Share this article
Share

And Dunbar’s most recent published research demonstrated the effectiveness of emotional storytelling in bonding groups of strangers who hear the story together — again, a fixture of religious worship.
“What you get from dance and singing on its own is a sense of belonging. It happens very quickly. What happens, I suspect, is that it can trigger very easily trance states,” Dunbar said. He theorizes that these spiritual experiences matter much more than dance and song alone. “Once you’ve triggered that, you’re in, I think, a different ballgame. It ramps up massively. That’s what’s triggered. There’s something there.”


Dunbar’s team will start research on religion in April, and he expects it will take three years. To begin, he wants to map a sort of evolutionary tree of religion, using statistical modeling to try to show when religious traditions evolved and how they morphed into each other.
Of course, religious people themselves might find Dunbar’s theory odd — most don’t think of religion existing to serve an evolutionary purpose, but of their faiths simply being true.
But Smith thinks one can easily have faith in both God’s truth and religion’s role in human development. “From the religious point of view, you can say this … . God created humans as a very particular type of creature, with very particular brains and biology, just so that they would develop into the type of humans who would know God and believe in God,” Smith said. “They’re not in conflict at all.”


He added: “A lot of people assume, falsely, that science and religion are zero-sum games: that if science explains something, then religion must not be true. … If you were God and wanted to set up the world in a certain way, wouldn’t you create humans with bigger brains and the ability to imagine?”

Christ is king.

The question you should ask is if there’s so much evil and blasphemy against God and degeneracy, why does God continue letting the world go on?

You’re too potato to think abstractly

Also the biggest religious people are some of the most degenerate sinners in the world behind closed doors.

You sound like a teenager with these arguments.

Try harder.

Probably the most common asinine question every atheist asks

Also one of the dumbest


Why does endless space exist, why is the sky blue, why do living things need to eat each other?

It's called nature, bud; the essence of all life is energy; energy can be created but never destroyed, only moved



What you should be asking is why does man's brain magically create an endless charge of energy out of thin air in the womb? It's physically unexplainable & shouldn't be possible

So where does your energy go when your body perishes? You've been told












You claim religion is false yet you've clearly never even read the Bible; what a joke

Reality is often too hard to cope. I used to be a huge religious person. Until I started losing the people that I loved the most to Cancer. They all were good people who didn't deserve to suffer. I prayed to God to save them, but they all died a miserable and painful death. That is when I realized I was just wasting my time believing in a garbage piece of sht "God".

Christ is Lord.

Why do you think gods controlling everything and interfering with free will and life on earth? Don’t even think he exists but presuming to know what he’s about or what even wether his attention focuses on things, does he have attention, is it even appropriate to think of him as singular as we understand it, would the thought pattern work how we know thought, does it think as we know consciousness?

It goes on and on, but you just go ahead and place a whole heaping of imagined limitations while arguing there should be no limits. We live in an existence with laws of reality and consequences of laws could be viewed as gods judgement but how can you even go about judging the process from any point of moral view other than your limited one without any view into the entire process of how / why / scope of our existence.
Why do you think this life even matters and how do you judge what matters?

Whether you choose to believe it or not there is a reason a lottery winner and somone with a terminal cancer diagnosis often have the same levels of happiness as each other a year later. Everything is relative, people are happy in this life for other reasons then getting lucky or being given chit, and you have no frame of reference to pose the assumptions inherent to the questions you ask.

Everything you stated is completely false. All we have to do is look at the results of what occurred when prayer and the Bible was taken out of the class room.
In 1963 when the Bible was removed from the classroom, immediately teen rape, suicide, drug use, dropout rate, STD's, pregnancy, even divorce all skyrocketed.















Now we have atheists teaching there are more than 2 genders, a man can be a biological woman, despite the very definition of the word..human life "doesn't really" begin at conception, & cannot even define what a woman is.
There are no "good people"...no one is good..NO ONE. Man has created a world of disease and sin...you reap what you sow.

You are as stupid as the religious people you critique, religion was a form of governance and the first form to form an alliance.

In order for faith, gace, and free will to exist at all, there also needs to be no limit to allowing humanity to do whatever it is capable of.

It's very simple to understand.

Now while God doesn't exist. I do believe that this "God" people believe is actually a High dimensional Alien with powers far above human comprehension. But let's be real, "God" doesn't really give a fuk about Earth.

You're thinking it's an extradimensional being,

I think that God created that being

What's a shroud of turin?

Evidence?

Atheists talk about society yet atheist communities cant even manage to achieve replacement level fertility. Name a non feminist atheist society where women have Atleast 2.1 children on average…

Atheism is a cancer & main reason why the white European race is becoming extinct.

Have fun celebrating: feminism, sex change, whores, pron, drugs.

So many great non destructive things you Get from becoming an edgy atheist!!
Not srs

All creation has a creator, nothing "evolved" as in abiogenesis ever taking place, and certainly never seen in Darwin's model of evolution. There is no missing link..happy to go through all of them

Cover your face in paint and wrap a shroud of material loosely over it (choose to press down on it or not, it doesn’t matter either way). It will never look like the Turin shroud. A three dimensional object will never look like a two dimensional object in relief. The same way the earth looks like the AuthaGraph map and not the Mercator map.

How the Turin Shroud has gotten this far is ridiculous.

Abiogenesis never happened? u wot m8?

Just looked it up.

It’s been carbon dated by multiple independent sources to being less than 1000 years old. wtf are people smoking.

True. Didn’t need to be though. Any high school kid can look at in and see isn’t a shroud.

Bruh……

Keep reading.

The carbon dating was debunked. Sample taken from corner which was repaired/sown on after fire incident.

Nobody with half a brain accepts the carbon dating results today