All manner of evidence that have come to light within the last two decades all lead to the theory that white people occupied America long before what is commonly taught today. So that means that the "native Americans" are not actually as native as they'd like to make it seem. With this in mind, shouldn't the natives be cut off from the government welfare that they have been receiving all these years? After all, the natives killed all of the whites who lived in the Americas pre-Columbus, and did not take care of them over the years, so why are post Columbus whites doing this for natives?

is there any race of people in history who ever took care of their defeated enemies and paid them reparations like whites do for natives? The natives killed every white man in America and kept the women as slaves (DNA evidence proves this)

Evidence that proves, without a doubt, that whites lived in the Americas:

-History/stories from Natives talking of blonde/red haired people
-Pyramids
-Ironworking locations found in America (natives were not capable)
-structures that were built by non-natives (natives lived in huts)
-skeleton remains of people who had red hair and stood between 6-8 ft tall

I for one find it despicable that we are intentionally teaching false history just so that the natives can keep their racket going. I think the world deserves to know the white history in the Americas. Many of the skeletal remains that have been found across America is clearly European, but the natives have always prevented the DNA testing of the remains. I mean everyone knows that natives aren't 7 ft tall and don't have red/blonde hair so the cats out of the bag at this point.


TLDR: White people traveled to both North & South America long before what is commonly known, and they could have even been in America before the "natives" arrived here. It's clear that Whites built up societies in parts of America that were quite advanced (pyramids) and these societies were lost due to race mixing and war with the "natives".

thats one of the biggest flaws of Whites is our altruistic nature. when we conquer people, we let them live. no one else does that.
when non-Whites conquer a people they kill them all or at the very least rape everyone.. and then kill them all.

Everyone knows Jesus was the first white person to discover America.

It's no fun if you don't leave a handful around to try a future usurping. If you're a hunter, you don't kill off the entire deer population. Do you? There's nothing left for sport if you do that.

It's a misguided belief that everyone can be fixed and civilized.

If you actually pay attention it's only white people and Asians that are able to build longstanding societies.

It's simply not in the genes of the others

The problem isn't that whites think that everyone can be "fixed".

The problem isn't that whites create grand civilizations that attract non-white people from all over the world. For a certain while this works for everyone as the whites are building, ruling, planning, conquering, and creating while the non-whites do manual labor and simple jobs that keep society going. Whites at this stage are based, and establish rules to prevent race mixing between them and the non-whites (ancient India, Egypt, Persia, Greece, Rome, and America during segregation)

The problem is that Whites can keep up the type of civilization described above for thousands of years and accomplish many feats, but eventually they always end up degenerating and collapsing. Based whites separate themselves from the non-whites, and this is the secret that keeps society functioning at peak performance; but eventually whites stop being based. They start talking of equality and diversity. They get too comfortable and start worshipping money over virtue. Once they allow race mixing it's over.

All Empires fall because of race mixing. Any race that has kept itself pure throughout the years have managed to survive, but the ones who mixed have lost the power they once held. This lesson has been taught over and over again throughout history but yet we still have cucks who will come and try to deny it to this day.

Columbus was a racist Italian (aka lazy Europoor mexican) who raped and destroyed, and didn't even touch the North American Continent (SRS). Fåggot discovered some Caribbean chitholes.










Is the real explorer and USa discoverer.

Erik the red landed in greenland sometime around ~1000 AD too, and his son 'discovered' North America.


[edit] wizard above

The history of the USA is much richer than we're lead to believe. Many remnants of past civilizations are dotted all around your country. It was hidden in order to paint a new narrative.

I have VIking blood in me and no one will convince me some limp wristed ph4ggot Euro like Columbus discovered this place before my VIKING brethren.

Lo, there do I see my father. Lo, there do I see my mother, and my sisters, and my brothers. Lo, there do I see the line of my people, Back to the beginning Lo, they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them, In the halls of Valhalla, Where the brave may live forever!

Vikings never found gold and the native Americans only had beavers n beads n chit so they noped back to England. Better plunder.

Vikings were in north America way before Columbus.

We are the most badass race in the world
Tallest & broadest race on average is a testament to that.

Since when lol?

I've been to Norway many times and even lived there for 6 months (my ex was Norsk), i saw very few people taller than me and while the women were hnng, the men were mostly quite feminine. In terms of size the people of Norway on average appear not signficantly different to any other Europeans. I do like the culture and temprament of Norwegians though, much more laid back than here.

Also, the vikings, while kind of cool were actually not as badass as many other races in History. They were glorified pirates during an unstable period of Europe when there wasn't a major imperial power to stop them (when they attempted to invade Europe during Charlemagnes time, they were repelled), they rarely conquered lands or made real gains, they just landed, plundered and legged it most of the time, and rarely fought actual set piece battles. The Germans were more feared than the Vikings for their physical prowess, over 1000 years before the vikings made their impact (hence why after the Teutoberg massacre, Rome stopped attempting to conquer Germanica), yet they still lost set piece battles to the Romans despite mogging them physically. There's a good reason the vikings mostly avoided fighting set piece battles.

Also, the dutch are probably the tallest and broadest 'race' in the modern age, statistically speaking.

if you mean the Vikings, google AI says they were actually black

this, bro

this too, bro.

















































the more you know.

This here

They were conquered by the Moors in the late 1800s

Brought to you by St0rmfr0nt University lmao.

This. We wuz Vikangz & chit.

Are you trying to deny that white people existed and created communities and even cities in the America's way before Columbus?
any facts?

Yeah I thought so.

Moors were white too though. They were Mediterranean not sub saharan African.

Moors being black is just another Hollywood trope. Or cope.

Limp wristed?

Cortez sailed there with 500 men, scuttled the ships so that they could not return until they were victorious and then took most of Latin America for Spain.

Like i said, limp wristed. Prolly swung his sword once while he sat and drank tea and crumpets while the SPanish FLu took the natives out. His most dangerous weapon was his cough. Vikings woulda fukd cortez up and cornholed his wife on a bear pelt

Nah brah. Its real. Example; This woman writes to the Scientific America in May 1856 to report to ancient ruins discovered California.



One of many many examples. All you need to do is look around you. Check this guys Anomalous America series where he explores America state by state, running through old newspaper archives from the 1800s before newspapers got cucked.

The fact that people find this hard to believe goes to show just how brainwashed and ignorant the majority are. Nothing GuineaDago585 says will have credibility anymore

LOLRed haired "giants" huh

So what race of people are known for being tall and having red hair?

All of our history is a lie.

Look at wagon trains for example.

Take the physical wagon itself. Do you think those skinny wheels could go over rough terrain, the rockies, deep sand in the deserts, without constantly breaking?

They didnt have smooth paths and all plains like tv shows. It had to have been rough travel.

If you bought a brand new four wheel drive in St Louis, how do you think it would fare if you drove it all the way to Oregon on zero roads, just rough terrain the whole way? It probably wouldnt make it so how in hell could a wagon full of pregnant women do it?

have you ever seen someone recreating driving a wagon across the desert? I have seen guys drive tiny motorcycles and clown cars but never an actual covered wagon. Thats because it cant be done.

This is just one example.

Roads had been in existence for hundreds of years before the wagon trains of the gold rush. You do know the wagon trains followed tracks cut by the US Army and mostly followed along with the military forts.

No sht
White people lived in America before the so called “native americans”

You sound like a little kid that thinks history is based on TV shows and movies. Lmao.

Youre so badass being an angry cornball on the misc.

Should natives pay whites reparations for wiping them out and taking their women as slaves 1000 years ago?