Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?
  1. Results 421 to 450 of 908
  2. Page 15 of 31
  3. First
  5. 13
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. 17
  11. Last

Thread: Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?

post 1698641533 03-02-2024, 09:40 PM
-
#421
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
So biology affirms gender now?

Just lol
A lot of folks are disgruntled, but I don't think we'll be going back to "traditional values" unless someone pulls off a real life Handmaid's Yale.
post 1698641993 03-02-2024, 09:49 PM
-
#422
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
A lot of folks are disgruntled, but I don't think we'll be going back to "traditional values" unless someone pulls off a real life Handmaid's Yale.
Disgruntled? Hmm.. because unlike the left, "Conservatives" like myself feel that if we truly care about people are we going to force them down a road, particularly as children, into a "solution" to a problem that has been proven not to be a solution? (gender re-assignment surgery)

Oh, okay


Thank you for showcasing your sentiment. Wow
post 1698642013 03-02-2024, 09:50 PM
-
#423
  1. BigElephant
  1. BigElephant
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 13,745
  5. Rep Power: 71403
Post deleted by user
post 1698642543 03-02-2024, 10:04 PM
-
#424
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Disgruntled? Hmm.. because unlike the left, "Conservatives" like myself feel that if we truly care about people are we going to force them down a road, particularly as children, into a "solution" to a problem that has been proven not to be a solution? (gender re-assignment surgery)

Oh, okay


Thank you for showcasing your sentiment. Wow
Yeah,. I definitely don't think anyone should be forced into gender reassugnment surgery. That's nuts.
post 1698642763 03-02-2024, 10:08 PM
-
#425
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BigElephant⏩
The middle ground is teaching kids not to discriminate against gays or treat them poorly, while also not celebrating LGBT as something good or showing it in the media. It should not be normalized because it is not a desirable outcome and it is harmful to civilization. Tolerance of it as a biological and environmental abnormality is different from the encouragement and promotion of it that we are seeing now in our media and our entire culture.

And I would argue that line of thinking not only includes LGBT but also straight degenerative behavior. IE sloot/manwhore/casual sex behavior that is also glorified and encouraged by the media and is also harmful.
There's nothing wrong with being gay or bi. Nor is it harmful to civilization. This is straight up Nazi talk.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1698644823 03-02-2024, 11:03 PM
-
#426
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 15,281
  6. Subscribers: 7
  7. Rep Power: 713134




See ShakeBrah's signature
post 1698645443 03-02-2024, 11:22 PM
-
#427
  1. BigElephant
  1. BigElephant
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 13,745
  5. Rep Power: 71403
Post deleted by user
post 1698645473 03-02-2024, 11:23 PM
-
#428
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Yeah,. I definitely don't think anyone should be forced into gender reassugnment surgery. That's nuts.
But you affirm it for a child? You think they have a sound mind to make that decision? Do you think they are influenced/persuaded into gender surgery?
post 1698645903 03-02-2024, 11:36 PM
-
#429
  1. BigElephant
  1. BigElephant
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 13,745
  5. Rep Power: 71403
Post deleted by user
post 1698645993 03-02-2024, 11:38 PM
-
#430
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 15,281
  6. Subscribers: 7
  7. Rep Power: 713134
Originally Posted By BigElephant⏩
JFL. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I wasn't expecting THAT.
See ShakeBrah's signature
post 1698650993 03-03-2024, 04:40 AM
-
#431
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
How is pushing for acceptance an extreme? What is the middle ground?



I entirely agree with the criticism of conversatism for their absurd fear of structural criticism and anti-hierarchy, but I hardly see acceptance of LGBT as some sort of extreme. What is the middle ground, IYO?
Except it’s never just a “push for acceptance”. The goal keeps moving and moving. No one here gives a sh!t if you want to fukk guys or trannies. But we’ve gone from “just let us live our lives and leave us alone” to “we just want to get married” to “if you won’t help us with our wedding we’ll sue you”, to “not putting your pronouns in your email signature is a form of microagression”, to “ not playing pretend with me and using my pronouns is a crime”, to teaching kids there are 47 genders and taking them away from parents if they don’t play along with a child who says he’s transgender, to our assistant health secretary saying one of the most important tasks of healthcare in our country is to provide “gender-affirming care” to children.




So no, it’s about much MUCH more than “acceptance”. It’s about the erosion and continual perversion of society at a younger and younger age while demoralizing people by practically forcing them to play along.
post 1698652383 03-03-2024, 05:36 AM
-
#432
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Except it’s never just a “push for acceptance”. The goal keeps moving and moving. No one here gives a sh!t if you want to fukk guys or trannies. But we’ve gone from “just let us live our lives and leave us alone” to “we just want to get married” to “if you won’t help us with our wedding we’ll sue you”, to “not putting your pronouns in your email signature is a form of microagression”, to “ not playing pretend with me and using my pronouns is a crime”, to teaching kids there are 47 genders and taking them away from parents if they don’t play along with a child who says he’s transgender, to our assistant health secretary saying one of the most important tasks of healthcare in our country is to provide “gender-affirming care” to children.




So no, it’s about much MUCH more than “acceptance”. It’s about the erosion and continual perversion of society at a younger and younger age while demoralizing people by practically forcing them to play along.
Lmao "it's ok as long as you do your "perversion" the way I want you to".

It's exactly the same failed logic people used with gays in the 90s.
post 1698652513 03-03-2024, 05:39 AM
-
#433
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 700751
Originally Posted By adimare⏩
jtaylor2010, can you name them? I'm not that active here but I've honestly never seen anyone here defend or support drag shows for kids.
I can.

Estrogenbro denying it - even with pics right under his nose:
Originally Posted By miscinbro⏩
Anything about telling kids to be sexually with adults? Nope, didn't think so. More lies from the "right."

I'd love to hear your response to "beauty pageants" - the ones Trump ran and used to walk into the changing area of underaged performers.
Originally Posted By miscinbro⏩
Let me get this straight. An image, that’s already obviously edited, (this Tweet has been deleted - yet shows the entire Tweet) is quoted on bb.com and I’m supposed to Google up a bunch of **** sht to confirm it’s source and validity, otherwise I’m the ****?

Get the fck out.
The 'tard comparing them to cheerleaders:
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
What is provocative clothing?

Is it only clothing that arouses you personally? Just homo stuff or do you mean cheerleader uniforms and tutus?
Ass Rot with deflection #2,653:
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
What does trans have to with ****philes? You know where there are lots of ****philes? Those conservative organizations the catholic church and boy scouts.
Pat blaming the parents instead of the parents AND his drag freaks:
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
I have a better idea. Why don't you tell me why you're not attacking the parents for bringing their kid to this type of event? Why do you people accuse the tranny of trying to "groom" the kid(s)? So fuking stupid..
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1698652753 03-03-2024, 05:45 AM
-
#434
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 700751
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Maybe. But the poster above me seems to be advocating for any all all nudity if children are present.

What should one do in a locker room if a picnic pool or gym if a parent brings their kids to the gym or pool?

Should anyone who changes clothes be charged?

Regardless, this thread if about p3dophilia. Jtaylor suggested p3dophilia is being taught in schools and there are p3dophillic books in school libraries.

When challengedhe decided to change the topic to a made up position he's ascribed to me.
350 post thread here filled from beginning to end with libs defending a book with graphic depictions of children having sex with grown men.

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=180640483
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Lmao "it's ok as long as you do your "perversion" the way I want you to"
That's exactly right Groomer. You freaks can air out your jock itch for each other 24/7/365 with zero fux given. But a line has to be drawn with children.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1698653023 03-03-2024, 05:55 AM
-
#435
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Lmao "it's ok as long as you do your "perversion" the way I want you to".

It's exactly the same failed logic people used with gays in the 90s.
Yeah, saying being gay is wrong is practically the same thing as being upset about the fact that it can be considered a crime to not play pretend with a mentally ill person(ie use their pronouns).



That’s one of the most retarded takes I’ve ever seen from you, which is saying a LOT.
post 1698653113 03-03-2024, 06:00 AM
-
#436
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
350 post thread here filled from beginning to end with libs defending a book with graphic depictions of children having sex with grown men.

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=180640483




That's exactly right Groomer. You freaks can air out your jock itch for each other 24/7/365 with zero fux given. But a line has to be drawn with children.
On spread…. We’ve all seen the type of sh!t some of the sick fukkers try to defend or downplay(J.L.C. included). And I could’ve linked him to tons of examples but it wouldn’t do any good because his only concern is with trolling and it isn’t worth wasting time on. Because trust me, he has more time than anyone here and absolutely LOVES spending it trying to irritate people. A sad existence, but I guess at least he isn’t out hurting people in the real world.
post 1698653133 03-03-2024, 06:00 AM
-
#437
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
But you affirm it for a child? You think they have a sound mind to make that decision? Do you think they are influenced/persuaded into gender surgery?
I realize that's the bogeyman, but no, don't think parents forcing or tricking their children into surgery is a widespread issue (or occurrence).

Do you have kids in school? Do you talk to them and their teachers?
post 1698653833 03-03-2024, 06:50 AM
-
#438
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Lmao "it's ok as long as you do your "perversion" the way I want you to".

It's exactly the same failed logic people used with gays in the 90s.
Authoritarianism is freedom when it's your views and preferences that are (en)forced on others
post 1698654273 03-03-2024, 07:09 AM
-
#439
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 700751
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Authoritarianism is freedom when it's your views and preferences that are (en)forced on others
...
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
That's exactly right Groomer. You freaks can air out your jock itch for each other 24/7/365 with zero fux given. But a line has to be drawn with children.
How 'bout that.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1698654303 03-03-2024, 07:13 AM
-
#440
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Yeah, saying being gay is wrong is practically the same thing as being upset about the fact that it can be considered a crime to not play pretend with a mentally ill person(ie use their pronouns).



That’s one of the most retarded takes I’ve ever seen from you, which is saying a LOT.
You're proving my point. In the 90s gay people were called mentally ill too. Literally the same exact playbook - no matter how you try to justify your "opinion" on them.
post 1698654343 03-03-2024, 07:14 AM
-
#441
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Authoritarianism is freedom when it's your views and preferences that are (en)forced on others
See this is the difference between Dems and Reps.

Dems want to give people options to do as they choose, and not be discriminated against.

Reps want to take those rights, and many others, away from you.
post 1698654423 03-03-2024, 07:16 AM
-
#442
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 700751
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
See this is the difference between Dems and Reps.

Dems want to give people options to do as they choose, and not be discriminated against.

Reps want to take those rights, and many others, away from you.
So you're ok with your tranny and drag freaks showing their taints to children.

I mean we all knew that anyway, but it's good you admit it.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1698654513 03-03-2024, 07:20 AM
-
#443
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
You're proving my point. In the 90s gay people were called mentally ill too. Literally the same exact playbook - no matter how you try to justify your "opinion" on them.
If someone is born as a biological male but identifies as a female to the point of taking hormones and altering/removing genitalia they are mentally ill. That isn’t debateable. But even with that being the case, I haven’t seen anyone trying to ban sex change operations for adults. All we’re saying is don’t push it on children and don’t force other people to play along with your delusions. If someone is anorexic and weighs 60 lbs I shouldn’t be required to agree with them and say they’re obese. And if someone imagines themself as the opposite gender I shouldn’t be forced to play along with them.


Again, your take on this topic is completely terrible. Saying “I don’t think being gay is right” and saying “they shouldn’t give children puberty blocking hormones” are not even close to being equivalent.
post 1698654533 03-03-2024, 07:21 AM
-
#444
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
See this is the difference between Dems and Reps.

Dems want to give people options to do as they choose, and not be discriminated against.

Reps want to take those rights, and many others, away from you.
I think devout partisans on both sides will trample rights. It's just a different set of rights that get trampled.

Classic liberalism is based on individual rights and freedoms. Conservatism has always been about maintenance of status quo and traditional hierarchies.

The right makes me lol with the obvious "free....to be like me" stuff.

The left makes me lol with the idea that people can be trusted to be responsible with drugs, but not with guns.

I don't think government should be involved in personal medical and health decisions. Regardless of party.

When have bans ever worked?
post 1698654543 03-03-2024, 07:22 AM
-
#445
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
See this is the difference between Dems and Reps.

Dems want to give people options to do as they choose, and not be discriminated against.

Reps want to take those rights, and many others, away from you.
So you’re saying if someone is born with a d!ck I should be allowed to choose to call them a “he”?
post 1698654713 03-03-2024, 07:30 AM
-
#446
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
If someone is born as a biological male but identifies as a female to the point of taking hormones and altering/removing genitalia they are mentally ill. That isn’t debateable. But even with that being the case, I haven’t seen anyone trying to ban sex change operations for adults. All we’re saying is don’t push it on children and don’t force other people to play along with your delusions. If someone is anorexic and weighs 60 lbs I shouldn’t be required to agree with them and say they’re obese. And if someone imagines themself as the opposite gender I shouldn’t be forced to play along with them.


Again, your take on this topic is completely terrible. Saying “I don’t think being gay is right” and saying “they shouldn’t give children puberty blocking hormones” are not even close to being equivalent.
It actually is debatable. To claim that someone born a biological male cannot transition into a women is transphobia which attempts to falsely support its hatred with biological science, even though science doesn't support purely binary sex, since it rests on a genocentric theory of biology (which is more of a way of interpreting biology than actually doing the science of biology).
Originally Posted By JLC
I think devout partisans on both sides will trample rights. It's just a different set of rights that get trampled.

Classic liberalism is based on individual rights and freedoms. Conservatism has always been about maintenance of status quo and traditional hierarchies.

The right makes me lol with the obvious "free....to be like me" stuff.
It's why they hate trans people so much. They're the perfect culture war. The perfect fodder for their paranoid phobias that evil entities are sneaking into places under our eyes. Because trannies are capable of blending in. You can portray them as a literal boogey man hiding in plain sight to instil fear.


Sneaking into women's bathrooms, tricking men into having sex with them, sneaking into schools to promote paedophilia, stereotypes and fears of trans people center around this.


And plus, when society makes too much progress against old heirarchies, the biggest losers out of the set of straight men of the majority race get really angry and blame others for their loserdom (incel pandemic). It's also why they hate marxists too, for the same reasons: They're both major threats to conservatists idea of heirarchy where the white male heterosexual Christian is the pre-eminent way to be a human.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1698654833 03-03-2024, 07:33 AM
-
#447
  1. GooBaaa
  1. GooBaaa
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: Buffalo NY
  5. Posts: 58,871
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 436263
Why did you never accept my lifting bet you tranny lover
post 1698655173 03-03-2024, 07:43 AM
-
#448
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  1. ExPatriot
  2. This is the end...
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 15,281
  6. Subscribers: 7
  7. Rep Power: 713134
Originally Posted By GooBaaa⏩
Why did you never accept my lifting bet you tranny lover
See ShakeBrah's signature
post 1698655263 03-03-2024, 07:46 AM
-
#449
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,186
  6. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
It actually is debatable. To claim that someone born a biological male cannot transition into a women is transphobia which attempts to falsely support its hatred with biological science, even though science doesn't support purely binary sex, since it rests on a genocentric theory of biology (which is more of a way of interpreting biology than actually doing the science of biology).





It's why they hate trans people so much. They're the perfect culture war. The perfect fodder for their paranoid phobias that evil entities are sneaking into places under our eyes. Because trannies are capable of blending in. You can portray them as a literal boogey man hiding in plain sight to instil fear.


Sneaking into women's bathrooms, tricking men into having sex with them, sneaking into schools to promote paedophilia, stereotypes and fears of trans people center around this.


And plus, when society makes too much progress against old heirarchies, the biggest losers out of the set of straight men of the majority race get really angry and blame others for their loserdom (incel pandemic). It's also why they hate marxists too, for the same reasons: They're both major threats to conservatists idea of heirarchy where the white male heterosexual Christian is the pre-eminent way to be a human.
Lmao….a person born as a male can never biologically become a female. They will have the DNA of a male. Again, that isn’t debatable. And again, if someone feels the need to inject themselves with hormones and mutilate their genitalia then they are mentally ill. Also not debateable.
post 1698655453 03-03-2024, 07:50 AM
-
#450
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920





https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/N...riteria_for_g/


“Gender identity disorder” was dropped from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). A new condition called “gender dysphoria” was added to diagnose and treat those transgender individuals who felt distress at the mismatch between their identities and their bodies. The new diagnosis recognizes that a mismatch between one’s birth gender and identity is not necessarily pathological (or an illness). It shifts the emphasis in treatment from fixing a disorder to resolving distress over the mismatch.

The DSM-5’s new definition is similar in effect to its 1973 declassification of homosexuality as a mental illness.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts