Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Fanni Willis trial verdict possible today
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 82
  2. Page 2 of 3
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  9. Last

Thread: Fanni Willis trial verdict possible today

post 1699239523 03-15-2024, 11:40 AM
-
#31
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By OrdoAbchao⏩
This seems like a decision that is a safe play for the judge. It shows a little that Willis and Wade fukced up, but it doesn't really do anything for Trumps side either.

“Reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety and the need to make proportional efforts to cure it,” McAfee wrote.

My opinion is that BOTH Willis and Wade should have been removed from the case, but the case should have been allowed to be continued/picked up by someone else. Not sure how that would work if the DA was removed from the case but I'm sure there is a way.

Edit: I followed the case pretty closely and it is quite obvious that they both lied on the stand about when their relationship started. That alone should have them removed and charged. How can you have a lying DA prosecuting someone?
If both are removed, then it would be taken up by a completely different office. It’s quite likely that other offices would drop it, as it is a complete stretch of the law to bring charges. More likely, another office would significantly limit the scope or toss all together.

The fact that a DA can be so obviously corrupt and lie under oath without any actual ramifications is what we always see— the establishment gets a pass for egregious crimes, whereas the law is twisted in any way possible to go after anyone in trumps orbit.
post 1699239623 03-15-2024, 11:42 AM
-
#32
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By OrdoAbchao⏩
This seems like a decision that is a safe play for the judge. It shows a little that Willis and Wade fukced up, but it doesn't really do anything for Trumps side either.

“Reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety and the need to make proportional efforts to cure it,” McAfee wrote.

My opinion is that BOTH Willis and Wade should have been removed from the case, but the case should have been allowed to be continued/picked up by someone else. Not sure how that would work if the DA was removed from the case but I'm sure there is a way.

Edit: I followed the case pretty closely and it is quite obvious that they both lied on the stand about when their relationship started. That alone should have them removed and charged. How can you have a lying DA prosecuting someone?
Removal would have been more devastating to the case. They would have had to start from scratch again, and would have messed up the timing. All of the cases against Trump were deliberately timed to interfere in the election. Jack Smith even violated judicial rules specifically written to prevent election interference, but he did it anyway.

There are so many details in the laws and rules that have to be known, that a majority of people don’t understand why these cases are so filled with corruption and that they aren’t being stopped/shut down for it.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1699239823 03-15-2024, 11:46 AM
-
#33
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 30,900
  6. Rep Power: 79002
Meh, I think the final outcome will still be the same. Keeping her involved when it is so painfully obvious what's going on is a slap in the face to any sane individual observing it play out - and frankly she's demonstrated to be so retarded that having her in place is preferred if this charade has to happen at all

Judge is a little bitch for sure.
#FreeCryptoBandit
post 1699239893 03-15-2024, 11:48 AM
-
#34
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Chicago
  5. Posts: 7,003
  6. Rep Power: 19077
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
If both are removed, then it would be taken up by a completely different office. It’s quite likely that other offices would drop it, as it is a complete stretch of the law to bring charges. More likely, another office would significantly limit the scope or toss all together.
Which is fine. I would prefer to go that route and let another office decide whether to take the case up than have the case simply tossed like Trumps team I believe was arguing for.
What are you on about mate?
post 1699240013 03-15-2024, 11:50 AM
-
#35
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Chicago
  5. Posts: 7,003
  6. Rep Power: 19077
Originally Posted By wickedman⏩
Meh, I think the final outcome will still be the same. Keeping her involved when it is so painfully obvious what's going on is a slap in the face to any sane individual observing it play out - and frankly she's demonstrated to be so retarded that having her in place is preferred if this charade has to happen at all

Judge is a little bitch for sure.
To be honest it's probably a loss for Trump in the end. Everything we have heard about Wade is that he was unqualified and a terrible pick for the case. If the DA office can actually now find someone with experience it will probably be worse for Trump. That is a big IF though.
What are you on about mate?
post 1699240233 03-15-2024, 11:53 AM
-
#36
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  1. Retoaded
  2. He/Him
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 50,517
  5. Rep Power: 650393
guess she gonna remove him and start fukking someone else then
post 1699240533 03-15-2024, 11:58 AM
-
#37
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By OrdoAbchao⏩
Which is fine. I would prefer to go that route and let another office decide whether to take the case up than have the case simply tossed like Trumps team I believe was arguing for.
What legal argument do you have for this?
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1699240543 03-15-2024, 11:59 AM
-
#38
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By OrdoAbchao⏩
To be honest it's probably a loss for Trump in the end. Everything we have heard about Wade is that he was unqualified and a terrible pick for the case. If the DA office can actually now find someone with experience it will probably be worse for Trump. That is a big IF though.
People with RICO experience won’t waste their time on this nonsense trial unless there is serious political or financial gain.

Fani giving her boyfriend a small fortune, and then allowing him to take her on 4 trips in 6 months, was the motivation. Fani claims she has a bunch of cash lying around to pay him back… though we have zero evidence or paper trail of this cash on either end (coming from Fani or going to wade). And like I says before-/ even with this cash pile, she had a lien on her home she could t pay. Funny how that works.
post 1699240573 03-15-2024, 11:59 AM
-
#39
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
What legal argument do you have for this?
Read the thread.
post 1699241283 03-15-2024, 12:19 PM
-
#40
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  1. OrdoAbchao
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Chicago
  5. Posts: 7,003
  6. Rep Power: 19077
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
People with RICO experience won’t waste their time on this nonsense trial unless there is serious political or financial gain.

Fani giving her boyfriend a small fortune, and then allowing him to take her on 4 trips in 6 months, was the motivation. Fani claims she has a bunch of cash lying around to pay him back… though we have zero evidence or paper trail of this cash on either end (coming from Fani or going to wade). And like I says before-/ even with this cash pile, she had a lien on her home she could t pay. Funny how that works.
I'm not arguing with you about Fani. I believe she should be removed from the case as well and potentially charged with perjury along with Wade.
What are you on about mate?
post 1699241313 03-15-2024, 12:21 PM
-
#41
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
Read the thread.
Read the name of the poster I quoted.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1699241523 03-15-2024, 12:25 PM
-
#42
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,482
  6. Rep Power: 12818
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
She dated a lawyer.

Even though the lawyer didn’t have RICO experience, she hired him.

He gets paid at a higher rate than experts, with shady billing practices. Racks up like 700k.

He and Willis travel the world and he pays for it.

She claims she paid him back in cash, of which there is zero paper trail on either end. And despite this pool of cash, she had a lien on her place and clearly had no cash. They were financially motivated to bill as much as possible and the extend any trial because they were personally benfitting financially.

They never reported they were dating, an ethics violation.

Despite them saying they were dating prior, they had 12,000 texts and calls in the year prior to being hired by Willis.

There were multiple instances where he would call at midnight, drive to her place, leave at 4am and then text her when he got home. An obvious booty csll. He says he went out yo dinner… gtfo.

A friend of his knew all details about it and told everyone about it. They got to him before he got to the stand and suddenly he forgot all of it.

Fani and wade lied repeatedly under oath.

So people that lie under oath, fail to report ethics violations, and personally benefit financially from bringing the case are running the show.
Translation: she was objectively not on trial.

So what are your thoughts on the other questions I asked?

Would that be a bad reflection on her if she was charged with a felony?

Would you be less likely to trust her if she was charged with a felony?
No war but class war
post 1699242453 03-15-2024, 12:43 PM
-
#43
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
Translation: she was objectively not on trial.

So what are your thoughts on the other questions I asked?

Would that be a bad reflection on her if she was charged with a felony?

Would you be less likely to trust her if she was charged with a felony?
Even the appearance of impropriety is enough to remove her. The judge was a pussy, as this goes way beyond appearance.

Are you honestly asking is a prosecutor, who has multiple ethical violations and was willing to lie under oath, is a bad thing… I mean… yes?
post 1699242703 03-15-2024, 12:49 PM
-
#44
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 14,326
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 162174
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
PS: No impropriety found.
1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
post 1699242833 03-15-2024, 12:54 PM
-
#45
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
Lold at no impropriety found. People are on death row with less evidence against them.

Sure, this wasn’t a criminal trial, but her actions and conduct were definitely on trial, and she proved to be corrupt and a liar. Hard to take anything she says in court seriously given her conduct.
post 1699244143 03-15-2024, 01:25 PM
-
#46
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,707
  5. Rep Power: 568200
Mason jar.
post 1699244273 03-15-2024, 01:28 PM
-
#47
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 20,542
  6. Subscribers: 19
  7. Rep Power: 1101641
Nathan Wade resigns from Fanni Willis Team:


post 1699244423 03-15-2024, 01:32 PM
-
#48
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 40,580
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 405667
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Nathan Wade resigns from Fanni Willis Team:


Nathan Wade is a beta simp. The judge said either him or Fani had to go. I can’t think of anything more pathetic and humiliating than this dude voluntarily disgracing himself like this. A real man would’ve stood his ground and said bitch, you dragged my name through the mud, I’m not going anywhere. He should’ve refused to resign and forced Fani to face the consequences of her actions.

But then again, this cocksucker left his much hotter wife for an ugly slampig so he’s obviously a dumbass.
post 1699244453 03-15-2024, 01:33 PM
-
#49
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Let’s set the trial date before the election and convict the attempted election stealer now.

LFG
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1699244993 03-15-2024, 01:48 PM
-
#50
  1. DanteEdmond
  2. Registered User
  1. DanteEdmond
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 6,521
  6. Rep Power: 29635
Originally Posted By GuineaDago585⏩
Nathan Wade is a beta simp. The judge said either him or Fani had to go. I can’t think of anything more pathetic and humiliating than this dude voluntarily disgracing himself like this. A real man would’ve stood his ground and said bitch, you dragged my name through the mud, I’m not going anywhere. He should’ve refused to resign and forced Fani to face the consequences of her actions.

But then again, this cocksucker left his much hotter wife for an ugly slampig so he’s obviously a dumbass.
I think she could just fire him
post 1699245113 03-15-2024, 01:53 PM
-
#51
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 19,776
  5. Rep Power: 330918
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
Squanto is a deluded TDS loser, you're not going to convince him it can only be one way. Orange man bad.
Wort ew in th wold.
post 1699246263 03-15-2024, 02:15 PM
-
#52
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
Let’s set the trial date before the election and convict the attempted election stealer now.

LFG
Honest question/ did you watch any of the trial?
post 1699246603 03-15-2024, 02:21 PM
-
#53
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,482
  6. Rep Power: 12818
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
Would you say the walls are closing in on Fani?
No war but class war
post 1699248273 03-15-2024, 03:03 PM
-
#54
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 14,326
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 162174
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
Would you say the walls are closing in on Fani?
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
PS: No impropriety found.
1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
post 1699262563 03-15-2024, 09:31 PM
-
#55
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 32,467
  6. Rep Power: 539821
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
Let’s set the trial date before the election and convict the attempted election stealer now.

LFG
(D)umbass take as can be expected
post 1699270733 03-16-2024, 03:21 AM
-
#56
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
Honest question/ did you watch any of the trial?
No.

But I know it had zero to do with the evidence that will be presented against Trump. In fact it had nothing to do with Trump other than he's clearly quite scared of the outcome of the trial.

The DA having some kind of ethical issues matters not when it comes to the evidence they've gathered against him.

buriful.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1699270743 03-16-2024, 03:22 AM
-
#57
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩




1) Recuse yourself or fire your special prosecutor
2) No impropriety found

Choose one because there can't be both.
Let me help you out boyo. Ethics violations have ZERO to do with the evidence that will be presented that Trump tried to steal the election. If ethics mattered much in this world Trump wouldn't have been able to be president and almost ruin our country.

Duh.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1699283053 03-16-2024, 09:59 AM
-
#58
  1. bpatel82
  2. Fuk BLM
  1. bpatel82
  2. Fuk BLM
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Illinois, United States
  5. Posts: 5,243
  6. Rep Power: 40972
Master shiet poster in chief..

Michael Schumacher is GOAT
post 1699293483 03-16-2024, 03:05 PM
-
#59
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
No.

But I know it had zero to do with the evidence that will be presented against Trump. In fact it had nothing to do with Trump other than he's clearly quite scared of the outcome of the trial.

The DA having some kind of ethical issues matters not when it comes to the evidence they've gathered against him.

buriful.
So a DA, who is willing to lie under oath and has multiple ethics concerned, can be trusted to apply the law fairly when deciding which cases to pursue? interesting.

The law she is using against Trump and crew has never been applied in the way they are attempted. Aka standard lawfare. She hired her unqualified boyfriend and paid him $100 more per hour than true experts on the case. At times, he was billing 24 hours per day, while others on the case were billing in 15 minute increments. He pocketed over 720K. She approved of his billing and he took her all over the world on that $$$. She alleged that she paid him back in cash, but cannot show any proof that this cash ever existed. Neither could he. NO bank records, ATM records, etc.

They had a motivation to pursue the case because they made a ton of $$$ in keeping it going. And she proved here that she is willing to lie under oath and has zero ethical boundaries. Definitely someone that will uphold the law honestly...

But hey, clown world is fine as long as Trump is facing charges, amirite?
post 1699294963 03-16-2024, 03:50 PM
-
#60
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
So a DA, who is willing to lie under oath and has multiple ethics concerned, can be trusted to apply the law fairly when deciding which cases to pursue? interesting.

The law she is using against Trump and crew has never been applied in the way they are attempted. Aka standard lawfare. She hired her unqualified boyfriend and paid him $100 more per hour than true experts on the case. At times, he was billing 24 hours per day, while others on the case were billing in 15 minute increments. He pocketed over 720K. She approved of his billing and he took her all over the world on that $$$. She alleged that she paid him back in cash, but cannot show any proof that this cash ever existed. Neither could he. NO bank records, ATM records, etc.

They had a motivation to pursue the case because they made a ton of $$$ in keeping it going. And she proved here that she is willing to lie under oath and has zero ethical boundaries. Definitely someone that will uphold the law honestly...

But hey, clown world is fine as long as Trump is facing charges, amirite?
Not to mention the protests and campaign events she attended saying if you vote for, or support her, she will take down Trump. That should have been enough to dismiss. Goes to predjudice, which is a dismissal with no chance of reopening the case. This is why everyone on th left doesn’t want that to happen and we hear from MSM that that isn’t what “we want”.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts