Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» NYT: COVID Vaccine Side Effects: 4 Takeaways From Our Investigation
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 115
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1700713753 05-05-2024, 06:52 AM
-
#61
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By WCline
It's so insane. Like what is the alternative to science? There is none.
Grifters on social media who say the things we want to hear. Obv
post 1700717873 05-05-2024, 09:25 AM
-
#62
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Same place Wincel said everyone who gets covid gets 7x more severe myocarditis.

Maybe that was just a translation?

Maybe it was you just being a disingenuous liar?

He said people were x7 more likely to get myocarditis - when compared to rate of those getting it from the vaccine. So, if the chance of getting myocarditis from the vaccine is X%, covid itself is 7X% (and he's linked the study, I have not yet but will read it). My counter, at the time: I wanted to know those people getting myocarditis from covid, what group(s)? Was it everyone? A healthy 18 year old is as likely as a diabetic overweight 82 year old recovering from cancer and chemotherapy? I suspected that was not the case and that the group(s) were the same people that covid itself was threatening.

Now, I spelled it out nice and clear, please pretend you understood none of it and that I said something completely different and then argue against the strawman, maybe even fudge some numbers 'accidentally' to strengthen your position, while you plant your flag as the Champion of Science. You know, because science needs people to lie and use deception to defend it all of a sudden.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1700718213 05-05-2024, 09:33 AM
-
#63
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By WCline
Here JUSA, I googled the 7x thing.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...22.951314/full

This wasn't the only one. There have been several reviews comparing risk from the vaccine to risk from the viral infection (if vaccinated and then also if unvaccinated).

At this point, is it a huge deal for you to get your shot? Not really. You've already had covid multiple times, right? But it would have been wise to get one. It would be a slight benefit. You can ask your doctor about it if you have concerns.

I had my latest booster a few months ago along with another flu shot.
Thank you for finding the study.

This seems to be the relevant information (at least in terms of who was getting myocarditis). As to the results of the study, I trusted you from the start as, unlike some, I think you are genuine and honest, whether we see completely eye to eye or not.
Of patients who developed myocarditis after receiving the vaccine or having the infection, 61% (IQR: 39–87%) were men. Meta-regression analysis indicated that men and younger populations had a higher risk of myocarditis. A slow decline in the rates of myocarditis was observed as a function of time from vaccination.
And, it did not specify whether the group(s) getting myocarditis from vaccine or covid were the same or not. Men and *younger* people seem more at risk. From covid itself as well? If so, this would be a blow to my original theory, that I didn't need it. If it is the case that the people getting myocarditis _from covid_ was dramatically different than the ones dying and being hospitalized, then at that point -- if vaccination lessened those chances (which we don't know for certain) then it would be a benefit.

The question is: While we do know the vaccines can lessen symptoms, does that include myocarditis? Oddly, the groups getting it are also the ones who are not being hospitalized or dying for the most part, possibly -- if that is the case (which was not worded clearly in the results).

Anyway, food for though. I am not someone who "needs to be right". I am open-minded and while this did not conclusively prove my stance wrong, it did open that door and I am willing to listen to more on the subject.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1700718223 05-05-2024, 09:34 AM
-
#64
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By WCline
It's so insane. Like what is the alternative to science? There is none.
The same science that says if you're morbidly obese, with pre-existing conditions, and you got the original strain, that you might die, or suffer worse symptoms, vs someone who's fit and healthy?
post 1700718263 05-05-2024, 09:37 AM
-
#65
  1. Holyfenix
  2. Registered User
  1. Holyfenix
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 8,018
  7. Rep Power: 55892
Originally Posted By WCline
I have done this dance with you too many times. It's a waste to debate crackpots.
So stupid and a pussy. Typical
*Updated* If you can't hit a 320 yard drive, are you even a man?
post 1700718533 05-05-2024, 09:44 AM
-
#66
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
All science is fake!

Trust me, bro
Cool story..


Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2788346



post 1700718743 05-05-2024, 09:48 AM
-
#67
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By WCline
It's so insane. Like what is the alternative to science? There is none.
Science is ever changing, unfortunately for the three stooges, yourself, JLC, and Bodhy, you seem to always think it changes to fit the narrative of the MSM and pharmaceutical companies..that's not how science works. Science is not to be manipulated and falsified.

post 1700719643 05-05-2024, 10:06 AM
-
#68
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2024
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 837
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By JUSA
Thank you for finding the study.

This seems to be the relevant information (at least in terms of who was getting myocarditis). As to the results of the study, I trusted you from the start as, unlike some, I think you are genuine and honest, whether we see completely eye to eye or not.



And, it did not specify whether the group(s) getting myocarditis from vaccine or covid were the same or not. Men and *younger* people seem more at risk. From covid itself as well? If so, this would be a blow to my original theory, that I didn't need it. If it is the case that the people getting myocarditis _from covid_ was dramatically different than the ones dying and being hospitalized, then at that point -- if vaccination lessened those chances (which we don't know for certain) then it would be a benefit.

The question is: While we do know the vaccines can lessen symptoms, does that include myocarditis? Oddly, the groups getting it are also the ones who are not being hospitalized or dying for the most part, possibly -- if that is the case (which was not worded clearly in the results).

Anyway, food for though. I am not someone who "needs to be right". I am open-minded and while this did not conclusively prove my stance wrong, it did open that door and I am willing to listen to more on the subject.
It is different. Vaccine induced myocarditis is almost always mild and presents differently from the one caused by the virus. And I can find you that study later if you want, too. Yes, being vaccinated reduces your risk of viral symptoms, and that includes reducing the severity of the kind of myocarditis sometimes seen with a covid infection. These are all things your doctor could have told you, lol. That's why I keep telling people to ask their doctor.
post 1700719993 05-05-2024, 10:12 AM
-
#69
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  2. Join Date: Aug 2015
  3. Posts: 16,256
  4. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By WCline
It is different. Vaccine induced myocarditis is almost always mild and presents differently from the one caused by the virus. And I can find you that study later if you want, too. Yes, being vaccinated reduces your risk of viral symptoms, and that includes reducing the severity of the kind of myocarditis sometimes seen with a covid infection. These are all things your doctor could have told you, lol. That's why I keep telling people to ask their doctor.
Any update on why you decided to go against the recommendations of the experts at rhe CDC, and refused to get the first and second boosters?

That put your entire community at a greater risk.

Did you ask your doctor about the first and second boosters?

post 1700720043 05-05-2024, 10:14 AM
-
#70
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2024
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 837
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron
Any update on why you decided to go against the recommendations of the experts at rhe CDC, and refused to get the first and second boosters?

That put your entire community at a greater risk.

Did you ask your doctor about the first and second boosters?

Fuk off, creep.
post 1700720153 05-05-2024, 10:16 AM
-
#71
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  2. Join Date: Aug 2015
  3. Posts: 16,256
  4. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By WCline
Fuk off, creep.
Interesting how you still, up to this day, cannot honestly answer that question.

post 1700720233 05-05-2024, 10:17 AM
-
#72
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By WCline
It is different. Vaccine induced myocarditis is almost always mild and presents differently from the one caused by the virus. And I can find you that study later if you want, too. Yes, being vaccinated reduces your risk of viral symptoms, and that includes reducing the severity of the kind of myocarditis sometimes seen with a covid infection. These are all things your doctor could have told you, lol. That's why I keep telling people to ask their doctor.
False, mRNA vaccines result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation. study posted above. Happy to post more if you need.
post 1700721413 05-05-2024, 10:47 AM
-
#73
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By JUSA
Maybe it was you just being a disingenuous liar?

He said people were x7 more likely to get myocarditis - when compared to rate of those getting it from the vaccine. So, if the chance of getting myocarditis from the vaccine is X%, covid itself is 7X% (and he's linked the study, I have not yet but will read it). My counter, at the time: I wanted to know those people getting myocarditis from covid, what group(s)? Was it everyone? A healthy 18 year old is as likely as a diabetic overweight 82 year old recovering from cancer and chemotherapy? I suspected that was not the case and that the group(s) were the same people that covid itself was threatening.

Now, I spelled it out nice and clear, please pretend you understood none of it and that I said something completely different and then argue against the strawman, maybe even fudge some numbers 'accidentally' to strengthen your position, while you plant your flag as the Champion of Science. You know, because science needs people to lie and use deception to defend it all of a sudden.

Nope, he said viral myocarditis is typically more severe than vaccine myocarditis.

He stated a fact. You made stuff up
post 1700721543 05-05-2024, 10:49 AM
-
#74
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Cool story..


Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2788346



Yes, vaccines (many) come with risk of myocarditis. Risk of myocarditis with covid vaccines isn't higher than the myocarditis risk with other vaccines.
post 1700721673 05-05-2024, 10:51 AM
-
#75
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Yes, vaccines (many) come with risk of myocarditis. Risk of myocarditis with covid vaccines isn't higher than the myocarditis risk with other vaccines.
So, it's just this jab..(which is not a vaccine), that we have to worry about myocarditis. Well that's comforting.
post 1700722043 05-05-2024, 10:55 AM
-
#76
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
False, mRNA vaccines result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation. study posted above. Happy to post more if you need.
So what?
post 1700722173 05-05-2024, 10:57 AM
-
#77
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
So, it's just this jab..(which is not a vaccine), that we have to worry about myocarditis. Well that's comforting.
Nope.

Some have decided to focus exclusively on relative risk only related to covid vaccines while ignoring absolute risk and all other vaccines.
post 1700722263 05-05-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#78
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Nope.

Some have decided to focus exclusively on relative risk only related to covid vaccines while ignoring absolute risk and all other vaccines.
You are free to post the risks of all other vaccines if you like, this thread was addressing the Covid vaccine.

Would you like to start a new thread?
post 1700722473 05-05-2024, 11:03 AM
-
#79
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
You are free to post the risks of all other vaccines if you like, this thread was addressing the Covid vaccine.

Would you like to start a new thread?
Nope.

I've shared the data many times. Can't see you, or others, reading it or paying attention this time. It counters the narrative and confirmation bias
post 1700722483 05-05-2024, 11:03 AM
-
#80
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161

Doctors Ordered To Euthanize MILLIONS of Vaccinated Patients to Cover-Up 'Disturbing' Side Effects
https://rumble.com/v4t0725-doctors-o...ver-up-di.html
"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
post 1700722583 05-05-2024, 11:06 AM
-
#81
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By LizzieTish
Doctors Ordered To Euthanize MILLIONS of Vaccinated Patients to Cover-Up 'Disturbing' Side Effects
https://rumble.com/v4t0725-doctors-o...ver-up-di.html
If they're already dead or drying from vaccines, why would murder be required?
post 1700722773 05-05-2024, 11:10 AM
-
#82
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Nope.

I've shared the data many times. Can't see you, or others, reading it or paying attention this time. It counters the narrative and confirmation bias
You puppet the narrative and are the embodiment of confirmation bias..I don't think anyone is disputing that
post 1700722803 05-05-2024, 11:11 AM
-
#83
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2024
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 837
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
If they're already dead or drying from vaccines, why would murder be required?
LMAO excellent question.
post 1700722923 05-05-2024, 11:14 AM
-
#84
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
If they're already dead or drying from vaccines, why would murder be required?
Originally Posted By WCline
LMAO excellent question.
Gee..I'm guessing because it's expensive to keep someone on life support that is dying lol.

Are you both serious with that question. Just LMAO
post 1700723053 05-05-2024, 11:17 AM
-
#85
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  1. WCline
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2024
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 837
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Gee..I'm guessing because it's expensive to keep someone on life support that is dying lol.

Are you both serious with that question. Just LMAO
But wouldn't life support costs be paid by patients to the very evil drug and healthcare corporations, further enriching them? Your logic is weak.
post 1700723193 05-05-2024, 11:20 AM
-
#86
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
You puppet the narrative and are the embodiment of confirmation bias..I don't think anyone is disputing that
Okay
post 1700723293 05-05-2024, 11:22 AM
-
#87
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By WCline
But wouldn't life support costs be paid by patients to the very evil drug and healthcare corporations, further enriching them? Your logic is weak.
Can't sue the pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injury dum dum...but even if you do manage to get a case together, do you realize how costly that would be?

JUST LMAO..FFS urine idiot. Just go, you've proven time and time again you are a legit moron Wincel
post 1700723433 05-05-2024, 11:25 AM
-
#88
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Can't sue the pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injury dum dum...but even if you do manage to get a case together, do you realize how costly that would be?

JUST LMAO..FFS urine idiot. Just go, you've proven time and time again you are a legit moron Wincel
No need to sue. There are margins in provision of life support - greater margins than in murder.
post 1700723543 05-05-2024, 11:27 AM
-
#89
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
No need to sue. There are margins in provision of life support - greater margins than in murder.
Cost my family over $10k...we did not receive these "provisions"...I'm guessing millions don't see these so called provisions as well
post 1700723593 05-05-2024, 11:28 AM
-
#90
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
If they're already dead or drying from vaccines, why would murder be required?
So the burden of proof that this is happening is contingent upon how someone answers your question? What a retarded gaslighting attempt.

German MEP Christine Anderson (just another conspiracy theorist according to J.L.C., Wincel, and nutsy):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k4Mppb9mbbhu/
"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts