Thread: Just ordered this watch
07-21-2024, 08:59 AM
-
#31
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By BraddlesMcGee⏩
True. I can’t justify spending 10k on a watch until my net worth is at least a couple milI'd rather pay $200 for a $200 watch than $10,000.
6’0
180
07-21-2024, 09:03 AM
-
#32
07-21-2024, 09:08 AM
-
#33
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By Peacening⏩
Thanks brah, can’t wait till it gets hereNever heard of it but I have always liked dress watches srs classy as fuk cuz
6’0
180
07-21-2024, 09:35 AM
-
#34
07-21-2024, 09:58 AM
-
#35
Originally Posted By eatliftskate⏩
Nah you don't really need that much. It's not like you buy a 10k watch and then your money is gone. The money is in the watch. It may even gain value if you bought correctlyTrue. I can’t justify spending 10k on a watch until my net worth is at least a couple mil
07-21-2024, 10:19 AM
-
#36
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By MetroBrah⏩
Valid point. I would also be worried about damaging the watch and/or getting robbed. I assume most people probably have insurance on watches of that value, though.Nah you don't really need that much. It's not like you buy a 10k watch and then your money is gone. The money is in the watch. It may even gain value if you bought correctly
What kind of watches do you own, brah?
6’0
180
07-21-2024, 10:31 AM
-
#37
Originally Posted By eatliftskate⏩
I'm not a huge collector, but I've got the bond Seamaster and a Grand Seiko. Then a few other plastic Casios for the gym etcValid point. I would also be worried about damaging the watch and/or getting robbed. I assume most people probably have insurance on watches of that value, though.
What kind of watches do you own, brah?
What kind of watches do you own, brah?
07-21-2024, 10:41 AM
-
#38
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By monster0ultra⏩
Im pretty sure orient and some seikos punch above their weight for the valueNot hating but bad buy I think.
Firstly and most importantly, it's mechanical. You need to wear it every day or put it in a turner or it's going to stop running. For super high end watches, ok, maybe mechanical can be justified. But for cheaper watches, you're better off with quartz which will just run and you don't want to worry about it.
Secondly, if you're going to spend $200, I feel like you could have spent $50 or even $20 and no one would be able to tell the difference.
Thirdly, Brad still hasn't paid blue hawk his $200.
Firstly and most importantly, it's mechanical. You need to wear it every day or put it in a turner or it's going to stop running. For super high end watches, ok, maybe mechanical can be justified. But for cheaper watches, you're better off with quartz which will just run and you don't want to worry about it.
Secondly, if you're going to spend $200, I feel like you could have spent $50 or even $20 and no one would be able to tell the difference.
Thirdly, Brad still hasn't paid blue hawk his $200.
Either that or some other ones are egregiously expensive..
As far as functioning, i think theyre good watches.. they just dont have the social status of a rolex
Hell, most people probably wouldnt even know audemars piguet and patek phillipe are more expensive and higher status than rolex
Look at the audemar piguet royal oak and then casios version (which is actually tougher)
07-21-2024, 10:46 AM
-
#39
- imbeingcereal
- Registered User
-
- imbeingcereal
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2009
- Age: 36
- Posts: 3,914
- Rep Power: 26058
-
-
You do you, OP, but I never understood some dudes' fascination with watches. I work in finance and have been around too many hardos who think they're hot chit just because they own a Rolex that literally has 0 functionality beyond telling me its 945. They also spent multiple months of rent for said bragging rights...
07-21-2024, 10:54 AM
-
#40
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By monster0ultra⏩
I understand your point.. but everything were talking is probably "middle ground". Thats the ironyFor the quality, sure, punch above weight is probably true.
But it's 2024, there's no need for a watch to tell time. It's purely a jewelry/fashion item at this point. IMO, either spend as little as possible or go high end, the middle seems like a waste.
But it's 2024, there's no need for a watch to tell time. It's purely a jewelry/fashion item at this point. IMO, either spend as little as possible or go high end, the middle seems like a waste.
The extreme end is probably realllll extreme and i would think nobody would wear it as its multi-millions and wearing it would damage it
But peep the rolex submariner and then the seiko 5 submariner
And tell me which one youd rather wear regularly: one for 300 bucks or one for 12,000
They literally look exactly the same but you wouldnt have to worry about bumping into a corner with the 300 dollar one
07-21-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#41
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,371
- Rep Power: 47124
-
-
watches are easy to ScAmazon.
multi-trillion mc company can lick my un-wiped ass after 4 cheese gorditas
multi-trillion mc company can lick my un-wiped ass after 4 cheese gorditas
07-21-2024, 11:01 AM
-
#42
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,371
- Rep Power: 47124
-
-
Originally Posted By imbeingcereal⏩
yeah the watch market is weird. The entire fashion industry actually. Compare a watch that goes for half a million with a car that goes for half a million and explain to me where the engineering/r&d/materials justify the watch.You do you, OP, but I never understood some dudes' fascination with watches. I work in finance and have been around too many hardos who think they're hot chit just because they own a Rolex that literally has 0 functionality beyond telling me its 945. They also spent multiple months of rent for said bragging rights...
07-21-2024, 11:04 AM
-
#43
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By monster0ultra⏩
I see your point, but you could say that about pretty much anything. Why buy a bmw/mercedes when you could buy a Camry or a Lamborghini?For the quality, sure, punch above weight is probably true.
But it's 2024, there's no need for a watch to tell time. It's purely a jewelry/fashion item at this point. IMO, either spend as little as possible or go high end, the middle seems like a waste.
But it's 2024, there's no need for a watch to tell time. It's purely a jewelry/fashion item at this point. IMO, either spend as little as possible or go high end, the middle seems like a waste.
I’m not very knowledgeable about watches. However, this watch is highly recommended for the price point and I love how it looks, so I have no problem paying $200. I’ve never owned a mechanical watch before, but it’ll be nice not having to replace batteries.
6’0
180
07-21-2024, 11:13 AM
-
#44
07-21-2024, 11:25 AM
-
#45
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By Silence2⏩
What did your ex do for a living? He sounds like a mogger if he could afford a bunch of Rolexes and a daily Pepsi habitYah my ex had a bunch of Rolex and I had two ladies Rolex myself but seeing that watch makes me nauseous now it just looks tryhard to me. I have been around too many snobs or narcissists or sleazy sales guys or finance bros etc wearing Rolex it’s just a bad crowd no thx makes me cringe nowadays.
6’0
180
07-21-2024, 11:28 AM
-
#46
- OptimusTrajan
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Posts: 14,069
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 123510
-
-
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
Meh. I've got 6.5" wrists and a 44mm Sami looks fine. Wouldn't want to go any bigger though.Square watches do not size the same way as round ones.
A 45mm traditional watch is larger than anyone with less than a 8" wrist can really pull off.
A 45mm traditional watch is larger than anyone with less than a 8" wrist can really pull off.
07-21-2024, 11:46 AM
-
#47
- 1Yalething
- Registered User
-
- 1Yalething
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2024
- Posts: 1,199
- Rep Power: 4264
-
-

$750:

07-21-2024, 12:09 PM
-
#48
- imbeingcereal
- Registered User
-
- imbeingcereal
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2009
- Age: 36
- Posts: 3,914
- Rep Power: 26058
-
-
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
I get it to some extent in that it's one of the few pieces of "jewelry" that's acceptable for men to wear. I just don't get what incremental benefit you get from a Rolex or Omega that's $10-15K over a good-looking watch that looks dressy/classy but is, say, $500-$1000. The later is affordable for any bloke that's a middle manager in corporat eamerica and gives you the same function, minus the branding.yeah the watch market is weird. The entire fashion industry actually. Compare a watch that goes for half a million with a car that goes for half a million and explain to me where the engineering/r&d/materials justify the watch.
If a Rolex were $3K, then it at least makes sense in that a Gucci t-shirt will cost more than an H&M t-shirt despite more or less looking the same. The price differential here, even after adjusting for branding, makes absolutely ZERO sense though to me and that's where I never got it. A Rolex watch will tell me its 945 on July 21st just like a cheaper watch. This isn't a lamborghini vs 3 series where a Lambo is way more advanced and faster, so the price differential (while excessive) could be justified to enthusiasts...
07-21-2024, 01:03 PM
-
#49
07-21-2024, 01:07 PM
-
#50
07-22-2024, 09:25 PM
-
#51
- LinuxJon
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 49,073
- Rep Power: 325966
-
-
Originally Posted By MetroBrah⏩
Should I buy a $10k watch brah?Nah you don't really need that much. It's not like you buy a 10k watch and then your money is gone. The money is in the watch. It may even gain value if you bought correctly
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP
Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032
Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
07-22-2024, 09:28 PM
-
#52
- alphaalbertan8
- Registered User
-
- alphaalbertan8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,621
- Rep Power: 18207
-
-
should of went omega
07-22-2024, 10:07 PM
-
#53
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
Don’t you already have a few of them?Should I buy a $10k watch brah?
6’0
180
07-22-2024, 10:13 PM
-
#54
- Adam16121
- Registered User
-
- Adam16121
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2017
- Age: 41
- Posts: 20,009
- Rep Power: 314711
-
-
Originally Posted By Silence2⏩
His watch is a generally well known bang for buck watch. “Rolex” is just a company name, and the model, year, condition, etc., matter more than the name in most cases. This hits the area where uninformed people view branding as more important than the product. Plenty of Rolexes are crap investments, and some are no brainer great purchases at msrp. But, you know, you have to learn about the things you are buying to tell the difference.Yah my ex had a bunch of Rolex and I had two ladies Rolex myself but seeing that watch makes me nauseous now it just looks tryhard to me. I have been around too many snobs or narcissists or sleazy sales guys or finance bros etc wearing Rolex it’s just a bad crowd no thx makes me cringe nowadays.
07-22-2024, 10:14 PM
-
#55
- BullittEV
- Registered User
-
- BullittEV
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 27,652
- Rep Power: 261167
-
-
Originally Posted By eatliftskate⏩
Wouldnt buy anything I want of legit quality off Amazon, you never know if youre getting chit tier product- especially watchesGot it for $195 on amazon, it’s $280 on the brand website
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
07-23-2024, 07:12 AM
-
#56
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
-
- eatliftskate
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 10,879
- Rep Power: 116206
-
-
Originally Posted By BullittEV⏩
It was from the orient store on Amazon, so it’s definitely legitWouldnt buy anything I want of legit quality off Amazon, you never know if youre getting chit tier product- especially watches
But agreed if you’re getting it from a different seller
6’0
180
07-23-2024, 07:41 AM
-
#57
07-23-2024, 07:46 AM
-
#58
07-23-2024, 07:47 AM
-
#59
07-23-2024, 03:18 PM
-
#60
- OptimusTrajan
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Posts: 14,069
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 123510
-
-
Originally Posted By imbeingcereal⏩
A $20 timex will keep better time too. Automatics are less accurate than quartz.I get it to some extent in that it's one of the few pieces of "jewelry" that's acceptable for men to wear. I just don't get what incremental benefit you get from a Rolex or Omega that's $10-15K over a good-looking watch that looks dressy/classy but is, say, $500-$1000. The later is affordable for any bloke that's a middle manager in corporat eamerica and gives you the same function, minus the branding.
If a Rolex were $3K, then it at least makes sense in that a Gucci t-shirt will cost more than an H&M t-shirt despite more or less looking the same. The price differential here, even after adjusting for branding, makes absolutely ZERO sense though to me and that's where I never got it. A Rolex watch will tell me its 945 on July 21st just like a cheaper watch. This isn't a lamborghini vs 3 series where a Lambo is way more advanced and faster, so the price differential (while excessive) could be justified to enthusiasts...
If a Rolex were $3K, then it at least makes sense in that a Gucci t-shirt will cost more than an H&M t-shirt despite more or less looking the same. The price differential here, even after adjusting for branding, makes absolutely ZERO sense though to me and that's where I never got it. A Rolex watch will tell me its 945 on July 21st just like a cheaper watch. This isn't a lamborghini vs 3 series where a Lambo is way more advanced and faster, so the price differential (while excessive) could be justified to enthusiasts...
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts