Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Cheating ho wants to fukk - the final chapter
  1. Results 3421 to 3450 of 5354
  2. Page 115 of 179
  3. First
  5. 113
  6. 114
  7. 115
  8. 116
  9. 117
  11. Last

Thread: Cheating ho wants to fukk - the final chapter

post 665316441 04-17-2011, 03:04 PM
-
#3421
  1. MoneyIsLife
  2. Registered User
  1. MoneyIsLife
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 901
  6. Rep Power: 1136
Originally Posted By Minjin⏩
Number matches up via Google. Name matches up via Google.

Worst case scenario: he is a reporter who knows the chick in question, trolling for info to give to cops

Possible scenario: you are being trolled by someone who saw the "I contacted the Sun" post, you call number, guys says he never messaged you, you hang up, no harm

Likely scenario: he is who he says he is, give him story, no charges result, get a couple bucks

Best case scenario: he is who he says he is, give him story, get bucks, no charges, become famous, enjoy 15mins of fame around world
No, If he gets paid for it. She can sue him pretty bad
post 665316751 04-17-2011, 03:05 PM
-
#3422
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 15,231
  7. Rep Power: 38649
Originally Posted By godsangina2⏩
It's already established that what he did isn't against any law. Unless she scrapes enough money together to appeal all the way up to the Supreme court what could possibly happen to him?
OMG...do you think the UK doesn't have privacy laws?? It's not a third world country. No...it has NOT been established that this is legal. Where are you getting that from? Some douche posted a wiretap statute and I said it didn't apply.
post 665316841 04-17-2011, 03:05 PM
-
#3423
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Posts: 7,801
  5. Rep Power: 55112
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Ask about criminal liability issues. If it's just a civil matter, then it's no biggie, but I'd be very concerned if there was an avenue to press criminal charges here.

**** I wish I was studying English law. Surely there is a certified English lawyer in the misc?
You studying Scottish law? How different is it from English law?
post 665316881 04-17-2011, 03:05 PM
-
#3424
  1. QB_Killa
  2. Registered User
  1. QB_Killa
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 3,930
  6. Rep Power: 297
Originally Posted By csjesse⏩
fukin lol

So much win

-----------------------------------------
******Low Ridin' crew********
-----------------------------------------
post 665316931 04-17-2011, 03:05 PM
-
#3425
  1. tr1ppz
  2. Registered User
  1. tr1ppz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 1,390
  6. Rep Power: 457
YBD you should delete the thread at this point

anyone who's anyone on misc knows about it already and you have essentially earned reps for life (potentially the misc crown)

there is nothing to gain from keeping it up, everyone has had a laugh and you are at god like status

save your own ass
If they ever tell my story let them say that I walked with giants. Men rise and fall like the winter wheat, but these names will live forever. Let them say I lived in the time of Chestbrah, prince of the shredders. Let them say I lived in the time of Zyzz.

Studysounds.blogspot.com

i wil rape u back if i get a chance
post 665317201 04-17-2011, 03:05 PM
-
#3426
  1. cldfreak10
  2. The Credible Hulk
  1. cldfreak10
  2. The Credible Hulk
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 7,411
  6. Rep Power: 7749
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
Just had a very intense detailed discussion with the law prof hubby and the UK is going to be harder on this type of thing than the US.(we are more protective of what type of info can be disseminated) This potentially could get very bad for OP. I am NOT kidding. This coming from a lawyer from a top 20 law school and a prof at a first tier law school.
Well, then for Dave's sake, let's hope something doesn't become of this.

What school does your husband teach at?
RMFTOTA! Living in a Saban nation!!

"Until you're deadlifting twice your bodyweight for reps, can squat four wheels, and bench more than 300 pounds, don't worry about making your biceps pop. If you accomplish these goals and want to keep progressing and growing, train to deadlift three times your bodyweight, squat five wheels, and bench 350 pounds." - Slay The Dragon

Snapchat Crew: cldfreak10
Manual Trans Crew
Retired Miscer Crew
Dirty South Crew/DSC
post 665317341 04-17-2011, 03:06 PM
-
#3427
  1. ZachSmash
  2. BOZZ is a phaggot
  1. ZachSmash
  2. BOZZ is a phaggot
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: simi valley, SoCal, Christmas Island
  5. Posts: 15,964
  6. Rep Power: 41957
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Ask about criminal liability issues. If it's just a civil matter, then it's no biggie, but I'd be very concerned if there was an avenue to press criminal charges here.

**** I wish I was studying English law. Surely there is a certified English lawyer in the misc?
sup, im here. you got questions?



ZachSmash is a *******
post 665317621 04-17-2011, 03:06 PM
-
#3428
  1. burnedfish
  2. I have to souls
  1. burnedfish
  2. I have to souls
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 2,837
  6. Rep Power: 4447
lmao @ people even considering him in any kind of legal trouble. Amazing how paranoia spreads.

While I would have gone about the situation differently due to personal moral issues, the outcome is favorable that the fiance is aware and can move on.
[Official] San Diego Brah

Ducks eat for free at Subway
post 665317931 04-17-2011, 03:07 PM
-
#3429
  1. WheytWut92
  2. IFBB Brofessional
  1. WheytWut92
  2. IFBB Brofessional
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 8,514
  6. Rep Power: 2331
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
Just had a very intense detailed discussion with the law prof hubby and the UK is going to be harder on this type of thing than the US.(we are more protective of what type of info can be disseminated) This potentially could get very bad for OP. I am NOT kidding. This coming from a lawyer from a top 20 law school and a prof at a first tier law school.
Shush bro, you're ruining the thread.
post 665318011 04-17-2011, 03:07 PM
-
#3430
  1. YL_LDN
  2. Banned
  1. YL_LDN
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,710
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Ask about criminal liability issues. If it's just a civil matter, then it's no biggie, but I'd be very concerned if there was an avenue to press criminal charges here.

**** I wish I was studying English law. Surely there is a certified English lawyer in the misc?
I study English Law at a top 5 uni here in first year. From what i know, this is a civil matter, in this case it is very unlikely that she will even have the resources to mount a legal challenge, fairly impossible i'd say.

Regarding article 8, the hra is only applicable (i am quite sure) when it is a public body infringing an individuals rights.
post 665318461 04-17-2011, 03:08 PM
-
#3431
  1. godsangina2
  2. ♫ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
  1. godsangina2
  2. ♫ ♪ ♫ ♫ ♪
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 19,131
  5. Rep Power: 6014
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
OMG...do you think the UK doesn't have privacy laws?? It's not a third world country. No...it has NOT been established that this is legal. Where are you getting that from? Some douche posted a wiretap statute and I said it didn't apply.
Someone posted the statute, which said you can't tape some while having sex with them without their consentfor sexual gratification.

He didn't tape it for sexual gratification. So..?
RIP mainsqueeze530
"Rustle your opponents jimmies from afar." - Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Mods - I don't have multiple accounts, asked for old accounts be banned, never had two open at one time.
Misc - you don't have to rep me back lol, in return no rep begging pls tx
post 665318771 04-17-2011, 03:09 PM
-
#3432
  1. ubermario
  2. ♥ ♦ ♠ ♣
  1. ubermario
  2. ♥ ♦ ♠ ♣
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: Antarctica
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 5,840
  7. Rep Power: 3940
Time to cover up some tracks dave
Once again the gods spread the cheeks to ram cock in fuking ass!
post 665318781 04-17-2011, 03:09 PM
-
#3433
  1. Kadafi25
  2. Drakebrah
  1. Kadafi25
  2. Drakebrah
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 9,892
  6. Rep Power: 1876
Originally Posted By abdus⏩
You studying Scottish law? How different is it from English law?
Completely different.

EDIT: to the guy suggesting "paranoia", I'm sure you'd be a little nervous if you were in OP's shoes right now. Nobody wants to see this come back to bite YBD hard and YBD himself just asked for legal input. We're just concerned for a quality miscer.
Misc Number 1. Boxing Analyst and Pundit

P4P Misc Boxer of the Year

Catford Crew

Palmarium shat it Crew

Misc Undisputed Chess Champion
post 665319161 04-17-2011, 03:09 PM
-
#3434
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Posts: 7,801
  5. Rep Power: 55112
Originally Posted By burnedfish⏩
lmao @ people even considering him in any kind of legal trouble. Amazing how paranoia spreads.

While I would have gone about the situation differently due to personal moral issues, the outcome is favorable that the fiance is aware and can move on.
And how do you think he might not get into legal trouble?

Do you know who is viewing this thread? And how far has it spread on the web?

Anybody can see it and when I say anybody, that includes the 'bitch' and her family who might support her.

There has been snitches in the past on the misc and it's better to cover his back than it being too late.
post 665319291 04-17-2011, 03:10 PM
-
#3435
  1. je1ani
  2. Banned
  1. je1ani
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Location: San Francisco, California, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 1,034
  7. Rep Power: 0
Dave did the right thing. I wouldn't want to wife up a slut.
post 665319331 04-17-2011, 03:10 PM
-
#3436
  1. david2283
  2. Registered User
  1. david2283
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 520
  5. Rep Power: 208
How did the ho know ybd was gonna expose her for cheating and try to beat Dave to the punch and start lying her way out of it before Dave sent the intel
post 665319351 04-17-2011, 03:10 PM
-
#3437
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 15,231
  7. Rep Power: 38649
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Ask about criminal liability issues. If it's just a civil matter, then it's no biggie, but I'd be very concerned if there was an avenue to press criminal charges here.

**** I wish I was studying English law. Surely there is a certified English lawyer in the misc?
American law is BASED on British law you guys. We are MORE protective of speech. England is LESS protective. It is WAY more likely that disseminating a video of a private act is actionable both criminally and civilly.
post 665319491 04-17-2011, 03:10 PM
-
#3438
  1. Strongbulk
  2. Registered User
  1. Strongbulk
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 318
  6. Rep Power: 310
GTFO here RHL you drama queen. No legal action will be taken you dumb phuck, it's not a soap opera.

Dave just don't show her this thread and you're golden. If i was you i'd end this here though.
post 665319651 04-17-2011, 03:10 PM
-
#3439
  1. Kadafi25
  2. Drakebrah
  1. Kadafi25
  2. Drakebrah
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 9,892
  6. Rep Power: 1876
Originally Posted By YL_LDN⏩
I study English Law at a top 5 uni here in first year. From what i know, this is a civil matter, in this case it is very unlikely that she will even have the resources to mount a legal challenge, fairly impossible i'd say.

Regarding article 8, the hra is only applicable (i am quite sure) when it is a public body infringing an individuals rights.
Would the misc not constitute a "public body"?
Misc Number 1. Boxing Analyst and Pundit

P4P Misc Boxer of the Year

Catford Crew

Palmarium shat it Crew

Misc Undisputed Chess Champion
post 665320071 04-17-2011, 03:11 PM
-
#3440
  1. Train_Harder
  2. Registered User
  1. Train_Harder
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 4,698
  5. Rep Power: 11361
Anyone else willing to pitch in for YBD's legal fund if it comes to that? Just to squash her with the best lawyers England can provide?
post 665320081 04-17-2011, 03:11 PM
-
#3441
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  1. redheadlaw7
  2. Dirty bulker.
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 15,231
  7. Rep Power: 38649
Originally Posted By cldfreak10⏩
Well, then for Dave's sake, let's hope something doesn't become of this.

What school does your husband teach at?
He teaches at Case but is also editor of the National Review and a Volokh Conspirator among other things. He's got a 14 page resume. I think he knows what he's talking about. He's a Con Law prof for God's sake.
post 665320271 04-17-2011, 03:12 PM
-
#3442
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  1. abdus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Posts: 7,801
  5. Rep Power: 55112
Originally Posted By YL_LDN⏩
I study English Law at a top 5 uni here in first year. From what i know, this is a civil matter, in this case it is very unlikely that she will even have the resources to mount a legal challenge, fairly impossible i'd say.

Regarding article 8, the hra is only applicable (i am quite sure) when it is a public body infringing an individuals rights.
What Uni you studying at?
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Completely different.
Ah ok. All the best mate. (same for YL_LDN)
post 665320281 04-17-2011, 03:12 PM
-
#3443
  1. RocketsFan
  2. wsup brahs!
  1. RocketsFan
  2. wsup brahs!
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 662
  6. Rep Power: 0
yeah, i agreed with everybody that said you should delete this thread asap OP.

**** is getting too real!


R.E.A.L. O.VE.R.L.O.A.D!!!
post 665320421 04-17-2011, 03:12 PM
-
#3444
  1. ProjectPatuhhh
  2. ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
  1. ProjectPatuhhh
  2. ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 2,286
  6. Rep Power: 5383
rhl you dont know what the phuck youre talking about
post 665321021 04-17-2011, 03:13 PM
-
#3445
  1. LzLz
  2. Registered User
  1. LzLz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 360
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
American law is BASED on British law you guys. We are MORE protective of speech. England is LESS protective. It is WAY more likely that disseminating a video of a private act is actionable both criminally and civilly.
This guys frauding


















(not srs) she makes a good point.
post 665321451 04-17-2011, 03:14 PM
-
#3446
  1. Archanic
  2. Registered User
  1. Archanic
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 6,302
  6. Rep Power: 6191
inb4 thread delete as we learn of possible criminal implications 100% speculation

thread has been legendary, YBD is a living misc legend no matter what.
post 665321511 04-17-2011, 03:14 PM
-
#3447
  1. Neto472_old
  2. Registered User
  1. Neto472_old
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Brazil
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 7,684
  7. Rep Power: 4894
Originally Posted By godsangina2⏩
Someone posted the statute, which said you can't tape some while having sex with them without their consentfor sexual gratification.

He didn't tape it for sexual gratification. So..?
lol you can't honestly think it's legal to video tape you ****ing someone without them being aware/their consent AND releasing it on the internet
it was done in a private place as well

i doubt this will result in any legal trouble though, she sounds dumb
brazilian crew [̲̅<̲̅Θ̲̅>̲̅|

A man chooses, a slave obeys
post 665321721 04-17-2011, 03:14 PM
-
#3448
  1. Mark142
  2. Registered User
  1. Mark142
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2002
  4. Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  5. Posts: 1,623
  6. Rep Power: 933
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Would the misc not constitute a "public body"?
Are you actually in law school? If so which one.

Cause the fact that you are asking that questions either means that you are lying about your law credentials or you are attending the worst school on the planet.
You don't understand, I have e-surance
post 665321801 04-17-2011, 03:14 PM
-
#3449
  1. Strongbulk
  2. Registered User
  1. Strongbulk
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 318
  6. Rep Power: 310
This is ridiculous.

Im outta here. ****ing *******s why are you even listening to that dumb bish, we don't have the suing culture that America does.
post 665321881 04-17-2011, 03:14 PM
-
#3450
  1. YL_LDN
  2. Banned
  1. YL_LDN
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,710
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Kadafi25⏩
Would the misc not constitute a "public body"?
No. Because it needs the government to designate it state functions. The only way in which it could be a public body is if its a hybrid public body (a private body performing both private and state functions), whereby the government contracts it jobs the state is meant to provide (e.g. contracting out private nursing homes for state programme use).
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts