Forum
»
Cheating ho wants to fukk - the final chapter
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3781
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3782
- RWC5113
- Registered User
-
- RWC5113
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,623
- Rep Power: 5528
-
-
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
So whose kid is it you ugly ogre?That's frikkin copyright law and in someone's home is NOT public. WTH are you talking about?? Why do all of you non lawyers keep telling the lawyers they're idiots? I just got off the phone with my BF who is also a lawyer and he laughed his ass off at people thinking there is no case against YBD. This whole thing is getting fukking ridiculous.
Isn't it time for a sonogram?
ALPHA MANLET CREW ~AMC~
*Deadlift Junkies*
-Dallas Cowboys-
-Penn State '13-
Reps for life: Suit. 1k+
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3783
Originally Posted By doufer⏩
Keep the info you have to yourself brah, if people are trying to get the info off of you then name and shame them in this thread. You should delete your posts though that had dave's info in it!stop PMing me for her FB link.. like i said i m not going to ruin this thread!!
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3784
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
be careful, your boyfriend may pull a Dave on youThat's frikkin copyright law and in someone's home is NOT public. WTH are you talking about?? Why do all of you non lawyers keep telling the lawyers they're idiots? I just got off the phone with my BF who is also a lawyer and he laughed his ass off at people thinking there is no case against YBD. This whole thing is getting fukking ridiculous.
tsk tsk cheating...
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3785
- irishpie
- Registered User
-
- irishpie
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Derry, Ireland
- Age: 42
- Posts: 4,383
- Rep Power: 7418
-
-
Originally Posted By FS2⏩
Was about to post thisneil.millard@the-sun.co.uk< NOTHING FOUND ON PIPL WHICH IS THE SITE TO FIND PEOPLE.
NEIL MILLARD ALTHOUGH DOES WORK FOR THE SUN.
DAVE PLEASE PLEASE DON'T SEND THIS TO THE SUN YOU'RE FROM LIVERPOOL THINK ABOUT THE HILLSBOROUGH DISASTER WHERE THE SUN LIED ABOUT THE 96 WHO DIED.
THINK ABOUT IT
NEIL MILLARD ALTHOUGH DOES WORK FOR THE SUN.
DAVE PLEASE PLEASE DON'T SEND THIS TO THE SUN YOU'RE FROM LIVERPOOL THINK ABOUT THE HILLSBOROUGH DISASTER WHERE THE SUN LIED ABOUT THE 96 WHO DIED.
THINK ABOUT IT
Former 500lber
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3786
- Mattiwatti
- Platinum Member
-
- Mattiwatti
- Platinum Member
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Age: 37
- Posts: 422
- Rep Power: 279
-
-
Originally Posted By doufer⏩
Each one of your dumbfukc posts increases the chance that this thead will be prematurely deleted.stop PMing me for her FB link.. like i said i m not going to ruin this thread!!
Go play in traffic.
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3787
- ziggaman91
- Registered User
-
- ziggaman91
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,739
- Rep Power: 5897
-
-
Even if this did go to the media you'd be in too deep. You could get into a lot of **** legally not to mention what it would do to the fiance who's done nothing bad to you.
Now i respect you even more brah, **** the s*n. JTF96 YNWA.
Originally Posted By Ya
I almost lost alot of respect for you because i thought you were gonna deal with the s*n.I wouldn't sell the story to the paper anyway. They would require personal info regarding all parties involved. I'm not willing to disclose this info for a few hundred . Also if the paper "The Sun" is legit in wanting to cover this....They ran a story a long time ago (1988) regarding a football (soccer for you US folk) disaster at a stadium caled Hillsborough (wiki or google "Hillsborough disaster") were a lot of Liverpool supporters (L'pool is my hometown) died. They made false claims about the people of Liverpool, they were stealing from the pockets of dead people/urinating on corpses etc. I would never deal with them. Nobody in Liverpool buys the Sun newspaper in protest of this. Even 20+ years later.
Now i respect you even more brah, **** the s*n. JTF96 YNWA.
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3788
- LovePollution
- ████████████████
-
- LovePollution
- ████████████████
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Location: London, England, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 23
- Posts: 10,697
- Rep Power: 21332
-
-
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
Nice save, lolzBest friend. BF+best friend.
How dare you!
Don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat around the corner.
LTC
04-17-2011, 04:31 PM
-
#3789
04-17-2011, 04:32 PM
-
#3790
- Handcannon7
- Banned
-
- Handcannon7
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Age: 33
- Posts: 4,894
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
YBD is one of the most legendary miscers ever, I hope im in the UK sometime soon to buy that fukker a drink.
04-17-2011, 04:32 PM
-
#3791
- BaguetteFO
- Banned
-
- BaguetteFO
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Age: 38
- Posts: 313
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
We miscers aren't scared of 'le law'.
04-17-2011, 04:32 PM
-
#3792
04-17-2011, 04:33 PM
-
#3793
- ira_est_a_donum
- Registered User
-
- ira_est_a_donum
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Posts: 5,093
- Rep Power: 3605
-
-
cliffs past the point of YBD re sent the correct video and is awaiting response from fiance via email??? any updates... pls
04-17-2011, 04:33 PM
-
#3794
04-17-2011, 04:34 PM
-
#3795
- Train_Harder
- Registered User
-
- Train_Harder
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 4,698
- Rep Power: 11361
-
-
Originally Posted By sonicares⏩
I've probably been to more countries than you have (srs).actually, we don't outside of some big airports. Give it up dude... bet u r one of the 80% of americans who don't have a passport. LMAO
And I have used Euros at Heathrow and downtown before. It's a place I used to stop at before going to interesting countries like Italy, Spain, Germany, or Holland.
04-17-2011, 04:35 PM
-
#3796
- Mattiwatti
- Platinum Member
-
- Mattiwatti
- Platinum Member
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Age: 37
- Posts: 422
- Rep Power: 279
-
-
Originally Posted By AJamesE⏩
Don't worry about it brah. Think of it this way, any random post in this topic will probably be read by more people than a 3 page topic full of naked women.Sh!t, was saving my 1000th post to contribute wimminz ot the misc... i have failed.
04-17-2011, 04:35 PM
-
#3797
- lunchbox12
- Registered User
-
- lunchbox12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Age: 38
- Posts: 9,129
- Rep Power: 3905
-
-
cliffs are on every page.
quit asking for them you *******s
quit asking for them you *******s
Ron Paul 2016
04-17-2011, 04:35 PM
-
#3798
04-17-2011, 04:37 PM
-
#3799
- envio
- Registered User
-
- envio
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 37
- Posts: 156
- Rep Power: 214
-
-
ok, this is 100% illegal and i can reference both statute and case law
data protection act s36 - recording in your own home without consent is legalonly for the purposes of that individuals personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes)
extract from an article on a case (full article below, important parts bold)
exemption in section 36 that applies when recordings like this are used for domestic purposes. This exemption excludes all of the data protection principles and rights, and applies, for example, when parents take their video cameras to record their children's performance in a school play.
But, he said, as soon as the recording was published online it is ineligible for the "'domestic purposes" exemption because of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in a case involving Mrs Bodil Lindqvist in Sweden.
The ECJ stated: "That [domestic purpose] exception must therefore be interpreted as relating only to activities which are carried out in the course of private or family life of individuals, which is clearly not the case with the processing of personal data consisting in publication on the internet so that those data are made accessible to an indefinite number of people."
data protection act s36 - recording in your own home without consent is legalonly for the purposes of that individuals personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes)
extract from an article on a case (full article below, important parts bold)
exemption in section 36 that applies when recordings like this are used for domestic purposes. This exemption excludes all of the data protection principles and rights, and applies, for example, when parents take their video cameras to record their children's performance in a school play.
But, he said, as soon as the recording was published online it is ineligible for the "'domestic purposes" exemption because of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in a case involving Mrs Bodil Lindqvist in Sweden.
The ECJ stated: "That [domestic purpose] exception must therefore be interpreted as relating only to activities which are carried out in the course of private or family life of individuals, which is clearly not the case with the processing of personal data consisting in publication on the internet so that those data are made accessible to an indefinite number of people."
The woman at the centre of a battle with social services over the future of her unborn baby willnot be able to claim an exemption from the Data Protection Act, a legal expert has warned.
Vanessa Brookes of Leamington Spa was recently told by a social worker that the local authority would apply for an interim court order to take her baby from her and place it with foster parents on birth.
Worried about the outcome of the meeting,Brookes secretly tape recorded it and published the recording on video sharing website YouTube.[The clip has now been removed for violating YouTube's terms of use.]
Local authority Calderdale Council has objected to that publication and has said it will take legal action to have it taken down because, it says, it breaches the Data Protection Act (DPA).
"The Council believes that the YouTube recording breaches the Data Protection Act, since the recording was made without the knowledge or consent of our member of staff," said a statement from Calderdale Council."We have concerns that, because the case involves court proceedings, it could prejudice child protection and safeguarding outcomes."
Dr Chris Pounder, a data protection specialist at Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind OUT-LAW.COM, said that the [DPA has anexemption in section 36 that applies when recordings like this are used for domestic purposes. This exemption excludes all of the data protection principles and rights, and applies, for example, when parents take their video cameras to record their children's performance in a school play.
But, he said, as soon as the recording was published online it is ineligible for the "'domestic purposes" exemption because of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in a case involving Mrs Bodil Lindqvist in Sweden.
Lindqvist was a church activist who published personal details of parishioners on a website as part of a computing project. She said publishing details should not breach the EU's Data Protection Directive, but the ECJ disagreed.
The ECJ stated: "That [domestic purpose] exception must therefore be interpreted as relating only to activities which are carried out in the course of private or family life of individuals, which is clearly not the case with the processing of personal data consisting in publication on the internet so that those data are made accessible to an indefinite number of people."
The Lindqvist judgment means that Vanessa Brookes loses the section 36 exemption and the personal data is fully subject to the DPA and the enforcement powers of the Information Commissioner, said Pounder.
He added: "The exemption is also lost, even if I put up online information about myself. However, in this case, there are very few data protection obligations as there is my consent. The problems arise when I put someone else's personal data on these web-sites in the absence of consent" he said.
Vanessa Brookes of Leamington Spa was recently told by a social worker that the local authority would apply for an interim court order to take her baby from her and place it with foster parents on birth.
Worried about the outcome of the meeting,Brookes secretly tape recorded it and published the recording on video sharing website YouTube.[The clip has now been removed for violating YouTube's terms of use.]
Local authority Calderdale Council has objected to that publication and has said it will take legal action to have it taken down because, it says, it breaches the Data Protection Act (DPA).
"The Council believes that the YouTube recording breaches the Data Protection Act, since the recording was made without the knowledge or consent of our member of staff," said a statement from Calderdale Council."We have concerns that, because the case involves court proceedings, it could prejudice child protection and safeguarding outcomes."
Dr Chris Pounder, a data protection specialist at Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind OUT-LAW.COM, said that the [DPA has anexemption in section 36 that applies when recordings like this are used for domestic purposes. This exemption excludes all of the data protection principles and rights, and applies, for example, when parents take their video cameras to record their children's performance in a school play.
But, he said, as soon as the recording was published online it is ineligible for the "'domestic purposes" exemption because of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in a case involving Mrs Bodil Lindqvist in Sweden.
Lindqvist was a church activist who published personal details of parishioners on a website as part of a computing project. She said publishing details should not breach the EU's Data Protection Directive, but the ECJ disagreed.
The ECJ stated: "That [domestic purpose] exception must therefore be interpreted as relating only to activities which are carried out in the course of private or family life of individuals, which is clearly not the case with the processing of personal data consisting in publication on the internet so that those data are made accessible to an indefinite number of people."
The Lindqvist judgment means that Vanessa Brookes loses the section 36 exemption and the personal data is fully subject to the DPA and the enforcement powers of the Information Commissioner, said Pounder.
He added: "The exemption is also lost, even if I put up online information about myself. However, in this case, there are very few data protection obligations as there is my consent. The problems arise when I put someone else's personal data on these web-sites in the absence of consent" he said.
04-17-2011, 04:38 PM
-
#3800
- ne12o
- Banned
-
- ne12o
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
- Age: 26
- Posts: 15,525
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By cldfreak10⏩
I'm not talking about the law. I'm talking about procedure, and the politics behind the legal world. And I can guarantee you it's damn close to the same.
Btw, strong spelling skills.
Btw, strong spelling skills.

04-17-2011, 04:38 PM
-
#3801
- gladstoned
- Registered User
-
- gladstoned
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 453
- Rep Power: 308
-
-
If not The Sun, I'm sure the Daily Mail would eat this up
I know, right?
04-17-2011, 04:38 PM
-
#3802
04-17-2011, 04:38 PM
-
#3803
- BeReal23
- Registered User
-
- BeReal23
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 17,682
- Rep Power: 24700
-
-
Originally Posted By redheadlaw7⏩
What about the death threats from her? Wouldn't that potential case against her be enough for her to leave this alone?he laughed his ass off at people thinking there is no case against YBD. This whole thing is getting fukking ridiculous.
04-17-2011, 04:39 PM
-
#3804
- cantwait2lift
- thegoodthebadtherustled
-
- cantwait2lift
- thegoodthebadtherustled
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Canada
- Age: 37
- Posts: 3,074
- Rep Power: 12642
-
-
-engineering brah-
***Canadian Crew***
Bench 330
Squat 460
Deadlift 625
04-17-2011, 04:39 PM
-
#3805
- sonicares
- Registered User
-
- sonicares
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Age: 42
- Posts: 247
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Train_Harder⏩
really doubt it brah..I have lived in 3 different countries for more than 5 years each growing up(dad's job) among countless holidays. Speak 3 languages fluently so GTFOI've probably been to more countries than you have (srs).
And I have used Euros at Heathrow and downtown before. It's a place I used to stop at before going to interesting countries like Italy, Spain, Germany, or Holland.
And I have used Euros at Heathrow and downtown before. It's a place I used to stop at before going to interesting countries like Italy, Spain, Germany, or Holland.
I am gonna ignore your "more interesting countries" cheeky dig and move on swiftly.
04-17-2011, 04:40 PM
-
#3806
- muscleholic
- Banned
-
- muscleholic
- Banned
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Age: 38
- Posts: 6,775
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
what gives
04-17-2011, 04:41 PM
-
#3807
- Fastforward7
- Registered User
-
- Fastforward7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Age: 45
- Posts: 7,773
- Rep Power: 4283
-
-
[QUOTE=der8auer post_id=665365981][IMG]http://i55.tinypic.com/a08nl0.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]That your work brah? If so you just joined my reps for life list.
2k+
Running permaban bet with papishasho:
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=125913233
Reps for life: franchise16, savagery, der8auer
*Knee Draggers Crew*
93 GSX1100G
02 VTR1000F
04-17-2011, 04:42 PM
-
#3808
- dhfootball92
- Registered User
-
- dhfootball92
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Age: 35
- Posts: 983
- Rep Power: 351
-
-
04-17-2011, 04:42 PM
-
#3809
- D3th 2 Aw3
- Vicious Traditions
-
- D3th 2 Aw3
- Vicious Traditions
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 5,212
- Rep Power: 6646
-
-
Wow this thread has more then doubled over night. This is fukking epic lol.
It's consistency. It's like building a house. Everyday I'm putting a brick on my wall.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts


