This perspective is based on several arguments:

Contradictions with previous revelations: Critics argue that Muhammad denied core Christian doctrines such as the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the crucifixion, and salvation by grace, which they see as incompatible with true prophethood as defined in the Bible (Deuteronomy 18:20–22).

Alleged false prophecies: Some point to Surah Al-Rum (30:2–4), which predicts a Roman victory over Persia within "a few years." Historical records indicate the victory occurred 13–16 years later, well beyond the timeframe implied by the Arabic term bidh'un (a few years), leading critics to argue this is a failed prophecy.

Physical and psychological experiences: Critics cite hadiths describing Muhammad’s revelations as resembling the sound of a bell (Sahih al-Bukhari 3215), convulsions, foaming at the mouth, and fear of being possessed, suggesting demonic influence rather than divine inspiration. These accounts are interpreted by some as signs of mental or spiritual disturbance.

Moral and ethical concerns: The marriage to Aisha at age six and consummation at nine (Sahih al-Bukhari 58:234–236), along with multiple wives, including the wife of his adopted son, are cited as evidence of personal indulgence inconsistent with a true prophet.

Death and divine protection: The claim that Muhammad died from poisoning (Sahih al-Bukhari 2617, 4428) and reportedly said, "I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison," is interpreted by critics as fulfilling Qur'an 69:44–46, which states that if a prophet fabricated revelation, Allah would cut his aorta—thus proving he was a false prophet.

Yes

Also arguing with Muslims about textual criticism is like arguing with a child. "the book says it has never been altered and has been passed down from God letter by letter, so that's what makes it superior to the Bible"


Mmmmmkey

Yeah most muslims are inbred, with IQ in the 70s-80s. They will believe anything, no matter how fucking retarded it sounds

And they lack the self awareness to be ashamed for their retarded takes

Is this actually true?

Doesn't the whole pedophile bisexual warlord thing already speak for itself? Why would you even need to argue about him?

when was the last time you boldly and publicly announced the fact Muhamed is a false prophet, and Islam is a false religion?


My guess is never

If I hit a squirel or opossum I feel bad. I ran over a coyote and was upset about it for about a week. However, I could kill every one of the people in this video, even the kids, and never feel an ounce of remorse. They are not humans like we are, although they have similar features such as being bi-pedal primate based, they do not have the same brain, nor are they really animals because animals have more sense and reasoning and do not harm out of hate.

I doubt that, you are romanticizing yourself