Forum
»
Caught a slight of hand
- Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread: Caught a slight of hand
04-01-2026, 06:34 PM
-
#1
Caught a slight of hand
This post is for dudes who know about epistemology
who is auditing the map against the territory?
no one cause it dont exist. The limits of my language are the limits of my world. The limits of my verification are the limits of my perception
look at how they never allowed this to exist
-Math audits math validate it.
-epistemology audits the logic we use to defend math.
-Nothing sits in the middle and says: "I don't care if your equation is “consistent.” Show me where this exists in the dirt without you '”rounding up” or “simplifying” the reality. Show me where your abstract number describes a concrete. show me where you're modeling the actual territory
there’s no independent system checking whether math actually describes raw concrete reality, the territory
because if there was it would conflict against 1x1=1 which is an abstract describing an abstract mental concept. and It would conflict against groups. Both do not exist in raw concrete reality. And once abstractions only define other abstractions, the system is no longer a map it’s a self referential delusion.
also keep in mind im ONLY talking about the reference. I’m not taking about if numbers or words are physical objects in the world. I’m talking about if the abstract number in the operation is defining a concrete, and it’s not an abstract number describing an abstract concept. So do not confuse this. You can still use abstractions, you just can’t use an abstract to describe an another abstract. An audit like this is possible, but it’s not allowed to be created
who is auditing the map against the territory?
no one cause it dont exist. The limits of my language are the limits of my world. The limits of my verification are the limits of my perception
look at how they never allowed this to exist
-Math audits math validate it.
-epistemology audits the logic we use to defend math.
-Nothing sits in the middle and says: "I don't care if your equation is “consistent.” Show me where this exists in the dirt without you '”rounding up” or “simplifying” the reality. Show me where your abstract number describes a concrete. show me where you're modeling the actual territory
there’s no independent system checking whether math actually describes raw concrete reality, the territory
because if there was it would conflict against 1x1=1 which is an abstract describing an abstract mental concept. and It would conflict against groups. Both do not exist in raw concrete reality. And once abstractions only define other abstractions, the system is no longer a map it’s a self referential delusion.
also keep in mind im ONLY talking about the reference. I’m not taking about if numbers or words are physical objects in the world. I’m talking about if the abstract number in the operation is defining a concrete, and it’s not an abstract number describing an abstract concept. So do not confuse this. You can still use abstractions, you just can’t use an abstract to describe an another abstract. An audit like this is possible, but it’s not allowed to be created
04-01-2026, 06:38 PM
-
#2
04-01-2026, 07:03 PM
-
#3
The entire foundation of math is just a very well guarded social contract
There is not even an audit to tell if the foundation exist in raw concrete reality lmao.. this type of audit is banned ceased to never be created
It’s fraud. A lot of semantic games and linguistic manipulation going on with this
Literally 1984. Who ever controls the math controls the world
There is not even an audit to tell if the foundation exist in raw concrete reality lmao.. this type of audit is banned ceased to never be created
It’s fraud. A lot of semantic games and linguistic manipulation going on with this
Literally 1984. Who ever controls the math controls the world
04-01-2026, 08:13 PM
-
#5
- SuperHercules
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Height: 6'5"
- Posts: 32,545
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 571349
-
-
Do you mean sleight of hand, or maybe you caught some disease that makes your hands small?
Didn't read your post where you may have been complaining about sudden tiny hands or talking about discovering someone's trickery
Didn't read your post where you may have been complaining about sudden tiny hands or talking about discovering someone's trickery
See Shakebrah's sig
04-01-2026, 08:22 PM
-
#6
- headturner1
- User title
-
- headturner1
- User title
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Washington, United States
- Age: 18
- Height: 6'5"
- Weight: 282 lbs
- Posts: 22,839
- Subscribers: 9
- Rep Power: 318202
-
-
Originally Posted By SuperHercules⏩
No he means slight of hand dude.
Do you mean sleight of hand, or maybe you caught some disease that makes your hands small?
Didn't read your post where you may have been complaining about sudden tiny hands or talking about discovering someone's trickery
Didn't read your post where you may have been complaining about sudden tiny hands or talking about discovering someone's trickery
Hey op, when you tell ChatGPT to spit out random, odd chit to make you sound smart, turn down the insane factor a bit.
Also, didn’t read (srs).
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
